ML18143B356
| ML18143B356 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 07/24/1985 |
| From: | Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Stewart W VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8508090005 | |
| Download: ML18143B356 (4) | |
Text
- ---~
e July 24, 1985 e
Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 Mr. W. L. Stewart Vice President - Nuclear Operations Virginia Electric and Power Company Post Office Box 26666 Richmond, Virginia 23261
Dear Mr. Stewart:
_Distribution
- Docket fi 1 e ORB#l ROG Gray fi 1 e OELD BGrimes CParrish DNeighbors NRC PDR L PDR HThompson EJordan JPartlow KJohnston ACRS ( 10)
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE REVIEW OF ASME SECTION XI RELIEF REQUESTS FOR SURRY UNITS 1 AND 2 The staff is currently reviewing the relief from ASME Section XI requirements requested for Surry Units 1 and 2 in your letter of April 15, 1985.
In order to complete our review, we need the additional information stated in the enclosure to this letter.
We request that you provide this information within 30 days or provide us with your schedule for doing so.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements of this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, 0MB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/enclosure:
See next page ORB#l:DL~
CParrish 07 /1,'V/85 ORB#l:DL{t/
KJohnston/,ks 07/it/85 Sincerely,
/s/SAVarga
~~rs ij1j~is5 Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #1 Division of Licensing
\\(,*
UNITED STATES e
e NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 July 24, 1985 Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 Mr. W. L. Stewart Vice President - Nuclear Operations Virginia Electric and Power Company Post Office Box 26666 Richmond, Virginia 23261
Dear Mr. Stewart:
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE REVIEW OF_
ASME SECTION XI RELIEF REQUESTS FOR SURRY UNITS 1 AND 2 The staff is currently reviewing the relief from ASME Section XI requirements requested for Surry Units 1 and 2 in your letter of April 15, 1985.
In order to complete our review, we need the additional information stated in the enclosure to this letter.
We request that you provide this information within 30 days or-provide us with your schedule for doing so.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements of this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, 0MB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
Sincerely, V
g~~l Operating Reactors Ba ch #1 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/enclosure:
See next page
e Mr. W. L. Stewart Virginia Electric and Power Company cc:
Mr. Michael W. Maupin Hunton and Williams Post Office Box 1535 Richmond, Virginia 23213 Mr. Robert F. Saunders, Manager Surry Power Station Post Office Box 315 Surry, Virginia 23883 Donald J. Burke, Resident Inspector Surry Power Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cornnission Post Office Box 166, Route 1 Surry, Virginia 23883 Mr. Sherlock Holmes, Chairman Board of Supervisors of Surry County Surry County Courthouse Surry, Virginia 23683 W. T. Lough Virginia Corporation Commission Division of Energy Regulation Post Office Box 1197 Richmond, Virginia 23209 Mr. J. H. Ferguson Executive Vice President - Power Virginia Electric and Power Company Post Office Box 26666 Richmond, Virginia 23261 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 2900 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 James B. Kenley, M.D., Cornnissioner Department of Health 109 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Surry Power Station Attorney General Supreme Court Building 101 North 8th Street Richmond, Virginia 23219
e ENCLOSURE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED -
RELIEF FROM ASME SECTION XI REQUIREMENTS, SURRY UNITS 1 AND 2
- 1.
In the first enclosure to your April 15, 1985 letter, under the heading "Reason for Request, you state that_the filter vessels for the boric acid transfer system were originally contracted to the requirements of ASME Section III, 1968 edition.
Please state whether any code addenda to the 1968 edition were applicable.
- 2.
In the enclosures to your April 15, 1985 letter, you indicated that an evaluation was made comparing the code for the original filter vessels with the code you proposed for the new vessels.
Provide a copy of the compari-son, item by item, not just your conclusions.
- 3.
The Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation "evaluation" letter enclosed with your April 15, 1985 letter, noted a difference in allowable stresses for Type 304 stainless steel between the original filter vessel code and the code requested for the new vessels.
The Stone and Webster letter proposed that your purchase requisition should include a specific requirement to account for this change.
Indicate whether you have included the proposed requirement in your requisition.