ML18149A186

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Proposed Tech Spec 6.1-14,revising Audit Frequency of Station Security Plan to Occur at Least Once Per 12 Months
ML18149A186
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 06/16/1986
From:
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
Shared Package
ML18149A185 List:
References
TAC-61783, TAC-61784, NUDOCS 8606190426
Download: ML18149A186 (6)


Text

)

e TS 6.1-14

6. The Station Security Plan and implementing procedures at least once J per 12 months.
7. Any other area of facility operation considered appropriate by the Executive Manager - Quality Assurance or the Senior Vice President - Power Operations.
8. The Station Fire Protection Program and implementing procedures at least once per 24 months.
9. An independent fire protection and loss prevention program inspection and audit shall be performed at least once per 12 months utilizing either qualified offsite licensee personnel or an outside fire protection firm.
10. An inspection and audit of the fire protection and loss prevention program shall be performed by a qualified outside fire consultant at least once per 36 months.
11. The radiological environmental monitoring program at least once per 12 months. ~

~

12. The Offsite Dose Calculation Manual and implementing procedures at least once per 24 months.

8606190426 860616 PDR ADOCK 05000280 p PDR

e e ATTACHMENT 2 SAFETY EVALUATION SURRY POWER STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2

e

  • SAFETY EVALUATION FOR SPS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE The proposed change will revise the audit frequency of the Station Security Plan to at least once per 12 months . vice 24 months to conform to the requirements of 10 CFR 73.40(d) as requested by Generic Letter 82-23.

50.59 Safety Review Pursuant to 10 CFR 50. 59, we have reviewed the proposed Technical Specification change and have concluded that no unreviewed safety question exists. Rather, the proposed change is administrative. The probability of occurrence or the consequence of at( accident or malfunction is not increased by this change. The possibility of a different type of accident other than discussed in the UFSAR has not been created by this proposed change. Finally, the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification is not reduced, because the change is administrative. Reducing the time between audits of the Station Security Plan is administratively more restrictive and provides an increased assurance of the proper implementation of the Security Plan.

50.92 Significant Hazards Determination Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.92, the proposed change does not involve a significant hazards considera_tion because operation of Surry Units 1 and 2 in accordance with the change would not:

(1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated. The change revises the audit

  • Page 2 frequency of the Station Security Plan fz:om 24 to 12 months.
  • The change does not alter plant operations or design and therefore cannot increa.se the probability or consequences of an accident.

(2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously analyzed. Modification of the audit frequency for the Station Security Plan does not alter plant design or operations and therefore cannot create a new or different type of accident.

(3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The audit frequency change does not affect the basis for any Technical Specification or the UFSAR safety analysis.

The Commission has provided examples of changes that constitute no significant hazards consideration in Federal Register Volume 48, page 14870. Example (i) consists of a* purely administrative change to Technical Specifications and example .(vii) consists of a change to make a license conform to changes in the regulations. The proposed change is similar to example (i) in that it corrects an administrative inconsistency between 10 CFR 73.40(d) and the Technical Specifications. The proposed change is also similar to example (vii) in that the change will make the license conform to 10 CFR 73.40(d) as requested in Generic Letter 82-23.

t

  • e ATTACHMENT 3 VOUCHER CHECK SURRY POWER STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2

.-- VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY Une Date Bank Number D1sb.

Number Date QS,J.,/!l:a \/e!"'dOr Numoer NetAmount

.{.*

i.sa.oc Attached Check Issued As Payment Of Items Listed Above-Please Detach Stub And Cash Check Promptly .

  • ,, ;,1 , l ! . *f ,, ( 1' *, 1 .'***

Accounts Payable Check VIRGINIA POWDli llll#ffHCIUfDUIIIA POllll&I/

  • WEST VIRGINIA PO-Void If Not Cashed In 90 Days Pay. EXACTLY Ot-4E HUNDREJ> FIFTY 'A.HJ> NO/l.OOataaasaassugsss::aa********************'

D1sb. Vendor Bk . Number Date Number- Amount To The UNITED STATES NUCLEAR *:i.so.oo Oraer REGULATORY COMMISSION*

Of WASHINGTON DC 2055S ..

. ~

11* 0 5 5 I. 8 b 11* I: 0 5 3 ii OO 3 5 51: 0 i Ol, 5 ? 0 J; C. l O L111