|
---|
Category:Letter
MONTHYEARML24312A2262024-11-0606 November 2024 Letter from C. Nelson, Michigan SHPO Regarding Palisades Nuclear Plant Architectural Survey ML24292A1572024-11-0505 November 2024 Ape Notification to Burt Lake Band Palisades ML24310A0142024-11-0505 November 2024 Ape Notification to Mackinac Bands of Chippewa Palisades ML24310A0132024-11-0505 November 2024 Ape Notification to Grand River Bands of Ottawa Indians Palisades ML24309A2032024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma Palisades ML24309A1972024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians Palisades ML24309A1982024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Match E Be Nash She Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians Palisades ML24309A1872024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Palisades ML24309A2072024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation Palisades ML24309A1832024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Bois Forte Band of the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe Palisades ML24309A2122024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians Palisades ML24309A2042024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians Palisades ML24292A0492024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians Palisades ML24309A1932024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Palisades ML24309A2012024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Palisades ML24309A1922024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lk Superior Chippewa Indians Palisades ML24309A1892024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Hannahville Indian Community Palisades ML24309A2002024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Palisades ML24309A1952024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Palisades ML24309A2112024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Saint Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin Palisades ML24309A1902024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Palisades ML24309A2022024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi Palisades ML24309A1852024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Citizen Potawatomi Nation Palisades ML24309A2142024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to White Earth Band of Minnesota Chippewa Tribe Palisades ML24309A2092024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians Palisades ML24309A1862024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Forest County Potawatomi Community Palisades ML24309A1822024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Bay Mills Indian Community Palisades ML24309A2052024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation Palisades ML24309A2102024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan Palisades ML24309A2082024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians Palisades ML24309A1992024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin Palisades ML24292A0072024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Achp Palisades ML24309A1882024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians Palisades ML24309A1842024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Chippewa Cree Indians of the Rocky Boys Reservation of Montana Palisades ML24309A1912024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians Palisades ML24309A2132024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians Palisades ML24309A2062024-11-0404 November 2024 Ape Notification to Prairie Island Indian Community Palisades PNP 2024-014, Request for USNRC to Rescind Approved Exemption Requests for 140.11(a)(4) and 50.54(w)(1), Reduction of Insurances2024-10-0909 October 2024 Request for USNRC to Rescind Approved Exemption Requests for 140.11(a)(4) and 50.54(w)(1), Reduction of Insurances PNP 2024-037, Response to Requests for Additional Information Regarding the Proposed Reauthorization of Power Operations Under Renewed Facility Operating License Number DPR-0202024-10-0404 October 2024 Response to Requests for Additional Information Regarding the Proposed Reauthorization of Power Operations Under Renewed Facility Operating License Number DPR-020 ML24267A2962024-10-0101 October 2024 Summary of Conference Call Regarding Steam Generator Tube Inspections ML24263A1712024-09-20020 September 2024 Environmental Request for Additional Information ML24240A1692024-09-18018 September 2024 Cy 2023 Summary of Decommissioning Trust Fund Status ML24219A4202024-09-12012 September 2024 Change in Estimated Hours and Review Schedule for Licensing Actions Submitted to Support Resumption of Power Operations (Epids L-2023-LLE-0025, L-2023-LLM-0005, L-2023-LLA-0174, L-2024-LLA-0013, L-2024-LLA-0060, L-2024-LLA-0071) IR 05000255/20244022024-09-0606 September 2024 Public: Palisades Nuclear Plant - Decommissioning Security Inspection Report 05000255/2024402 PNP 2024-029, Notice of Payroll Transition at Palisades Nuclear Plant2024-08-15015 August 2024 Notice of Payroll Transition at Palisades Nuclear Plant IR 05000255/20240022024-08-0909 August 2024 NRC Inspection Report No. 05000255/2024002 PNP 2024-030, Update Report for Holtec Decommissioning International Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program Rev. 3 and Palisades Transitioning Quality Assurance Plan, Rev 02024-08-0202 August 2024 Update Report for Holtec Decommissioning International Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program Rev. 3 and Palisades Transitioning Quality Assurance Plan, Rev 0 PNP 2024-032, Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Selected Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications Administrative Controls to Support Resumption of Power Operations2024-07-31031 July 2024 Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Selected Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications Administrative Controls to Support Resumption of Power Operations ML24206A0572024-07-25025 July 2024 PRM-50-125 - Letter to Alan Blind; Docketing of Petition for Rulemaking and Sufficiency Review Status (10 CFR Part 50) PNP 2024-033, Response to Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request to Revise the Palisades Nuclear Plant Site Emergency Plan to Support Resumption of Power Operations2024-07-24024 July 2024 Response to Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request to Revise the Palisades Nuclear Plant Site Emergency Plan to Support Resumption of Power Operations 2024-09-06
[Table view] Category:Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI)
MONTHYEARPNP 2024-037, Response to Requests for Additional Information Regarding the Proposed Reauthorization of Power Operations Under Renewed Facility Operating License Number DPR-0202024-10-0404 October 2024 Response to Requests for Additional Information Regarding the Proposed Reauthorization of Power Operations Under Renewed Facility Operating License Number DPR-020 PNP 2024-033, Response to Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request to Revise the Palisades Nuclear Plant Site Emergency Plan to Support Resumption of Power Operations2024-07-24024 July 2024 Response to Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request to Revise the Palisades Nuclear Plant Site Emergency Plan to Support Resumption of Power Operations PNP 2023-005, Response to Palisades Nuclear Plant - Request for Additional Information Related to the Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report2023-03-0101 March 2023 Response to Palisades Nuclear Plant - Request for Additional Information Related to the Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report PNP 2022-036, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Proposed Permanently Defueled Emergency Plan and Permanently Defueled Emergency Action Level Scheme2022-11-0808 November 2022 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Proposed Permanently Defueled Emergency Plan and Permanently Defueled Emergency Action Level Scheme PNP 2022-012, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Revise Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications for a Permanently Defueled Condition2022-04-21021 April 2022 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Revise Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications for a Permanently Defueled Condition CNRO-2021-00002, Entergy Operations, Inc. - Basis for Concluding the Terms of Confirmatory Order EA-17-132/EA-17-153 Are Complete, Element L2021-01-28028 January 2021 Entergy Operations, Inc. - Basis for Concluding the Terms of Confirmatory Order EA-17-132/EA-17-153 Are Complete, Element L ML20272A1662020-09-30030 September 2020 Attachment 3 - Framatome Document No. ANP-3876, Revision 1Q1NP, Response to NRC Request for Additional Information of Palisades Relief Request Number RR 5-8, Repair of Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetration, Inservice Inspection Program, CNRO-2019-00030, Response to Confirmatory Order EA-17-132/EA-17-153, Element K 2019 Summary2019-12-30030 December 2019 Response to Confirmatory Order EA-17-132/EA-17-153, Element K 2019 Summary PNP 2019-034, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request Resubmittal to Adopt TSTF-425, Revision 3, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control- Risk Informed Technical Specification...2019-08-23023 August 2019 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request Resubmittal to Adopt TSTF-425, Revision 3, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control- Risk Informed Technical Specification... ML19149A3032019-05-28028 May 2019 Enclosure Attachment 1 to Pnp 2019-028: Renewed Facility Operating License Page Markups ML19149A3022019-05-28028 May 2019 Enclosure to Pnp 2019-028: Response to Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request to Revise Existing Facility Operating License Conditions Regarding NFPA 805 Modifications ML19149A3042019-05-28028 May 2019 Enclosure Attachment 1 (Continued) to Pnp 2019-028: Operating License Page Change Instructions and Retyped Renewed Facility Operating License Pages PNP 2019-003, Response to Request for Additional Information for License Amendment Request to Revise Emergency Diesel Generator Degraded Voltage Surveillance Requirement2019-02-0707 February 2019 Response to Request for Additional Information for License Amendment Request to Revise Emergency Diesel Generator Degraded Voltage Surveillance Requirement PNP 2018-059, Response to Request for Additional Information for Relief Request No. RR-5-7, Proposed Alternative to ASME Section XI Code Requirements for Repair of Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetrations2018-12-0303 December 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information for Relief Request No. RR-5-7, Proposed Alternative to ASME Section XI Code Requirements for Repair of Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetrations PNP 2018-023, Response to Second Request for Additional Information - Alternative to the Reexamination Frequency for a Relevant Condition Foreign Material Lodged in the Reactor Pressure Vessel2018-04-30030 April 2018 Response to Second Request for Additional Information - Alternative to the Reexamination Frequency for a Relevant Condition Foreign Material Lodged in the Reactor Pressure Vessel PNP 2018-018, Response to Request for Additional Information - Proposed Changes to the Emergency Plan to Reflect a Permanently Shut Down and Defueled Reactor Vessel2018-04-16016 April 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information - Proposed Changes to the Emergency Plan to Reflect a Permanently Shut Down and Defueled Reactor Vessel PNP 2018-014, Response to Request for Additional Information - Alternative to the Reexamination Frequency for a Relevant Condition Foreign Material Lodged in the Reactor Pressure Vessel2018-03-27027 March 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information - Alternative to the Reexamination Frequency for a Relevant Condition Foreign Material Lodged in the Reactor Pressure Vessel PNP 2017-075, Response to Request for Additional Information - Proposed Changes to Administrative Controls Section of the Technical Specifications for Permanently Defueled Condition2017-12-19019 December 2017 Response to Request for Additional Information - Proposed Changes to Administrative Controls Section of the Technical Specifications for Permanently Defueled Condition PNP 2017-020, Response to Request for Additional Information - Relief Request Number RR 4-25 Impracticality - Limited Coverage Examinations During the Fourth 10-year Inservice Inspection Interval2017-04-0505 April 2017 Response to Request for Additional Information - Relief Request Number RR 4-25 Impracticality - Limited Coverage Examinations During the Fourth 10-year Inservice Inspection Interval PNP 2016-055, Response to Generic Letter 2016-01, Monitoring of Neutron Absorbing Materials in Spent Fuel Pools.2016-10-25025 October 2016 Response to Generic Letter 2016-01, Monitoring of Neutron Absorbing Materials in Spent Fuel Pools. PNP 2016-053, Supplement to License Amendment Request: Control Rod Drive Exercise Surveillance2016-09-0808 September 2016 Supplement to License Amendment Request: Control Rod Drive Exercise Surveillance PNP 2016-047, Voluntary Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2016-09: Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2016-07-26026 July 2016 Voluntary Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2016-09: Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations PNP 2016-037, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request for Implementation of an Alternate Repair Criterion on the Steam Generator Tubes (CAC No. MF74352016-06-0707 June 2016 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request for Implementation of an Alternate Repair Criterion on the Steam Generator Tubes (CAC No. MF7435 ML16071A4412016-03-0707 March 2016 Entergy Fleet Relief Request No. RR-EN-15-1-Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-789-1 - E-mail from G.Davant to R.Guzman - Response to Second RAI (MF6340 - MF6349) PNP 2016-016, Reply to Request for Information EA-16-0112016-03-0303 March 2016 Reply to Request for Information EA-16-011 CNRO-2016-00005, Response to Request for Additional Information Pertaining to a Change to the Entergy Quality Assurance Program Manual (QAPM)2016-02-25025 February 2016 Response to Request for Additional Information Pertaining to a Change to the Entergy Quality Assurance Program Manual (QAPM) CNRO-2016-00002, Entergy - Relief Request Number RR EN-15-1, Rev. 1 - Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-789-1, Alternative Requirements for Pad Reinforcement of Class 2 and 3 Moderate Energy Carbon Steel Piping for Raw Water Service, Secti2016-01-29029 January 2016 Entergy - Relief Request Number RR EN-15-1, Rev. 1 - Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-789-1, Alternative Requirements for Pad Reinforcement of Class 2 and 3 Moderate Energy Carbon Steel Piping for Raw Water Service, Section Xl, CNRO-2015-00002, Entergy Operations, Inc. - Response to RAI Questions and Submittal of RR EN-15-2, Rev. 12015-12-0404 December 2015 Entergy Operations, Inc. - Response to RAI Questions and Submittal of RR EN-15-2, Rev. 1 PNP 2015-069, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request No. RR 5-22015-09-0909 September 2015 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request No. RR 5-2 PNP 2015-063, Supplemental Information for the Response to the First Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Implement 10 CFR 50.61a2015-08-14014 August 2015 Supplemental Information for the Response to the First Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Implement 10 CFR 50.61a PNP 2015-059, Response to Request for Supplemental Information for Relief Request Number RR 4-2 - Proposed Alternative, Use of Alternate ASME Code Case N-770-1 Baseline Examination2015-07-31031 July 2015 Response to Request for Supplemental Information for Relief Request Number RR 4-2 - Proposed Alternative, Use of Alternate ASME Code Case N-770-1 Baseline Examination ML18344A4421993-11-30030 November 1993 Reply to NRC Request for Information Regarding the Pressurizer Safe End Crack Critical Flaw Size and Margin to Failure Analysis. Response to Items 10 and 11 of the Nrc'S October 8, 1993 Information Request ML18346A2931993-09-22022 September 1993 CPC Letter of 7/6/1993, Responding to Inspection Report 93010 & Subsequent Conference Call of 7/22/1993, Letter Submit Supplemental Information to Inspection Report within 60 Days ML18344A2651993-08-16016 August 1993 Response to Request for Additional Information Recent Fuel Failure Event ML18354A6531990-05-30030 May 1990 Information Required by the November 9, 1989 Technical Evaluation Report - NUREG 0737, Item Ii.D.L, Performance Testing of Relief and Safety Valves, Palisades Plant to Close Items Not Fully Resolved ML18354A6151988-01-15015 January 1988 Updated Response to IE Bulletin 87-03 Dated 11/15/1985, Entitled, Motor-Operated Valve Common Mode Failures During Plant Transients Due to Improper Switch Settings ML18348A8881979-05-15015 May 1979 Rapid Response to Additional Information Request on Three Mile Island ML18348A3721978-07-0707 July 1978 Provide Additional Information Related to Diesel Generators Control Circulatory, as Requested ML18348A3741978-07-0606 July 1978 Provide Requested Information of Additional Analysis Specific to Determine Consequences of Potential Boron Dilution Incidents ML18348A7441978-05-23023 May 1978 Response to Request for Additional Information Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance ML18346A1121978-01-24024 January 1978 Response to Request for Additional Information Relating to Water Hammer in Feed-Water Lines and Feed-Water Spargers ML18353B1571977-12-22022 December 1977 Response to Request for Specific Information Re Potential Problem of Post-LOCA Ph Control of Containment Sump Water of IE Bulletin 77-04 ML18347A1711977-09-26026 September 1977 Additional Information Relating to Power Increase Request ML18348A3961977-07-29029 July 1977 Response to Request for Specific Information Concerning Reactor Vessel Materials & Associated Surveillance Programs ML18348A4151977-07-12012 July 1977 Response to Request for Additional Information Re IE Bulletin 77-01, Relating to Use of Pneumatic Time Delay Relays in Safety-Related Systems ML18348A6911977-05-16016 May 1977 Response to Request for Additional Information Alarm and Diesel Generator Control Circuitry ML18348A6921977-05-12012 May 1977 Response to Request for Additional Information Proposed Emergency Dose Assessment System ML18348A8521977-05-0404 May 1977 Advising Exxon Concluded Three of Six Documents Do Not Contain Proprietary Information, Which Was Identified by AEC Letter of 3/1/1977, & Forwarding Affidavit as Additional Information Re Proprietary Documents ML18348A7051977-03-23023 March 1977 Response to Request for Additional Information Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment and the Effects of Its Submergence ML18348A8681977-03-0808 March 1977 Letter Reactor Vessel Overpressurization 2024-07-24
[Table view] |
Text
/
consumers
- Power company General Offices: 212 West Michigan Avenu_e, Jackson, Michl JRegufa1ory Docket File July 20, 1976 Director of Nuclear Reactor Att: Mr Albert Schwencer Operating Reactor Branch No 1 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255, LICENSE DPR-20 PALISADES PLANT, MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVES In your letter dated May 6, 1975, you requested additional information regarding the design of the Palisades main steam isolation valves. Specifically, you re-quested a summary of the analyses employed to confirm the integrity of the main steam isolation valves under the dynamic loads associated with the postulated steam line breaks.
- We previously reported preliminary results of our analyses of a main steam iso-lation valve for these conditions in our letters to you dated October 29, 1975 and June 9, 1976. These preliminary results indicated that the valve would per-form satisfactorily under these conditions. The purpose of this letter is to submit the final results of our analyses to you as you requested ..
These analyses and their results are described in Attachments 1 and 2.
Attachment 1 summarizes the detailed fluid-dynamic and valve closing tran-sient analysis which was performed to obtain the dynamic loading conditions on the valve disc during the transient. The results of the analysis are included therein.
Attachment 2 summarizes the structural analyses which were performed of the critical structural elements for the dynamic loading conditions prior to, during, and after impact of the disc on the valve seat. The results of the analyses are compared to the acceptance criteria.
The results of these analyses confirm that a main steam isolation valve would perform satisfactorily under the postulated steam lirie break conditions. It was found that the shaft, arm, and disc post can properly support the disc throughout the transient and the disc can absorb the closing impact energy through plastic deformation well within the capability of the material.
Although the valve will perform satisfactorily under the postulated steam line break conditions, we have concluded that a change in valve internalparts (disc
2
- and disc arm) would improve its performance tinder operating and accident condi-tions. These parts have been ordered and are scheduled for installation during the next refueling outage. The valve, as modified with the new parts, will meet the same criteria specified in the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Final Safety Analysis Report, Appendix lOA, .Amendment No 45, dated February 21, 1975.
David A. Bixel Assistant Nuclear Licensing Administrator
MPR ASSOCIATES. INC. Attachment 1
I. INTRODUCTION In the event of a postulated main steam Iine rupture, the main steam isolation valve at the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant would undergo a severe transient due to impact of the valve disc onto the valve seat as the valve closes to isolate its associated steam generator. An analysis was performed to determine the steam pressure and the angular velocity attained by the disc at impact as a result of the postulated accident. The
- results of this analysis are described herein. A complete report of the C!,nalysis including computer printouts is contained in Reference 1. The pressure and impact velocity obtained from this analysis will be used in the structural analysis bf the disc and valve body to determine if the valve can perform its function properly under the dynamic loads as so-ciated. with a postulated steam line break.
The method of analysis uses a control volume approach to solve the mass, energy, and momentum equations throughout the appropriate region of
. the main steam piping. The' valve internals are modeled with sufficient detail to allow a good representation of the torque on the valve disc using the solution from the mass, energy, and momentum conservation equa-
- tions. Effects of the changing disc position on the flow areas and volumes
r-*
- .in the valve are consl.dered in the analysis
- A description of the transient c,~nsidered and the corresponding results of the analysis are provided in Section II below. A short description of the computer program used in the analysis including the model used for the valve and the associated steam line piping is described in Section III.
II. TRANSIENT ANALYZED AND RESULTS A schematic of the main steam line piping is provided in Figure l.
This figure shows the two main steam isolation valves and their relation to the two steam generators and the two main steam lines. The cross connect between the steam lines is also shown in the figure *
- The function of the main steam isolation valve in the event of a postu-lated steam line break is to close promptly and prevent the blowdown of*
its associated steam generator. Since the safety analyses for the Pali-sades Plant assume that one steam generator cannot be isolated from the b_reak and consequently blows down through the break, the valve which is analyzed for its ability to isolate its associated steam generator is the one in the steam line not experiencing the assumed break. The most severe closing transient for this valve would occur if the break location is near the cross connect between the two steam lines. This break location, therefore, is taken as the design basis break for the valve analysis**
r Since higher steam pressures cause more severe valve closing tran-sients, the design basis pressure used for the analysis was the hot standby condition of 900 psig.
The Palisades main steam isolation valve is held open by pressure from an air cylinder which applies a torque to*the disc. This air pressure is removed by a signal generated when the pressure in the steam generator drops below 500 psig. The analysis described in this report predicts that the restraining torque on the disc will be overpowered by the fluid forces on the disc during the early part of the transient, leading to a valve clo-sure before a signal to trip the valve .is gen.erated. For the sake of con-servatism it is assumed that the valve could trip at any time during the
- transient. To determine the time of trip which would lead to the largest impact velocity a number of computer runs were made, each assuming a different time at which the valve trips. The maximum impact velocity was found to occur whe~ the valve trips at 104 milliseconds after the break occurs. For conservatism, this trip time was assumed as the design basis for the analysis.
The results of the analysis show a maximum disc centerline velocity of
. 5 81 ft I sec and an impact energy of 7. 8 x 10 in-lbs. The pressure up~
- stream of the disc peaks at 905 psia within 3 millisec_onds after impact
- due to steam hammer. The pressure upstream of the disc at impact-is 767 psia *
- Ill . DESCRIPTION AND BASIS OF COMPUTER PROGRAM The motion of the disc in the main steam isolation valve is determined to a large extent by the fluid pressures and flows which exist inside the valve. These pressures and flows are in turn strongly dependent on disc position. Consequently, a solution for the impact velocity attained by the disc as a result of a postulated main steam line break requires a simultaneous solution of the fluid equations which describe the blow-down of the main steam line and the equation of motion of the disc. The calculational technique used achieves such a solution by utilizing a time step approach in which the fluid conditions and disc position are deter-mined alternately during each time step using the mass, energy, and momentum conservation equations for the fluid behavior and the equation of motion for the disc. The basic approach is a modified version of the Flash-4 approach described in Reference 2 where the equation of motion of the disc has been added to the solution and is utilized to redefine the geometry inside the valve during each time step.
A schematic of the computer model used for the simulation of the steam line break is shown in Figure 2. This schematic shows the division of one of t~e two main steam lines into a series of connected control volumes beginning at the steam generator and ending at the turbine stop valves. The location of the break in the eras s connect between the two steam lines is also showna l
The valve internals are modeled by four separate control volumes and*
four fluid connectors so as to provide enough detail to allow an adequate determination of the pressure drop across the disc. A detail of the valve showing the control volwnes and flow paths as modeled in the *pro-gram logic is given in Figure 3. As can be seen in the figure, several of the control volumes and flow areas inside the valve are dependent on the angula+ position of the disc. These volumes and areas, and all parameters dependent on them, are redefined by the computer program
<at each time step so as to take into account the geometry changes due to disc motion.
REFERENCES
- 1. MFR Associates Report, MPR-500, Line Rupture, 11 dated November 1975.
11 Analysis of Disc Impact Velocity for Palisades Main Steam Isolation Valve as a Result of a Main Steam
- 2. Porsching, T. A., Murphy, J. H., Redfield, J. A., and Davis, V. C.,
11 Flash-4; a Fully Implicit Fortran IV Program. for the Digital Simulation of Transients in a Reactor Plant, ' 1 March 1969, WAPD-TM-840 Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory *
\KO~CO**ECT
\
STOP VALVES
~MATIC OF fl1AIN STEAM LINE FIGURE 1
- DETAIL CF MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE -
.- BREAK LOCATION IN
\
. cacss-co:-.:.;:::cT STOP VALVES COMPUTER MODEL OF SYSTEM FIGURE 2
- DETAIL OF VALVE INTERNALS FIGURE 3
e ~
Attachment 2
- ATWOOD & MORRILL CO., INc.
"i!);;;d"GYak~~~~
- 0 ""' G" TELEX: 94-0299 "RS."
PHONE: 617-744-5690 0 ".
POWER PLANT
- MARINE MASSACHUSETTS AND INDUSTRIAL SERVICE 01970 Ju 1y 6, 1976 Consumers Power Company 1945 Parnall Road Jackson, Michigan 49201 Attention: Mr. John Yope
Subject:
Palisades Nuclear Plant Main Steam Isolation Valves Consumers Power P.O. No. 72575 A&M S.O. 13938 Valve Closure Analysis Gentlemen:
A&M is performing an evaluation to confirm the integrity of the main steam isolation valves (MSIV's) at Palisades Nuclear Plant under the dynamic loads
- associated with the steam line break .
Summary of Results and Conclusions The preliminary results are summarized below:
- 1. The kinetic energy at impact is 179000 ft-lb.
2, The maximum equivalent strain in the rim region of the disc is 17%.
This is less than the maximum allowance equivalent strain from Reference 1 of 30%.
- 3. The maximum equivalent strain in the center region of the disc is 10.5%.
This is less than the maximum allowable strain from Reference 1 of 18%.
The evaluation was based upon qualifying the Palisades MS I V's by reference to J M Farley Nuclear Plant FSAR Appendix 10A Amendment No. 45 (Reference 1) and correlating the parameters by means of the methods outlined in TMR Report TR2196 (Reference 2).
The same modifications made to the Farley MSIV's will be incorporated in the Palisades MSIV's. In brief, this involves replacing the present discs with discs of Type 304 stainless steel of a slightly modified configuration and replacing the disc arms with the newer design which allows for greater deflection of the disc center .
- We therefore conclude that the redesigned discs and disc arms for the Palisades MSIV's meet the criteria specified in Reference 1 and the discs will withstand the impact due to the pipe break.
Consumers Power Cu119,y July 6~ 1976
- 1. Design Closing Transient The design closing transient conditions were calculated by MPR Associates, Inc. That calculation used a computer model of the fluid dynamics and valve mechanics to obtain the transient pressures, flows, accelerations, and velocities resulting from the postulated main steam line break. The predicted closing velocity of the disc centerline at the time of impact on the seat is 120 feet per second. This value is used in the structural evaluation of the disc and seat upon impact.
- 2. Structural Analysis The disc centerline velocity was converted to an 11 Equivalent Translational Velocity 11 which is the velocity obtained by equating rotational kinetic energy of impact to translational kinetic energy by lw2 = MVeg2 2g 2g where I is the moment of inertia of the disc assembly, /A.I is the rotational velocity, M is the mass of the disc assembly, g is th~ gravitational constant and Veg is the equivalent translational velocity.
The kinetic energy of the disc assembly is then solved for by
- = KE where KE is the maximum kinetic energy of the rotating system, and Md is the mass of the disc.
The kinetic energy was normalized with respect to disc volume to yield the energy density from e = KE v
where e is the energy density and V is the disc volume.
Because of the geometric similarity between the valves and the Farley valve, the structural evaluation was performed by comparing the impact energies of Palisades with that of Farley. The method is presented in Reference 2. The.
equivalent strain is found from the Farley analysis by plotting the equivalent strain in critical locations versus the energy absorbed by the Farley valve
- Consumers Power C~ 9y July 6, 1976 The formal report covering the above is due to be completed in early August, If you have any questions regardtng any of the above, please contact me or Paul Syrakos .
Very truly yours, ATWOOD & MORRILL CO,, INC, RAG:aa Robert A. Genier Manager, Project Management Dept.
cc: P. A. Syrakos References
- 1. Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Final Safety Analysis Report Appendix 10A Amendment No. 45 dated 2/21/75.
- 2. Teledyne Materials Research Technical Report, TR-2196, Further Inter-pretation of Farley Isolation Valve Closure Analysis" dated November 5, 1975 .