ML19242C121
| ML19242C121 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick (DPR-071) |
| Issue date: | 08/30/2019 |
| From: | Bradley Davis Division Reactor Projects II |
| To: | William Gideon Duke Energy Progress |
| Reeder D | |
| References | |
| IP 35001 | |
| Download: ML19242C121 (5) | |
Text
August 30, 2019 Mr. William R. Gideon Site Vice President Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Duke Energy Progress, LLC 8470 River Rd. SE (M/C BNP001)
Southport, NC 28461
SUBJECT:
BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT UNIT 1-NOTIFICATION OF NRC SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION (IP 95001) AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Gideon:
By letter dated May 15, 2019, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) communicated to you the updated assessment of Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Unit 1. The NRCs review identified that the Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Leakage performance indicator (PI) crossed the green-to-white threshold. This was the result of increased RCS leakage in the Unit 1 drywell from the March 2019 Cryofit coupling failure.
On August 20, 2019, we received notification from your staff of Brunswicks readiness for the NRC to conduct our supplemental inspection to review the actions taken to address the White PI. Accordingly, we plan to conduct the supplemental inspection September 23-27, 2019. The inspection team will be led by Ms. Gwynne Eatmon, Resident Inspector at North Anna Power Station. This inspection will be conducted in accordance with the supplemental inspection procedure, 95001, Response to Action Matrix Column 2 Inputs, issued August 24, 2016.
The objectives of the supplemental inspection are to evaluate and assure the root cause and contributing causes of individual significant performance issues are understood, to independently assess and assure that the extent of condition and extent of cause of signification individual performance issues are identified, to assure that the corrective actions taken to address and preclude repetition of significant performance issues are prompt and effective, and to assure that corrective plans direct prompt actions to effectivity address and preclude repetition of significant performance issues.
On August 27, 2019, Ms. Eatmon discussed with Mr. Tom Sherrill some details and expectations for the one-week onsite inspection.
The enclosure lists documents that will be needed prior to the inspection. Please have the referenced information available no later than September 16, 2019, unless otherwise requested in the enclosure. The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents required for inspection preparation.
W. Gideon 2
If additional documents are needed, they will be requested when identified. Prior to the onsite inspection, Ms. Eatmon will discuss with your staff the following inspection support administrative details: availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection; method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection; access to licensee computers; working space; arrangements for site access; and other applicable information.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding the information requested or the inspection, please contact Ms. Eatmon at (404) 997-5190.
This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
Sincerely,
/RA Omar Lpez-Santiago for/
Bradley J. Davis, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 4 Division of Reactor Projects Docket No.:
50-325 License No.: DPR-71
Enclosure:
Information Request for Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Supplemental Inspection cc: Distribution via ListServ
ML19242C121 OFFICE RII/DRP RII/DRP NAME GEatmon BDavis /RA OLpez-Santiago for/
DATE 8/28/2019 8/30/2019 Enclosure INFORMATION REQUEST FOR BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION (SEPTEMBER 23-27, 2019)
Note: Please provide the requested documents in electronic format. If the information is not available in electronic format, please contact the inspection team leader to coordinate other available methods to provide the information.
- 1. Copies of the corporate and site level procedures and sub-tier procedures associated with the corrective action program. This should include procedures related to:
- a. Corrective action process
- b. Root cause and apparent cause evaluations
- c. Common cause assessments, effectiveness reviews, and self-assessments
- d. Self-assessment and bench marking process
- e. Cause evaluations and extent of condition evaluations
- f.
Preventive maintenance deferral program
- 2. Copies of the following documents:
- a. Condition report(s) regarding the failed coupling
- b. Root cause report(s) regarding the failed coupling and all attachments, and any previous revision(s)
- c. Condition report(s) that resulted from the root cause evaluation
- d. Condition report(s) that resulted from any assessments of the root cause evaluation
- e. Any internal and/or external assessments of the root cause evaluation and any follow-up assessments that occurred because of the root cause evaluation, including departmental assessments, corporate assessments, and mock 95001 assessments conducted at the plant to assess readiness for the inspection
- f.
Copies of all extent of condition evaluations and/or extent of cause evaluations conducted for the failed coupling
- g. Copies of all condition reports from the mock inspection and self-assessments
- h. Condition report(s) for Green NCV 05000324,05000325/2019002-04
- i.
Copy of the Raychem Cryofit Coupling NOUE
- j.
Evaluation of generic communication NRC IN 91-87, and any documented actions from the information notice
- k. Vendor Manual for Raychem Cryofit Couplings, including updates
- l.
Maintenance schedule/plan for the Raychem Cryofit Couplings
- 3. For the existing Raychem Cryofit Couplings, please provide the following information for each unit:
- a. Total number of coupling(s) currently installed by system
- b. System
- c. Environment (water, air/steam, etc)
- d. Safety related system (yes or no)
- e. System/component scoped in Maintenance Rule (yes or no)
2 If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below).
Number of Coupling System Environment Safety related (Y/N)
Maintenance Rule Scoped (Y/N)
- 1. List of site personnel involved in the root cause report, identifying their organizations and responsibility.