ML19257C177
| ML19257C177 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 09/03/1974 |
| From: | Gaut H US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Brown H US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19257C164 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001250139 | |
| Download: ML19257C177 (2) | |
Text
...
~
Q..
er j,N %+,,
UNITED STATES i.*.k * 'a N
f/
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION n
- i i
I' I I
wasm NGTON, D.C.
20545 hrnej gp3 B7%
4-b, lierbert H. Brown, Director, DRGL f
j THRU:
liarold E. Collins, DRGIA TRIP REPORT--SACRAMEfff0, CALIFORNIA, JUNE 17-21, 1974 Synopsis
- 1 hmmm On June 19, 1974, the Sacramento Municipal Utilities District (SMUD) and the State of California Of fice of Emergency Services (OES) held a joint emergency response exercise at the Rancho Seco Nuclear Power (BWR) Station located 15 miles southeast of metropolitan Sacramento.
A briefing and F
tour of this unique site was provided on the 18th for the 100 plus repre-sentatives of sone 40 local, state, Federal, and civic organizations who participated in the exercise. Af ter the f act news coverage was provided on three T.V. channels and in two local newspapers.
All coverage, while somewhat distorted in some areas, was basically fair and generally favorable.
A follow-up meeting was held between AEC and OES staff regarding their h
draft state plan (May 1974) and the AEC " Guide and Checklist" (November 1973).
Substantive constructive criticism was offered on both documents.
7 This should aid greatly in their revision.
V
?
Tangential benefits from the trip include the establishment of an informal working liaison with staff of AEC-SF00, AEC-RO:V, EPA Region 9, DCPA Region 7, SMUD, and California OES.
Special credit is due Mr. Ray Fish (AEC-RO:V) for his excellent assistance in establishing these contacts.
W.
Recommendations 1.
That the planning concepts of OES be closely monitored as a possible N-alternate to the model plan effort in Pennsylvania.
l-2.
That the " Guide and Checklist" contain two distinct sections.
One would contain model formats while the other would list essential elements to be contained in each echelon of the plan / annex.
3.
That representatives of OES and Pennsylvania-DER be invited to Washingten in the next few months to confer on optimum or alternate
~
methods of approach.
q
)
/
- .s em ~. g -
15 I u
Office of Government Liaison Regulation 1807 343 p-Attachments:
(See list on second page) 8001250,39 e.
I ': 'T.Y hyW n a r * '. ;:.i g,
n,,,.
.. h
O e
Herbert 11. Brown -
m W
Attachments:
4
,gg}
I.
Administration Information p
II.
Facility Tour--June 18
.j g8 III.
Exercise and Critique--June 19 IV.
OES Meeting--June 20 M
6,=
a
+
V i
I e
s F
>c:
- Y pre +3,
I;...
[
{
f.
C..
s.-
G 1807 344 L.
y.W ce n, '
s
.- y3j
-