ML18153B882

Forwards Summary of Two Mgt Meetings on 890807 in Region II Ofc Re operations-related Events & self-evaluation pre-SALP Briefing.List of Attendees,Meeting Summaries & Handouts Encl

ML18153B882
Person / Time
Site:	Surry
Issue date:	09/06/1989
From:	Ebneter S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Stewart W VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
References
NUDOCS 8909140048
Download: ML18153B882 (42)

Text

--

' b Docket No~. 50-280, 50-281 SEP O 6 1989 --

rr*,

• U;-r I c_;_,., (_,. J

~

License No~. DPR-32, D~R-37 Virginia Electric and Power Company ATTN:

Mr. W. L. Stewart Senior Vice President - Power 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

MANAGEMENT MEETING

SUMMARY

- SURRY This letter refers to two Management Meetings held on August 7, 1989, at the Region II Office.

The meetings concerned activities authorized for your Surry facility.

The first meeting involved a discussion on several recent operations related events at the station.

The second meeting involved a self-evaluation pre-SALP briefing.

A list of attendees, meeting summaries, and copies of your handouts are enclosed.

In accordance with 2.790 of the NRC 1s 11 Rules of P,ractice,U Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact us.

Enclosures:

1.

List of Attendees

2.

Meeting Summary:

Operations Issues

3.

Meeting Summary:

Pre-SALP Briefing

4.

Handout:

Operations Issues

5.

Handout:

Pre-SALP Briefing cc w/encls:

W. R. Cartwright, Vice President - Nuclear Operations J. P. 0 1Hanlon, Vice President - Nuclear Services R. F. Saunders, Manager - Nuclear Licensing M. R. Kansler, Station Manager Commonwealth of Virginia bee w/encls:

NRC Resident Inspector NRC Section Chief NRC Project Inspector Document Control RII:~

PFrear1ckson 08~1 /89

3909*:)i::,

osooo2:::o i:;,r,,--

RII~

MSinkule 08/~ /89 Sincerely, Original signed by Stewart D. Ebneter Regional Administrator I

ee ENCLOSURE 1 MANAGEMENT MEETINGS LIST OF ATTENDEES Virginia Electric and Power Company W. Stewart, Senior Vice President, NuGlear W. Cartwright, Vice President, Nuclear Operations F. Moore, Vice President, Power Engineering Servicej J. 0 1Hanlon, Vice President - Nuclear Services

_ M. Kans 1 er, Station Manager, Surry

• J. Mccarthey, Superintendent of Operations, Surry R. Saunders, Manager, Licensing D. Sommers, Supervisor, Nuclear Licensing Nuclear Regulatory Commission S. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II (RII)

G. Lainas, Assistant Director for ~egion II Reactors, NRR L. Reyes, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), RII C. Hehl, Deputy Director, DRP, RI!

H. Berkow, Director, Project Directorate II-2, NRR M. Sinkule, Branch Chief, DRP, RII

1. D. Collins, Chief, Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards

1. C. Julian, Chief, Engineering Branch, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS)

• J. Knight, Section Leader, NRR P. Fredrickson, Section Chief, DRP, RII

1. P. Kellogg, Chief, Operational Programs Section, DRS J. Caldwell, Senior Resident Inspector, DRP, RII

• W. Holland, Senior Resident Inspector, DRP, RII B. Buckley, Project Manager, NRR J. York, Resident Inspector, DRP, RII

1. L. Nicholson, Resident Inspector, DRP, RII

• W. LeFave, Senior Reviewer, NRR

• Conference Call Attendees

1. Attended Pre-SALP *Briefing Only

ee ENCLOSURE 2 MEETING

SUMMARY

OPERATIONAL ISSUES An NRC and Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO) management meeting was conducted at the Region II Office on August 7, 1989, to discuss severa 1 operational issues and their impact on the operation of Unit 1 and the restart of Unit 2.

The Senior Vice President (VP) - Nuclear, opened the meeting by stating that the primary reason f~r the events were lack of attention to detail and inconsistent management involvement and followup.

The Station Manager added that he believed that the events were not indicative of a major plant-wide problem, but that he did need to ensure that the entire plant has the proper sensitivity to procedural adherence and attention to detail.

Using the handout from Enclosure 4, the Superintendent of Operations discussed each event and the corrective actions.

The first event, an intake canal level

, Technical Specification (TS) violation, was caused initially by a procedure which elimfnated a 10 CFR 50.59 revie~ that probably would have identified the TS relationship to the planned temporary modification.

In addition, operators

,could have been more attentive to changing control room annunciators.

The corrective action included changing the affected procedure and providing operating training.

The component cooling water(CCW) problem, in~olving a loss of level in a CCW head tank, was due to a good auxiliary operator not receiving proper guidance on a delicate operation and also due' to not having a specific procedure for the evo 1 ut ion.

The evo 1 ut ion is p 1 anned to be procedura 1 i zed as part of the corrective action.

The lowering of the condensate stofage tank (CST) event was another examp1e of lack of attention to detail for both the senior reactor operator and reactor operator involved in the fill and drain evolution.

VEPCO is looking at raising the CST tank al arm to ensure that this type of problem 'does not reoccur.

The last two events involved the same problem, air entrainment resulting in tripping of several service water pumps. -The first event was totally unexpected and resulted in the licensee taking several precautions prior to the second event.

Apparently, even these precautions were not sufficient.

VEPCO is continuing to review the cause for both events, but a most probab 1 e contributor comes from Unit, 2 being shutdown with a partial draining of the unit 1s service water system.

At this point, a discussion ensued over the 10 CFR 50.72 reportability of these events and, also, TS related charging pump operability determinations.

VEPCO believed that as the unit was never actually outside the design basis during the events, that the affected pumps could be recovered in a short time and that TS 3. 0.1 covers this type of event, neither reportabi 1 ity nor, charging pump operability were an issue.

The NRC stated that these concerns were under _

review.

i 2

The Station Manager summarized the presentation by stating that station personnel were returning to the correct operations attitude, that operation personne 1 feedback and self-critiques were being so 1 i cited, and that other efforts were underway to ensure that operating crews were trained, motivated, and displayed the proper attitude for safe operations.

The Division of Reactor Projects' Director stated that although the NRC is aware that VEPCO is taking these issues seriously, Surry, being a problem plant, gets close scrutiny; and that mainly bad news has been heard from Surry in the 1 ast month.

He emphasized that the next severa 1 weeks would be very critical for Surry and a challenge to ensure events are minimized.

The Senior VP - Nuclear, concluded the meeting by stating that the p 1 ant staff has been sensitized to the events and the necessity to operate the units safely.

"".*.:-.. v,...;*

ee ENCLOSURE 3 MEETING

SUMMARY

PRE-SALP BRIEFING An NRC and VEPCO management meeting was conducted at the Region II Office on August 7, 1989, to discuss VEPC0 1s pre-SALP evaluation for the Surry facility.

The Senior VP - Nuclear, opened the meeting by stating that, at present, Surry was in good material condition, with personnel having good morale and good safety awareness.

He believed that the plant staff had risen to lower expectations in the past, and that the problem now was raising management's expectations.

The Station Manager, using the handout from enclosure 5, first discussed the restart readiness confirmation effort conducted for the Unit 1 restart.

The effort closely paralleled the Systematic Assessment of Licensee Per_formance (SALP) functional areas.

A discussion then ensued on engineering work request (EWR) backlogs.

VEPCO stated that a concerted effort was underway to lower the EWR backlog at both units, with more emphasis at North Anna than Surry.

The Assistant Station Manager then presented the VEPCO performance assessment using the NRC SALP categories.

Both strengths and weaknesses from the handout were discussed.

The Vice President - Nuclear Operations, concluded by stating that the SALP period began very roughly for Surry and that the period was more an outage SALP than an operations one.

He also stated that the trend appears to be up with regards to site performance and that there has been significant management changes, an outside evaluation, and the initiation of many program-matic improvements.

The DRP Di rector closed the meeting by stating that he appreciated the visit and bri efirig and that it is important to have a perspective that many good things are ongoing at Surry.

He al so stated that

.the apparent people problem needs to be addressed immediately and that it may have been neglected through.a 11 the hardware fixes completed during the dual-unit outage.

He also advised VEPCO to look at the procedures upgrade program and to ensure that the scope and schedule are realistic enough to provide a good product.

ENCLOSURE 4 ee AGENDA NRC/VIRGINIA POWER MANAGEMENT MEETING AUGUST 7, 1989 OPENING. REMARKS

'INTRODUCTIONS OPERATIONS EVENT REVIEW Channel Ill Intake Canal Minimum Level Trip Circuit Not Placed in a Tripped Condition When Stop Logs Installed Loss of Component Cooling Water System Head Tank Level During Filling of Heat.Exchanger 1-CC-E-18 Unit 2 Emergency Condensate Tank Less Than Tech Spec Minimum. Level Required for Unit 1 Cross Connect Service Water Supply to MCR/ESGR Chillers and Charging Pump Service Water

SUMMARY

OF ACTIONS W. L. STEWART M.R.KANSLER J.H.McCARTHY M.R.KANSLER

r---------------------**

113A

~

INII IH8 INC 111110

~~~~1

~NDENSER __ -

cuNIT l I

1138 193C 1130

~ §

~

116A 1868 lfil6C 11111 11118

~

(ifjy E§9

~ ~

213A I~

i l

--~.

! i i i

UNl!_!_J._~!T 2 i

i 2138 e>

211A

~

INTAKE CANAL 293C e:9 21128 e

~~~H~V~~T~~=~J

!_~T ~!<~-C~N-~!-:

___ __ -----*-**7

( _________ *---------------*--. -----* -l B CIRC WATER PUMPS J E.S.W. PUMPS LOW LEVEL INTAKE STRUCTURE JAMES RIVER CANAL INVENTORY DIAGRAM SURRY POWER STATION Vllll,INIA f't"IIO[II 1411111111A111111r,,, r*r,w11, f'lllff'A (W,ltl*"l'lf, 'f*wlff'*

Af(J,94(,,f,. 1J*lf,lfllA

1°CC 0 TK 0 t 1-CC-547 1-CC-554 1-CC-580 T

FROM UNIT 1 CONDENSATE PUMPS DISCHARGE HEADER 1-LCV-CC-100 1°CC 0 574 t-CC 0 U8 1*CC-P-1C 1-CN-800 1 *CC-570 AUXILIARY BUILDING 1-cc.uo I

I C f

-CC*E-1CI )

1-CC-5111 UNIT 1 TURBINE BUILDING 1-CC-510 COMPONENT COOLING SYSTEM

~

r e

e e -

. I I

11 11 11

. I

I

AUXILARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM y

1[

NIC CROSS-TIC NOV*

FROM MAIN FEED PUMPS AWCILIARV rec DWA 1C111 IDDSTCIII PUMPS CHCRGCNCY MKCUP lANK fRON a:rPOSITC lJNIT AUX! 1MV re IIWAl

• suisvn" 10 S l[AH C.ChCRAlDlc~

e e

. Ii I\\

18 cw 10 cw Int Seal Cooler A

TO Unit 1 Disch Tunnel A

Lube Oil Coolers

--~-------

KEY: 1A SW-P-10A 2A SW-P-10A 18 SW-P-108 28 SW-P-108 1-sw~263 1-SW-11 MOV-SW-102A 1-SW--495 MOV-SW-1028 Strainer I

I L- -

1. 1 Turbine Building r

From Unit2 CH PPSW Int Seal Cooler B

I #1 Aux. Bldg !

A Chiller B Chiller C Chiller

1. 2 Turbine Building I

.J 2-SW.... 74 MOV-SW-201A CHARGING PUMP SERVICE WATER

1. 3 Mech EQ Room 2A cw 2C cw

PCV 101A PCV 100A

1. 3 Mech EQ Room Turbine Building Mech EQ.

t Unit 1 Discharge Canal

\\

1-VS-E-4A Control And Relay Room Air Conditioning Chiller Condenser -

1-VS-P-1A Strainer Element PCV 100B 1-DS-3 _... r - - - -1 Strainer I

I 1-SW-263

-_J I

/

/

I I

t Unit 2 Discharge Canal PCV PCV 100C 1-VS-101C E-4B

• Control and Relay Room 1-VS-P-18 Strainer Element Air Conditioning Chiller Condenser CH pps SW Pump Suctions 1 /2-SW-P-1 OB

.....J_

_J_

/

/

~--&.-147 -

1-VS-E-4C Conlrol And Relay A.A Air Condlllonl~*-

Chlller Condenser 1-VS-P-1C Strainer Element e -

Room TT 1-VS-S-.1A Self Cleaning Strainer "1 B" and "1 D" I

cw I

1-VS-S-1B Self Cleaning Strainer MCA CHILLER SERVICE WATER SYSTEM CH pps 1/2-SW-P-10A SW Pumps

~11rtinnc "2A" and "2C" I

cw I

ENCLOSURE 5 VIRGINIA POWER SURRY PRE - SALP PRESEN*TATION TO NRC REGION II AUGUST 7, 1989 e -

~

.{

AGENDA SURRY PRE - SALP BRIEFING TO NRC AUGUST 7, 1989 OPENING REMARKS RESTART READINESS CONFIRMATION PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT BY SALP CATEGORIES CLOSING REMARKS W. L. STEWART M. R. KANSLER.

E. S. GRECHECK W. R. CARTWRIGHT e -

e e

VIRGINIA POWER OPENING REMARKS W. L. STEWART e -*

,;)

• ~

VIRGINIA POWER RESTART READINESS CONFIRMATION M.R.KANSLER i I e -

e 9*

I I

OUTAGE

SUMMARY

DUAL UNIT OUTAGES IN SEPTEMBl;R 1988 UNIT1 VOLUNTARY SHUTDOWN DUE TO EDG LOAD SEQUENCING. CONCERN RETURNED TO SERVICE ON JULY 7, 1989 UNIT2

• SCHEDULED REFUELING

• . PROJECTED ON-LINE MID-AUGUST 1989 e

e e

e I

ISSUES ADDRESSED DURING OUTAGES.

EDG LOAD SEQUENCING CONCERN SERVICE WATER SSFI FINDINGS REACTOR CAVITY SEAL MODIFICATIONS MOTOR OPERATED VALVE PROGRAM MAIN CONTROL ROOM AND ESGR AIR CONDITIONING GAS BINDING OF CHARGING PUMPS EROSION / CORROSION - SECONDARY PIPE THINNING SOCKET WELD INTEGRITY POWER TERMINATIONS e

e e

e I

I

. I

ISSUES ADDRESSED DURING OUTAGES (CONTINUED) e NON-ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER PARTS e

• -4160 VOLT BREAKERS

• . INSTRUMENT AIR CONTROL ROOM HABITABILITY ELECTRICAL CABLE SEPARATION COMPONENT. COOLING SYSTEM CABLE TRAY COVERS INSTRUMENT CABLE REPLACEMENTS e

e

OPERATIONAL READINESS PROGRAM SYSTEM WALKDOWNS POWER SUPPL V AND TRAIN INDEPENDENCE ASSESSMENT OF OUTSTANDING-ISSUES ESF TESTING e

e e

e

. I

RESTART READINESS CONFIRMATION -

FUNCTIONAL AREAS ASSESSED OPERATIONAL ITEMS (INCLUDING MATERIAL CONDITION, HOUSEKEEPING, EQUIPMENT STATUS AND,AVAILABILITY)

MAINTENANCE (INCLUDING INSTRUMENTATION AND PLANNING)

SURVEILLANCE ENGINEERING RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS SAFETY ASSESSMENT QUALITY VERIFICATION e

.e e

e

. i OPERATIONAL ITEMS ASSESSED MATERIAL CONDITION WALKDOWNS HOUSEKEEPING WALKDOWNS SAFETY SYSTEM LINE-UPS

r.

SELECTED CRITICAL VALVE THIRD CHECKS CHEMISTRY CONTROL READINESS ANNUNCIATOR REVIEW SYSTEM STATUS LOG ACTION STATEMENT LOG TEMPORARY MODIFICATION (TM) LOG STATUS.

POST MAINTENANCE TESTING STARTUP TRAINING COMPLETED, AS APPROPRIATE e

e e

e

MAINTENANCE ITEMS ASSESSED MATERIAL CONDITION WALKDOWNS WORK ORDER BACKLOG MOV ISSUES - PHYSICAL WORK CHECK VALVE ISSUES STEAM GENERATOR ISSUES PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE (PM) STATUS 4160 VOLT BREAKERS 480 VOLT BREAKERS

-e e

e

SURVEILLANCE ITEMS ASSESSED PERIODIC TESTING PROGRAM ASME XI PROGRAM EROSION / CORROSION PROGRAM TYPE B AND C TESTING SPECIAL TESTING 1

e e e

e

ENGINEERING ITEMS ASSESSED 0

EWR BACKLOG 0

TYPE 1 BACKLOG 0

TECHNICAL REVIEWS OF DCPs AND EWRs MOV ISSUES - TECHNICAL WORK AND CLOSEOUT e

SNUBBER SURVEILLANCE

• . POWER TERMINATIONS INSTRUMENT AIR SYSTEM DRAWING UPDATES CABLE SEPARATION e

e

RADIOLOGICAL* ITEMS ASSESSED CONTAMINATED AREA PERSONNEL CONTAMINAT~ON REPORTS EXPOSUREEVALUATION HOT SPOT REDUCTION CONTAMINATION CONTROLS

• TEMPORARY SHIELDING REMOVED HP TECH AVAILABILITY AND EFFECTIVENESS ENGINEERING CONTROLS e

e

SAFETY ITEMS ASSESSED CONFIRMATION OF ACTION LETTER ITEMS SOERs LERs NRC COMMITMENTS COMMITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM ITEMS OPERATIONAL EVENTS HPES RECOMMENDATIONS e -

INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE e.

NAPS STARTUP ISSUES-REVIEW FOR APPLICABILITY e

(E.G., STEAM GENERATOR TUBE LEAK)

REVIEW OF DEVIATION BACKLOG JCOs EMERGENCYPREPAREDNESS

QUALITY VERIFICATION ITEMS ASSESSED AUDITS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RISK RELEASE STATUS QA INVOLVEMENT IN OPERATIONAL READINESS PROGRAM

-e e

e

I I

MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT KEY OUTAGE ACTIVITIES OPERATIONAL READINESS PROGRAM MANAGEMENT INSPECTIONS MANAGEMENT BACKSHIFT INSPECTIONS COMMUNICATIONS FOCUSOFSUPPORTGROUPS PARTICIPATION IN MATERIAL CONDITION WALKDOWNS MANAGEMENT ON ROTATING SHIFTS FROM

.* 200 DEGREES TO CRITICAL AUTHORIZED ALL MODE CHANGES

/

-e e,

e

VIRGINIA POWER PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT BY SALP CATEGORIES E. S. GRECHECK

-e

SALP FUNCTIONAL AREAS OPERATIONS RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE EMERGENCYPREPAREDNESS SECURITY ENGINEERING / TECHNICAL SUPPORT SAFETY ASSESSMENT / QUALITY VERIFICATION OUTAGE e

e el e*

OPERATIONS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES STRENGTHS OPERATIONAL READINESS PROGRAM OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF OPERATORS

• . OPERATOR TRAINING PROGRAMS ACCREDITED BY INPO MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT DEVIATION REPORTS AND WORK REQUESTS USED TO IDENTIFY AND RESOLVE TECHNICAL ISSUES WEAKNESSES ACTIONS TO CORRECT PERSONNEL ERRORS / IMPROVED USIE OF PROCEDURES NOT FULLY EFFECTIVE AITENTION TO DETAIL

• QUALITY OF PROCEDURES e

e e

e

RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES STRENGTHS HIGH PRIORITY AND EMPHASIS ON RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS AND ALARA GOALS PRE-JOB BRIEFS, ALARA REVIEWS AND SNSOC REVIEWS FOR HIGH RISK RADIOLOGICAL RELATED WORK RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION PROGRAM HP TRAINING PROGRAMS ACCREDITED BY INPO REALISTIC GET/ GER PRACTICAL FACTORS TRAINING SOURCE TERM AND LEAK RATE REDUCTION PROGRAMS HP RADIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING FUNCTION SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN PCEs RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSOR POSITION HIGH MORALE AND POSITIVE ATTITUDE IN HP DEPARTMENT e -

e e

RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS*

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES WEAKNESSES

r.

RADIATION WORKER RESPONSIBILITY/

ACCOUNTABILITY FIRST LINE SUPERVISION INVOLVEMENT JOB COVERAGE EXPERIENCE ATTENTION TO DETAIL e

e e

e I

MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES STRENGTHS SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT IN MATERIAL CONDITION OF PLANT QUALITY MAINTENANCE TEAM (QMT) PROGRAM MAINTENANCE TRAINING PROGRAMS ACCREDITED BY INPO USE OF PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING MOV PROGRAM e -

e -

MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES WEAKNESSES

• UNACCEPTABLE NUMBER OF REPORTABLE EVENTS AND VIOLATIONS DUE TO MAINTENANCE/ SURVEILLANCE ACTIV~TIES

• FORMAL ROOT CAUSE PROGRAM NOT FULL V IMPLEMENTED

• POST MAINTENANCE TESTING PROGRAM

• PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE (PM) PROGRAM

• WORK CONTROL PROCESS INEFFICIENT

• ATTENTION TO DETAIL

• QUALITY OF PROCEDURES e

e e

e

SECURITY STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES STRENGTHS NO BREACHES OF SECURITY NO NRC IDENTIFIED VIOLATIONS OR REPORTABLE EVENTS HIGH LEVEL OF STAFF PROFESSIONALISM AND QUALIFICATION COMPENSATORY MEASURES TIMELY AND EFFECTIVE PERIMETER SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT UPGRADED MUL Tl INTEGRATED LASER ENGAGEMENT SYSTEM (MILES}

USED IN TACTICAL TRAINING WEAKNESSES SECURITY SURVEILLANCE AND MONITORING EQUIPMENT NOT STATE OF THE ART I

I e -

. e.

e

ENGINEERING / TECHNICAL SUPPORT STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES STRENGTHS CONSOLIDATION OF ENGINEERING ENGINEERING EFFECTIVE IN RESOLVING IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS.

COMPREHENSIVE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROJECT EFFECTiVE CHEMISTRY PROGRAMS EROSION / CORROSION INSPECTION *AND REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (INPO GOOD PRACTICE)

~*.

I I

_e

e.

e-

ENGINEERING / TECHNICAL SUPPORT STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES.

WEAKNESSES _

• CONFIGURATION CONTROL PROCESS

• FORMAL ROOT CAUSE PROGRAM NOT FULL V IMPLEMENTED

• ENGINEERING STAFFING LEVELS

• OPERATIONAL EXPERTISE IN'ENGINEERING S'

• • • I -*; -

e e

SAFETY ASSESSMENT / QUALITY VERIFICATION STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES STRENGTHS AGGRESSIVE POSTURE TO RESOLVE ISSUES PERFORMANCE-BASED QA SURVEILLANCES AND AUDITS AUGMENTING SAFETY AND LICENSING STAFf MANAGEMENT SAFETY REVIEW COMMITTEE (MSCR)

ESTABLISHED NUCLEAR OVERVIEW BOARD ESTABLISHED ENHANCED COMMUNICATIONS WEAKNESSES OVERALL INTEGRATION OF VARIOUS SELF-ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES TRENDING / ANALYSIS

• , STAFFING LEVELS t

I I

.ii,.

-e e

e

OUTAGE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES

'STRENGTHS OPERATIONAL READINESS PROGRAM EXTENSIVE SCOPE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT OUTAGE MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION ESTABLISHED WEAKNESSES OPERATIONAL EVENTS PLANNING AND COORDINATION OF EFFORTS

'f I

I e -

• e e

I I

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES STRENGTHS EARLY WARNING SIREN CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE NUCLEAR TRAINING PROGRAM GUIDE FOR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES SUPPORT/ INTERFACE SELF-ASSESSMENT PERFORMED WEAKNESSES EMERGENCY PLANNING STAFFING LEVELS AUGMENTATION TIMES EXERCISE PERFORMANCE

~

"I" e -

i

• J VIRGINIA POWER CLOSING REMARKS W. R. CARTWRIGHT

!~

• *i.

, r e

e e -*