ML18139B590
| ML18139B590 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 09/18/1981 |
| From: | Leasburg R VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18139B589 | List: |
| References | |
| 526, NUDOCS 8111050515 | |
| Download: ML18139B590 (2) | |
Text
e e
- -: I VIRGINIA. ELECTRIC AND POWER COMP.A.Ni~_:'.'
R.H.LEASllUHO Vxc:s l'R.Esx>>ENT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS RICHMOND., VIRGINIA 2 3 2 61 September 18, 1981 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Serial No. 526 NO/RMT:acm Docket Nos. 50-280 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 DPR-37 We have reviewed your letter of August 20, 1981 in reference to the inspection conducted at Surry Power Station between July 3-8, 1981 and reported in IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-280/81-21 and 50-281/81-21. Our response to the specific infraction is attached.
We have determined that no proprietary information is contained in the report.
Accordingly, the Virginia Electric and Power Company has no objection to these inspection reports being made a matter of public disclosure.
The information contained in the attached pages is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.
R.H. Leasburg Attachment City of Richmond Commonwealth of Virginia Acknowledged before me this
- d
/3 day of 4-:I., 19 2' /
My Commission expires: _::;>.-.;:L.'
cc: Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing
~c_.~~~
Notary Public 19l].$'
SEAL
e NRC CONCERN:
SURRY POWER STATION RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION APPENDED TO INSPECTION REPORT 50-280/81-21 AND 50-281/81-21 Attachment Page 1 Technical Specification 6.4.E requires that a temporary change to a periodic test procedure may be made provided the change is approved by the cognizant supervisor and a licensed Senior Reactor Operator prior to implementing the change.
Contrary to the above, Step E.3.2 of Periodic Test 28.11, Control Bank B Rod Worth Measurement Using Dilution, was deleted without documented prior approval.
Water samples for analysis of the boron concentration in the reactor coolant system and pressurizer were not taken at 15 and 30 minute intervals as *specified by Step E.3.2.
Failure to obtain the samples at 15 and 30 minute intervals did not invalidate the test results.
This is a Severity Level VI Violation (Supplement I. F.).
RESPONSE
- 1.
Admission or denial of violation:
The violation is correct as stated.
- 2.
Reason for violation:
The reason for this violation was an oversight by the responsible test engineer.
- 3.
Corrective steps which have been taken and results achieved:
All station engineers have been retrained in the proper use of procedure deviations.
- 4.
Corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations:
None deemed necessary.
- 5.
Date when full compliance will be achieved:
Full compliance has been achieved *