ML19207B501

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-267/79-12 on 790612-15.Noncompliance Noted: Failure to Comply W/Tech Specs Requirements Re Operating Procedures
ML19207B501
Person / Time
Site: Fort Saint Vrain Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/28/1979
From: Dickerson M, Westerman F
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML19207B497 List:
References
50-267-79-12, NUDOCS 7908300069
Download: ML19207B501 (6)


See also: IR 05000267/1979012

Text

.

.

U. S. NUCLEAR REGUIATORY COMIISSION

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEZIENT

REGION IV

IE Inspection Report No. 50-267/79-12

Docket No. 50-267

License No. DPR-34

Licensee:

Public Service Company of Colorado

P. O. Box 840

Denver, Colorado

80201

Facility:

Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station

Inspection at: Fort St. Vrain Site, Platteville, Colora 4

Inspection Conducted: June 12-15, 1979

Inspector:

. (4-)

h

$j6.8/7 f

.

M. W. Dickerson, Reactor Inspector

Date'

Reviewed by:

Ma

[h

-

6 AP/79-

'T. F. Westerman, Chifef', Reactor Projects Section

Date

Inspection Summary

Inspection on June 12-15, 1979 (Report No. 50-267/79-12

Areas Inspected: Routine, uannounced inspection of review of plant operations;

licensee event reports; followup on Bulletins / Circulars; review of special and

periodic reports; and followup on inspector identified and unresolved problems.

The inspection involved twenty-nine (29) inspection-hours on-site by one (1)

NRC inspector.

Results: Of the five (5) areas inspected, one (1) item of noncompliance was

found during the review of plant operations (Infraction - failure to comply

with T/S requirements - paragraph 3).

852 062

7908300 O

.

2

Details

1.

Persons Contacted

  • L. Brey, QA Manager

M. Ferris, Engineer, Technical Services

  • J. Gamm, Supervisor, Technical Services
  • E. Hill, Supervisor Operations
  • T. Howard, Superintendent Operations QA

J. Liebelt, Supervisor Electrical Maintenance

  • F. Mathie, Operations Manager

M. McBride, Engineering Coordinator

J. Solakiewkz, QA Engineer

J. Van Dyke, Shift Supervisor Operations

G. Wiltscheek, Results Engineer

V. Wetzbarger, Scheduling /QC Supervisor

R. Wollum, Scheduling QC

  • D. Warembourg, Manager Nuclear Production
  • Attended exit interview.

2.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings

(Closed) Unresolved Item (50-267/73-04):

Corrosion Monitoring Program.

Based on the information, regarding the results of the four year corrosion

monitoring program, contained in the licensees letter P-79110, dated

May 23, 1979, there are no further questions at this time.

,

(Closed) Open Item (50-267/77-04): Steam Generator Bimetallic Weld. Based

upon the information contained in a transmittal from Gammill to Fuller, dated

March 30, 1979 and Public Service Company letter P-79073 dated April 6, 1979.

The matter is considered resolved.

(Closed) Open Item (50-267/77 -11): Turbine Trip Test. The data utilized

from strip chart recorders wai used to determine 1/4 amplitude dampening

only. No other acceptance cre eria were utilized from instrumentation

which was not in a formal calibration program prior to December 1977 for

the Turbine Trip Test. Based on this information, an informal calibration

program prior to this date, and the fact that no instrumentation was

noted as being out-of-calibration at the time of formal calibration program

initiation (December 1977) The data appears to be acceptable.

(Closed) Open Item (50-267/7903-1): 50% Load Time Not Explicitely

Defined In Diesel Generator Test SR5.6.1.a.w.

The licensee has revised

the surveillance test to specifically define the time at 50% load.

852 063

.

3

(Closed) Open Item (50-267/7908-4): Fire Water Booster Pump Installation.

The addition of Booster pumps P-2109 and P-2110 to proved fire water

for motive force of the circulator pelton wheels has been completed.

3.

Review of Plant Operations

The inspector selected several procedures for review which had been changed

by the licensee for those systems which had undergone maintenance, or were

disturbed during the outage.

Included was a determination by review of

records whether the systems were returned to service in accordance with

approved procedures.

During this review it was determined that overall plant operating pro-

cedure 1 (OPOP I) pages 11 and 12 had been signed off on June 12, 1979 as

" Reserve Shutdown System Operable" based on section B.2.a(1) 1.3

"Preoperational Valve lineup made per S0P 12-05" and section B.2.a(1)1.4

Prerequisites complete per S0P 12-05".

A review of Appendix 1 to

S0P 12-05 (valve lineup checklist) indicated that the status of valves

HV-1104-1 and HV-1102-1 had apparently not been checked as required.

Since the check list had not been completed and OPOP I had been signed

off based on completion of the check list, the licensee was informed that

this was an item of nonconformance and was considered an infraction.

Technical Specification AC 7.4.a requires in part that, " written procedures

shall be establishsd, implemented and maintained . . .", and OPOP 1,

General Plant Requirements states that section B of the procedure contains

check lists to determine the operability of Various Plant System and that

completion of the check lists shall be in accordance with the following:

All system checklists shall be completed in their entirety

before startup

following a shutdown from refueling and instrumentation and control system

signoffs, prerequistes per S0P signoffs, and the senior licensed operator

signoffs are required.

In addition to the system 12 review noted above the inspector also reviewed

S0P 11, Prestressed Concrete Reactor Vessel; S0P 21-02, Helium Circulator

Auxiliary System; and S0P 31 Feedwater and condensate system.

Review of the above procedures and checklists indicated a need for a system

of control for items such as stop valves to pressure differental indicators

which are closed, where flexibility is exercised in a system when a valve

is closed or open instead of open or closed as shown on a pre-startup

checklist, when bypasses are cracked open, where valves may be partially

opened and where one of several duplicated components is utilized instead of

the others.

In discussing this with the licensee it was indicated that this

need had been recognized and that numbered control tags were an order which

would replace the present system of using unnumbered status tags. Use

of the numbered tags should provide fcr supervisory control and establish

the systems status. This will remain as an open item.

852

064

.

4

The inspector also reviewed records of the control rod withdrawal sequence,

plant startup, heatup, approach to criticality and rise to less than 2%

power and determined that they were conducted in accordance with approved

procedures and the Technical Specifications.

The inspector had no additional questions in this area.

4.

Holdup Items For Greater than 2% Power

a.

Emergency Condensate Isolation Vtives

An engineering evaluation study of the hydraulic operators used on

emergency feedwater condensate isolation valves HV-2237 and HV-2238 has

resulted in the replacement of the hydraulic operators with seismically

qualified limitorque valve operators. The addition of the operators

has resulted in the need of the additional support of two spring

hangers and eight hydraulic snubbers. At the time of the inspection

the valve operators had been installed but the hanger and snubbers

had not been installed.

b.

PCRV Deflection Tests

Deflection tests have been performed on the PCRV up to 400 psia and

no constraint _is imposed on power greater than 2% except that

deflection tests are also required at approximately 28% power.

c.

Two Loop Dump

The two loon dump radification (fix) have been completed and T-62

the functional test has been completed and found acceptable by the

licensee.

d.

Phase III Fire Protection

The phase III fire protection system has been completed with the

exception of CN-619, the installation of one spray shield over inverter

IA in the 480 volt room. Additionally functional test 724 has not

been completed because of diffievlties associated with the first hit

annunciator panel.

c.

Hydraulic Snubbers

At the time of the inspection sixteen snubbers remained to be tested,

reassembled and installed.

f.

Alternate Cooling Method

The alternate cooling method has been installed and functionally tested.

A review of the functional tests by the inspector indicated that the

testing had been performed satificatorrily.

Ob2

.

.

5

g.

A letter from the licensee to reactor licensing is in preparation which

would resolve those items included in letter P-78071, dated May 8,

1978, which were required to be resolved prior to startup after the

first refueling. The status of the items are as follows:

(1) CN 892 has updated the applicablu P&I's and S0P 21-02 and

S0P 46 have been revised to show valves V 211526, V-46181, V-46182

and V-42144 closed.

(2) CN 892 completed for seismically qualifying the following

instrument root valves:

PS-1194

LS-21502

LS-92206-3

PI-11217

LG-21502

LS-92207-3

LIS-11267

PDIS-2329

M-92800

PIT-11215

PDIS-2330

M-92801

PDT-2133

PT-23103

M-92802

PDT-2134

PT-23104

M-92803

= >

u-

PI-21470

LCV-4501

(3) The Cardox Tank and associated piping systems has been determined

by the licensee not to require upgrading. The piping system

is supported to withstand OBE and DEE forces. Additionally the

Cardox Tank is an "FM" approved installation and will withstand

seismic forces in accordance with code requirements.

5.

Startup Report

The tenth and eleventh startup reports for Fort St. Vrain for the period

November 22, 1978, through May 22, 1979, reviewed by the inspector,

contained no relevant information on the initial approach to power tests

since none were performed during this period of time due to the restriction

for plant operation in excess of 70 percent power and the shutdown of the

plant for refueling.

6.

Review of Licensee Event Reports

The inspector verified that licensee event reporting activities were in

accordance with Technical Specification, Section 7, including identification

of details, corrective action, review and evaluation of aspects relative

to operations and accuracy of reporting.

852 006

6

The following reports were reviewed by the inspector:

U.E. 75-21

R.O. 79-07

A.O. 76-20

R.0. 79-09

R.O. 77-47

R.O. 79-10

R.O. 78-37

R.O. 79-11

R.O. 78-39

R.O. 79-15

R.O. 79-01

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

7.

IE Bulletins

The inspector verified by record review, observation and discussion with

representatives of the licensee, the action taken in response to IE Bulletins.

The following Bulletins were reviewed by the inspector:

- s ,

x._

78-12B

79-07

79-01

79-09

79-03

79-10

'

79-04

79-11

No items of nonconformance or deviations were identified.

8.

Exit Interview

An exit interview was conducted with representatives of the licensee

on June 15, 1979, at the conclusion of the inspection. At the interview,

the inspector discussed the findings indicated in the previous paragraphs.

The licensee acknowledged these findings.

852 067