ML19256D631
| ML19256D631 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 02/07/1975 |
| From: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Arnold R METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19256D629 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910190591 | |
| Download: ML19256D631 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000289/1975001
Text
n
.
. . . . . . a
..
,
,
_
' '
' ' '
-
f.:'. m-
,
necton a
,
631 PARK AVENUC
,
KING oF PftUS$1 A. PENNSYLVANI A 19406
/]
Metropolitan Edison Company
License No. DPR-50
j
Attention:
Mr. R. C. Arnold
Insp. No. 50-289/75-01
s"
Vice President
P.O. Box 542
7
Reading, Pennsylvana
19603
Gentlemen:
This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. Spessard of this
office on January 6-9,1975 .it Three Mile Island Unit 1, Middletown,
Pennsylvania and the Metropolitan Edison Company Corporate Office,
Reading, Pennsylvania of activities authorized by AEC License No.
DPR-50 e d to the discussions of our findings held by Mr. Spessard with
Mr. Her'
1, Mr. Lawyer and other members of your staff at the
conclusion of the inspection, and to a subsequent te.lephone discussion
between Mr. Brunner and other members of my staff and yourself on
January 15, 1975.
This also refers to the meeting held at your office
at your request to further discuss our findings on January 17, 1975
and atte.nded by Mr. Davis and other members of my staff and by
yourself and Mr. Lawyer of your staff.
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the Regulatory
Operations Inspection Report which is enclosed with this letter.
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective e::aminations
of procedures and representatiJe records, interviews with personn'el,
and observations by the inspector.
-
,
During this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities
appeared to be in violation of AEC requirements.
The itecs and
references to the pertinent requirements are listed in the enclosure
to this letter.
This letter constitutes a notice sent to yo,u
pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201 of the AEC's " Rules of
Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.
Section
.
2.201 requires you to submit to this office within 20 days of your
receipt of this notice, a written statement of explanation in
reply, including:
(1) corrective steps which have been or will
be taken by you, and the results achieved; (2) cot rective steps
which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the
date when full co=pliance will be achieved.
In addition to the
need for corrective action regarding these specific deficiencies,
we are concerned about the implementation of your quality assurance
program that permitted these deficiencies to occur.
Consequently,
in your reply, you should describe in particular, those actions-
_
taken or planned to improve the effectiveness of your quality
otungsurance program.
I@@N, ~ k
1452
177
Wuj
- 7/s.198
7 910190 N[
-
.
,
.
-2-
.
=
Ch
5.
)
As shown in Enclosure No. 1 tc this letter, Item 1 is a recurrent ites
"U
'
~
of nonco=pliance.
In your reply to this letter please give this matter
your particular attention.
Also as indicated, your immediate corrective
_
actions and your commitment regarding disposition of existing TCN's,were
reviewed during this inspection; therefore, these actions may be omitted
from your reply, if desired.
'In accordance with Section 2.790 of the AEC's " Rules of Practice",
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this
letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the
NRC's Public Document Room.
If this report contains any infor. nation
'that you (or your contractor) believe to be proprietary, it is
necessary that you make a written application within 20 days to
this office to withhold such information from public disclosure.
Any such application must include a full statement of the
reasons on the basis of which it is claimed that the information
is proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary
information identified in the applicati6n is contained in a
separate part of the document.
If we do not hear from you.in
this regard within the specified period, the report will be
placed in the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will
be pleased to discuss them with you.
-
'
'
,
Sincerely,
'
J.e%00 . -
a
mes P. O'Reilly
Di ctor
Enclosures:
1.
2.
RO Inspection Report No. 50-289/75-01
,
cc:
J. G. Herbein, Station Superintendent
R.
Heward, Project Manager, GPUSC
~
l452
178
-
@
.
.
.
~
.
-3-
D
.
(D
,f
'
,]
be :
20 Chief, FSEE3
'
RO:HQ (4 cpys of ler, 5 cpys of report)
10 Files
Central " ail & Files
/
DL (4 cpys of ler, 13 cpys of report)
RS (1 cpy of ltr, 3 cpys of report)
,
Local PDR
,
State of Pennsylvania
Reg Peg Reading Roos
B Directors (II, III, IV) ('leport only)
'
OGO
-
IIiss Mary V. Southard, Chaimsn, Citizens for a Safe Environnent
.
o
O
e
1452
179
g
-
.
e
,o..
e.-
e
4
+m
/
'
~
.
~