ML19256B264
| ML19256B264 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 05/18/1979 |
| From: | Grier B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Dunn C DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7906080079 | |
| Download: ML19256B264 (1) | |
Text
pa neog, M A' t
J o
UNITED STATES 8y).f,, I,j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION A5Mt t
REGION I h
. [
631 PARK AVENUE o, -
%, ' ' t;#
,d KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406 May 18, 1979 Docket No. 50-334 Duquesne Light Company ATTN: Mr. C. N. Dunn Vice President Operations Division 435 Sixth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 Gentlemen:
The enclosed IE Circular 79-08, is forwarded to you for information.
If there are any questions related to the contents or intent of the Circular or its attachments, please contact this office.
Sincerely, Boyce rier Director
Enclosures:
IE Circular No. 79-08 w/ attachments cc w/encls:
F. Bissert, Technical Assistant Nuclear R. Washabaugh, QA Manager J. Werling, Station Superintendent G. Moore, General Superintendent, Power Stations Department J. J. Carey, Nuclear Technical Assistant 7906080629*
t UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C.
20555 IE Circular No. 79-08 Date:
May 18,1979 Page 1 of 2 ATTEMPTED EXTORTION - LOW ENRICHED URANIUM
Background
In January 1979, a temporary contractor employee who was working at the General Electric plant in Wilmington, North Carolina, allegedly entered the plant and removed a drum containing two 5-gallon cans of low enriched uranium from the facility with the intention of extorting money for the return of the material.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted an intensive investigation leading to the arrest of the employee on February 1,1979. All material was recovered and returned to the plant.
Discussion Based on preliminary information provided the NRC, the theft was allegedly carried out in the following manner:
On Friday, January 26, 1979, the subject worked the day shift.
At 10:50 p.m. the same day he drove back to the plant and entered with the night shift.
He showed his Florida driver's license at the entrance gate instead of his yellow contractor badge because it had a blue background similar to that on the picture badge which he thought was required to gain access to the area of the plant that he wanted to penetrate.
He had allegedly gained access using his driver's license on previous occasions.
Once inside the plant, the subject would have been guided by gates and fences into a parking area had it not been for the fact that one gate had been removed to allow installation of truck scales. He proceeded down the unprotected road to an area adjacent to the building he wanted to enter.
After the subject entered the building through a personnel door, he pro-ceeded to his normal working station which was the Chem Tech Lab and entered, using his own key.
In the lab he picked up his protective clothing, a two wheel cart used to move 55 gallon drums and a container used to ship chemicals.
The container could hold two 5-gallon cans. He then proceeded to a door leading up a stairwell into the radiation controlled area.
The door was normally locked even though not required by regulations; however, at this time it was slightly ajar due to malfunction of the locking mech-anism.
Once inside the door, the s DUPLICATE DOCUMENT Entire document previously entered into system unde hh ANO No. of pages: