ML18057B454

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 911105-1216.Violation Noted:Licensee Conclusion Did Not Include Written Evaluation W/Basis Stating Why Additive Did Not Create Unreviewed Environ Question
ML18057B454
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/27/1991
From: Shafer W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML18057B453 List:
References
50-255-91-24, NUDOCS 9201070026
Download: ML18057B454 (1)


Text

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Consumers Power Company Palisades Nuclear Generating Plant Docket No. 50-255 License No.

DPR~20 During a~ NRC inspection performed from November 5 to December 16, 1991, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.

In accordance with the "General Statement 'of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"

10 CFR Part 2, Appendix c (1991)), the violation is listed below.

The Palisades Operating License at paragraph 2.C.(2), requires compliance to the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B of the license.

Section 3~1 of Appendix B.requires a written evaluation which provides the bases for determination that a change, test, or experiment does not

  • involve an unreviewed environmental question nor constitute a decrease in the effectiveness of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP.)~
  • Contrary to the above, the licensee concluded that a chemical additive could be added to the service water system to kill zebra mussels, 'with no increase in: EPP effectiveness.

This conclusion did not include a written evaluation*with a basis stating why the additive did not create an eviewed environmental question.

. is is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement 1) *.

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Consumers Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission; ATTN:

Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region III, 199 Roosevelt Road, Glen Ellyn, Illinois, 60137, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).

This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and sho.uld include the following:

{l} the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Glen Ellyn, Illinois this 27th day of De6ember, 1991 9201070026 911227 PDR

  • ADOCK 05000255 Q.

PDR 2