ML18110A242
| ML18110A242 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs, Nine Mile Point, Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 04/20/2018 |
| From: | Blake Purnell Plant Licensing Branch III |
| To: | Tom Loomis Exelon Corp |
| References | |
| L-2018-LLA-0077, NMP1L3209 | |
| Download: ML18110A242 (3) | |
Text
NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Purnell, Blake Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 8:40 AM To: Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc) (thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com)
Cc: Wrona, David; Barstow, James:(GenCo-Nuc)
Subject:
Calvert Cliffs, Nine Mile Point, and Ginna - License Amendment Request to Eliminate Nuclear Advisory Committee (EPID L-2018-LLA-0077)
Mr. Loomis, By application dated March 26, 2018 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Package Accession No. ML18086A138), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; and R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant. The amendments would revise license conditions to eliminate the Nuclear Advisory Committee.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the review of this licensing request will take approximately 120 hours5 days <br />0.714 weeks <br />0.164 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by October 31, 2018, as requested. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1380.
Sincerely, 1
Blake Purnell, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-317, 50-318, 72-8 50-220, 50-410, 50-244 and 72-67 2
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 307 Mail Envelope Properties (Blake.Purnell@nrc.gov20180420084000)
Subject:
Calvert Cliffs, Nine Mile Point, and Ginna - License Amendment Request to Eliminate Nuclear Advisory Committee (EPID L-2018-LLA-0077)
Sent Date: 4/20/2018 8:40:07 AM Received Date: 4/20/2018 8:40:00 AM From: Purnell, Blake Created By: Blake.Purnell@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Wrona, David" <David.Wrona@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Barstow, James:(GenCo-Nuc)" <James.Barstow@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None "Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc) (thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com)" <thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3605 4/20/2018 8:40:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Purnell, Blake Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 8:40 AM To: Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc) (thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com)
Cc: Wrona, David; Barstow, James:(GenCo-Nuc)
Subject:
Calvert Cliffs, Nine Mile Point, and Ginna - License Amendment Request to Eliminate Nuclear Advisory Committee (EPID L-2018-LLA-0077)
Mr. Loomis, By application dated March 26, 2018 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Package Accession No. ML18086A138), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; and R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant. The amendments would revise license conditions to eliminate the Nuclear Advisory Committee.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the review of this licensing request will take approximately 120 hours5 days <br />0.714 weeks <br />0.164 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by October 31, 2018, as requested. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1380.
Sincerely, 1
Blake Purnell, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-317, 50-318, 72-8 50-220, 50-410, 50-244 and 72-67 2
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 307 Mail Envelope Properties (Blake.Purnell@nrc.gov20180420084000)
Subject:
Calvert Cliffs, Nine Mile Point, and Ginna - License Amendment Request to Eliminate Nuclear Advisory Committee (EPID L-2018-LLA-0077)
Sent Date: 4/20/2018 8:40:07 AM Received Date: 4/20/2018 8:40:00 AM From: Purnell, Blake Created By: Blake.Purnell@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Wrona, David" <David.Wrona@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Barstow, James:(GenCo-Nuc)" <James.Barstow@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None "Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc) (thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com)" <thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3605 4/20/2018 8:40:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: