ML19256B651
| ML19256B651 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 06/08/1979 |
| From: | Churchill B SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17338B295 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7908160260 | |
| Download: ML19256B651 (2) | |
Text
.
S H AW, PITTM AN, PoTTs & TROW 8 RIDG E 6 8 0 0 M ST R C CT, N. W.
e
- ' e [. 9 WA S HINGTO N, Q. C. 2 0 0 3 6
.a...
f a cas 33i-**co ma= sa, c6 ports stevrw L.mtttata st ewant s. nerTwam ocam o. AwuCn scoar.c r. tmoweneoog soam cwork s v a rte c w o. Pov7 s s T C Pw C N e. MWPf k C R yg Lg gg py g g ac ea6o Cmammore wintumor e6 enown saoas ase.oesa a ase-erso
=e6up c6 sostweCs sawt s s. massum a.timotwo wanto
nos tar t. an=6cm cconose acosas.sa, necisano c. oasen somw e. mainstamoca mos car ow mooseees itLCa s awC t w. C=w =Ca*LL Lawna n. rannam o a->a*'***-"""'"'
ifa'.',7e '<;"n"3
"," ei l'tG*%
C 2 CacLc snawbaw*
neceonso a acaecat6 som m m. o'= ritt.sm Jag C. sete t AG saf a. EPSTIC M e 4 A m aSa se. 80 9 3o771 7 4aN K u N o. CMU c r o mo t v. *L k C N. s ab G EoeG C o. CmowkCY, J&
JoMN w. sMamoM woe. S macromo ACvMOLos seeCwath c.navs r e t o a. u ?TL E Twomas M. e*eComoseC A
'owamoe.CmoSLaMo rmCo osasnte Swsam o FALasoM COUMSCL maTeeasseCL A e ACEo JE ST E vCM es. LwCa s seamm awGCh euCE M*NQ L.ALLE8e wes6c wri.Se.a.no s7une 8, 1979 e m = c a r 6. e u a t. s at.
Atam s.
a Canscrow s.so=cs T set * *e a s 4. sa a t t e abase m.vySpCM sase t s es. sw AG E S somos L. CAS A.J &
SMCLoose A wCISCL PMeup J naavCT
\\
somosa.meCutkowGee Raf L. meCMM AN sam i s f *'C eem e L EMMaAT
=
Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 Re:
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No.
1, Docket No. 50-346
Dear Mr. Denton:
By letter dated April 24, 1979, the Toledo Coalition for Safe Energy has made several demands related to the operation of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1.
This letter is being treated by the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation as a request for action under 10 C.F.R. 52.206.
The first demand, related to "all possible operational problems, human and mechanical" is so broad and vague it must be dismissed; its lack of specificity permits no reasoned response by the NRC Staff.
The next three demands are all related to emergency plans, and are actions which are neither required nor authorized by NRC regulations; as such they could be considered, if at all, only as a request for rulemaking, and not as actions relating to the status of a particular license.
The fifth and final demand -- for a hearing on the previous four demands --
is thus an empty request.
I M
B35 314 7908160 N#4
SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
~
Mr. Harold R. Denton Page Two June 8, 1979 Jef -
Accordingly, the Licensees respectfully submit tl.at the Coalition's request should be denied.
Sincerely yours,'
/Y A/
\\ CO Bru a W.
Churchill Counsel for The Toledo Edison Company and The Cleveland Elec tric Illuminatir.g Company, Licensees BWC:cp cc:
Toledo Coalition for Safe Energy 835 318