ML19240A156
| ML19240A156 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/24/1981 |
| From: | Dircks W NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19240A157 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-81-145, TASK-PINV, TASK-SE SECY-81-192, NUDOCS 8104030014 | |
| Download: ML19240A156 (13) | |
Text
7c4 t
h
~b';fp/,7%
4,,u, %
g g #
t
(.'[
Ili~192 A
ut e
" xn at us, POLICY ISSUE %W (Notation Vote)
FOR:
The Comissioners FROM:
William J. Dircks, Executive Director for Operations
SUBJECT:
PIAN FOR IMPROVING THE TEQINICAL CAPABILITY OF LICENSEE PERSONNEL PURPOSE:
To in?orm the Commission of our plans for improving the technical capability of licensee personnel.
DISCUSSION:
Section 307(a) of the NRC Authorization of Appropriaf. ions for Fiscal Year 1980 authorized and directed the Comiss Lon to prepare a plan for improving the technical capability of licensee personnel to safely operate utilization facilities icensed under Section 103 or 104(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of l'.'54.
- Further, the ComLssion was directed to transmit to the Congress the plan required by this subsection within 6 months after the enactment of the Act.
Enclosed is a description of the subject plan showing each improvement. The elements of the plan are those addresced in Chapter I, Ooeration Safety of the 'IMI-2 Action Plan (MREG-0660), a review of foreign coerator practices requested by Comissioner Ahearne, and the Long Range Research Plan proposed by the Division of Hunnn Factors Safety.
REC 0tt M ATION:
We recmrx vi that the Cotrission:
1.
Aoprove the letter and report as enclosure for transmittal to Congress.
2.
Note that similar letters forwarding the reports E be sent to the appropriate Congressional ComLttees.
~
d k gc William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations
Enclosure:
Draft letters to President of Senate and Speaker of House transmitting subjec* report
Contact:
Joel J. Kramer, NRR 49-28446 81040300144
2 Commissioners' conc.ents should be provided directly to the Office of the Secretary by c.o.b. Thursday, April 13,1981.
h l! 2 : :l a<,,
,1 Commission Staff Offica comments, if any,, should be submitted to the Commissioners NLT April 6,1981, with an information copy to the Office of the Sccretary.
If the paper is of such a nature that it requires additional time for analytical review and comment, the Commissioners and the Secretariat should be apprised of when comments may be eroected.
DISTRIBUTIO" Commissioners Commission Ste#f Offices Exec Dir for Oper ctions ACRS ASLBP Secretariat
The Honorable Thacus P. O'Neill, Jr.
Speaker of the United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C.
20515
Dear Mr. Speaker:
Enclosed is a plan for improving the technical capability of licensee personnel to safely operate utilization facilities licensed under Section 103 or 104(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. The Nuclear Regulatory Cotmd.ssion w1s authorized and directed to prepare this plan and to transmit it to Congress by Sectior. 307(a) of the NRC Authorization of Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1980.
(Public law 96-295).
Sincerely, Joseph M. Hendrie Chairenn
Enclosure:
Plan for Improving the Technical Capability of Operators and Senior Operators
PIAT FDR IMPROVING TFI TFONICAL CAPABILITY OF LICENSEE PFRS0tNEL Section 307(a) of Public Law 96-295 directs the Corm ission to preoare a plan for improving the technical capability of licensee personnel to safely operate uti.lization facilities licensed under section 103 or 104(b) of the Atcmic Energy Act of 1954 Based on the scope of the plan indicated in section 307(a) we have limited the scope of this plan to licensed operators and senior operators.
An important part of operational safety is the level of qualificaticus of opera-tions personnel, including their education, training, experience, and fitness.
A general technical education provides the basis for understanding the principles and operation of nuclear power plants. One objective of the actions in this plan is to increase the level of the education of senior operators to assure that they have appropriate technical backcrounds. To provide this additional technical capability onshift until the time that staffing and qualifications of operator and senior operators are upgraded, operating staffs are being required to have onshift a technical advisor with engineering expertise; training in details of design, function, arrangement and operation of plant systems; and special training in plant: dynamic response.
Besides educational background, training and experience of the operators and senior operators of nuclear por plants are being increased to improve their imowledge of plant design, response, and procedures.
Actions in this area include requirements for additional onshift training for operators and senior operators,
. additional nuclear power plant experience recuirements prior to licensing, require-mente for experience as a licensed operator before licensing as a senior operator, increased use and variety in simulator training, increased plant training during the initial test program, inplant drills for shift operating personnel, and en-har.ced requalification progrzms.
The plan also addresses the improvement in the cuality of training to be provided, including accreditation of training institutions. Training center and facility instructors who teach reactor systems, transient response of reactors and simu-lator courses will be required to demnstrate their competence to the ?EC by successful completica of a senior operator examination. These instructors will also be required to successfully participate in requalification programs to retain instructor status or possess instructor certification from the Institute for fluclear Power Operations (INPO).
Emphasis will be placed on the instructors' abilities to teach as well as their technical knowledge. The IEC will develop criteria and crocedures to be used in auditing training programs and increase the amount of auditing. The audits to be condacted will assure that training is formlized and structured, including the use of lesson plans, qualified instructors, qualified supervision of instructors, and proper conduct of testing. The need for mandatory sfrulator training is discussed in the plan as well as the quality of the simulators to be used.
Improvem nts in simulators will be required to improve the level of realism in the training and retraining of coerators. Require-mnts and procedures for licensing and requalification of operating personnel are also addressed, both for initial issuance of licenses and for license renewals.
. The licensing of additional operations personnel is also covered.
The plan recognizes the need to
- 2 proper shift staffing and administration to deal with unusual situations.
Such actions include requiremnts for the number and qualifications of people onshift, assurance of operator fitness, testrictions on the use of overtime, control of shift turnover, control of access to the control room, delineation of authority in the control room, and specifica-tion of shift supervisor responsibilities.
Hunan beings mke errors no nutter how qualified thev are.
Better systes of verifying correct performance of operating activities are needed to provide a means of detecting human errors, thus imoroving the quality of normal operations by reducing the frequency of occurrence of situations that could result in or contribute to accidents.
Steps for nere effective verification by licensees of correct perfornance of operating activities are addressed in the plan. Consid-eration is also given to actions to be taken by the NRC and facility licensee in the event of personnel errars that cause losses of a safety function.
As part of our response to the accident at Three "11e Island w published a multi-faceted action plan, NUREG-0660 entitled, "NRC Action Plan Developed as a Result of the "MI-2 Accident". Chapter 1 of the plan addresses operational safety, including training and qualification of licensed operators. The plan consists of (1) short term acticns where it ws readily apparent that immediate improvements muld result and could be accmplished without rule changes, and (2) long-
. term Lmprovements where further study is recuired to develop a position and/or rule changes will be necessary. contains the details of the appli-cable Tasks in the Action Plan and the long rance research plan indicated below.
We are also conducting a review of practices in foreign countries regarding train-ing and qualifications of licensed personnel.
Details of this plan are addressed in Enclosure 2.
Finally, and nest importantly, an effort is underway to develop and implement integrated, lona-term, technical programs aimed at critically evaluating the generalization of results from related applications, e.g., military, space, aviation, and other civilian and commercial systems, to nuclear power plant issues. Were such data are incomplete, obsolete, and caps exist, new empirical data must be generated to provide the scientific basis needed for regulations and requirements involving the total personnel subsysten in nuclear pow r plants - encoupassing the entire selection, placement, training, and retraining cycle. The proposed research objectives will also identify problems raised by the slurt term requirements and reconnend meacures to correct any deficiencies. is a table that indicates each specific action plan or research project, indicating the responsible tEC office, scheduled ccepletion date, other organizations involved, professional staff year requirecents and contractual assistance, if required.
. Our plans for hnproving the technical competence of licensed personnel go beyond the spacific concerns addressed in Public law 96-295.
Listed below are the items of concern as enumerated in section 307(a) of Public Law 96 295 and a brief description of the portion of the plan that addressas the Concern.
Section 307(a)
Item Feasibility of requiring standard, mandatory training programs for nuclear facility operators, including classroom study, apprenticeships at the facility, and energency sinulator training.
Plan NRR will require all utility mnagement co provide specific inprovements in training and to upgrade the qualifications of licensed reactor and senior reactor operators.
Qualifications A rule change will be issued for public comrent that will require a high school education fo reactor operators and a college degree, with a mLnicum number of engineering credits, for senior reactor operators. (TMI Action Plan Task I.A.2.6)
Exoerience (Anprenticeshios)
Operators are presently required to have two years of power plant experience, one of which must be nuclear to be eligible to sit for a license examina-tion, kh believe that this is a reasonable ninLmum amunt of time to
. prepare for the training programs leading to a license examination. Conse-quently, we have not changed this requiremnt.
Senior operators were previously required to have four years of power plant experience. We have changed this to four years of responsible experience; defining what is " responsible experience." As part of this experience, one year must be as a licensed operator.
('IMI Action Plan Tasks I.A.2.1 and I.A.2.6)
Training We have required training programs to be codified to include additional training on shift and additional classroom training in heat transfer, fluid flow and thermodynamics, ad.tigating an accident in which the core is severly damaged and ircreased emphasis on reaucar and plant transients.
In addition, the rule change will require candatory simulator training.
('IMI Action Plan Task I.A.2.6)
Section 307(a)
Item Guch plan shall include specific criteria for nere intensive training and retraining of operator personnel licensed under section 107 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, and for the licensing of such personnel, to assure:
1) conformity with all conditions and requiremnts of the operating license; 2) early identification of accidents, events or event sequences which ray significantly increase the likelihood of an accident; and 3) effective response to any such event or sequence.
. Plan The operator and senior operator examinations contain specific categories that address " conditions and requirements of the operating license".
Prior to the accident at TMI, there was no mLnian grade requirement for each category of the examination. We nw requ're at least 70% in each category and 80% overall to pass written examinations. Hence, we have reasonable assurance that individuals who are licensed are kn wledgeable regarding conditions and requirements of the operating license.
Approximately 25% of the operator and 33% of the senior operator written examinations contain questions that explore an applicant's knwledge and understanding regarding early identification of accidents, events or event sequences that nny lead to accidents.
In addition, about 35% of the oral portion of each examination explores an individual's kn wledge and understanding of abnormal and emergency operating conditions and procedures.
However, to assure better kn wledge and understanding, we have revised the scope of the examinations to include categories dealing with heat transfer, fluid f1 w and thermodynamics.
Finally, the rule change will mandate administration of simulacor examina-tions to enable us to observe an applicant's response to any such event or sequence.
OFI Action Plan Task I.A.3.1)
8_
Section 307(a)
Itan Such plan shall include provision for Corr tssion review and accroval of the qualifications of personnel conducting any recuired training and retraining prozram.
Plan We plan to establish procedures and criteria for the accreditation of training institutions. ~5ese procedures and criteria shall also address instructor cualifications to assure their technical empetence and that they have sucessfully empleted instructor educational programs.
In the interim, we plan to add M ster senior operator exa:-inations to individuals who teach systems, integrated plant response and sirulator courses to assure their technical comoetence.
(IMI Action Plan Tasks I.A.2.3 and I.A.2.7)
Section 307(a)
Item The plan shall also include requiremnts for the renewal of operator licenses including, to the extent practicable, remiiremnts that the coerator -
A) has been actively and extensively enzaged in the duties listed in such licerse, 3) has discharred such duties safely to the satisfaction of the Coartssion, C) is capable of continuing such dut.ies, and D) has participated in a requali.fication trairiz program.
9_
Such plan shall include criteria for suspending or revoking operator licenses.
Plan The present regulations and implementing procedures governing operator licen-sing require tw to tmke the findings indicated above in (A), (B), (C) and (D) prior to renewing a lice _nse.
The regulation also contains criteria for nodi-fying, suspending or revoking an operator's license. How ver, the plan calls for nore direct NRC involvement in the development of the requalification program content, nandatory sinulator training and NRC addnistration of written, oral and sinulator examinations to provide us with additional evidence of competence. The plan calls for suspension of licenses if the applicant fails the NRC examination.
(WI Action Plan Tasks I.A.2.6 and I.A.3.2)
Section 307(a)
Item In addition, the Comission shall also consider the feasibility of requiring such licensed operators to pass a requalification test every six months including:
i) written questions, and 11) emergency sfrulator exams.
Plan Present requalification programs are continuous programs that require individuals to attend regularly scheduled Icctures and take a facility
. administered written quiz at the conclusion of each lecture. These programs also call for systematic evaluation of the individual's performance during normal and abnormal operations.
Finally, the programs require facility-administered, annual written examinations.
The plan calls for the NRC to administer the annual erantnations. These examLnations will consist of written examtnations, oral exaninations at the plant and simulator examinations.
Based on our present nethods of administering examinations and the number of individuals presently licensed, administration of annual examinations will require four visits a year for every site. The number of PSY roquired to accomplish the task is forecasted as 55 in FY'82, 59 in FY'83, and 64 in FY'84.
The operator licensing program is extremely labor-intensive.
Based on our knowledge and understanding of the operator's duties and responsibilities and the nr>de of operation of the facilities and recenmendations contained in a report prepared under contract IEC 80-117, we believe that examinations every six months would not be cost effective.
(Hil Action Plan Tasks I. A.3.2)