ML18052B193

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Conformance to Item 2.1 (Part 2) of Generic Ltr 83-28, Reactor Trip Sys Vendor Interface,Calvert Cliffs-1 & -2, Millstone-2 & Palisades, Final Informal Rept
ML18052B193
Person / Time
Site: Millstone, Calvert Cliffs, Palisades, 05000000
Issue date: 06/30/1987
From: Farmer F
EG&G IDAHO, INC., IDAHO NATIONAL ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
To:
NRC
Shared Package
ML18052B192 List:
References
CON-FIN-D-6001, CON-FIN-D-6002 EGG-NTA-7720, GL-83-28, TAC-52855, NUDOCS 8707170237
Download: ML18052B193 (15)


Text

.. '*.

,)daho.

  • c*
  • :**. i Na.tional **.
    • i~dineeti1J~ii**~.:

._-*._ *Laboratoey>*:~.. -*.

... ~. "

    • .*** .~,~*:* *~.. ::b~~~-aew-*~.

.., *** Depaitinerft.. _.

qfEnergv~*:.':_,:.

.. ; r*,,.,.. :: ~.

  • ~'.-.

~ *..

. *, ~ :. ~ ',.,... ' ;* :~{. -*. ',...

... ~.. -

. * :.'../:,;,.

PDR ADOCK 05000255

.~~-

P PDR

.::'* \\**:

EGG-NTA-77 20 June 1987 INFORMAL REPORT CONFORMANCE TO ITEM 2.1 (PART.2) OF GENERIC LETTER 83-28, REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM VENDOR INTERFACE, CALVERT CLIFFS-1 A~D -2, MILLStONE-2, AND PALISADES F. G. Farmer Prepared for the U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

DISCLAIMER This book was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the.united States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy., completeness. or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe p~ivately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product. process. or service by trade name. trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise.

does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring

. by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do riot necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

I

1.

CONFORMANCE TO ITEM 2.1 (PART 2) OF GENERIC LETTER 83-28 REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM VENDOR INTERFACE CALVERT CLIFFS-1 ANO -2 Mll.LSTONE-2 PALISADES F. G. Farmer Published June 1987 Idaho National Engineering Laboratory EG&G Idaho, Inc.

Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 Prepared for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm1ss1on Washington, O.C.

20555 Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC07-761001570 FIN Nos. 06001 and 06002 E GG-NTA-77 20

ABSTRACT This EG&G Idaho, Inc. report provides a review of the submittals for some of the Combustion Engineering (C-E) nuclear plants for conformance to Generic Letter 83-28, Item 2.l (Part 2).

The report includes the following Combustion Engineering plants, and is in partial fulfillment of the following TAC Nos.:

Plant Calvert Cliffs-1 Calvert Cliffs-2 Millstone-2 Palisades ii Docket Number 50-317 50-318 50-336 50-255 TAC Number 52825 52826 52855 52864

~.

FOREWORD This report is provided as part of the program for evaluating licensee/applicant conformance to Generic Letter 83-28, "Required Actions Based on Generic Implications of Salem ATWS Events." This work is conducted for the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Conmission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Division of Engineering and System Technology by EG&G Idaho-,

Inc~

The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Conmission funded the work under the authorization, B&R 20-19-19-11-3, FIN Nos. D6001 and 06002.

CONTENTS ABSTRACT.............................................................

FOREWORD.............................................................

1.

INTRODUCTION....................................................

2.

REVIEW REQUIREMENTS.............................................

3.

GROUP REVIEW RE SUL TS............................................

4.

REVIEW RESULTS FOR CALVERT CLIFFS-1 ANO -2......................

4. 1 4.2 Evaluat1on Conclusion
5.

REVIEW RESULTS FOR MILLSTONE-2....................... :..........

5. 1 5.2 Evaluation Conclusion
6.

REVIEW RESULTS FOR PALISADES....................................

7.

6.1 6.2 Evaluation Conclusion GROUP CONCLUSION

8.

REFERENCES.................. *....................................

iv ii i ii 1

2 3

4 4

4 5

5 5

6 6

6 7

8

I~

CONFORMANCE TO ITEM 2.1 (PART 2) Of GENERIC LETTER 83-28 REACTOR TRIP s*vsTEH VENDOR INTERFACE CALVERT CLIFFS-1 AND -2 HILLSTONE-2 PALISADES

1.

INTRODUCTION On July 8, *1983, Genertc Letter 83-281 was tssued by 0. G. 'usenhut, Otrector of the 01v1ston of Ltcenstng, Offtce of Nuclear Reactor.

Regulatton, to all ltcensees of oper~ttng reactors, applicants for operating ltcenses, and holders of constructton permits.

This letter included required actions based on generic impltcattons of the Salem ATWS events.

These requirements have been published in Volume 2 of NUREG-1000, "Generic Implications of ATWS Events at the Salem Nuclear Power Plant.~

2 Th\\s report documents the fG&G Idaho, Inc. rev1ew of the subm1ttals of four of the Combustion fngtneertng plants, Calvert Cliffs-1 and -2,*

Mtllstone-2 and Palisades, for conformance to Item 2.1 (Part 2) of Gener1c Letter 83-28.

The submittals from the licensees and applicants ut11tzed in these evaluattons are referenced in Section 8 of this report.

1

2.

REVIEW REQUIREMENTS Item 2.1 (Part 2) (Reactor Trip System - Vendor Interface) requires licensees and applicants to establish, implement and maintain a continuing program to ensure that vendor information on Reactor Trip System (RTS)

  • components is complete, current and controlled throughout the life of the plant, and appropriately referenced or incorporated in plant instructions and procedures.

The vendor interface program is to include periodic convnunications with vendors to assure that all applicable information has been received, as well as a system of positive feedback with vendors for mailings containing technical information, e. g., licensee/applicant acknowledgement for receipt of technical information.

That part of the vendor interface program which ensures that vendor information on RTS components, once acquired, is appropriately controlled, referenced and incorporated in plant instructions and procedures, will be evaluated.as part of the review of Item 2.2 of the Generic Letter.

Because the N~clear Steam System Supplier (NSSS) is ordinarily also the supplier of the entire RTS, the NSSS is also the principal source of information on the components of the RTS.

This review of the 11censee and applicant submittals will:

l.

Confirm that the licens~e/applicant has identified an interface with either the NSSS or with the vendors of each of the components of the Reactor Trip System.

2.

Confirm that the interface identified by licensees/applicants includes periodic convnunication with the NSSS or with the vendors of each of the components of the Reactor Trip System.

3.

Confirm that the interface identified by licensees/applicants includes a system of positive feedback to confirm receipt of transmittals of technical information.

2 1.* 0'

  • ~,
3.

GROUP REVIEW RESULTS The relevant submittals from each of the included reactor plants were reviewed to determine compliance with Item 2.1 (Part 2). First, the submittals from each plant were reviewed to establish that Item 2.1 (Part

2) was specifically addressed.

Second, the submittals were evaluated to determine the extent to which each of the plants complies with the staff guidelines for Item 2.1 (Part 2).

3

4.

REVIEW RESULTS FOR CALVERT CLIFFS-1 AND -2 5.1 Evaluation Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, the licensee for Calvert Cliffs, provided their response to Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter on April 6, 1987.

In that response, the licensee confirms that the NSSS for Calvert Cliffs is Combustion Engineering and that-the RTS for Calvert Cliffs is included as a part of the C-E interface program established for the Calvert Cliffs NSSS.

The C-E interface program for the NSSS includes periodic convnunication between C-E and licensees/applicants such as "INFOBULLETINS" containing information and reconvnendations concerning C-E.

systems*~ a system of positive feedback from licensees/applicants in the form of signed receipts for technical information transmitted by C-E, and periodic issuance by C-E of indices of INFOBULLETINS.

5.2 Conclusion We find the licensee's statement confirming that Calvert Cliffs is a participant in the Combustion Engineering interface program for the RTS, which meets the staff position on Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter, is acceptable.

4

5, REVIEW RESULTS FOR MILLSTONE-2 5.1 Evaluation Northeast Utilities, the licensee for Hillstone-2, provided their response to Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter on April 2, 1987.

In that response, the licensee confirms that the NSSS for Hillstone-2 is Combustion Engineering and that the RTS for Millstone-2 is included as a part of the C-E interface program established for the Hillstone-2 NSSS.

The C-E interface program for the NSSS includes periodic co11111unication between C-E and licensees/applicants such as "INFOBULLETINS" containing information and reco11111endations concerning C-E systems~ a system of positive feedback from licensees/applicants in the form of signed receipts for technical information transmitted by C-E, and periodic issuance by C-E of indices of INFOBULLETINS.

5.2 Conclusion We find the licensee's statement confirming that Millstone-2 1*s a participant in the Combustion Engineering interface program for the RTS, which meets the staff position on Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic letter, is acceptable.

5

6.

REVIEW RESULTS FOR PALISADES 6.1 Evaluation Consumers Power, the licensee for Palisades, provided their response to Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter on May 8, 1987.

In that response, the licensee confirms that the NSSS for Palisades is Combustion Engineering and that the RTS for Palisades is included as a part of the C-E interface program established for the Palisades NSSS.

The C-E interface program for the NSSS includes' periodic communication between C-E and licensees/applicants such as "INFOBULLETINS" containing information and recolll1lendations concerning C-E systems, a system of pos1t1ve feedback from licensees/appltcants in the form of signed receipts for technical information transmitted by C-E, and periodic lssuance by C-E.

of indices of INFOBULLETINS.

6.2 Conclusion We find the licensee's statement confirming that Palisades is a participant 1n the Combustion Engineering interface program for the RTS, which meets the staff position on Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Gener1c Letter, is acceptable.

'J

7.

GROUP CONCLUSION We conclude that the licensee/applicant responses for the listed Combustion Engineering plants meet the staff position for Item 2.1 (Part 2) of Generic Letter 83-28 and are acceptable.

7

8.

REFERENCES

1.

NRC Letter, D. G. Eisenhut to all 11censees of Operating Reactors, Appl1cants for Operat1ng License, and Holders of Construction Permits, "Required Actions Based on Gener1c Implications of Salem ATWS Events (Generic letter 83-28)," July 8, 1983.

2.

Generic Implicat1ons of ATWS Events at the Salem Nuclear Power Plant NUREG-1000, Volume l, Apr11 1983; Volume 2, July 1983.

3.

Baltimore Gas and Electric Company letter to NRC, J. A. Tiernan to Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, "Additional Information Concerning BG&E Responses to Generic Letter 83-28," Apr11 6, 1987.

4.

Northeast Utilities letter to NRC, E. J. Mroczka to Document Control

Desk,

"~eneric Letter 83-28, Salem AtWS," April 2, 1987.

5.

Consumers Power letter to NRC, J. L. Kuemin to Document Control Desk, "Additional Information - Vendor Interface and Equipment Classification - Generic Letter 83-28," May 8, 1987.

8

    • .. /

NAC FOAM 335 12-8*1 U.I. NUCLIAA RIOULATOAY COMMllllON

1. REPORT NUM8ER IAuipMIOv TIOC. *dd Vot. No.* il*nvl NRCM 1102.

3201. 3202 BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA SHEET EGG-NTA-7720 SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON TME REVERSE

2. TITLE ANO SUBTITLE CONFORMANCE TO ITEM 2.1 (PART 2) OF GENERIC LETTER 83-28, REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM VENDOR INTERFACE, CALVERT CLIFFS-1 AND -2, MILLSTONE-2, AND PALISADES
5. AUTMORIS)

F. G. Farmer

1. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME ANO MAILING ADDRESS 11..ctut#ZIP C-1 EG&G Idaho, Inc.

P. 0. Box.1625 Idaho Falls, Idaho

10. SPONSORING ORGANIZATION NAME ANO MAILING ADDRESS f/ttelut#Zip Cadel Division of Engineering and System Technology Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
12. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
13. ABSTRACT 1200 won/1 °' !auJ
l. LIAVI BLANK
  • .DATE REPORT COMPLETED MONTH I

YEAR June 1987

6. DATE REPORT ISSUED MONTH I

YEAR June 1987

8. PROJECTITASIC/WORIC UNIT NUMBER
9. FIN OR GRANT NUMBER D6001/D6002 1 h. TYPE OF REPORT
b. PERIOD COVERED f/ttelu1i.. dll,..I This EG&G Idaho, Inc. report presents the results of our evaluation of the submittals of some of the Combustion Engineering nuclear plants for conformance to Generic Letter 83-28, Item 2.1 (Part 2).

1

  • OOCUllll~NT ANAL YStS
  • KE 'l'IOROS10ESCA1PTOMS
o. IOENTIF 1EASIOPEN-ENOEO TERMS
15. AVA11.ABl\\.ITV STATEMENT Unlimited
16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

/Thir,,.,_,

Unclassified (Tlti1,..gort}

Unclassified

17. NUMBER OF PAGES
18. PRICE