ML18153C289
| ML18153C289 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 06/26/1990 |
| From: | Reyes L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18152A233 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-281-90-20, NUDOCS 9007170338 | |
| Download: ML18153C289 (1) | |
Text
L NOTICE OF VIOLATION Virginia Electric and Power Company Surry Unit 2 Docket No. 50-281 License No. DPR-37 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted between the period of May 6 through June 2,1990, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the 11General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions, 11 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1990), the violation is listed below:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI and the licensee 1s Quality Assurance Program (VEP 1-5A, Section 17.2.16) collectively state, in part, that measures shall be established to insure that conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified and corrected.
Contrary to the above, a condition adverse to quality was identified on January 25, 1990, when oil was discovered to be leaking from the lower bearing oil reservoir drain plug for the outside recirculation spray pump 2-RS-P-2A motor, and was not adequately corrected until May 16, 1990, after the NRC inspectors questioned pump operability.
This violation has been categorized as a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I) and applies to Unit 2 only.
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Virginia Electric and Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, within 3.0 days of the date of this Notice.
This reply should be clearly marked as a 11 Reply to a Notice of Violation 11 and should include:
(1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the correc-tive steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps whi.ch will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will.be achieved.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked; or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
Under the authority of Section 182 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 2232, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 26th day of June 1990
,;,()(>71 7(>:3::::::::
F'DR ADOCt<
C!
9()(16:21:.,
()50002:30 F'DC FOzN:~;t:TORY COMMISSION Luis A. Reyes, Director Division of Reactor Projects