ML18139A989
| ML18139A989 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 11/25/1980 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18139A986 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-280-80-39, 50-281-80-43, NUDOCS 8101160700 | |
| Download: ML18139A989 (1) | |
Text
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Virginia Electric and Power Company Surry Station License Nos. DPR-32 DPR-37 Based on the NRC inspection of September 2 - October 3, 1980, certain of your activities were apparently not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements as indicated below. These items have been categorized as described in correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.
A.
As required by 10 CFR 50.59 and Section 14 of the VEPCO NPS QA Manual, the licensee may make changes to the facility as described in the FSAR, provided that records of these changes are maintained and include a written safety evaluation which determined that the change does not involve an unreviewed safety question.
In addition, Section 14 of the QA Manual requires the maintenance of the Jumper Log Book and forms listing the status of each installed jumper or temporary modification for jumpers not installed by an approved procedure.
Contrary to the above, on September 16, 1980, the inspector observed that the Unit 2 safeguards valve pit sump piping had been modified by the instal-lation of a jumper hose on the piping to valve 2-DA-43, and no record, safety evaluation, procedure, or jumper log entry for the installation had been completed.
The jumper, with 2-DA-43 open, apparently led to the inadvertent diversion of Units 1 and 2 containment sump water into the Unit 2 safeguards building valve pit (basement), where several feet of radioactive standing water was observed.
This is an infraction and applies to Unit 2.
B.
As required by Technical Specification 3.10.A.1, the containment equipment door (hatch) shall be properly closed during refueling conditions.
Contrary to the above, on September 24, 1980, the inspector observed that the Unit 1 containment escape hatch was not installed in the equipment door and the blank metal flange installed in the equipment door to substitute for the escape hatch was not properly sealed during refueling operations.
This is an infraction and applies to Unit 1.