ML19207B192
| ML19207B192 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/31/1978 |
| From: | Nelson P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Herbein J METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19207B193 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7908230531 | |
| Download: ML19207B192 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000289/1978008
Text
x
g**
'
[.
[
.iUNITED STATES. - f -
' ~ -
a
er
g '.f
,
4
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON
T."
7 3%g)i. -- j
- I)
2
REGION I
-
su eaax Avsnut
,
o, (
mino or causs:4. eemusvt. vama is4cs
.....
MAY 31 BH
Docket Nos. 50-200
=
(50-32Q
u
Metropolitan Edison Company
ATTN: Mr. J. G. Herbein
Vice President
P. O. Box 542
Reading, Pennsylvania
19603
Gentlemen:
..
.
y'
Subject:
Combined Inspection 50-289/78-08; 50-320/78-16
f
This refers to the inspection conducted by Dr. R. Bores of this office
~
on April 17-21, 1978, at Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Middletown,
Pennsylvania, and at the Metropolitan Edison corporate offices in Read-
ing, Pennsylvania, of activities authorized by NRC License Nos. DPR-50
and DPR-73, and to the discussions of our findings held by Dr. Bores
with Messrs. O'Hanlon, Dubiel, and other members of your staff at the
conclusion of the inspection, and to a subsequent telephone discussion
between Dr. Bores and Messrs. O'Haalon and Dubiel on May 5,1978.
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the Office of
Inspection and Enforcement Inspection Report which is enclosed with this
letter. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective
examinations o procedures and representative records, interviews with
personnel
and observations by the inspector.
Our inspector also verified the steps you had taken to correct the items
of noncompliance brought to your attention in a letter dated April 6,
1977.
We have no further questions regarding the steps you took to
correct item B.
With regard to items A and C, we note that these items
have recurred, ae 2 tailed in items B anu C of Appendix A to this letter.
In your response to this letter please give these matters your particular
attention.
With respect to Unit 1, NdC License No. DPR-50, based on the results of
- nis inspectien, it appears that certain of your activities were not
conducted in full ccmpliance with NRC requirements, as set forth in the
Notice of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appendix A.
These items of
noncompliance have been categorized into the levels as described in our
correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.
This notice is sent to
you pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of
..
W
vssze
_
_
_
_
m8 2aossfq
y p. :
43. e . w Q.T:l -%ggg-t;g[ ; 7= .
x ':, ,: = v
'S ?
.L ~
. -
.
.
~
-
-%
.::
.
-
~
. Metropolitan Edison Company
2
_.
e s.o ae-
.
.-
Practice," Part 2 Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations.
Section 2.201
requires you to submit to tr.is office, within twenty (20) days of your
_.
receipt of this notice, a written statement or explanation in reply
---
including:
(1) corrective steps which have been taken by you and the
results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid
=.
further items of noncompliance; and (3) the date when full ccmpliance
will be achieved.
With respect to Unit 2, NRC License No. OPR-73, within the scope of this
-
inspection, no items of noncompliance were observed.
g
In accordance with Sec.i. ion 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part
L
2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the
[
enclosures will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Rocm.
If this
report contains any information that you (or your contractor) believe to
.
be proprietary, it is necessary that you make a written application
-
within 20 days to this office to withhold such information from public
disclosure. Any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit
executed by the owner of the infor nation, which identifies the document
or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a statement of reasons
which addresses with specificity the items which will be considered by
the Commission as listed in subparagraph (b) (d) of Section 2.790.
The
information sought to be withheld shall be incorpercted as far as possible
into a separate part of the affidavit.
If we do not hear from you in
this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed in
the Public Document Rocm.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be
pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
&
"
i
JU
/
s
Paul R. Nelson, Chief
Fuel Facility and Materials Safety
Branch
78927
,
I-
l
- - -
'
.
= -
..