ML19241B147

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 790416-19
ML19241B147
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 05/17/1979
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML19241B144 List:
References
50-482-79-08, 50-482-79-8, NUDOCS 7907110735
Download: ML19241B147 (2)


Text

.

STN 50-482/79-08 Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Based on the results of the NRC inspection conducted April 16-19, 1979, it appeart. that certain of your activities were not conducted full com-pliance with the conditions of your NRC Construction Permit No. CPPR 147 as indicated below:

A.

_ Failure to Follow Approved Concrete Curing Procedures Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 requires that activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with prescribed instructions, procedures, and drawings.

Section 12.1 of Bechtel Specification 10466-C103(Q), Rev.16 states that concrete shall be cured in accordance with one or a combination of the methods described in Section 2.2 and Section 2.3 of ACI 308.

These sections allow for concrete curing by either the water curing method or by the use of sealing materials.

Contrary to the above:

At 8:30 a.m. on April 18, 1979, the NRC inspector observed that the construction joints at the north and east face of Placement OC-141-S-01 (floor slab in south portion of Fuel Handling Building) were dry an' were not being cured as specified by ACI 308.

Dis-cussion witt contractor personnel verified that sealing materials had not been applied.

This is an infraction..

B.

Failure to Establish Proper Document Control for Blasting Procedure Criterion VI of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 states in part, " Measures shall be established to control the issuance of documents...,

including changes thereto, which prescribe all activities affecting quality.

These measures shall assure that documents, including changes, are reviewed for adequacy and approved for release by authorized personnel...."

SNUPPS, Wolf Creek Preliminary Safety Analysis Report, paragraph 17.1.6 states in part, "... each major contractor shall establish measures for document control which include:

"a.

Review of documents... and changes thereto, prior to release to assure that the quality requirements are... authorized G

7907110705

"e.

Assurance of prompt inclusion of approved-changes... into procedures....

"f.

Control of documents, including approved changes thereto, at use locations....

"g.

Providing document lists that identify the current revision number of each document.... "

Daniel Procedure AP-I-02, Rev. 6, dated November 2,1978, paragraph 3.7 states, "Each procedure shall be complate with project name, title, type, number, volume, section, date, revision number, and approval signatures. When revisions are issued, the date shall be displayed along with the revision number and the revision approval signature."

Contrary to the above:

1.

Paragraph 3.7 of Daniel Procedure AP-I-02 only applies to Daniel originated procedures and not to procedures written by subcon-tractors such as Clarkson Construction Company.

Discussion with the Daniel Field QA Manager verified that Daniel had no measures requiring the approval of Clarkson procedures.

2.

The Clarkson Construction Company Blasting Procedure Specification A-3854, dated April 27, 1978, was not reviewed and approved for implementation prior to commencement of blasting on the Ultimate Heat Sink.

3.

The blasting procedure was not assigned a revision number or some other means to establish control of the accument.

4.

A revised copy of the blasting procedure which incorporated a change on verbal notification of an intended blast was not signed as being approved and reviewed until April 19, 1979, after the inspector identified the item to the licensee. The change to verbally notify the geotechnical engineer of an intended blast was only signed off on April 19, 1979, although the change had been in effect since commencement of the Ultimate Heat Sink blasting work in December 1978.

5.

The blasting procedure dated April 19, 1979, had no revision number or other means of identification to indicate it contained updated information from the procedure dated April 27, 1978.

This is an infraction.

A-2

~n 9,

,