ML18152A654

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 871116-20.Violation Noted: Procedure EP-1.02A,Rev 1,inadequate in That Cooldown Curve Ref as Attachment 2 in Procedure Less Conservative than Tech Spec Heatup/Cooldown Curve,Figure 3.1-1
ML18152A654
Person / Time
Site: Surry  
Issue date: 01/27/1988
From: Julian C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML18152A476 List:
References
50-280-87-32, 50-281-87-32, NUDOCS 8802030348
Download: ML18152A654 (2)


Text

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Virginia Electric and Power Company Surry Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on November 16-20, 1987, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.

In accordance with the "General Statement of Po 1 icy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the violation is listed below:

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V requires that instructions, procedures, and drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished.

Technical Specification 6.4 requires that detailed written procedures with appropriate check-off lists and instruc-tions be provided for actions to be taken for specific and foreseen.

malfunctions of systems or components including alarms, primary system leaks and abnormal reactivity changes.

Contrary to the above, the procedure utilized by the licensee for Natural Circulation Cooldown, EP-l.02A, Rev. 1 is inadequate in that the cooldown curve referenced as Attachment 2 in the procedure, is less conservative than the Technical Specification heat-up/cooldown curve, Figure 3.1-1.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Virginia Electric and Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:

Document Control Desk, Washington, DC

20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, Surry, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include [for each violation]:

(1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response ti'me.

If an adequate J8R203034S 880127 O

ADOCK 05000280 PDR

Virginia Electric and Power Company Surry Units 1 and 2 2

Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 27th day of January 1988 FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Caudle A. Julian, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety