ML18153B440
| ML18153B440 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 12/30/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18152A339 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-280-93-26, 50-281-93-26, NUDOCS 9401240033 | |
| Download: ML18153B440 (1) | |
Text
ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Virginia Electric and Power Company Surry 1 and 2 Docket Nos.: 50-280, 50-281 License Nos.: DPR-32, DPR-37 During an NRC Inspection conducted on November 7 through December 4, 1993, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Eriforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:
10 CFR 50, Appendix 8, Criterion III, as implemented by Operational Quality Assurance Program Topical Report {VEP l-5A, Section 17.2.3) collectively require that measures be established to assure that the design basis as specified in the license application are correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions.
Section 2.3.1.2.2 of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report requires that the two emergency service water pump building doors be equipped with removable watertight seal plates to protect against flooding when the possibility of a flood is anticipated.
_Contrary to the above, the seal plates installed in front of the emergency service water pump building doors on August 31, 1993, were not watertight.
The seal plates were installed to protect the building against the potential for flooding when Hurricane Emily was projected to be in the area.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation {Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Virginia Electric and Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation {Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, {2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, {3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or demand for information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as my be proper should not be taken.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given
. to extending the response time.
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia This 30-n..day of December, 1993 9401240033 931230 PDR ADOCK 05000280 G