ML18283B694
| ML18283B694 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1976 |
| From: | Tennessee Valley Authority |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RH-77-2-BF2 | |
| Download: ML18283B694 (44) | |
Text
RH-77-2-BF2 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITYLEVELS BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT 1976 APRIL 1976
f, I
Cl w
CONTENTS Introduction Figure 1 Tennessee Valley Region Table 1
Environmental Radioactivity Sampling Schedule 3
4 Atmospheric Monitoring.
Figure 2
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Atmospheric and Terrestrial Monitoring Network.
Detection Capabilities for Environmental Sample Analysis Maximum Permissible Concentrations for Nonoccupational Exposure.
Radioactivity in Air Radioactivity in Rain Radioactivity in Heavy Particle Fallout Radioactivity in Charcoal Filters 9
10ll 12 13 Terrestrial Monitoring.
4
~
~
15 Figure 3 Table 8
Table 9
Table 10 Table ll-Table 12 Table. 13 Table 14 Table 15 Milk Monitoring Network Radioactivity in Milk Radioactivity in Vegetation Radioactivity in Soil Radioactivity in Well Water Radioactivity in Public Water Supply Environmental Gamma Radiation Levels Radioactivity in Food Crops Radioactivity in Poultry
~
~
~
~
16 18 19 20 21 22 23
. 24 26 Reservoir Monitoring 27 Table 16 Figure 4
Table 17 Table 18 Table 19 Table 20 Table 21 Table 22 Table 23 Table 24 Table 25 Sampling Schedule Reservoir Monitoring.
Reservoir Monitoring Network.
Radioactivity in Reservoir Water (Dissolved)
Radioactivity in Reservoir Water (Total)
Radioactivity in Fish (White Crappie, Flesh)
Radioactivity in Fish (Smallmouth Buffalo, Flesh)
Radioactivity in Fish (Smallmouth Buffalo, Whole)
Radioactivity in Plankton Radioactivity in Sediment Radioactivity in Clam Flesh Radioactivity in Clam Shell 29 30 31 32 33 34
. 35 36 37 38 39 Quality Control Data Analysis Conclusions 41 41
S l>>
II
\\
I V
g
\\
p l
~,
,t t
1
~
I I
,ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITYLEVELS BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT 1976 Introduction The Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFNP), operated by the Tennessee
,Valley Authority, is located on a site owned by TVA containing 840 acres of land in Limestone County, Alabama, bounded on the west and south by Wheeler Reservoir (see figure 1).
The site is 10 miles southwest of Athens,
The plant consists of three boiling water reactors; each unit is rated at 3,293 MWt and 1,098 MWe.
Unit 1 achieved criticality on August 17, 1973, and began commercial operation on August 1, 1974.
Unit 2 began commercial operation on March 1, 1975.
How-
- ever, a fire in the cable trays on March 22, 1975 forced the shutdown of both reactors.
Units 1 and 2 resumed operation and Unit 3 began testing in August 1576.
Unit 3 began commercial operation in January 1977.
The preoperational environmental monitoring program established a baseline of data on the distribution of natural and manmade radioactivity in the environment near the plant site.
However, seasonal,
- yearly, and random variations in the data were observed.
In order to determine the potential increases in environmental radioactivity levels caused by the
- plant, comparisons were made between data for indicator stations (those near the plant) and control stations (those remote from the plant).
Field staffs in the Division of Environmental Planning and the Division of Forestry, Fisheries, and Wildlife Development carried out the sampling program outlined in tables 1 and 16.
The updated Environmental Technical Specifications issued in July 1976 contained a revised environ-mental radiological monitoring program.
This program is indicated by the items enclosed in parentheses in Table 1.
The samples shown in Table 16 were collected quarterly prior to July 1976 and semiannually thereafter.
Sampling locations are sho~n in figures 2>',
and 4.
All the radiochemical and instrumental analyses were conducted in a central laboratory at Muscle
- Shoals, Alabama.
Alpha and beta analyses were performed on.Beckman Low Beta II and Beckman Wide Beta II low background proportional counters.
Two Nuclear Data Model 2200 multichannel analyzer'systems were used to analyze the samples for specific gamma-emitting radionuclides.
Data were coded and punched on IBM cards or automatically printed on paper tape for computer processing specific to the analysis conducted.
An IBM 370 Model 165 computer, employing an Alpha-M least squares
- code, was used to solve multimatrix pro-blems associated with estimating the activities of the gamma-emitting nuclides.
'I f
, It
.A primary difficulty in sample analysis is the detection of very low ra'dionuclide concentrations.
The detection capabilities for environ-mental'ample analysis given as the nominal lower'imits of detection (LLD)~
are 'listed in table 2.
h Samples analyzed by gamma spectral analysis were analyzed for,the 13 specific gamma-emitting radionuclides listed in table 2.
For each sample type, only the radionuclides for which values greater than the 'LLD were
'ep'o'rt'ed are listed in the tables.
4 Ilf'I'Ifh,t h
I h
LOVISVLLE TENNESSEE VALLEY REGION i I
N D.
'c I
L L.
/"
PAOUCAH M
0.
.5' I
+p.
(
('ACKSON+
(
V A
SOWUNG GREEN E
//
I MEMPHIS
\\ ir 8NP NP
+HUNTSVILLE rrcrls
/
o
/
lg I
A L
A B
A M
A LEGEND
~-HARTSVILLENUCLEAR PLANT
~- PHIPPS BEND NUCLEAR PLANT QRP-LIOU1D METALFAST BREEDER REACTOR
~-WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT
~- SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT
- BELLEFONTE NUCLEAR PLANT
- BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT
~- YELLOWCREEK NUCLEAR PLANT M
I SS.
G EORG I
A r
~
~
(TVA NUCLEAR PLANT SITES)
ENSSORO K
E N
T U
C K
Y r Lr r
V ~
l
~.M r
..J r
~.M
à PAIN r
r
~ 4
/
/<~~
g
-=L'~/-)
L.r ASHVILL OAK RIOGEP
(
N N
/
//
r~
/
(xr
(
J
(
~N J
/
I
/ rJ rJ CHATTANOOGA' TW]
I v
n J r'
C A
R.
MUSCLE
Table 1
'!iVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITYSAMPLING SCHEDULE Air Charcoal Rain-Heavy Particle River Well Public Aquatic Life Senti iocat'. n Farcer Filter neer tello t Soil Ve~etacton Milk ilacer Crater kac r and d din nt Muscle Shoals i'(W)
W(W)
M(M)
M(M)
Q(A)
Q
- " -'M(M)
Lavre'nceburg, W(W)
W(W)
M(M)
=.
'.M(M) -.
Q(A)
Q Fayettevi lie...
~
W Wl Ml 1 1 Rogersville W(W)
W(W)
M(M)
M(M)
Q(A)
~
1 Athens Decatur W(W)
W(W)
~
M(M)
M(M)
Q(A)'(W)
W(W)
M(M)
M(M)
Q(A)
M(M)
Courtland.
W(W)
W(W)
M(M)
M(M)
Q(A)
Site h"'-I W(W)
W(W)
M(M)
M(M)
Q(A)
Site N-2 W(W)
W(W)
M(M)
M(M)
Q(A)
Q Site NE-3 Site 'NW-de W(W)
W(W)
M(M)
M(M)
Q(A)
Q W (W)
W (W)
M(M)
M(M)
Q(A)
Q Site WSW-5 (W)
(W)
(M)
(M)
Farm -8 Farm 8i Farm. il Farrm T-Farm L Control Farms Onsite Well Wheeler Dam
'lk River Tt nnessek River ChamPion PaPer Co.
Various Local Communities M(Q)
~
W(W)
M M(Q)
W (W)
M M(Q)
W (W)
M (M)
M(Q)
W (W)
M M(Q)
W (W)
M M(Q)
W(W)
M (M) 1, i'M (M)Q M (M)
M (M) a
'r
'Q(S)
W - Weekly M - Monthly Q - Quarterly S-Semiannually A-Annually Omitted after July 1976 1
ATMOSPHERIC MONITORING The atmospheric monitoring network is divided into three groups.
Four, local air monitors are located on or adjacent to the plant site in the quadrants of greatest'wind frequency.
One addi-tional station is located at the point of maximum predicted off-site concentration of radionuclides.
Four perimeter'air monitors are located at distances out to 10 miles from the plant, and two remote air monitors are located at distances out to 45 miles.
These monitoring stations are shown in figure 2.
The remote monitors are used as control or baseline stations.
At each monitor, air is con-tinuously pulled through a Hollingsworth and Voss HV-70 particulate filter at a regulated flow of 3 ft /min.
In series with, but down-stream of, the particulate filter is a charcoal filter used to collect iodine.
Each monitor has a collection tray and storage container to obtain rainwater on a continuous basis and a horizontal platform that is covered with gummed acetate to catch and hold heavy particle fallout.
Thermoluminescent dosimeters are used to record gamma radiation levels at each remote and perimeter station.
Each of the local air monitors is fitted with a GM tube that continuously scans the particulate filter. The'isintegration rate of the atmospheric radioactivity is continuously recorded at each'station and radiotelemetered into the plant.
These stations will detect any significant airborne release from BFNP.
Air filters are collected weekly and analyzed for gross beta activity.
No analyses are performed until 3 days after sample collec-tion.
The samples are composited monthly for analysis of specific gamma-emitting radionuclides and quarterly for Sr, Sr analysis.
89 90 The results are combined for each station to obtain a annual average.
These data are presented in table 4.
With reference to table 3, which contains the maximum permissible concentrations (MPC) recommended by 10 CFR 20 for nonoc-cupational exposure, it is seen that the maximum beta concentration is 0.51 percent MPC.
Rainwater is collected and analyzed for gross beta activity, specific gamma-emitting isotopes, and radiostrontium.
For the gross beta
- analysis, a maximum of, 500 ml of the sample is boiled to dryness and counted.
A gamma scan is performed on a 3.5-liter monthly sample and the strontium isotopes are separated chemically and counted in a low background system.
The results are shown in table 5.
The
, highest value reported for beta activity is 3.8 percent MPC for drinking water.
Gross beta and strontium analyses are not routinely performed under the revised monitoring program but may be done if the gamma scan indicates a need.
The gummed acetate that is used to collect heavy particle fallout is changed monthly.
The sample is ashed and counted for gross beta activity.
The results are given in table 6.
Charcoal filters are collected and analyzed for radioiodine.
The filter is counted in a single channel analyzer system.
The data are shown in table 7, where the highest value reported is 0.09 percent MPC. for I.
Figure 2
ATMOSPMERIC AND TERRESTRIAL MONITORING NETWORK RM.28F LAWRENCEBURG
+PULASKI FAYETTEVILLE~0 RM-38F WILSON FLORENCE PM-IBF WHEELER
'ROGEPSVIL DAM ATHENS PM-28F FFIEL MUSCLE SHOALS RM-IBF LEIGHTON TUSCUMBIA COURTLAND
, PM"4 F pRUSSELLVILLE BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PL NT OECAT PM-38F 0 IO MILES HARTSELLE HUNTSVILLE GUNT SVIL OAM HALEYVILLE RM-SBF CULLMAN 45 MILES RAINWATER SOIL 0- ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING STATION NOTE-'HE FOLLOWING SAMPLES ARE COLLECTED FROM EACH STATION:
AIR PARTICULATES RADIOIODINE HEAVY PARTjCLE FALLOUT
e
, Table 2
E CTIOV C NOMINAL LOWER LIMITOF DETECTION (LLD)
Air Vegetation Soil and Fish Particulates Charcoal Fallout Water "and grain Sediment pCi/gm Clam Flesh
~ci/ee
~ci/er ocr/Kae dC//i deci/ ~ed
~ci/ ~d drl
/~cd/ ~d Food.(Tomatoes, Clam Shells
- Potatoes, etc.)
Meat and Plankton Milk Poultry
~r/ o dr cCi/1
. ~Ct/R er Total e Gross cl Gross 8
'H 1 ac Gee 5lC
- 1 311*
- 0. 005
- 0. 01 0.03
- 0. 07
- 0. 01 2.0 0,05
- 2. 3 330 30 60 15
.01
.05 0.2
.55
- l. 10
.35
.35 0.7 0.35 0.60 0.20 0.1 0.1 O.l 0.1
- 0. 30
- 0. 55 0.15 0.7
- 0. 7
- 0. 35 0.60 0.20 1.5 25 38 75 19 0.1 0;1
~
e
- r~
re 25 90 200 50 1311 105R
- 13cC
- 137C *
- 0. 04
- 0. 01
- 0. 01 53Coe 5 Mn*
c52ne coCoe cOR*
"48a-La*
"Sr 50Sr
- 0. 02
'.02
- 0. 02
- 0. 01
- 0. 10
- 0. 02
- 0. 005
- 0. 001 Zr-Nb*
0, 01
- 0. 01.
10 10 10 15 10 15 10 100 15 10
,20
.20
.20
.23
.20
.25
.17
- 2. 50
.68
.25
.05 30
.65 0.45 0.50
- 0. 12
- 0. 12
- 0. 12 0.12
- 0. 12
- 0. 12
- 0. 20
- 0. 18 0.15 0.13 0.23 0.20
- 0. 11 -
- 0. 10.
- 0. 90 1.40
- 0. 15 0.48 0.3 0.1 0.1 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.45 0.12 0.12 0.12
- 0. 20 0.15 0.23
- 0. 11 0.90 0.15 5.0 1.0 38 13 13 13 19 13 19 13 125 19 40 8
~ r e
e tc 1
0.5 0.1 0.5 10 150 40 40 40 55 40 70 30 400 15
150 10 40-2 8
- These measurements are perfomed by gamma spectroscopy.
The LLD values are calculated by the method of Pasternack and Harley as discussed in HASL-300-The original method was published in Nucl. Instr. Methods 91, 533-40 (1971).
These LLD values are expected to vary depending on the activities of components in the samples.
These figures vill be rarely> if ever, attainable.
Water is counted in a 3.5 liter Marinelli beaker.
Vegetation and fish are counted in a 1-pint container as=dry weight.
Meat and poultry are counted in a 1-pint container as-dry veight, then corrected to vet veight using an average moisture content of 70X.
Average dry weight is 250 grams.
Air particulate filters are counted in a veil crystal.
The counting system consists of a multichannel analyzer and either a 4" x 4" solid NaI crystal, or a 4" x 5" NaI veil crystal.
The counting time is 4,000!seconds.
All calculations are perfomed by the least-squares computer program ALpHA-M.
The assumption is made that all samples are analyzed vithin one veek of 'the collection date.
Table 3
MAXIMUMPERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATIONS FOR NONOCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE AlP110 Nonvolatile 'beta Tiitium 137C 103$ 106R 14%C "Zr-"Nb I 1%0B I WOLa 131I Zn II
'"Mn 60Co 89Sr "Sr "Cr 134C ssG In Water
~Cf/1 30 3,000 3,000,000 20,000 10,000
'0,000 60,000 20,000.
300 100$ 000 1000000 30,000, 3,000 300 2,000,000 9,000
/
90,000 In Air
$Ci/m 100 200,000 500 200 200 10000 1,000 100
'25000 11000
, 300 300 30 80$ 000 400 2,000
TABLE 4 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORINC SUaaRY RADIOACTIVITYIN AIR ca NARK OF FACILITY MCATION OF FACILITY BROWNS FERRY LIMESTONE AIABAfh DOCKET NO.
RH-77-4-BF2 REPORTIhC PERIOD 76 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT TYPE AND TOTAL NUMBER OF ANALYSIS PERFORMED Lfyd"R LIMIT OF DETECTION
~llD ALL CONTROL Nl"GER OF INDICATOR ACTIONS ICATION WITH HICHEM RiNUAL MEAN LOCATION)
NONROUTISE MEAN (F)
NAME MEAN (F(
MEAN (F(
REPORTED RANCE DISTANCE AKD DIRECTION RANCE RANCE MEASURE~T TN
.Ol(1/26)
.01.01
.09(25/25)
.02 -.31
~ 01(7/52)
.01 -..02 05(156/156)
,.01 -.24 REMOTE - FAYETTEVILLE
- 0. 005 AIR PCI/M(3)
CROSS ALPHA 78 CROSS BETA 588 Ch)Ofh SCAN 147 CE-141>144 0.01
.05(430/432)
.01 -.51 LOCAL - DAVIS FARM 2.5 MILES WSW
.04(18/99)
.03 -.06 0.02
.03(13/99)
.02 -.05 RU-1031106
.06(2/99)
.06 -.06 CS 134
.02(3/99)
.01 -.03 ZR-95,NB-95
.02(14/99)
.01 -.04 CR-51
.10(5/99)
.08 -.15 ZN-65 0.02
.02(l/99)
.02 -.02 I-131 0.01
'.06(28/99)
.01 -.27 SR-89 46 0'005
'01 7 34)
.01 -.01 a.
Noainal Lover Liait of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable aeasureaencs only.'raction BA-140,IA-140 0.04
- 0. 01 0.01 0.07
. 06(1/12)
.06 -.06
.04(3/12)
.02
.05
.06(1/12)
.06 -.06
.03(1/12)
.03 -.03
.03(2/12)
.03 -.03
.15(1/12)
.15 -.15
.02(1/12)
.02 -.02
..12(1/12)
.12 -.12
.01(1/12)
.01 -.01
.04(3/48)
.03 -.05
.05(Z/48)
.05 -.05 LOCAL - NORTHWEST 1.0 MILE N PERI - ROCERSVILLE AL 13.8 MILES NW LOCAL NORTH 0.9 MILES NNE PERI - ATHENS 10.9 MILES NE PERI - DECATUR 8.2 MILES SSE PERI - ATHENS 10.9 MILES NE
.01(2/48)
.01 -.01
.10(2/48)
.08 -.13
<LLD LOCAL LN-4BF 1.7 MILES RiÃ
. 06(4/48)
.02 -'.16
.01(2/12)
.01 -.01 PERI - ATHENS 10.9 MILES NE LOCAL NORTHWEST I~ 0 MILE N of dececcable aeasureaents of specified locacions is indicated in parencheses (F).
TABLE 5 ENVIROMNTALMONITORINC
SUMMARY
NANE OP FACILITY LOCATION OF FACILITY RADIOACTIVITYIN RAIN BROWNS PERRY LIMESTONE ALABA'.%
DOCKET Ã0.
RR-77-4-BF2 REPORTINC PERIOD 76 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT TYPE hÃ)
TOTAL NUMBER OF ANALYSIS PERFORMED LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION
~l>>
ALL INDICATOR LOPTIOÃS MEAN (F(
RANCE UCATIOÃ WITH NIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN CONIROL KUHBER OF NAHE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANCE RANCE HEASURBKÃT RAIN PCI/L CROSS BETh 125 CAR(A SCAN 136
- 2. 3 17.21(56/103) 2.50-114.99 LOCAL DAVIS PAIN 2.5 MILES WSW 33.05( 3/
5) 18.73(10/
22) 7.14-79.77 2.43-65 F 00 BA-140,LA 140 15.0 CO-60
- 10. 0 RU-103>106 CS-134
- 30. 0 10.0.
CR-51 60.0 ZN-65
- 15. 0 I-131 15.0 SR-89 124 SR 90 125 10.0.
2.0 ZR-95,NB 95 10>0 37.06(25/100) 15.19-93.56 14.26( I/100) 14.26-14.26 73.31(12/100) 30.80-123.28 12.47( I/100) 12.47-12.47 18.37( 4/100) 12 '1-21.64 72.34( 4/100) 61.09-90.38 18.76( 3/100) 16.68 21.00 44.45(13/100) 23.78-64.83 24.39( 9/102) 16.77-35.00 5.79( 3/103) 2.20-11.68 LOCAL - NORTH 0.9 MILES NNE PERI COURTIAND AL 10.5 HILES WSW LOCAL - NORIH 0.9 MILE KNE LOCAL - DAVIS PARM 2.5 MILES WSW LOCAL - NORTHEAST 1.0 NILE NE PERI - DECATUR AL 8.2 MILES SSE LOCAL - DAVIS FARH 1.7 MILES WSW PERI - COURTIAÃD AL 10.5 HILES WSW PERI - ATHENS AL 10.9 MILES NE PERI - DECATUR AL 8.2 MILES SSE 25.11( 8/ 36) 15.22-36.33
<LLD 65.86( 2/ 36) 31 F 88-99.84 12.19( 2/ 36) 10.36-14.02
<LLD 69.08( 2/ 36) 63.92-74.23 1'7( 2/ 36) 15.01-15.73 46.25( 5/ 36) 15.43-62.19
<LLD 45.53( 2/ 22)
- 43. 16-47. 89 40.46( 6/ 12) 18.72-87.22 14.26( I/ 12) 14.26-14.Z6 77.84( 2/ 12) 32.40-123.28 12.47( I/12) 12.47-12.47 21.64( I/ 12) 21.64-21.64 90.38( 1/12) 90.38-90.38 21.00( I/ 12) 21.00 21.00 64.83( 1/12) 64.83-64.83 35.00(
1/ ll) 35.00-35.00 11.68( I/ 11) 11.68-11.68 a.
Noninal Lover Linit of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
Mean and range based upon detectable neasurenents only.
Praction of detectable neasurenents of specified locations is indicated in parentbeses (F)
TABLE 6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Sb.VARY RADIOACTIVITYIN HEAVY PARTICLE FALLOUT NAME OF FACILITY LOCATION OF FACILITY BROWNS PERRY LIMESTONE ALABAMA DOCKET NO.
RH-77-4-BF2 REPORTING PERIOD 76 TYPE AND MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER SAMPLED OP ANALYSIS UNIT OF MEASUREMENT PERFORMED
!OWER LIMIT OP DETECTION
~LLD lOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN ALL MEAN (F(
RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANCE CONTROL MUSER OF LOCATION)
NONROUTIBE MEAN (F)
REPORTED RANGE MEASURE HEAVY PARTICLE PALLOUT MCI/SO. KM GROSS BETA 138
.05 1.07(113/114)
.09 - 13.86 PERI - ATHENS AL 10.9 MILES NE 1.45(12/12) 1.08(24/24)
.12-13.86
.08-10.94 a.
Noninal Lover Linit of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable neasurenents onlF.
Praction of detectable neasurenents of specified locations is indicated in parentheses (P)
TABLE 7 ENVIROh KiTALMONITORIÃC SUNDRY
" RADIOACTIVITY IN CHARCOAL FILTERS
~ NAME OF FACILITY MCATION OF FACILITY BROWNS FERRY LIMESTONE ALABAMA DOCKET NO.
RH-77-4 BF2 REPORTINC PERIOD 76 TYPE AND MEDIUM OR 'PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER SAMPLED
, OF ANALYSIS UNIT. OP MEASUREMENT PERFORMED LOWER I.EMIT OF DETECTION
~lLD ALL IhDICATOR LOPTIONS MEAN (F(
1OCATION WITH RICHEST ANNUAL MEAN NAME MEAN (F)
DISTANCE AhD DIRECTION RANCE COÃIROL NUMBER OF 10CATION)
NONROUTIhV.
MEAN (F)
REPORTED RAÃCE MEASURBKhT CHARCOAL PILTERS PCI /M(3)
IODINE AIR 588
.01
.02(71/432)
F 01 -
F 09 PERI - DECATUR 8 ~ 2 MILES SSE
.03( 6/52)
. 01
~ 07
.03(22/156)
.01 -.06 a.
Noninal Lover Linit of Detection (LLD) as described in'Table 2.
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable neasurenents only.
Praction of detectable measurenents of specified locations is indicated in parentheses (P).
15 Terrestrial Monitorin Mi.lk Milk is collected from five farms within a 10-mile radius of the plant (see fi~ure 3),
and from four control farms.
Raw milk is analyzed weekly for I, and monthly for gamma-emitting isotopes and for radio-strontium The average results for each farm are shown in table 8.
So that any relationship between fallout on pastureland and the presence of radionuclides in milk might be seen',
pasturage is'lso sampled at the farms.
Cow censuses were conducted in June and December 1976. It was determined that there are no dairy farms nearer the plant than the nearest farm being sampled.
Ve e'tation In addition to the pasturage samples mentioned previously, vege-tation samples were collected near each monitoring station in the network to determine possible plant uptake of radioactive materials from the soil or from foliar deposition.
Table 9 gives the results obtained from the laboratory analyses.
In the revised program implemented in July, vegetation is collected at the dairy farms only.
Soil I
Soil samples are collected near each monitoring station in order that any relationship between the amount of radioactive material found in vegetation and that in soil might be established.
The results are given in table '10.
In the revised sampling program soil will be collected annually.
Water Domestic water supplies, obtained from surface streams and wells, narc sampled and analyzed.
Well water is obtained from seven private supplies within a 10-mile radius of the plant.
The results of analyses of well water are shown in table ll and indicate that the maximum beta concentration is 0.30 percent MPC.
Table 12 indicates the results of samples taken, from public water supplies.
The maximum beta concentration is 0.20 percent MPC.
In the revised sampling program a'well downgradient from the plant and the first public water supply downstream from the plant are equipped with automatic water samplers.
Composite samples are analyzed monthly.
Environmental Gamma Radiation Levels Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD's) are placed at nine stations around the plant near the plant boundary and at the perimeter and remote
~\\
II air monitors to determine the gamma exposure rates at these locations.
The TLD's are changed every 3 months.
The quarterly gamma radiation levels determined from these TLD's are given in table 13.
pigutei 3'NILK lOHITORZSC NETWORK Athens us Clement
, School,1 S
Mica 1
Roo
+one, Rlpley; 2.+
Mogg Roid
~dg)dd dd Dry~
C'i do~
ts<ttts'
~ fsffy
- Jones, Crossroods Sy~
~
Q Pg 7,'ntr Fares 1 ~
Fare N
2 ~
Fore B
3 Farm t, 4 ~
Farm V b.
Fare Bf ALA, 20 Scale:
1"'~ 1.5 et]c-i
Poultr and Food Cro s Poultry and food crops raised in the vicinity of Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant and at control locations are sampled as they become avail-able during the growing season.
During this sampling period samples of
- tomatoes, potatoes, corn, green beans,
- peaches, cabbage, and poultry were collected and analyzed for gross beta, specific gamma-emitting radionu-
- clides, Sr, and Sr.
The results are given in tables 14 and 15.
TABLE 8 ENWIROAKNTAL MONITOR INC SU%!ARY RADIOACTIVITYIN MILK NARK OF FACILITY BROWNS FERRY LOCATION OF FACILITY.
LIMESTONE AIABAMA DOCKET M.
RN-77-4-BF2 REPORTILC PERIOD 76 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL HEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OP
'NDICATOR 10pTIONS LOCATION WITH RICHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATI0'Sc Sh%'LED OP ANALYSIS DETECTION HEAN (F)
NAME MEAN (F)
MEAN (F)
UHlt Op IIEISIIREtEÃt PKRPQRIIED
~IM RANCE DISTA'NCE AND DIRECTION RANCE RANCE
Ã1".SK OF NOÃROl aINE REPORTED Y~SURE.'fE.'iT MILK PCI/L IODINE-MILK
.5 448 Chm SCAN 107 3.65( 32/ 255)
.53-12.88 FARM B 7.0 MILES NNW 5.84( 6/ 51) 5.16(20/193)
.70 12.88
.52 27.26 CS-137 SR-89 105 SR-90 105 10.0 10.0 2.0 12'6(9/ 60) 10.1-15.4 15.53( 2/ 59) 11.78-19.28 5.16( 58/ 59) 2.27-10.09 PARH B 7.0 MILES NEW PARM B 7.0 MILES NNW FARM B 7.0 MILES NNW 14.6( I/ 12) 14.6-14.6 11.1( 2/ 47) 10.2-12.0 7.03(11/
11) 4.15-10.09 5.51(38/ 46) 2.02 14.34 19.28( I/ 11) 46.68( 1/ 46) 19.28-19.28 46.68-46.og a.
Noninal Lover Linit of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable neasurenents only.
Praction of detectable neasurenents of specified locations is indicated in parentheses (F).
TABLE 9 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Slk'lMARY RADIOACTIVITYIN VEGETATION NAME OF FACILITY BROWNS FERRY LOCATION OF FACILITY LIMESTONE ALABAMA DOCKET NO ~
RH-77-4-BF2 REPORTING PERIOD 76 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED UNIT OF MEASUREMEhT TYPE AND TOTAL NUMBER OF ANALYSIS P ERFOR.'tED LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION
.~LLD
.. LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL i'KAV ALL NAME MEAN (F(
RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE CONTROL LOCATION)
MEAN (F(
RA'LGE NUHBFR OF NONROUTINE REPORTED MEASL'RBKNT VEGETATION PCI/GM (DRY WEIGHT)
GROSS BETA 107 TOTAL ALPHA 36
.20
.01 32.27(70/70) 5.62-62.57
.05(30/30)
.01 -.19 FARM L 5.75 MILES ENE PERI - ROGERSVILLE AL 13.8 MILES.'iW
- 37. 24(9/9) 33.41(37/37) 7.26-62.57 12.04-63.98
~ 10( 3/ 3)
.03( 6/ 6)
.04 -.19
.02 -.05 GAMMA SCANill CE-141,144 BA-140,LA-140 CO-60 RU-103,106 CS-134 CS-137 ZR-95,NB-95 CO-58 CR-51 ZN-65 I-131
.55
.68
.17
.65
.20
.20
.20
.23
- l. 10
.25
.35 7.85( 5/69) 4 ~ 05-9.98
.95(16/69)
.75-1.35
.20( 3/69)
.18-
.21
- 2. 17(19/69)
.68-4.59
.47( 1/69)
.47 -.47
.22( 1/69)
.22 -.22 8.58( 5/69) 5.54-11.47
.55( 1/69)
.55 -.55 1.90(10/69) 1.16-3.10
.29( 8/69)
.26 -.37 1.00(11/69)
.62-1.59 FARM T 7.0 MILES ENE PERI - ROGERSVILLE AL 13.8 MILES NW LOCAL - DAVIS FARM 2.5 MILES WSW FARM Bl 4.5 MILES ENE LOCAL - DAVIS FARM 2.5 MILES WSW FARM B 7.0 MILES NNW FARM B 7.0 MILES NNW FARM T 7.0 MILES ENE PERI-DECATUR AL 8.2 MILES SSE FARM B 7.0 MILES NNW PERI - ROGERSVILLE AL 13.8 MILES hW 9.98( I/10) 9.98-9.98 1.35( I/ 3) 1.35-1 ~ 35
.21( 1/ 2)
.21 -.21 3.61( 2/10) 3.57-3.64
.47( 1/ 1)
.47 -.47
.22( 1/10)
~ 22
~ 22 11.47( 1/10) 11.47-11.47
.55( 1/10)
.55 -.55 3.10( 1/ 3) 3.10- 3.10
.37( 1/10)
.37 -.37 1.59( 1/ 3) 1.59-1.59
'5.48( 3/42)
- 2. 34-.7. 33
. 1.13(11/42)
.70- 1.95
.19( 4/42)
~ 17 -.22 1.22( 5/42)
.71-1.99
.35( 3/42)
.22 -.59
.21( 1/42)
.21.21 4.61( 3/42) 1.66-5.77
<LLD 1.92( 2/42) 1.32-2.53
.35( 7/42)
.26 -.52 1.00( 6/42)
.67-1.40 SR-90 107 F 05
.36(70/70)
.07-1.26 PERI ROGERSVILLE AL 13.8 MILES iiW
.74( 3/ 3)
.54-1.08
.27(37/37)
.06 -.97 a.
Nominal Lover Limit of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only.
Fraction of detectable measurements of specified locations is indicated in parentheses (F).
TABLE 10 EhVIROhMENTAL MONITORINC SPIRY RADIOACTIVITYIN SOIL NAME OF FACILITY BROUNS FERRY LOCATION OF FACILITY LIMESTONE ALABAMA DOCKET NO.
RH 77 '-BF2 REPORTINC PERIOD 76 MEDIUM OR PATHUAY SAMPLED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT TYPE AND TOTAL NIMER OF ANALYSIS PERFOR~
Uy&R LTMIT OF DETECTIO!I
~tUI ALL INDICATOR LOPTIONS MEAN (F$
IVBCE
Ãh.K DISTANCE AND DIRECTION
~~4 (F)
Rh!CCE IOCATION HITH HIGHEST Ai".O'AL YMN CONTROL NlD(BER OF LOCATION)
ÃONROUTINE MEAN (F)
REPORTED RANCE MEASURE'.KNT SOIL PCI/CN (DRY HEIGHT)
CROSS BETh 36 CANNA SCAM 36 CE-141,144 CS-137
~ 35 12 19.18(26/26) 10.06-25.55 0.80(24/26) 0+48-1.30 0.56(26/26)
Oo20- Ie53 LOCAL - NORTHUEST 1.0 NILE N LOCAL - NORTH 0.9 MILES NNE PERI - ATHENS 10.0 MILES NE 23.60(3/3) 21.92-24.90 1.07(2/2) 0.89-1.25 1.21( 3/ 3)
.89 1.53 18.01(10 10) 14.26 22'6 0.75( 9/10) 0.44- 0.98
- 1. 05(10/10) 0.43-2.15 a.
Noninal Lover Linit of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable neasurenents only.
Fraction of detectable neasurenents of specified locations is indicated in parentheses (P) ~
TABLE 11 EhVIRO!RE!iTALMOÃITORINC
SUMMARY
NA.K OF FACILITY LOCATION OF FACILITY RADIOACTIVITYIÃWELLWATER BROWS FERRY LIMESTONE ALABA.{A DOCKET NO.
RH 77-4-BF2 REPORTINC PERIOD 76 TYPE AND MEDILM OR.PATHWAY TOTAL UMER SAMPLED OF ANALYSIS UNIT OF MEASUREMENT 'ERFORMED LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION
~ILD ALL INDICATOR LOPTIONS MBAÃ (F)
RANCE LOCATION WITH NIGHEST AÃNUAL MFAN NAME MFAÃ (F)
DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANCE CONTROL LOCATION)
HEAÃ (F)
RANGE NUMBER OF SUBROUTINE REPORTED HEASURE~
WELL WATER PCI/L GROSS BETh 115 CAHNA SCAN 115 2i 3 BA-140,LA-140 15.0 2.61( 3/25) 2.33-2.80 18.6 ( 2/25) 16.3-21 0
PARM BI 2.0 HILES NhW PARM BI 2.0 MILES NNW 2.8 (I/12) 2.8-2.8 21.0 (I/12) 21.0-2li0 5.00(27/90) 2.39-9.13 19.0 (I/90)
- 19. 0-19. 0 a.
honinal Lover Linit of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable neasurenents only.
Fraction of detectable neasurenents of specified locations is indicated in parentheses (P).
TABLE 12 ENWIRONMENTAL MONITOR INC SQOlARY RADIOACTIUITY IN PUBLIC 'WATER SUPPLY NAME OF FACILITY BROWNS FERRY LOCATIOll OF FACILITY LIMESTONE ALABAMA DOCKET NO.
RH-77-4-BF2 REPORTING PERIOD 76 MEDIQl OR PATHWAY SAMPLED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT PUBLIC llATER SUPPLT PCI/L TYPE AND TOTAL NUMBER OF A'.lALYSIS PERFORMED GROSS BETA 76 CARR SCAN 76 LOWER LIMIT OF.
DETECTION
~UD
- 2. 30 INDICATOR LOPTIONS MEAN (F)
RANCE 3.34(14/44) 2.36-6.13
~ IDCATILN WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NAME
'HEAN (F DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANCE COLBERT STEAH PIANT AL 6.13( I/ 4) 6.13-6.13 CONTROL LOCATION)
MEAN (F(
RANCE 2.77( 5/32) 2.40 - 3.27 NUMBER OF NONROUTINE REPORTED
..EASIiRET I-131 15.0 CE-141,144
- 30. 0 BA-140)LA-140 15.0 18.73(.2/44) 18.28-19:17 41.83(.1/44) 41.83-41.83 17.58( I/44) 17:$ 8-17;58 TRITIUM 330.0 397.0 (11/44) 76 337. 0-487. 0 CHAMPION PAPER CO TRH 282.6 SHEFFIELD, AL
'. CHAMPIO'l PAPER CO
,TRMi282.6
~ iCHAMPION PAPER CO TRM 282.6 19 F 17( I/12)
<LLD 19.17-19.17 41.83( I/12)
<LLD 41.83-41.83 17'8( I/12)
<LLD
. 17. 58-17.58 i421.0 ( 4/12) 433.9( 7/32) 344.0-487.0 342.0-614.0 a.
Noainal Lover Liait of Deteccioa (LLD) as described in Table 2.
- b.
Mean aad ran8e based upon detectable aeasureaeats only.
Fraction of detectable neasureaeats of specified locations is iadicated in parentheses (P).
23 Table 13 ENVIRONMENTAL GAK1A RADIATION LEVELS uarter Location Environmental Gamma Radiation Levels
/""
~/
January-March 1976 On-Site (9)*
Maximum Minimum Average**
Off-Site (8)
Maximum Minimum Average 0.016
- 0. 012 0.013+-0.002
- 0. 016 0.011
'.013+0.004 35.7 25.7 30.4+5.4 35.9 23.8 27.7+8.8 April-June 1976 On-Site (9)
Maximum Minimum Average Off-Site (8)
Maximum Minimum Average 0.010 0.005 0.006+0.003
- 22. 7 10.9 14.2+7.2
- 0. 009 20.6 0.006 13.2 0 008+0 003 18 6+5 6
July-September 1976 October-December 1976
,. On-Site (9)
Maximum Minimum Average Off-Site (8)
Maximum Minimum Average On-Site (9)
Maximum Minimum Average
- 0. 010
- 0. 007 0.009+0.002
- 21. 6 14.5 19.9+5.0 0.011 23.9 0.005 11.6 0.008+-0.004 17.1-+8.4
- 0. 010
- 22. 1 0.'006 13.9 "0.008+0.003 17.9+6.6 Off-Site (8)
Maximum Minimum Average
- 0. 012
- 0. 004 0.008+0.005
- 26. 3 8.2 17.4+11.6
>>Number of stations (three TLD's at each station)
- Allaverages reported
+26 4
TABLE 14 ENYIRONMENTAL MONITORINC
SUMMARY
RADIOACTIVITYIN FOOD CROPS NAME OF FACILITY LOCATION OF FACILITY BRQ:NS FERRY LIMESTONE ALABAMA DOCKET NO RH 77 4 BF2 REPORTINC PERIOD MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT TYPE AND TOTAL NUMBER OF ANALYSIS PERFORMED LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTI0!s
~l!!!
ALL INDICATOR ~ATIONS MEAN (F(-
RANGE LOCATION WITH HIGHEST AX>GALv~i NAME
'ZA!i (F$
DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANCE CONTROL NUMBER OF LOCATION)
NONROUTINE MEAN (F)
REPORTED RANCE MEASUREMENT TOMATOES PCI/KGM (WET WEIGHT)
PEACHES PCI/KCM (WET WEICHT)
CROSS BETA 2
GROSS BETA 2
TOTAL ALPHA 2
25 25 1.5 514.66(1/1) 514.66-514.66 1648. 71(1/I) 1648.71-1648.78 1648.78(1/I) 1648.78-1648.78 BROWNS FERRY AREA ATHENS 10.0 MlLES NE ATHENS 10.0 MILES NE 514 66(1/I) 1626 31(1/I) 514.66-514.66 1626.31-1626.31 1648 ~ 71(1/I) 1544 ~ 20(1/10).
1648.78-1648.78 1544.20-1544.20 1648 '8(1/I) 1544 '0(1/I) 1648 '8-1648.78 1544.20-1544 '0 CABBACE PCI/KGM (WET WEIGHT)
CROSS BETA 2
TOTAL ALPHA 2
SR 90 2
25 1.5 2397.73(1/I) 2397.73-2397.73 1.70(1/I) 1.7D1.70 15.86(1/1) 15.86-15 F 86 BROWNS FERRY AREA BROWNS FERRY AREA BROWHS FERRY AREA 2397.73(1/I) 2699.66(1/I) 2397.73-2397.73 2699.66 2699.66 1.70(1/I)
<LLD I.70-1. 70 15.86(1/I) 37.05(IYT) 15.86-15.86 37.05-37.05 a.
Noninal Lover Linit of Detection (LLD) as described in,Table 2.
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable neasurenents only.
Fraction of detectable measurenents of specified -locations is indicated in parentheses (F) ~
TABLE 14 (Contd.).
EhVIRONHENTAL MONI'IORING SIRBARY RADIOACTIVITYIN FOOD CROPS NAME OF FACILITY LOCATION OF FACILITY BROWS FERRY LIMESTONE ALABAMA DOCKET NO RH 7 ~ 'F2 REPORTING PERIOD 76 MEDIUM OR PATHHAY SAMPLED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT TYPE AND TDTAL NUMBER OF ANALYSIS PERFORMED LONER LIMIT OF DETECTION
~(LID ALL INDICATOR LOPTIONS MEAN (F)
RANCE LOCA'TION HITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MELV NAME MEAN (F)
DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE CONTROL NUMBER OF LOCATION)
NONROUTINE MEAN (F(
REPORTED RANCE MEASURED"iT POTATOES PCI/CM (HET MEICHT)
CROSS BETA 2
TOTAL ALPHA 2.
25 1.5 3876.56(1/I) 3876.56-3876.56
- 1. 75(1/I) 1.75-1.75 BROWS FERRY AREA BROWS FERRY AREA 3876.56(1/I) 3017 '2(1/1) 3876.56-3876.56 3017.22-3017.22
- 1. 75(1/I)
- 1. 88(1/I)
- 1. 75-1. 75
- 1. 88-1. 88 CREEN BEANS PCI/KCM (NET WEIGHT)
CROSS BETh 25 2
2651. 73(1/I) 2651.73-2651.73 2.25(1/1) 2.25-2.25 22'7(1/I) 1;5 TOTAL ALPHA 2
SR-90 2
TOTAL ALPHA 2
1.5 1.77(1/1) 1.77-1.77 22.47 22.47 CORN PCI/RCM (NET HEIGHT)
CROSS BETA 25 1998.72(1/I) 2 1998.72-1998.72 BROWS FERRY AREA BROWS FERRY AREA BROWS FERRY AREA BROWS FERRY AREA BROWS PERRY AREA 2651.73(1/1) 2651.73-2651.73 2.25(1/I) 2.25 2 25 22.47(1/I) 22.47-22.47 1825.63(1/I) 1825.63-1825.63 2.12(1/I) 2.12-2.12 23.32(1/I) 23.32-23.32 1998.72(1/I) 1750.43(1/I) 1998.72-1998.72 1750.43-1750.43 1.77(1/1)
<LLD
- 1. 77-1. 77 a.
Noninal Lcwer Lijsit of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable neasurenents only.
Fraction of detectable neasurenents of specified locations is indicated in parentbeses (P).
TABLE 15 E!DVIRONMENTALMONITORINC SUGARY RADIOACTIVITYIN POULTRY NAME OF FACILITY BROKNS FERRY LOCATION OF FACILITY LIMESTONE AIABAMA DOCKET NO.
RH-77-'-BF2 REPORTING PERIOD 76 TYPE AND MEDIUM OR PATHUAY-TOTAL NUMBER SAMPLED
~
OF ANALYSIS LDNIT OF YEASUREMENT PERFORMED L04~R LIMIT OF DETECTION
~DDD ALL INDICATOR LOPTIONS MEAN (F(
RANCE LOCATION L'ITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NARK MEAN (F(
DISTANCE AND DIRECD ON RANCE CONTROL NUMBER OF LOCATION(
NOÃROUTINE MEAN (F)
REPORTcD RANCE MEASURET POULTRY PCI/KCM (WET WEIGHT)
CROSS BETh 25 1755.14(1/1) 1755.14-1755.14 ATHENS 10.0 MILES NE 1755. 14(1/I) 2490. 71Q/I) 1755.14-1755.14 2490.71-2490.71 a.
Noninal Lover Linit of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable neasurenents only.
Fraction of detectable neasurenents of specified locations is indicated in parentheses (P).
27 Reservoir Monitorin Samples are collected from the Tennessee River as detailed in table 16.
Samples collected for radiological analysis include plankton from three of these cross sections-and bottom fauna and sediment from four cross sections.
The locations of these cross sections are shown on the accompanying map (figure 4) and conform to sediment ranges established and surveyed by the Data Services
- Branch, TVA.
Water January-June 1976 From five of the seven cross sections a total of 15 water samples were collected quarterly for determination of total and dissolved radio-activity.
The locations and depths for sampling are shown in table 16.
Results are displayed in tables 17 and.18.
Samples from all horizontal locations and depths at each river mile cross section were composited quarterly for tritium analy'sis.
Water samples were also collected monthly at the point of plant discharge to.the Tennessee River and at a point on the Elk River.
These samples are a part of the quality control program.
July-December 1976 Water samples are collected automatically by sequential type sampling devices at three cross sections and composite samples analyzed
. monthly.
Sampling locations are shown in table 16.
Results are displayed in table 18.
Fish Radiological monitoring for fish is accomplished by analysis of composite samples of adult fish taken from each of three contiguous reser-voirsWilson, Wheeler, and Guntersville.
No permanent sampling stations have been established within each reservoir; this reflects-the movement of fish species within reservoirs as determined by TVA data from the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant preoperational monitoring program.
Two,species, white crappie and smallmouth buffalo, are collected representing both commercial and game species.
Sufficient fish are collected in each reservoir to yield 250 to 300 grams oven-dry weight for analytical purposes.
All samples are collected quarterly and analyzed for gamma, gross alpha, gross beta activity, "Sr, and Sr.
The composite samples contain approximately the same quan-tity of flesh from each fish.
For each composite a subsample of material is drawn for counting.
Results are given in tables 19, 20, and 21.
In the revised sampling program implemented in July, fish samples are collected semiannually and analyzed for gamma-emitting radionuclides.
28 Plankton As indicated in table 16, net plankton (all phytoplankton and zooplankton caught with a 100 p mesh net) is collected for radiological analyses at each of three stations by vertical tows with a !-meter net.
At least 50 grams (wet weight) of material is necessary for analytical accuracy.
Collection of this amount will probably be practical only during the period April to September (spring and summer quarters) because of seasonal variability in plankton abundance.
Results are shown in table 22.
In the revised program, plankton samples are collected semi-annually.
Sediment Sediment samples are collected from Ponar dredge hauls made for bottom fauna.
Gamma and gross beta radioactivity and Sr and Sr content 90 are determined quarterly in composite samples collected from each of four stations.
Locations of these stations are shown in table 16.
Results are shown in table 23.
In the revised program, sediment samples are collected semiannually.
Bottom Fauna The flesh and shells of Asiatic clams collected from the cross sections at four stations (table
- 16) are analyzed for gamma and gross beta activity at quarterly intervals.
The Sr and Sr contents are deter-mined on the shells, and on the flesh when sufficient amounts were available.
A 50-gram (wet weight) sample provides sufficient activity for counting.
R'esults are given in tables 24 and 25.
In the revised sampling program, benthic samples. are collected semiannually.
.Table 16 SAMPLING SCHEDULE RESERVOIR MONITORING Biolo ical S
les Water Sam les Tennessee River Mile)
Zooplankton, Chlorophyll, Benthic Fauna+
Sediment~
Fish**
Distance From Left Bank Depths Feet Percent (Meters)-
277.98 283. 94 285. 2 288.78 3600 40 7100 78 1
1, 10 Automatic Sampler***
291.76 293.5 293. 70 295. 87 305.0 307.52 5000 60 7000 84 6800 65 9200 88 4000 44 7500 82 1800 24 2800 37 1
1,
'5 1
1, 5
1, 5
1 1,
5 1
Automatic Sampler~**
Automatic Sampler***
<<Replicate samples
- Gillnet and/or electroshocker will be used for collection.
Samples of fish are collected from Guntersville, Wheeler, and Wilson Reservoirs.
- Collected monthly.
30 Figure 4
R ES ER VOIR MONITORING NETWQR K Elk River WHEELER DAM mile 274.90 mile 277.98 Rogersville 0
mile 29l.76 Athens 0
B.F. NUCLEAR PLANT mile 295.87 ile288.78
>nile 285.94 0
Cour tland raile 295.70 0
Decatur mile 307.52 Scale of Miles 0
TABLE 17 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORINC
SUMMARY
RADIOACTIVITY LN RESERVOIR WATER (DISSOLVED)
NAME OF FACILITY BROWS FERRY DOCKET NO ~
RH-77-4-3F2 LOCATION OF FACILITY LIMESTONE ALABAMA REPORTINC PERIOD 76 TYPE AND MWER LIMIT MEDIIDI OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF SAMPLED
'OF ANALYSIS DETECTION IIEET OT HEREIIREHELE TRRIDRIHD
~LLD ALL IhDICATOR LOPTIONS MEAN (F)
RANGE LOCATION WITH RICHES.
AD.DUAL vEAN NA'K (F)
DISTAhCE AND DIRECTION RANCE CONTROL NUMBER OF LOCATION) iNONROUiihT.
MEAN (F)
REPORTED RANCE MEASURE~T RESERVOIR WATER DIS.
PCI/L CROSS BETA 30 CAINA SCAN 30 2.3 3.0( 8/18) 2.4-3.8 TRM 283.94 4DI 3.8(1/2) 3.8-3.8 2.7( 6/12) 2'-
3.3'A-140, IA-140 CS-134 15.0 15.7( 1/18) 15.7-15.7 10.0 11.2( I/18) 11.2-11.2 TRM 291. 76-60-1 TRM 283.94-78-1 ol. 2(1/2) il. 2-11. 2
<LLD 15.7(1/2) 24.3( I/12) 15.7-15.7 24.3-24.3 a.
Nominal Lover Limit of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only.
Fraction of detectable measure~ence of specified locations is ind(cated in parentheses (F).
TABLE 18 F'iVIROb".KNTALMONITORINC BUIOQRY RADIOACTIVITYIN RESERVOIR WATER (TOTAL)
NAME OF FACILITf BROWNS FERRY LOCATION OF FACILITY LIMESTONE AIABA'.R DOCKET NO.
RH-77-4-BF2 REPORTING PERIOD 76 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT.
TYPE AND TOTAL NUMBER OF ANALYSIS PERFORMED LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION
~IID ALL INDICATOR OPTIONS MEAN (F)
LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NA'K MEAN (F)
DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANCE CONTROL NUMBER OF LOCATION)
NONROUTINE MEAN (F(
REPORTED RANCE MEASURBKÃT RESERVOIR WATER TOT PCI/L CROSS BETh 90 2.3 3.2(35/54) 2.3-5.2 TRM 293. 70-88-5 4.9( I/ 2) 4.9-4.9 3.4(21/36) 2.4 6.4 CJQRA SCAN 90 BA-140,IA-140 15.0 20.1( 5/54) 15.2-32.6 TRM 285.2 20.6( 4/12) 25'( I/36) 15.2-32.6 25.7-25.7 I-131 TRITIUM
- 15. 0 21.8( 2/54)>
17.8-25.8 330.0 405.8(18/42) 70 333 703 TRM 293.70-88 1
TRM 293.7 25.8( I/ 2) 25.8-25.8 443.2( 4/12) 345 - 703 45.8( 2/36) 39.9 51.8 369.0( 2/28) 355 - 383 a.
Noninal Lover Linit of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable neasurenents only.
pracrion of detectable neasurenents of specified locations is indicated in parentheses (P) ~
TABLE 19 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORINC S4.HART RADIOACTIVITYIN FISH (WHITE CRAPPIE, FLESH)
NAME OP PACILITY LOCATION OF FACILITY BROWNS FERRY LIMESTONE ALABAMA DOCKET NO.
RH-77-4-BF2 REPORT INC PERIOD 76 MEDILM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED UNIT OP MEASUREMENT TYPE AND TOTAL h UMBER OF ANALYSIS PERFORMED LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION
~iiO ALL INDICATOR LOPTIONS P~ (F(
RANCE LOCATION WITH HIGHEST AiHHJAL MEAN NAME MEAN (F$
DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANCE CONTROL LOCATION) iHEAN (F$
RANCE NUMBER OF NONROUTINE REPORTED MEASURE~tT WHITE CRAPPIE (FL)
PCI/CM (DRY WEICHT)
CROSS BETA 9
ChKfA SCAN 9
.10
.12
.15 19.1 (6/6) 17.9-20.2
. 17(5/6)
.13-.20
.22(1/6)
.22-.22 WHEELER RESERVOIR TRM 274.9 WILSON RESERVOIR TRM 259.4 WHEELER RESERVOIR TRM 274.9 19.6 (3/3) 18.6-20.2
. 17(3/3)
.14-.20
.22(1/3)
.22
.22 19.4 (3/3) 18.5-20.6
. 18(3/3)
.12-.24
.45(1/3)
.45-.45 a.
Noninal Lover Linit of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable neasurenents only.
Fraction of detectable neasurenents of specified locations is indicated in parentheses (F).
NAME OF FACILITY LOCATION OF FACILITY TABLE 20 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR INC SRQQRY DOC'kET NO. 'H 77 4 BF2 REPORTINC PERIOD 76 RADIOACTIVITY IN FISH (SMALQQUIH BUFFALO, FlESH)
BROWNS FERRY LIMESTONE ALABAMA MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED UNIT OF MEASURE.'TNT TYPE AND TOTAL NL~BER OF ANALYSIS PERFORMED LoWER LIMIT OF DETECTION
~LLD LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN ALL INDICATOR LOPTIONS MEAN (F)
RANCE
~ DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANCE CONTROL LOCATI0'.i)
MEAN (F(
RANCE N'".GER OP NCNROUTINE REPORTED
~~SLRE~T SM.MOUTH BUFF. (FL)
PCI/CM (DRY WEICHT)
CROSS BETA 9
.10 13.0 (6/6) 8.5 - 17.4 "WHEELER RESERVOIR TRM 274.9 15.0 (3/3) 11.4 - 17.4 12.4 (3/3) 9.9 - 16.3 GAMMA SCAN 9
.55
.15
.10 82(1/6) 82 -":82
.72(2/6)
.60 -
.84
.27(1/6)
.27 -
.27 WILSON RESERVOIR TRM 259 ~ 4 WHEELER RESERVOIR TRM 274.9 "WILSON RESERVOIR TRM 259.4
. 82(1/3)
.82 -,.82
.84(1/3)
.84 -
.84
.27(1/3)
.27 -
.27
<LLD
. 30(1/3)
.30 -
.30
<LLD a.
Noninal Lower Linft of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable neasurenents only.
Fraction of detectable neasurenent's of specified locations is indi ate'n parentheses (F) ~
TABLE 21 NA.IE OF FACILITY LOCATION OF FACILITY ENVIRON?lEhTAL MalITORINC SU%(ARY RADIOACTIVITYIN FISH (SMALLMOUIH BUFFALO> MHOLE)
BROMNS FERRY
~
DOCKET ÃO.
RH-77-4-BFZ
\\,IMESTONE ALABAMA REPOR'TlhC PERIOD 76 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT TYPE AhD TOTAL NL'HBER OF ANALYSIS PERFOR~~D LO'AR LIMIT OF DETECTION
~U.D ALL INDICATOR LOPTIONS MEAN (F)
RANCE LOCATION MIIH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NAME MEAN (F)
DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANCE CONTROL NLTClER OF LOCATION)
NONROUTINK MEAN (F)
REPOR ED RANCE MEASL~T SM.MOUTH BUPP.
(MH)
PCI/Ql (DRY MEICHT)
GROSS BETA 9
.10 13.7 (6/6)
~ 13.1-14.4 MI1SON RESERVOIR TRM 259 ~ 4 14 ~ 0 (3/3) 13.2-14.4 10.4 (3/3) 9.5-10.9 CAID(A SCAN 9
.55
.15
.10
. 64(2/6)
.62-.66
. 24(1/6)
.24-.24
,.24(6/6)
.13-..45 MHEELER RESERVOIR TRM 274.9 MHEELER RESERVOIR TRM 274.9 MILEON RESERVOIR TRM 259.4
.66(1/3)
.66-.66
.24(1/3)
,24-.24
.24(1/3)
.13-
~ 45 1.9 (I/3) 1.9-1.9 1.3 (I/3) 1.3-1.3 a.
Noninal Lover Linit of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
Mean an ranEe based upon detectable neasurenents only.
Fraction. of detectable neasurencnts of specified-locations is indicated in paicntheses (F).
TABLE 22 EhVIROÃtEiTAL MONITORIÃC SLMARY RADIOACTIVITYIN PLANKION NAME OF FACILITY LOCATION OF FACILITY BROWNS FERRY LIMESTONE ALABAMA DOCKET NO.
RH-77-4-BF2 REPORTINC PERIOD 76 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT TYPE AND TOTAL NUMBER OF ANALYSIS PERFORMED LOWER LIMIT ALL OF INDICATOR ~ATIONS DETECTION
~
YEAN (F)
~LLD ROICE LOCATION WITH HICHEST ANNUAL MEAN NAYE
.ZAÃ (F$
DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANCE CONTROL LOCATIO.'l$
MEAN (F(
RANCE NUMBER OF NONROUTINE REPORTED MEASURBKNT PLANRTON PCI/CM (DRY WEIGHT)
CROSS ALPHA 6
CROSS BETA
~ 10
.10 1.91(1/4) 1.91-1.91 18.75(2/4) 15.39-22.12 TRM 291'6 TLf 291.76 1.91(1/2) 1.91-1.91 22.12(1/2) 22.12-22.12
.51(1/2)
.51 -.51 21.56(1/2) 21.56-21.56 a.
Noninal Lover Linit of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
b.
Mean and ranSe based upon derectable neasurenents only.
Fraction of detectable neasurenents of specified locations is indicated in parentheses (F).
TABLE 23 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORINC Sl:RQRY RADIOACTIVITYIN SEDI'K'.iT Nh'.K OF FACILITY BROWNS FERRY LOCATION OF FACILITY LIMESTONE AIABAMA DOCKET ZO ~
RH-77 4-BF2 REPORTINC PERIOD 76 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL !iLSER OF SA%'LED OF AÃALYSIS DETECTION IIHZT OP NEISURBKMt P RFDIL%D
~UJI ALL INDICATOR 10PTIONS MEAN (F)
XQK DISTANCE A'.iD DIRECTION MEAN (F$
RANCE LOCATION WITH HIGHEST hÃNDAL MEAN CONTROL LOCATION)
MEhil (F)
RANCE NLi3ER OF
ÃONROUTINE REPORTED MFAS~T 5.70(12/
12) 3.60- 7.00 CROSS BETA 16
.70 32.93(12/
12)
- 30. ID36. 5 SEDIMENT PCI/CM (DRY WEIGHT)
CROSS ALPHA
.35 16 TRM 277.98 TlN 277.98 6.44(4/ 4) 3.6 - 7.0 34.81(4/ 4)
- 32. 9-36. 5 5.26(4/ 4) 4.5 - 6.1 30.34(4/ 4)
.35 12 0.9 ( 5/ 12)
~
0.7 - 1.3 2.12( 12/ 12) 1.60- 3.0 TRM 288.78 TR)( 277.98 2.80( 4/ 4) 2.6D 3.0 0.8 ( 2/ 4) 0.8 - 0.8 1.3 ( I/ 4) 1.0 ( 2/ 4) 1.3 - I~ 3 1.0 - 1.0 SR 90
.30 16
.34(
4/ 12)
TRM 293.70
.30 -.46
.46( I/ 4)
.46 -.46 a.
Noninal Lower Linit of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable neasurenents only.
Praction of detectable neasure~nts of sPecified locations is indicated in Parentheses (F).
TABLE 24 ENVIRO)"IENT*LMONITORINC
SUMMARY
NA'.K OF FACILITY LOCATION OF. FACILITY RADIOACTIVITYIN CLAM FLESH BROWNS FERRY
. DOClXT NO.
RH-77 4-BF2 LIMESTONE ALABAMA REPORTIFG PERIOD 76 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT TYPE AND TOTAL NliiBER OF ANALYSIS PERFOR. KD LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION
~iUI ALL INDICATOR LOPTIONS MEAN (F)
RANCE NAME DISTANCE AND DIRECTION MEAN (F(
RANCE LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN CONTROL LOCATI0'X$
MEAN (F)
RANCE
'.il".GER OF
Ã0ÃROUTINE REPORTED
'YSAS URE.'KNT CIJW FLESH PCI/CM (DRY WEIGHT)
CROSS ALPHA 16 CROSS BETA 16
.10
.10 I~ 62 (12/12)
.88-2.28
- 1. 92(4/4) 1.77-2.28 5.44(4/4) 4.33-6.12 1.06(4/4)
.36-1.85 3.55(4/4) 1.82-5'9 CA~i SCAÃ 16 CE-141, 14i4 BA-140, LA-140 CO-60 CS-137 ZR-95,NB-95 CR-51 1.31( 2/12) 1.24 1.37 1.16( 4/12)
.87-1'7
.17( 3/12)
.06-.33
.20( 7/12)
.11-45 1.24( 2/12)
.14-2.34 1.86( I/12) 1.86-1.86 TRM 277.98 TRM 288.78 TRM 293.70 TRM 288.78 TRN 277.98 TRM 293.70 l.37(1/4)
<LLD 1.37-1.37 1.57(1/4) 1.57-1.57
.33(1/4)
.33-.33
.31(4/4)
.12-.45 1.93(1/4) 1.93-1.93
.08(1/4)
.08-.08
.25(2/4)
.17-.33 1.24(2/4)
<LLD
. 14-g. 34 1.86(l/4)
'LLD 1.86-1.86 ZN-65
.97( 4/12)
.56-2.11 TRM 277'8 2.11(1/4) 2.11-2.11
.23(3/4)
.15-
~ 33 a.
Noninal Loser Limit of Detection (LLD) as described in Table 2.
cations is indicated in parentheses (F) ~
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable neasurenents only.
Fraction of detectable neasucemnts of specified locations is indite<<n pares c.
No LLD is available for specific isotopic analyses perforned by g~ spectroscopy.
Therefore, an LLD of 0.0 has been assu"ed.
TABLE 25 ENVIROIDKNTALMONITORINC Sb.
tARY RADIOACTIVITYIN CLAM SHELL NA"K OF FACILITY BROHNS FERRY LOCATIOIN OF FACILITY LIMESTONE ALABAMA DOCKET NO.
RH-77-4-BF2 REPORTINC PERIOD 76 MEDIUM OR PATHHAY SAMPLED UNIT OF MEASUREMEÃI TYPE AND TOTAL NUMBER OF ANALYSIS PERFORMED LOUR LIMIT OF DETECTION
~LID ALL INDICATOR MPTIMS MEAN (F)
RANCE LOCATION HITH RICHEST A'.L>TAL YEAN KINE (F)
DISTANCE A'.LD DIRECTION RANCE CONTROL LOCATION)
MEAN (F(
RANCE NUMBER OP NONROUTIÃE REPORTED MEASURELKÃT CLAM SHELL PCI/CM (DRY lKICHT)
CROSS ALPHA 16 CROSS BETA 16 CAINA SCAN 16 CE-141,144 SR-90 16
.70
. 70 1.01( 3/12)
.87-1.15 7.76(12/12) 3.49-12 F 25
.35
.44( 6/12)
.35-.52 1.00 5.06( 6/12) 4.33-6.57 TRM 293.70 TRM 293.70 TRM 293.70 TRLI 293.70 1.08(2/4) 1.02-1.15 8.14(4/4) 3.49-12.25
.45(4/4)
.35-.52 5.72(2/4) 4.86-6.57
.97(3/4)
.71-1.28 8.26(4/4) 3.66 12.66
.52(4/4)
.41-.58 4.44(2/4) 3.99-4.90 a.
Noninal Louer Linit of Detection (LLD)=as described in Table 2.
b.
Mean and range based upon detectable neasureaents only.
Praction of detectable neasurenents of specified locations is indicated in parenthesea (F).
ualit Control A quality control program has been established with the Alabama Department of Public Health Environmental Health Administration Laboratory and the Eastern Environmental Radiation Facility, Environmental Protection Agency, Montgomery, Alabama.
Samples of air, water, milk, and vegetation collected around the BFNP are forwarded to these laboratories for analysis; and results are exchanged for comparison.
Data measured at the control stations for each medium were
~
averaged for each sampling period.
In order to describe the distribution of control station data, a mean, standard deviation, and 3-sigma value were calculated.
Me can expect, with 99 percent confidence, that back-ground concentrations would be distributed within these limits.
This pro-vides us.the basis for comparing. control and indicator data.
If the indi-cator data fall within the limits defined for control data, we can say, with 99 percent confidence, that the indicator data were not significantly affected by the nuclear plant.
If the data do not fall within the limits, we will perform further analyses to determine if the difference is attribu-table to the nuclear plant.
Conclusions A vast majority of the indicator station data were found to be within the distribution defined by the control station;data.
The Alpha-M least squares computer program identified concentrations slightly exceeding the limits of the control station data for a small number-of radionuclides in samples from indicator stations.
Many of these values may be discounted because the error reported by the Alpha-M program was greater than the cal-culated concentration.
The remaining isolated elevated concentrations may be the result of fallout, computer program artifacts, or analytical errors.
The same type of isolated high values occurred in the control station data and may be attributed to the same sources.
Increased levels of radioactivity'were observed in milk, rainwater, air particulates, heavy particle fallout, vegetation, and in atmospheric radio-iodine in mid-October following the atmospheric nuclear weapons testing con-ducted by the Republic of China.
This incr'ease was seen in control stations as well's indicator stations, and 0as widely reported in the eastern portion of the United States.
Levels of
'I in milk as high as 27.3 pCi/1 were ob:erved.
The primary radioisotopes identified in the atmosphe'ric media were Zr-Nb and Ru.
It is concluded from the above analysis of the data that there were no significant increases in radioactivity attributable to the operation of Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant.