ML18052B148

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 870505-0601
ML18052B148
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/11/1987
From: Guldemond W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML18052B147 List:
References
50-255-87-14, NUDOCS 8706230335
Download: ML18052B148 (1)


Text

  • .. :*.. *

~.. *. :*_..,:. **

~.,........,_ :..... -:1 *. '.*.. ':

,_...... :.:*,.:.. *:.* : ~~_::.. :1'.;*...:._*

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Consumers Power Company Docket No. 50-255 As a result of the inspection conducted on May 5 through June 1, 1987 and in accordance with the General Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C), the following violation was identified.

10 CFR 50.55a(g)(4)(ii) requires that inservice tests to verify operational readiness of valves whose function is required for safety shall comply with the applicable Section XI edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Article IWV-3400 requires valve exercising tests to be performed on active Category A valves as defined in IWV-2000.

Article IWV 3300 requires valve position indicator verif.ication.

The eight containment isolation valves (SV 2412 A&B, SV 2413 A&B, SV 2414 A&B, SV 2415 A&B) for the Hydrogen Monitoring System are active Category A valves.

Contrary to the above, the eight containment isolation valves for the Hydrogen Monitoring System neither had been tested nor had position indicator verifications performed as required by the Code since construction of the system in 1984.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of the Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:

(1) corrective action* taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

Date JUN 11 1987 t 91 w~~

Reactor Projects Branch 2