ML19220A882
| ML19220A882 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 04/18/1978 |
| From: | Herbein J Metropolitan Edison Co |
| To: | Brunner E NRC Office of Inspection & Enforcement (IE Region I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19220A876 | List: |
| References | |
| GQL 707, GQL-0707, NUDOCS 7904250060 | |
| Download: ML19220A882 (3) | |
Text
.
W"i f
mm.f. 2747
/
q i
mm mau
/
/
/ METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY : nc.:ev er czeg
... wu crs es; es w u re:.
t PCST OFFICE BOX 542 READING, PENNSYLVANI A 19603 TELEPHONE 215 - 929 3601 April 18, 1978 GQL 0707 Mr. Eldon J. Enmner, Chief Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support 3 ranch U. S. 'iuclear Regulatory Cc =ission 631 Park Avenue King of P assia, Pennsylvania 19h06
Dear Mr. Brunner:
Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 2 (mI-2)
Operating License No. DPR-73 Docket No. 50-320 Inspection Report No. 78-10 This letter and its attach =ent are in response to your inspectica letter of March 29, 1978, concerning Mr. R. S. Markovski's inspection of TMI-2, and the resultant findings of apparent infractions.
Sincerely, J. G. Hertein Vice President JGH:RAL:dkf Attachnent
, I. s 2
G) 7904250000
Attachnect to GQL 0707
_Restense to Inspection Retort No. 78-10 The folleving was included in Appendix A to the above referenced Inspection Repert.
Infracticn ( A.2) 1, Section 5.1 of Adninistrative Procedure AP1001 Docunent Contrel, Revision 12, Nevenber 8,1977 states in part:
"All.
drawing revisicus... vill initially be received by TMI Adninistrative Office.
A designated individual... vill assure that said doc =ents are p:cperly distributed in accordance with...distributien list.
... distributed in accordance with this list vill be considered centrolledAll drawings drawings.
These dravings vill be stanped controlled conv in red..."
Centrary to the above, centrolled drawing revisions vere received (as indicated by the Master Draving Index) and not distributed in accordance January 1, 1978) in that en Februarywith the distribution list (TMI Nucle 23, 1978:
Two cut of seven centrolled dravings selected in the Instr =ent a.
and Control (I&C) shop - 2517 Revision 8 and 3020 sheet LA Revision j
6 - did not correspond to the latest revision indicated by the Master Draving Index.
could not be located within the I&C shop.One out of the seven drawings,
{
b.
Two out of four centrolled drawings selected in the Mechanical i
Maintenance Trailer (MM) - 241k, Revisica 15, and 2076 EF Sheet 1 l
Revision 7 - did act correspond to the latest revision indicated by the haster Draving Index.
Revisien 8, was not en the distributien list for MM, was not theOne ou latest revisica (i.e. Revision 9), and was sta= ped centrolled ecev in red.
One out of six drawings, 3094 sheet 13h Revision 6, selected in the c.
Electrical Maintenance Trailer did not correspond to the latest revision indicated by the Master Draving Index.
d.
Control Trailer did not correspond to the latest revisie by the Master Drawing Index.
One out of the four drawings, 2076 EP sheet 1 was not stamped centrolled cerv in red, was en the distri-bution list for QC and was of tha vreng'revisien.
I Corrective Action (A.2)
All deficiencies identified vere corrected on February 24, 1978.
_ Corrective Stets To Be Taken To Avoid Further Violation (A.2)
Based upon the potential for a generic problem in this area, a ec=prehensiv review and audit of Unit 2 drawings was begun in early March,1978 and is e
scheduled for ce=pletion prior to August 4
15, 1978.
i r y. 4 >= q f.
J. i' O
, Infraction (3) 10 CFR 50, Criterien V states in part:
"... procedures...shall include appropriate quantitative... acceptance criteria for deter =ining that i=-
portant activities have been satisfactorily accc plished." The accepted Operational Quality Assurance Progra: (FSAR Secticn 17.2.17) states =
"... Tools...necessa'y for =aintenance...are calibrated...in accordance par.-
with station maintenance procedures..."
Centrary to the above, Preventive Maintenance Procedure M h8, Tcrque. k~rench and Torque '4rench Tester Calibratien, Revisica 0, April 15,19Th does not incorporate criteria for deter.ining that the calibration of torque vrenches and the torque vrench testers have been satisfacterily acec=plished.
Cali-bratien data for the torque tester (EC-1) dated Dece=ber,1976, and torque vrench (EC-32) dated June,1977, indicate that these ite=s had not =et the tolerances specified by the =anufacturer and had been accepted as ce.librated.
The calibration data was reviewed by the inspector en February 23, 1978.
Corrective Action (3)
Torque tester (EC-1) and torque vrench (EC-32) have been recalibrated and are within the tolerances specified by the manufacturer.
Corrective Stens Taken to Avoid Further Violation (B)
Preventive Maintenance Precedure M-h8 has been revised to incorporate criteria for dete=.ining that calibration of torque vrenches and the torque vrench testers vill be satisfactorily accc=plished, (i.e., vithin the manufacturer's specified tolerances).
6 It should be noted that your letter of March 29, 1978, indicated that a respense
.o Infractica ite: A.1 (dealing with uncalibrated Torque 'Jrenches located in a cabinet which is designated for calibrated instruments) need not be included in this report, as the situation had already been corrected to your satisfaction.
I e
h
,~3 - a ma
/.
.*3