ML19210B064

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Evaluates RO Insp Rept 50-289/74-34.Problems W/Meeting I-131 Milk Sensitivity Requirement Per Tech Specs Due to Rmc Lab Analytical Deficiencies.Radiological Monitoring Program Needs Upgrading to Be Consistent W/Aec Std ETS Guide
ML19210B064
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/20/1974
From: Bores R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Stohr J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML19210B061 List:
References
NUDOCS 7911010793
Download: ML19210B064 (2)


See also: IR 05000289/1974034

Text

_

_ ___

_ _ . _

_

UNITED STATES

.#

I '%,

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

[

t

DIRECTOR ATE OF REGULATORY OPER ATIONS

,#

d,' & #* [?Ij'

REGION 4

'

f

631 P ARK AVENUE

,

KING oF PRUSSI A, PENNSYLVANI A 19406

,.

J. P. Stohr, Chief, Environmental Protection and Special Programs Section

RO:I

.

INSPECTOR'S EVALUATION RO INSPECTION REPORT No. 50-289/74-34

THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1

The special inspection performed to evaluate the status of the previously

identified enforcement items revealed much improvement in the overall

program.

The program administration was shifted to the Reading office

and that group appears to have a good handle on the program. The Plant

Operations people also are involved with respect to routine maintenance

and a surveillance program which serves to identify any missing sample

or analysis.

One of the violations identifed during this inspection was in regard to the

sensitivity of I-131 analysis in milk.

I have identified this area as a

generic problem in a previous memo to you dated November 8, 1974, in which

I said that only one laboratory (RMC,) in our region appeared to be capable

of meeting the "0.5 pCi of I-131/ liter of milk within an overall error of

25%" sensitivity of analysis requirement imposed by the newer Environmental

Technical Specification.

TMI uses RMC to analyze their milk. The data showed

that while RMC could meet this requirement most of the time, it could not do

it all of the time. This re-enforces the statements in the above referenced

memo that licensees with the above milk sensitivity requirement will have

much difficulty in meeting it.

In IMI's case, by prompt notification from

RMC and resampling milk when analytical difficulties arise, TMI can probably

live with this limit. However, if the required sampling intervals were

shorter, such as Peach Bottom has (1 week), this resampling would not help

as there would be insufficient time between samples to replace 4" bad sample."

With respect to the Appendix B, Technical Specifications, the radiological

environmental monitoring program should be upgraded in several areas to be

consistant with the AEC Standard Environmental Tech Spec. Guide. These

areas are identified below.

1.) Air particulate filters should be composited for quarterly Sr-89

' and 90 analyses.

The method of compositing, i.e. filters from each

station or from all indicator stations, should be indicated for the

strontium, as well as, for the gamma spectral analyses.

'

2.) Milk should be analyzed for Sr-89 and 90 and by gamma spectral

analysis monthly.

'

,

172

1nc

sou

7911010 7 / 3

-

- - .. -.-

..

, . _ . - _,

!' *

_

.

. , .

!

'])

'

'

-2-

.

3.) Drinking water, i.e. for the City of Columbia intake, should be

-'

analyzed at weekly intervals.

~

'-

,

@;,

4.) River water should be composited for quarterly Sr-89 and 90

-"

analyses.

'

.

lbFO&d)

,

Robert J. Bores

Radiation Specialist

i

cc: Speasard

,

,

4

1

3

.

8

isuo

-.