ML19207B211
| ML19207B211 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 03/29/1974 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19207B210 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-289-74-07, 50-289-74-7, 50-320-74-02, 50-320-74-2, NUDOCS 7908230584 | |
| Download: ML19207B211 (2) | |
Text
-
__ m c.
- ENCLOSURE t
(q..
u_.
DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATTONS Metropolitan Edison Co:pany Box 542 2
Reading, Pennsylvania I?603 P
Docket Nos. 50-2S9 The folloteing itens wer.e found to be in apparent violation of AEC requirement as indicated belou. These apparent violations are considered to be of Category II Severity.
E..
t 1.
10 CFR 50, Appendix 3, Criterion V requires that activities affecting quality be prescribed by documented instructions, 3
procedures, or drc::ings, of.a type appropriate to the circunstances p
and shall be accceplished in accordance
- ith these instructions, procedures or drattings.
a.
Contrary to this requirement, Procedure 1101-36, Chlorinator Operations Procedure, uas not folloteed during the use of chlorin cors, in tha: chlorine usage logs were not =ain:cined as required by that procedure.
b.
Contrary to this requirtr.ent, Procedure 1104-36, Chlorinator Operations Procedure, teas inadequate in th:: it did not require as a prerequisite for chlorinator use, that chierine residuals be T.cni: Orad during chlorinatinn.
C,nce,na,H f chlorine residuals tera not nonitored bet een September, 1973 and Februcrj 20, 1974 during chlorination.
The followin; items trere found :: be in apparent violation *ith the environmental conitoring progran described in Eection 11.b of the FSAR for Three Mile Island Unit 1.
These apparent viola:icas are considered to be of Category III Severity.
2.
Section 11.6 of the FSAR requires that airborne particulates be monitored on a weekly basis.
Contrar'; to this requiren:nt, airborne particulates,ere no conitored en a treekly. basis in all instances.
3.
Section 11.6 of the FSAR requires that airborne iodine ha acnitored on a weekly basis.
Contrary to this require ent, airborne iocines were collected and analyced on a conthly basis and in several instances t ere no:
analyced at all.
a)b w
y 1ssa+,
490S23067f.'#
,_..m.
. f.
).
u~.:T=*
=-N..ZEL f..
-?::~~ :.E.- 2
=
L
(.
4.
Section 11.6 of the FSAR re' quires that precipitation be sampled continuou<.ly and analyzed (including H-3 analysis) at =onthly intervals.
~
Contrary to this requirement, the sa=pling and analytical techniques
.m e= ployed invalidated the results of this program.
Specifically, evaporation losses were not "aken into account, nor was sa=ple dilution with de=ineralized w e er before analysis considered 4--
the determination of the activiev concentrations.
Further, H-3 analyses ware not perfor=ed at al2 on a number of occasions.
E
~
5.
Sectic a 11.6 of the FSAR requires that river vater be sa= pled and analyzed, including gan=a isotopic analysis, on a conthly basis.
Contrary to this require =ent, ga==a isotopic analyses of river water were not performed on a =onthly basis, but on a quarterly basis.
6.
Section 11.6 of the FSAR requires that = ilk 'ce c.a= pled and analyzed on a conthly basis, Contrary to this require =ent, milk was not sa= pled on a conthly basis prior to October, 1973.
9 0
47 &4 4
O e
e e
~
h h
4 e
Me e
9 a
=
W N
~
^
e
- h
_ ~.
's
. - ~
- x.._.- - ~ - -
- =_.~_ z _ _._-
.i. _.
r;=: _
f.._ _ _. _; _ ;. __.
7
...c=.
.