ML19225B476
| ML19225B476 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 06/04/1979 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19225B475 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-482-79-09, 50-482-79-9, NUDOCS 7907250222 | |
| Download: ML19225B476 (2) | |
Text
-
STN 50-482/79-09 Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Based on the results of the NRC inspection conducted on April 23-26, 1979, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in full compliance with the conditions of your NRC Construction Permit No. CPPR-147 as indicated below:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V states: " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.
Ins tructions,
procedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or quali-tative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished."
A.
Failure to Follow Storage Procedures for Reactor Vessel Internals Daniel Procedure QCP-I-01, Revision 5, paragraph 4.2 requires that deficiencies found during storage and maintenance inspections shall be handled by the issue of a Deficiency Report (DR) in accordance with Daniel Procedure AP-VI-02.
Contrary to the above:
Five deficiencies noted on upper and lower internals storage in QC Inspection Report No. 052 conducted February 17, 1979, were not documented in a Deficiency Report (DR).
This is an infraction.
B.
Failure to Conduct Quality Control Inspection Paragraph 6, ANSI Standard N45.2-1971 states in part, " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions...
and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions...."
Paragraph 6 further states in part, "The activity may be prescribed in job specifications, work instructions... test procedures, or any other type of written form, provided that the activity is adequately described. Quantitative criteria... and qualitative criteria...
shall be specified...."
Paragraph 17.1.5 of the SNUPPS PSAR states in part, "Each major SNUPPS contractor is responsible for controlling its activities affecting quality in accordance with documented procedures...."
398 I89 79072 5 MM
~
Daniel Supplier Qualification Certificates-dated March 30,1978, and April 25,1977, require that work performed by Clarkson Construction Company on the Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) be monitored by Daniel Quality, Control personnel using existing Daniel QC procedures.
~
Cont-ary to the above:
i.
The constructor, Daniel International, has not conducted quality control 1
inspections or surveillance on the UHS work since its beginning on or
'~
about October 16, 1978.
In addition, the applicable Dan'el quality control procedures have not been identified for the UHS work nor have qualitative and quantative acceptance criteria been specified for the blasting work.
This is an ',nfraction.
J 4
1 398 190 A-2
___..