ML18094B292
| ML18094B292 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 02/01/1990 |
| From: | Gallo R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Miltenberger S Public Service Enterprise Group |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9002150241 | |
| Download: ML18094B292 (14) | |
Text
Docket Nos. 50-272 50-311 Public Service Electric and Gas Company ATTN:
Mr. Steven E. Miltenberger Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer P. 0. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Gentlemen:
Subject:
Maintenance Program Team Inspection This letter is to inform you that the NRC intends to perform a team inspection of your maintenance program at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 on April 9 to 13, and April 23 to 27, 1990, and to request your assistance in accomplishing this task.
The inspection will focus on the performance of maintenance and whether components, systems and structures of your plant are adequately maintained and properly repaired so that they are available to perform their intended safety function.
In order for us to properly prepare for the inspection and max1m1ze the onsite time spent in observation of maintenance in progress, we request that you furnish the reference material identified in Enclo~ure 1 to this letter.
To assist you ir the gathering of the requested reference material, we have enclosed a Maintenance Inspection Tree (Enclosure 2) which is used, by the team, as guidance during the inspection.
The team leader will be contacting a member of your staff shortly regarding the information that will be needed prior to the start of the inspection and to arrange a suitable date for a meeting to explain the inspection and assessment methodology.
A copy of the NRC Temporary Instruction 2515/97 "Maintenance Inspection,"
Revision 1 is enclosed for your information and to aid in the preparation for the inspection (Enclosure 3).
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Jay Ball, Team Leader, at (301) 492-0962, J. Konklin at (301) 492-0953 or myself at (215) 337-5291.
Sincerely,
/1~~~£~~fl
~
Robert M. Gallo, Chief ~
Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety OFFICIAL RECORD COPY CAPHTON/90 DAY/1/25/90 01/30/90
- 0001. 0. 0
'\\ Jt
\\~
i*x\\ I
... --\\
P~blic Service Electric & Gas Co.
2
Enclosures:
- 1.
Request for Material
- 2.
Maintenance Inspection Tree
- 3.
NRC Temporary Instruction 2515/97 Maintenance Inspection cc w/encl:
J. Urban, General Manager, Fuels Department, Delmarva Power & Light Co.
L. K. Miller, General Manager - Salem Operations B. A. Preston, Manager, Licensing and Regulation General Manager - Nuclear Safety Review R. Fryling, Jr., Esquire M. J. Wetterhahn, Esquire S. Ungerer, Manager, Joint Generation Projects Department,
- Atlantic Electric Compariy Licensing Project Manager, NRR D. Wersan, Assistant Consumer Advocate, Office of Consumer Advocate R. Engel, Deputy Attorney General, Dept. of Law and Public Safety Lower Alloways Creek Township Public Document Room (PDR)
Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
Nucle~r Safety Information Center (NSIC)
NRC Resident Inspector State of New Jersey bee w/encl:
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
Management Assistant, DRMA (w/o encl)
D. Caphton, DRS N. Blumberg, DRS A. Gady, NRR (w/o encl)
J. Chung, NRR (w/o encl)
J. Dyer, EDO J. Stone, PM, NRR J. Ball, NRR J. Conklin, NRR DRS Files (3)
/Yi!'13 }t--
[/I bDRS:RI Caphton/ajk 01/Jfa\\/90 Blumberg 01111190
- ~
Gallo 018\\;90 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY CAPHTON/90 DAY/1/25/90 - 0001.0.1 01/25/90
ENCLOSURE 1 To aid us in the preparation for the maintenance inspection, please provide us with certain documents, procedures, administrative controls, and information which are needed to prepare for the inspection.
We request that you provide your pertinent documents covering each of the elements on the Maintenance Inspection Tree (see Enclosure 2) to include your management and administrative controls, procedures, instructions and guides.
Experience has shown that providing the requested information in accordance with the elements on the inspection tree makes the preparation for the inspec-tion less difficult for both yourself ahd the team.
If you do not have a document for any specific item within an element, it is not necessary to generate it to comply w]th this request.
The blocks on this tree identified as 1.0, 2.0, etc. need not have any information provided by you.
It is recognized that some documents may be applicable to a number of elements.
For these, it is only necessary to provide the document for one element and only list it for the other elements for which it also applies.
Also, to aid in the planning of the onsite portion of the inspection, please provide us with the appropriate contact for each element.
In addition to the information provided in accordance with the elements on the inspection tree, to fully prepare for the inspection, we also request that you include, for our review, the following information.
Any of the below listed information provided in accordance with the tree elements need only be listed and not separately provided.
Please provide three sets of the requested documents.
A member of our staff will contact a member of your staff regarding the best method of transmitting the documents to us.
Additional Requested Information Description of methods by which maintenance performance is measured.
Are performance indicators used?
What are they?
Who is informed of the reports that are used to assess maintenance performance.
Description of process for communications with vendors for technical services and latest technical information on equipment and systems installed at the plant, and interfaces with equipment and NSSS vendors for training, modifi-cations, and equipment replacement.
Documents which describe the preventive maintenance and predictive maintenance programs.
Which equipment is included?
How is maintenance frequency determined?
What is done with results of these maintenance actions?
The number of craft personnel for electrical, mechanical, and I&C maintenance organizations.
Please include foremen and the foreman to craft ratio.
2 The average years of experience for each individual and the turnover rate.
Description of shift work and work assignments.
How do license~
supervisors decide on which craft or contractor is to perform what type of work?
Identify significant equipment failures which occurred during the last two years, include those identified during the last refueling.
Describe the maintenance and testing of diesel generators and class lE electrical equipment.
Provide the following status concerning Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs).
Current total listing and status of MWOs, number in planning, number in final sign-off, number on hold for lack of parts, number on hold for engineering assistance, number available to be worked on.
Projected number of corrective MWOs to be outstanding at start-up by priority.
Rate of completion of corrective MWOs in terms of number completed per month and manhours expended (by craft) per month for the past 12 months.
Current number of preventive maintenance work orders overdue.
Rate of completion of preventive MWOs for the past 12 months.
Estimated manhours required to complete current preventive maintenance MWOs.
Number MWOs requiring rework over the past six months.
Provide five corrective maintenance procedures for work that is scheduled for the outage (e.g., MOVs, PRVs, Solenoid Operated Valves, Safety/Relief Valves, ECS Pumps, Batteries, Switchgear, etc.)
Provide five preventive maintenance procedures that are scheduled prior to your next scheduled outage.
Provide your overall maintenance schedule for the outage.
TREE ltl!TIATORS I AUDIT awooir rol,lUl[S
- l.,.,, ISMQ 1
TCPICS fl 111001 ICKat YAUU, l60ft, Ao9 MTOl.S, SIUllOS, ll'IOTUS) l'lf'<<llS llSP(Clb flOQ 1 OISttl'AIOl(#l'lJMIACn111u
- **lll.MIJl'l
-*~tell~
llliCn.i.t.IOIS ClJ1"8 11'1111.AllQllS U.1.LC1 Oii DOu.llD
- lltll.tlCJll>>t?iUI[
- -.a D09illr5P(C11<J111
, *ot"5PlClals I
CllJlllAI. IOJRmJlllC IM:OJl'lOC*ST&TllSIQ.CI
- DUQllC1 l(l'CI~
- 00100ar~
- l'UllT""CAhmlCS o SQIU'SISMlill 11.....C Ill lf-"l1DfMa
- l'totaAlllC...-.
- ..,,.rDIAllCIDlifAU.
1 llJtl 10 llCS. ti!1H-c. um0-1, om1-c. 42SIJJ-1.t2511K u5TI6-t. t!!ITn-1. AilCI nm~c.
- Ul.taJ91£D
- l'ltOttM,l,lJlm
- M*UHD o POlmC ll(\\l(W WI l#'CIA'I(
11
- WMllA,11
- l'UllTAQICI
... LOOr.OJ WORKING TREE MAINTENANCE INSPECTION TREE
... '311.llT(
tca.utDlf
' ID o llOMCAL SP'lmlCl.IQo!S 1 lllt IXIMDOlh CIKltlCUllUSMOll(l.S..t,,IC) li.l.lCDIS
, Allf'UCMUTO*s
- TN
~.
-.moon ll.fkOln\\
IOCGlllCl t<<Jl:ll)
~--/
- llOICN wni rm..:JICll o AUUll l"l.Nll 11 l'mnl IHUaTT o lPAanHllMllT~
- IDlrltl...
.\\111
'!IWQl.llilflllJ'AaS m
lj[}C)(ll tlDMCA(. AW&l4L COUlll.S
- COlllCI.~
- DTJllJ941U.Tt1J.l.CDlllll.
I U1AllJ9I. fllll.tallmfl.
o En1.a191 CDlflelal.1(11 aJl11CU I.. rDJllllUilla i.CCXUltaaJl'r
-stia.ia:
-!S!U..W:CIU o l.lilfQCIACa.llA...'"1' 1r1J1AA1~
- 11110
' tll.JQ'laa&S
,._~IJIWl<<lr
.~
.. ti LEGEND Enclosure n
~----1 _:~~~~~:_.~..
UNITED ST A TES
/
NUCLEAR REGULATORY -COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 NRC INSPECTION MANUAL TE~PORARY INSTRUCTION 2515/97, REVISION 1 MAINTENANCE INSPECTICN 2515/97-01 PURPOSE PQEB This temporary instruction (TI) provides guidance for conducting a perfor-mance-based inspection of an established and implemented maintenance process at all operating nuclear power stations.
2515/97-02 OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this TI is to determine whether all components, systems, and structures of nuclear power plants are adequately maintained so that they can be relied upon to perform their intended functions.
R Additionally, this TI. should determine whether the mai ntena nee process provides for the prompt repair of plant components, systems, and structures,
)
as dppropriate to their prescribed functions.
2515/97-03 BACKGROUND NRC has examined their nuclear power plant maintenance programs and has found a wide varfation in their effectiveness.
Inadequate maintenance has been a significant contributor to plant and system reliability problems and, thus, is a safety concern.
Analysis of operational events has shown that nuclear power plant components are rot being maintained at a level of reliability R commen~urate with their importance to safety.
This TI was developed tc- *inspect and assess the effectiveness of maintenance at selected nuclear power plant sites.
A Maintenance Inspection Tree (tree) wi.11 be used as guidance during these inspections to col late and present inspection findings.
The tree is intended to provide a systematic approach to the performance of the inspections and to ensure a 1evel of consistency. R 2515/97-04 CONDUCTING TEAM INSPECTIONS The maintenance team i nspectfons wi 11 be announced when the tean: leader prepares for the pre-insp~ction visit (Section 04.01) to the site.
The. full-scope inspection cycle wi 11 generally be of a 6-week duration, with the team leader possibly taking an additional 2 weeks to initially coordinatf' the
. inspection, gather infonnation, and issue the final inspection report.
Issue Date:
09/22/C9
The G \\1eeks of tei::lm effo*o-uld generally consist of 1.w.of preparation, 1 week of in-office inspection, z weeks of onsite inspection, and 2 weeks of documentation.
The sequence of the inspec.tio11 effort will be determined by the regional office.
For example, the 2 weeks of onsite inspection may be consecutive or separated hy 1 week of in-office inspection.
Generally, the inspection team will be composed of the following six members:
one team leader {regio11) two reactor/project engineers (region) one radiation specialist (region) c.*."0 eng*inee;-~ \\i-iQ)
Thr tPam composition and/or the extent of effort for individual members riay be adjusted by the region.
For example, the extent of involvement of the radiation specialist may be less than 6 full WE'eks, as determined by the regional office.
In addition, the regions may include involvement of the resident inspector {RI) to the extent that is normally covered by TP-62703 monthly examinations.
The RI should be provided training in the use of the logic tree by the appropriate team leader for this purpose.
The project manager {PM) will be generally involved with each inspection to the following extent:
0 0
be available to the team leader to facilitate contacts with the licensee attend 1 to 2 days of the team preparation attend final pre-exit team meeting attend exit meetings The team will determine what failures of significant equipment (probabilistic R
risk assessment (PRA)-identified, safety-related, or balance of plant (BOP) that affects safety-related and specia 1 interest items) have occurred and will inspect the. licensee's trending and maintenance activities to schedule, R
repair, and prevent further failure of that equ.ipment.
9ther selective examir.ations of equipment failures attributed to maintenance will be examined to determine the adequacy of licensee Corrective actions and root-cause detE!rminations of the failures.
The inspection should be performed following review of the elements of the Maintenance Inspection Tree (tree) and the additional inspection guidance provided in the Maintenance: Inspection Guio-...
ance Volumes I and II {separately distributed).
This guidance should be used as an aid in determining adequacy and implementation of maintenance activities and to evaluate them.
The tree is also used as a tool to provide a
level of uniformity in inspection structure and in the preliminary recording of the inspection results.
It is important to stress that the tree does not drive the inspecticn, but it does represent guidance in the areas of inspection to be considered in planning the scope of the inspection, with R
inspection results recorded on the trPe to the exter.t completed.
The tree consists of three major sEcti ons:
(l) Overa 11 Pl ant Performance, (2) f'ianagerr.ent Support of Maintenance, and (3~ Maintenance Implementation.
The inspection requirements for Maintenance Implementation. which focus on the plant systems, co~ponents, test and surveillance data, and related ilctivities, will receive the major portion (at least 80 percent, including direct observations of maintenance being performed) of the inspection effort.
Issue Date:
09/22/89 L
251.::;19;
/
It shou 1 d be recogni. that i r.spect ion results fri. th<::
Maintenance Implementation area wil lso provide input to the ~iar.a n'L
~upport area.
It is expected that portions of the Mariagement Support of Maintenance sections of the tree, esµecial ly th t-"anagerrient Co1m1itment i!nd Management Organization SEctions, could be cond1!cted by a single team mell'ber in a.
relatively short time.
The amount of inspection effort cevoted to the iridividui!l subsections of the tree will be-determined by the regional office, taking into accoun"t recent inspection findings. time and staff limitations, and future inspec-tions planned to cover specific areas.
The inspection is tu det:ermine thE e:-**'.C\\.iveness of the total inr.egrated maintenance procp~s of the power reactor 1 i censees.
Therefore, the team inspection may be directed into areas for which explicit regulatory require-ments may not exist.*
Thus, the inspection is oriented toward analyzing the performance of maintenance activities rather than toward the identifi-cation of violations.
A specific example of an area not subject to explicit requirements is the licensee's participation with the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO).
Review of licensee resolution of INPO activities shall be car.ducted in accordance with established policy and, thus, observa-tions in this area, when warranted, should be treated as. indicators of strengths or wea~nesses.
Although the inspection may result in the identification of inadequacies that are not covered by explicit regulatory requirements, there is no intent to "ratchet" licensees.
Individual findings that licensees are not following published NRC guides and industry guidelines do not necessarily indicate that a program or area is inadequate.
The goal of the inspection effort is to emphasize the use of plant experience, test, reliability and surveillance R data, component failures, PRA insights (available to the licensee or provided P.
l:o -the team by the Risk Jl.pplications Branch), and items of interest in evaluating the licensee's maintenance process in terms of capabilities and performance, and to identify major strengths and weaknesses *as they are related to safety significance.
04.01 Team Leader Preparation.
A meeting should be held with th licensee to describe the scope C'lf the inspection and to obtain preliminary review materials, such as the licensee's procedures for planning, conducting and assessing maintenance, as well as organizational charts, work schedules, equipment lists, component failure and trending data, completed work orders, R
and related quality control (QC) inspection procedures.
The material obtained by the team leader from the 1 i censee should be ci stri buted to the team members for their review.
Following completion of the in-office review of the licensee's maintenance process, the team 1 eader wil 1 discuss the results of these reviews with the team members and factor them into the plan for the onsite inspection.
04.02 Inspection Preparation.
In preparation for site inspections, the inspection team should review the elements of the Maintenance Inspection Tree to determine which areas may have received recent inspections, which areas may not be applic~ble, ~nd which areas will be reviewed at the plant site.
The three major parts of maintenance {i.e., overall plant perforr.iance, man<1gement support of maintenance, arid maintenance implementation) should be inspected to the degree required to provide a valid ccnclusion rega~ding the effectiveness of the licensee's mainten~nce program.
?515/'.;7 Issue Date:
09/22/89
During the preparatio.hase, the team should selec.everal components and/or systems for detailed ir.spection either throt:C'h consideration of
- wailable PRA
- insights, licensing trendin<;
dnta,
- componerrt failures R
in safety-related or BOP systems that affect safety, or selected equipment of heightened interest to the Commission, such as check valves, motor-operated valves, solenoid-operated valves, and air systems_
The PR/l insights rr.ay be used to select components or activities whose potEr>tial failures are predicted to contribute most to the risk at that plant.
At least one high-risk system should be included to verify that all performance-related maintenance has been accomplished, including preventive maintenance_
Equip-R ment failures provide a vehicle for review of v2riaus 2spects of maintEnance, including r-oot-c;;use analysis and trencin;;,, t'quipment history, corrective F:
actions, and past maintenance {preventive or cc,rrective:).
Inspection of failed equipment repairs or work pCickages will provide the opportunity to examine the adequacy of the interaction of a 11 1 i censee functions supporting maintenance, including engineering analyses and trending.
Review of performance indicator data, systematic assessment of 1 icensee performance (SALP) reports, previous inspection findings, licer:see event reports (LERs), maintenance radiation exposure history, and other direct' measures may identify potential weak areas at that plar.1 for which more detailed 1nspection may be required.
Figure 1 (Inspection Flowchart) depicts the initiators that may be selected to enter the tree.
During the preparation phase, prcgrarn strengths and weaknesses in certain areas may be recorded on the Maintenance Inspection Tree (working tree).
If there are sufficient data to provide an evaluation rating during the prepara-
- tion, the elements should be rated in
~ccordance with the Maintenance f
t \\
Inspection Guidcince.
However, selected items and, in particular, identified
(
weaknesses should be verified during the onsite inspection, even if an evaluation rating is assigned during the preparation.
04.03 Onsite I~spection.
An entrance meeting sha)l be held with the licen-
- see tc detail the. scope and schedule of the inspection, introduce the team members. and establish the licensee's contacts for the inspection.
The team should obtain from the licensee the status of ongoing work applicable to the inspection or that may affect the-perfonnar.ce of the inspection or the ir.spection schedule.
SchE-dules and plans for the exit meetings and the interim meetings between the team leader and licensee m~nagement should also be est2blishea during the entronce meeting.
Team members shall perfonn a detailed wall<down inspection of the plant on the first or second day on site to observe the overall plant and equipment material condition.
This walkdown inspection, in which the team should observe the condition of nu~erous valves,
- pumps,
~otors, etc., should include, but not be limited to the following:
0 Condition of components 0
Si gnifi co nee of tagged equipment 0
Housekeeping and environment 0
Adequacy of ~ ahe ling 0
Comparisons \\"l'i th drawings and/or procedures 0
Status of annuncic:tors This walkdown insrection mc:y provide indications of areas r<:<]uiring further exci1J1ir1i:Jtion du1*ing the inspection_
Issue Date:
09/22/89 2515/S/
I' ThE onsite inspecti.should focus on the direct Arvatior. of v.*ork in progress.. including e
followir:s of licensee woi'!" 1*1ith c<;uipment in progress (e.g., tagouts, procedures, 1-Jf'rk packages, engineering support, materials, co111munications, testing, approvals, GUality co11trol holdpoints.
etc.), significance of the mainten.:nce backlog, rework, licensee assessment.
of the performance of maintenance, work control processes. control of inter-
.faces, post-mainten<Ince testing, plant material condition, ar.d maintenance facilities.
On the basis of the collected dct.a, the team should deterrr.ine the apparent cause of any problems noted; that is, if the cause is related to the adeol!acy of procedures,
~1ork pach~ges, qualification cf -personnel, r::anagement, engineering, etc.
This analysis should provide entry into specific elements of the tree, which then becomes a tool to explore the suspected causes and to assess effectiveness of the implementation of applicable elements.
All areas listed need not be used in forminq conclusions for each element.
Furthermore, other areas of inspection selected by the team may be used for entry to tree elements.
04.04 Analysis.
Using the inspection findings and results noted on the Maintenance Inspection Tree, the team should determine: whether each of the areas inspected has been adequately implemented by. the licensee and whether or not there is enough information to assign a rating.
The Maintenance Inspection Guidance and Criteria previous1y provided also assists use of the Maintenance Inspection Tree.
The team will assign a rating to the applicable elements identified en the work sheets.
The team should assign an overall evaluation rating to each of the elements inspected.
Hhen this analysis has been completed, an overall rating car. be determined in accordance with the Maintenance Inspection Guidance and Criteria.
04.05 Exit Meeting.
Before the final days of inspection, issues and findings should be reduced to definitive writing and then used to highlight.
the presentation version of the Mai-ntenance Inspection Tree (the Presentation Tree) and to complete the rating roll-up.
The exit meeting should 1nclude a brief discussion of the preliminary inspection firrcings using the Presenta-tion Tree to depict inspection results in a summar_v fashion; however, the licensee should be ir.fonned that the findings are preliminary until they are reviewed by regional management and the inspect.ion report is issued.
04.06 Report Preparation.
Because of the broad extent of the inspection, documentation of inspection activities should begin early in the process to minimize the time required to complete the final report.
The final report should document the assumptions used, the elerr.erits inspected, the elements that were not app l i cab l E, licensee strengths anc.f weaknesses, and overall conclusions consiste:r:t.,.lith IMC-0610.
The report should address elements of the tree to at least the depth of the tier with eight areas (e.g., Direct Measures, Manage~ent Commitm~nt and Involvement, etc.).
04.07 Fallo" Up.
Any unresolved findin~s identified during the inspection will be appropriately tracked ar.d resolved by the regior.al office.
2515/97 Issue Date:
0~/22/89
2515/97--0~
ThE: inspectior. shall include selective examinations of tl1e aspects of main-tenance listed i11 Sections 05.0l through 05.03, including each of the areas and related elements of licersee activities identified under the sectior.s.
To the extent possible, selective examinations should be b<Jsed on observation of maintenance and equip~~nt work activities in progress. review of licE:nsee implementation of maintenance procedures and controls, results of rPviev1 of selected documents (such as work packages. equipment test results, and engi-neering evaluations), and interviews with personn~l).
05.01 Overall Plant Perforn10.r.ce Related to tv:a1ntenar.ce
- a.
Direct Measures.
The team shall cor.c!l.lct appropr*iate examinations of plant operability, equipment availability, and plant material conditio11 that can be directly relC1ted to the effective implementa-tion of a maintenance process.
Before conducting the inspection of plant perfonnance, the inspector should review available plant information on (1) availability, (2) operability, and (3) reliability.
Infonrsation on these items can be obtained from the plant's.
operating hi story.
Other sources for obtaining the information a re SALP
- reports, Performance Indicator Data, AEOD-Scrarn
- Studies, ESF Actuation
- Studies, Safety System Unavailability Studies, Techni ca 1 Speci fi ca ti on Violations, Monthly Operating Report
- Data, and Capacity Factors from NUREG-0020.
Data collection should be directed to those measures related to safety significant aspects of the maintenance process.
In addition, the inspector should conduct a detailed walkdown inspection of the overall plant material condition to assess the effectiveness of the licensee's maintenance process to the extent that it is reflected in plant housekeepinQ and in the external condition of equipment.
The scope of the inspection shculd include examination of direct measures by using information gleaned from plant and equipment for the following:
0 0
05.02
- a.
Historical data Material condition Management Support of Maintenance Management Commit~ent and Involvement.
The examination of management effectiveness concerning maintenance should be directed to deter-mining the extent of corporate and plant management awareness and support of the n~intenance and resolution of maintenance problems and should include examination of:
0 0
The application of industry initiatives.
Extent of manaqement direct participation in maintenance ond in corrective actions (management vigor and example).
- b.
~anagement Organization and Administration.
The inspection of management organization and administration contra 1 s should be directed to determining how the organi zatic:n supports maintenance
<1ct.ivities, what maintenance activity plan has been established, hm..
- the maintenance activity plan has been implemented, corrEcted, and controlled, a11c the control o-7 resources.
The inspection* should includp examination of:
Issue Cate:
09/22i89
- G -
2515/97
(
\\
)
\\
j 0
0 c
c 0
c Prog r.am cove rag.or ma i 11tenance Policy, roals, an~ objectiv~s for maintenance Allocation of resources Definition of maintenance requirements Performance measurement Document Control System for maintenance Maintenance decision process
- c.
Technical Support.
The areas that are to be selectively examined for the technical support o~ganizations with regard to maintenance are as fo 1101-;s:
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Internal and/or corporate corrnriuni cation channels Engineering control Ltcensee acknowledgement of risk significance Quality control Incorpordtion cf radiological controls into maintenance process Safety Review Committees Regulatory documents Trending Examples of the applicable departments or organizations subject to this inspection are:
0 0
0 0
0 0
c Engineerihg (nuclear, instrumentation and control (I&C),
mechanical, electrical~ licensing, systems, etc.)
Quality Assurance (QA)
Quality Control (QC)
Health Physics (HP)
Safety Fi re Protection Operatic..r1s 05.03 Maintenance Implementation
- a.
Work Control.
The inspection of the work control process should be directed to work order documentation, equipment history, observation of'.testing in progress, plar1ning and scheduling, and document review.
The inspection should incluae selective examination of:
0 Review of maintenance in progress 0
Work order control 0
Maintenance of equipment records and history Cl Job planning 0
Work prioritization c
Maintenance work scheduling c
Backlog controls c
Maint~nance procedures c
Post-maintEriance testing C'
Revie~ of completed work control documents
- b.
Plant Maintenance Organization.
The inspection of the plcint mainte-nance organization should be directed to how the OrQanizatior1 supports ma "inten<H?ce activities, how the r.ia i ntencince activi ti£:~ are controlled, implemented, and corrected, how personnel are controlled, how the organizc.tion establishes documentation, the effectiveness of 2515/97 Issue Dote:
09/22/89 R
R
- c.
the cqordi nation.d feedb;ick lines of corr.muni ca.r. t'etween r l ar.t mdnagement and craft personnel, and the effectiveness of int.Erfaces with other departments, especially operntions.
The ir1sp~ction shculd include selective examination of:
c
('
c c
0 Control of plant maintenance activities Control of contracted maintenance Deficiency identification, control, and corrective action system Maintenance trending Support interfaces Maintenance Facilities, Equipment, and Materials Control.
lowing are to be selectively examined for the nrea of equipment, and material controls, as well as for their the maintenance process:
c 0
Maintenance facilities ar.d equipment Material controls Maintenance tool and equipment control The fol -
facilities, suppcrt of c
Control and calibration of measurement and test equipment
- d.
Personnel Control.
The following areas of personnel control are to be selectively
- examined, including cor.sideration of
- staffing, training, and qualification:
0 c
(*
c Staffing control Personnel training Test ~nd qualification process Assessment of the current personnel control status 2515/97-06 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS The appropriate regional office will document the findings and the actior.s taken in an inspectiol1 report and, in addition to the normal distribution, will forward one copy to the Director, Division of Licensee Performance and Quality Evaluation, Office of NRR, ar.d one copy to the Director, Division of Reactor *.Safety, in each of the other regional offices.
P.
copy of the R
Maintenance Inspection Tree colored to reflect the inspection results for P.
each inspection conducted should be sent to the Chief of PQEB at mail stop R
10-A-19.
R 2515/97-07 COMPLETION SCHEDULE Inspections should be scheduled so that they are completed prior to Ppril, P.
1991.
2515/97-08 EXPIRATION This temporary instruction shall remain in effect until April J.9~1 or R
until the inspections t*...l'te been completed.
Issue Date:
09/22/89 2515/97
l
\\ !
)
2515/97-09 NRR CONTA.
Any c;uestions regarding this temporary instruction should be addressed tG A. T. Gady (301-492-1117).
2515/97-10 STATISTICAL DATA REPORTING Record the actual time spent to perform this inspection against inspectior:
procedure number 25597 for the 766 system and {515/0~7 for RITS.
2515/97-11 ORIGINATING ORGANIZATION INFORMATION 11.01 Organization Responsibilities.
The Perfonnance ar.d Quality Evaluation Branch of t-jRR will provide support and overall guidance for these inspec-tions.
11.02 Estimated Resources.
Eoch inspection is plarined for 6 weeks for 6 persons with 2 of the 6 weeks being direct onsite inspection (12 staff weeks) and 1 week in-office inspection, with expected additional effort by the team leader (a total of 38 staff weeks).
This total includes prepara-tior1, inspection and report writing.
11.03 Parallel Inspection Procedures The inspection procedures that this TI may satisfy totally or in part are listed below.
Where credit is taken, the inspection report should note the inspection procedure number per IMC-0610.
The region should make final determinations based on the scope ilnd documentation of the inspection.
37701 37702 37828 CIP 38701 38702 41400 2515/97 56700 61700 61725 62700 62702 62703 CIP 62704 62705 72701 83000 series 92700 CIP 92701 END
- s -
IssuE Vate:
09/2~/89