ML19246B787

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 790227-28,0301-02,19-23 & 0409-11
ML19246B787
Person / Time
Site: Zimmer
Issue date: 05/07/1979
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML19246B779 List:
References
50-358-79-06, 50-358-79-6, NUDOCS 7907180608
Download: ML19246B787 (3)


Text

.

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Cincinnati Gas and Docket No. 50-358 Electric Company Based on the inspection conducted February 27-28, March 1, 2, 19-23 and April 9-11, 1979, it appears that certain of your activities were in noncompliance with the NRC requirements as noted below.

Items 1 and 2 are infractions and item 3 is a deficiency.

1.

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, states in part that,

" Activities affecting quality...shall be accomplished in accordance with instructions, procedures or drawings."

Paragraph 17.1.5.1 of the FSAR states in part that, "Acti-vities affecting quality of the facility are accomplished in accordance with written instructions, procedures or drawings...."

a.

Paragraph 5.2 of Startup Manual Procedure SU.ACP.16 states in part that all safety related equipment shall be maintained free of excessive oil, water or other material which could prevent the equipment from per-forming its intended safety functions.

Contrary to the requirements of SU.ACP.16 above, the licensee did not maintain the immediate enclosed area around the IB and Spare 125VDC Battery Chargers clean of debris and trash, and did not maintain the internals of the Spare 125VDC Battery Charger free of insulation and concrete pieces leaving a side panel off even though it had been turned over for preoperational testing.

Contrary to the requirements of SU.ACT.16 above, on March 17, 1979, the licensee did not maintain control of flushing waters which sprayed down the HPCS pump and motor after it had been turned over for preoperational testing.

Contrary to the requirements of SU.ACP.16 above, on March 17, 1979, the licensee flooded the RHR-A/LPCS pump room submerging the system jockey pump and motor, instrumentation and valves of both systems, of which LPCS system had been turned over for preoperational testing.

7907180608 344 093

Appendix A b.

Step 5.1.5 of the operating procedure OP.HP.01-4, Revi-sion 0 for lineup, fill and vent of the RPCS system requires that the operator close valves lE22-F003 and IE22-F031.

Contrary to the above, on January 19, 1979, when the HPCS system was started, because valves lE22-F003 and F031 had been left open, high pressure core spray water entered the condensate and low pressure core spray system causing a rupture of the steam jet air ejector condensor lA.

c.

Switching Order No. 781317, dated November 16, 1978, re-quired valve IE21-F025 to be safety tagged and closed.

This valve completes a crossconnection of the LPCS and HPCS systems.

Contrary to the above, on January 19, 1979, the valve IE21-F025 was in the open position when the HPCS system was started resulting in overpressurization of the LPCS system piping.

2.

10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B, Criterion V, states in part that,

" Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances...."

Paragraph 17.1.5.1 of the FSAR states in part that, " Activities affecting the quality of the facility are accomplished in accordance with written instructions, procedures or drawings which prescribe accep-table methods for carrying out the activities...."

Contrary to the above, the Inspection Procedure 22A4387, Revision 4 and the Field Deviation Disposition Report No.

KN-1-286 used for inspection of the control rod blades by the licensee during the months of July through October of 1978 did not specify what readings were desired-

"..e r e such readings were to be taken on the blade and specifically, how the clamp was to be used.

3.

10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B, Criterion XVII, states in part that,

" Sufficient records shall be maintained to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality.

... Inspection and test records shall, as a minimum, identify the inspector or data recorder, the type of observation, the results, the acceptability and the action taken in connection with any deficiencies noted."

Section 17.1.17 of the FSAR requires that sufficient records to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality be maintained at the site or available for audit.

Records for inspections and tests include, but not limited to 344 094

Appendix A inspector or data recorder, type of observation, results, acceptability and results of deficiencies.

Contrary to the above, the licensee's contractor failed to maintain sufficient records for the inspection of control rod blades in accordance with the Field Deviation Report (FDDR) No. KN-1-286.

No raw data existed from the inspection to verify the conclusions presented by the FDDR.

344 095