ML19248D564
| ML19248D564 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 06/15/1979 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19248D553 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-348-79-21, NUDOCS 7908160483 | |
| Download: ML19248D564 (1) | |
Text
_ _ -
JUN 151979 APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION
'\\
License No. NPF-2 Alabama Power Company Farley, Unit 1 Based on the NRC inspection riay 21-25, 1979, certain of your activities were apparently r.ot conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements as indicated below. These items have been categorized as described in correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.
As required by Criterion V of Appendix B of 10 CFR 50 and as imple-A.
neuted by Operations Quality Assurance Policy Manual, Section 5,
" Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures or drawings.
Instructions, procedures or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished." Drawing D-175004, "P&J Diagram-Drains and Ver.ts C'DfT and Auxiliary Building-Radioactive" shows that three sink drains and two floor drains in the decontamination room drain into the Unit I drain system.
Contrary to the above, the drain system was installed with three drains draining into the Unit I drain system and 3 draining into the Unit 2 system. Drain piping from decontamination sinks was then incorrectly connected to sink drain line draining into Unit 2.
Criteria was not provided (e.g., flow test) to assure that the sinks were satisfactorily installed. This led to the release of radioactive vaste from the sinks into Unit 2 and the environment.
This is an infraction.
W3210 B.
As required by 10 CFR 20.203(b), each radiation area shall be conspicuously ~ posted " Caution-radiation area".
Contrary to the above, on May 23, 1979, the piping penetration room was not posted as a radiation area although the dose rate inside was as high as 65 mrem /hr.
This is an infraction.
C.
As required by Technical Specification 6.11, procedures for personnel radiation protection shall be adhered to.
Section I.C of the Farley Health Physics Manual requires that each individual must obey plant health physice procedures and practices.
Contrary to the above, on May 25, 1979, an individual was observed by the inspector to enter an area posted "No entry-contact health physics".
It was determined that the individual had not contacted health phys 0 ' prior to his entry into the area.
h This is an infraction.