ML19122A208

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Final Q/A Related Forms (Folder 1)
ML19122A208
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point 
Issue date: 01/25/2019
From:
Operations Branch I
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Shared Package
ML18338A499 List:
References
CAC 00500, EPID L -2018-OLL-0007
Download: ML19122A208 (11)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility:

Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Date of Examination:

12/03/2018 II Developed by: Written: Facility ~ NRC D II Operating:

Facility

~ NRC D Target Task Description (Reference)

Chief Examiner's Date*

Initials

-240

1.

Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a-b). For NRC-prepared exams,

~

arrangements are made for the facility to submit reference materials (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3).

-210

2.

NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.f).

~

3.

Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c). As applicable, the facility

-210 contact submits to the NRC any prescreened K/As for elimination from the written examination

/f, outline, with a description of the facility's prescreening process (ES-401, D.1.b).

-210

4.

Reference material due for NRC-prepared exams (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3). 0 N/A

-210

s.

Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.e).

~

6.

NRC-developed written examination outline (ES-401-1/2 or ES-401N-1/2 and ES-401-3 or

-195 ES-401N-3) sent to facility contact (must be on the exam security agreement) (C.1.e-f; C.2.h;

~

C.3.d-).

-150

7.

Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1,

~

ES-301-2, ES-301-5, and ES-D-1, as applicable (C.1.e-f; C.3.d-).

-136

8.

Operating test outline(s) reviewed by the NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.d-).

~

9.

Proposed examinations (written, JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable) and outlines (Forms ES-301-1,

-75 ES-301-2, ES-D-1, ES-401-1/2 or ES-401N-1/2, and ES-401-3 or ES-401N-3); supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, ES-401-6, ES-401N-6, and any Form ES-201-2 and ES-201-3 updates); and reference materials due (C.1.e-h; C.3.d).

~

Examinations prepared by the NRC are approved by the NRC supervisor and forwarded for facility

-75

10.

N/A licensee review (C.1.i; C.2.h; C.3.f-g).

-60

11. Preliminary waiver/excusal requests due (C.1.m; C.2.c; ES-202).

~

-50

12. Written exam and operating test reviews completed (C.3.f).

~

-35

13. Examination review results discussed between the NRC and facility licensee (C.1.i; C.1.k-1; C.2.h;

~

C.3.g). The NRC and the facility licensee conduct exam preparatory week.

-30

14. Preliminary license applications and waiver/excusal requests, as applicable (NRC Form 398) due

~

(C.1.m; C.2.i; ES-202).

-14

15. Final license applications and waiver/excusal requests, as applicable (NRC Form 398), due and

~

Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.m; C.2.k; ES-202).

-7

16. Written examinations and operating tests approved by the NRC supervisor (C.2.j-k; C.3.h).

~

-7

17. Request facility licensee management feedback on the examination (C.2.1).

~

18. Final applications reviewed; one or two (if more than 10) applications audited to confirm

-7 qualifications/eligibility; and examination approval and waiver/excusal letters sent (C.2.k;

/0 ; ES-202, C.3.j; ES-204).

-7

19. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k).

~

-7

20. Approved scenarios and job performance measures distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i).

/1/?

?

  • Target dates are based on facility-prepared examinations and the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.

These dates are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

ES-201 1

Form ES-201-3 Nile Mile Point Unit 1 ILT NRC Exam

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 12/3/18 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) ofll.h/1q+-1l/*1/ 1*From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or proiide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE/ RESPONSIBILITY

1. PAv L.

J:s H/tM

&lf'I,J,vri,oR..

2. 10~ ttoopi:R.

tj/l-fn.

t~4crt>r..

3. /111/<.e,. Al*eii<.M~'

th-"" AJ+hc:..-

4. J£'"'-" ~Z_:Q f't i"\\-- ~-rl-o{L
s. At1r Ah<t,J; f"'ilL~

6.t=c~~y :!JD~ses....

7.==~M ottlh

~ V0v,~ov-

9. \\t:'{ttN I\\M.I£(LT
10. "t,4,J Tu8MJrl
11. i'<Gv'N i1 1tJ6S

~~:~~( 0~

~~:~~:tr~j~:i~

NOTES:

(j) p c.--1<.

JC; 1.,_( dJ'Y\\

(6) PGR b ((1/1, L

\\ll'n.\\b~Q.

V 1 t... I 0.1'-J--O fl V 1-l I I) t2::l12.. IL fi'*r:t lf,,(hv s;"--~~

~Ill i

~q :loc

~

""1, dcd:or

~GNA~URE (1)

?---=-;..-----_-~_:::~-/

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

.;;£/~

, ), '2. /, B ~

- :-::::;;;;5--:; -

7J12Jt3 f~~

7/1:i.f!d.

DATE NOTE

'210~~~

l;dr? (}_)

/2 13/1i--

' )J '(A j'

{j;)

'1dv/a (0 1--0r/lt _!!2_

';)IJ/13

<D i~,:e ¥ l).,1Y,Pd {i2_

'~~r.

'21??16' © J.. Y..11lli

~-~-

vi.j11\\1f --

12/t;h CD

ES-201 1

Form ES-201-3 Nile Mile Point Unit 1 ILT NRC Exam

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 12/3/18 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of11l~h+ 1J/,o/.t From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME

3.

-./\\..

" eN*~

4. IIOA&cT 1<<7<@
5. "'u d1 ;14..,
6. /(,gnt ~'1'"BJ(W(
7. k.,\\ V<<"43fkkt.;;
8. GR6mtt-tv C~
9.,,3:u$nN

°r6v,.,,,.,.._

10. lc.:ffi-~f ?l~~
11. ~~a /Mqo-~~ ~

12

~

~

13:~-:z~

14.,hM'l5 f (OQfOt
15. 6rer 8,l,"

NOTES:

(!)

Per

+~t~rdv\\

0)

P6R c;-vvi A 'L JOB TITLE/ RESPONSIBILITY lilt/I/

,SilQ I/Hit

~O /t/a};d~r I

UI.,:1-'C ~

op,

'v&, {)flOI<

Of?{

V ffk t04:trJ /(

Nl,v..$ I

-rl?.>"'"\\N.I t.\\l.,

~1 T,-'~

Sas PMI' ~O=:

NN!J ~~k1: kz§ SIGNATURE (1)

SIGNATURE (2)

DATE

~~~

DATE NOTE

~~~

~~

~~~

Ji/illlt 4!2:J. J ~A

  • 11/:q/JJ ~/~

~:;?~~

DJJM

~

I **f-tf' 00 = =

~**~

!!d11!1...

l~#Y a,>

J.2/;f//9 0 I '2 /1 L/ l,~

'tffe' --

'?L1ri a)

t~I'.@_
  • z,

~

1Yftd{J @

~~

~

f i)-<)-~

11./13.i(_

.G:Jiar&_

!.!d!J1!j -

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Date of Exam: December 2018 Operating Test No.: LC117-1

1. General Criteria Initials a

b*

c#

a.

The operating test conforms to the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with Pf1 fM,J ~

samplinQ requirements (e.Q., 1 O CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

b.

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered Pfl /~,J ~

durinQ this examination.

c.

The operatino test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s) (see Section D.1.a.). Pf1

{Jiltl,J ~

d.

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within Vfl (l'W ~

acceptable limits.

e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent Pfl fMJ,&,

aoolicants at the desiQnated license level.

2. Walkthrough Criteria
a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific pr, f',MJ ~

designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include-detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b.

Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walkthrough f,A,.J ~

outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and ES-301-2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the f~/

acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

I

3. Simulator Criteria I -- I -- I -- I The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Pr' '"',,;,&:,

Form ES-301-4, and a copy is attached.

Pri~~e/~ijlna_!u__.!:e Date

a.

Author Paul Isham/

IIL1/li

b.

Facility Reviewer (*)

Phil Nichols/ A8J 11/1(/ti C.

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

fl,.ie,,r Pr esL,,, ! '.;?.-R / _ f\\~

11/uh11

d.

NRC Supervisor n...__\\~ I.V~ I /"}/(J,.~ LI l{-3b'l'

\\ -/

  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
  1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Date of Exam: Dec 2018 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3/4 Operating Test No.: LC117-1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, Pfl '",,.; At?

but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

Prl /#.,c/ ~

3.

Each event description consists of the following:

the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

~

the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event PFI /JH,41 the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

Pfl

/11,,; ~

5.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete pp-1

/114,v ~

evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

~

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

pp, fM.41 Cues are given.

7.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

PFI "'*" lrb

8.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional pp,

/M,.t I%

fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9.

Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.

PFI /P1d ~

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the ff/ /M,.J /_2:::1 form along with the simulator scenarios).
11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable ffl 1/.,tl,J I~

rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified Pfl 1/,'I,<./ I~

on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. Applicants are. evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when Pf-I />r.u I~

possible.

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Pfl /P,4/ ~

Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d)

Actual Attributes

1.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 3/1/2/1 PPI /10v ~

2.

Abnormal events (2-4) 4/3/3/4 Pfl

/M_,v /h

3.

Major transients (1-2) 1 /1 /2/1 Ph

/1H// ~

4.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2/2/2/3 PFI jM,t,1 M

5.

Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (?. 1 per scenario 1 /1 /1 /2 Pf/

/111,1µ 1/b b7 set)

6.

Preidentified critical tasks (> 2) 3/2/2/2 ff/

//'AA! /JO

  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
  1. An independent NRG reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Date of Exam: December 2018 Operating Test No.: LC117-1 A

p p

L I

C A

N T

RO 1 R02 R03 ISRO 1 1SR02 1SR03 1SR04 1SR05 E

V E

N T

T y

p E

RX NOR 1/C MAJ RX NOR 1/C MAJ TS RX NOR 1/C MAJ TS RX NOR 1/C MAJ TS 2

CREW POSITION s

A B

R T

0 0

C p

Scenarios 3

4 T

M 0

I CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T

N s

A B

s A

B A

I M

R T

0 R

T 0

L u

0 C

p 0

C p

M(*)

Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)"

positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (1/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one 1/C malfunction can be credited toward the two 1/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

4.

For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I a

licants in either the ATC or BOP osition to best evaluate the SRO-I in mani ulatin lant controls.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Nine Mile Point Unit 1 A

p 2

p L

I C

A N

T E

V E

N T

CREW POSITION T

y p

E RX NOR ISRO 6 1/C MAJ TS s

R 0

USRO 1 t--R_X_tt-----+

NOR USRO 2 1/C A

T C

1-----ll-.:...._.:...._F=

MAJ 6

USRO 3 I--T-S-11-----1' 4,5 RX 2

NOR B

0 p

Scenario 1----4-----1-----1,__ __

1 1/C (Spare)

MAJ 7

TS 3,4,5 Date of Exam: December 2018 Operating Test No.: LC117-1 Scenarios 3

4 T

M 0

I CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T

N s

A B

s A

B A

I M

R T

0 R

T 0

L u

0 C

p 0

C p

M(*)

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Date of Examination: December 2018 Operating Test No.: LC1 17-1 RO 1 R02 R03 APPLICANTS ISRO 1 ISR02 ISR03 ISR04 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 2

BOP 3

ATC 2

ATC Interpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions 4,5,6 3,5,6,7 Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control Boards 2 Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Su Comply With and Use Tech. S ecs. 3 1,4,5,6 1,4,5,6 All Notes:

( 1)

(2)

Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

Optional for an SRO-U.

(3)

Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

3 2

3 SRO SRO 3,4,5,6,7

,8 All Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

4 BOP 4,5,6,7,8 4,5,6,7,8

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Date of Examination: December 2018 Operating Test No.: LC1 17-1 APPLICANTS ISR05 ISR06 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO Interpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control Boards 2 Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Su 2

3 4

2 SRO BOP ATC BOP 3,4,5,6, 3,6,7,8 3,7,8 4,5,6 7

All 2,3,6,7, 1,2,3, 1,4,5,6 8

7,8 1,2,3, 1,4,5,6 7,8 All All 4,5 Notes:

( 1)

(2)

Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

Optional for an SRO-U.

(3)

Only applicable to SROs.

3 4

ATC SRO 5,6,7 3,4,5,6, 7,8 1,5,6,7,8 All All All All 5,6 USRO 1 USR02 USR03 SCENARIO 2

SRO 3,4,5,6,7 All All All 4,5 3

BOP 3,6,7,8 Signed and completed written examination grading quality checklist Form ES-403-1 for Reactor Operator and Senior Reactor Operator examinations Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-63

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Facility: Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Date of Exam:12/12/18 Exam Level:

Item Description

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

2.

Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required (N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted)

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in detail

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Grader

~~

a.

Paul Isham /, <

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

Phil Nichols /

~Jl{ ~r/r,~~;vt C.

NRC Chief Examiner (*) ?e~/bfy/

v'lL! 1i1n,

d. NRC Supervisor(*)

~"'lJ..JOl c\\C..sov 1'1,

( /

Form ES-403-1 RO ~ SRO lg]

Initials a

b C

fFJ f,'(A~ M N/R iJ 1Q...,!/~

~

~M~ TF Pr1 fl..p Iv/~ tJl(l ~

N/f\\

~l\\l--

JJ/A Iv='

Pr!

y~\\~

~

Date 12/;J/;i 7

/2 !"$/ g tj; I

tf 2 z[l, r

i

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19122A208&oldid=4929982"