ML18153B957

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Transmitting Analytical Results of Spiked Liquid Samples to Suppl Insp Repts 50-280/89-32 & 50-281/89-32.All Comparative Results Were in Agreement,Per NRC Confirmatory Measurements Program
ML18153B957
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 10/19/1989
From: Dan Collins
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Stewart W
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
References
NUDOCS 8911070018
Download: ML18153B957 (5)


See also: IR 05000280/1989032

Text

. '

OCi 19 \\~9

Virginia Electric and Power Company

ATTN:

Mr. W. L. Stewart

Sehior Vice President - Power

5000 Dominion Boulevard

Glen Allen, VA

23060

Gentlemen:

ofAc1aJ

SUBJECT:

DOCKET NOS. 50-280 AND 50-281, CONFIRMATORY MEASUREMENT RESULTS,

SUPPLEMENT TO NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 89-32

As part of the NRC Confirmatory Measurements Program, spiked liquid samples

were sent on June 13, 1989, to your Surry facility for selected radiochemical

analyses.

We are in receipt of your analytical results transmitted to us by

your letter dated September 15, 1989.

Th~ following comparison of your results

to the known values are presented in Enclosure 1 for your information.

The

acceptance criteria for the comparisons are listed in Enclosure 2.

In our review of these data all comparative results were in agreement.

These

data should be reviewed in detail by cognizant staff members for any

significant trends in the data among previous successiv~ years in which samples

have been analyzed by your facility .

These results and any results from previous years pertaining to these analyses

will be discussed at future NRC inspections.

Enclosures:

1. Confirmatory Measurement

Comparisons

2.

Criteria for Comparing

Analytical Measurements

cc w/encls:

(See page 2)

Sincerely,

ORIGIN.C.,L S1GN[u t; *

THOMAS R. DEC:(:J;

Douglas M. Collins, Chief

Emergency Preparedness and

Radiological Protection Branch

Division of Radiation Safety

and Safeguards

Virginia Electric and Power Company

cc w/encls:

W. R. Cartwright

Vice President - Nuclear Operations

Virginia Electric & Powef Company

5000 Dominion Boulevard

Glen Allen, VA

23060

J. P. 0

1Hanlon

Vice President - Nuclear Services

Virginia Electric & Power Company.

5000 Dominion Boulevard

Glen Allen, VA

23060 .

M. R. Kansler

Station Manager

Surry Power Station

P. 0. Box 315

Surry, VA

23883

R. F. Saunders, Manager

Nuclear Licensing

Virginia Electric & Power Co.

5000 Dominion Boulevard

Glen Allen, VA

23060

Sherlock Holmes, Chairman

Board of Supervisors of Surry County

Surry County Courthouse

Surry, VA

23683

W. T. Lough

Virginia Corporation Commission

Division of Energy Regulation

P. 0. Box 1197

Richmond, VA

23209

Michael W. Maupin

Hunton and Wi 11 i ams.

P. 0. Box 1535

Richmond, VA

23212

C. M. G. Buttery, M.D., M.P.H.

Department of Health

109 Governor Street

Richmond, VA

23219

  • Attorney General

Supreme Court Building

101 North 8th Street

Richmond, VA

23219

Commonwealth of Virginia

bee w/encls:

(See page 3)

2

Virginia Electric and Power Company

3

bee w/encls:

Document Control Desk

NRC Resident Inspector

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Route 1, Box 166

Surry, VA

23883

RJJ: DRSS

J;/oJ

~CHughey.

....,

10//6/89

RII:DRSS

£IV

/

e,TDecker

lOJ,%'89

RII:.m1v/

PFrJiri ckson

10/ i1/89

Isotope

H-3

Fe..:55

Sr-89

Sr-90

ENCLOSURE 1

CONFIRMATORY MEASUREMENT COMPARISONS OF H~3, FE-55, SR-89

AND SR-90 ANALYSES FOR SURRY POWER STATION

ON JUNE 13, 1989

NRC

Licensee

Ratio

(uCi/ml)

(uCi/ml)

  • Resolution

(Licensee/NRG)

2.24+/-0.07 E-5

2.1 E-5

32

0.94

2.42+/-0.07 E-5

2.8 E-5

35

1.16

9.60+/-0.29 E-5

8.3 E-5

33

0.86

5.20+/-0.21 E-6

5.5 E-6

25

1.06

Comparison

Agreement

Agreement

Agreement

Agreement

ENCLOSURE 2

CRITERIA FOR COMPARISONS OF ANALYTICAL MEASUREMENTS

This enclosure provides criteria for the comparison of results of analytical

radioactivity measurements.

These* criteria are based on empirical

  • relationships which combine prior experience in comparing radioactivity

analyses, the measurement of the statistically random process of radioactive

emission, and the accuracy needs of this program.

In the.se criteria, the

11Comparison Ratio Limits 111 denoting agreement or

disagreement between licensee and NRC results are variable.

This variability

is a function of the rat i6 of the NRC I s ana lyt i cal va 1 ue re 1 at i ve to its

associated statistical and analytical uncertainty, referred to in this program

as

11 Res6lution112 .

For comparison purposes, a ratio between the licensee's analytical value and

the NRC's analytical value is computed for each radionuclide present in a given

sample.

The computed ratios are then evaluated for agreement or disagreement

based on "Resolution. II

The corresponding values for

11 Resolution 11 and the

"Comparison- Ratio Limits" are listed in the Table below.

Ratio values which

are either above or below the

11Comparison Ratio Limits" are considered to be in

disagreement, while ratio values within or encompassed by the Comparison Ratio

Limits" are considered to be in agreement.

TABLE

NRC Confirmatory Measurements Acceptance Criteria

Resolution vs. Comparison Ratio Limits

Resolution

<4

4 - 7

8 - 15

16 - 50

51 - 200

>200

Comparison Ratio Limits

for Agreement

0.4 - 2.5

0.5 - 2.0

0.6 - 1.66

0.75 - 1.33

0. 80 - 1. 25

0.85

1.18

1Comparison Ratio= Licensee Value

-~~---------

NRC Reference Value

2Resolution = NRC Reference Value

Associated Uncertainty