ML19261D732
| ML19261D732 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 03/22/1979 |
| From: | Parker W DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19261D729 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7906260250 | |
| Download: ML19261D732 (2) | |
Text
.
,2~
ja
-nu.1 ib -
DUKE Powen COMPANY Powru Dentonwo
':' Son in Cucacn Starri, CILAHLOTir, N. C. esa42 o n I7.R 20 A
'e' 4 March 22, 1979 w,w o....co..,.
Tg.go.0=g A.g. Toa Vic e Per s.or =,
373 4033 st g a en PooDsc*io=
Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re: RII:kiC 50-269/79-1 50-270/79-1 50-287/79-1
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
k'ith regard to Mr. R. C. Lewis's letter of February 27, 1979 which transmitted
~
OIE Inspection Report 50-269/79-1, 50-270/79-1, and 50-287/79-1, Duke Power Company does not consider the report to be proprietary.
Please find attached a response to the apparent item of noncompliance.
V y truly yours, we O -
N k'illiam O. Parker, Jr.
2311 016 n'c : "-
Attachment
\\. I t
~ t 'j 3
'/
.. )
enoc er#
/go's f
+,
- $f 7906260 2 7 0 7q0//1
'- un 7Anniversar
%e *ong m #.#y OtFit'L41.
.,i DUKE POWER CONTANY OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION RESPONSE TO OIE INSPECTION REPORT.
50-269, -270, -287/79-1 ITEM A As required by Technical Specification 6.6.2.1.b. written reports of the types of events listed in that specification are to be submitted to the Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement, Region II, within 30 days of the occur-rence of the event.
Contrary to the above, four of the thirteen Licensee Event Rerorts for Units 1 15, 1979 were sub-and 3 submitted during the period November 1, 1978 to January mitted from one to three days later than required.
RESPONSE
k'ith regard to the submittal of written documents-- such as Reportable Occurrence to Oconee Nuclear Station Technical Reports (Licensee Event Reports) pursuant Specification 6.6.2.1 -Duke Power Company has followed d
then the period ic extended until the end of the next day which is not a Sunday or legal holiday.
not substantively significant as it relates to public health and safety, being This position is also consistent rather a reasonable administrative flexibility.
with standard business / legal practice and with specific Commission regulations
~
Absent further, governing certain proceedings, as given in 10CFR Section 2.710.
more definitive interpretation of the existing requirements, it is not considered that an item of noncompliance exist in this instance.
2311 017
\\
(.*
e,
e