ML18045A464
| ML18045A464 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palisades  |
| Issue date: | 07/23/1980 |
| From: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Dewitt R CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8008120112 | |
| Download: ML18045A464 (4) | |
Text
Docket No. 50-255 Consumers Power Company ATTN:
Mr. R. B. DeWitt Vice President Nuclear Operations 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, MI 49201 Gentlemen:
CENTRAL FILES PJH[ 2 3 980 The enclosed IE Circular No-. 80-17, is forwarded to you for information.
If there are any questions related to your understanding of the suggested actions, please contact this office.
Enclosure:
IE Circular No. 80-17 cc w/encl:
Mr. D. P. Hoffman, Nuclear Licensing Administrator Mr. J. G. Lewis, Manager Central Files Director NRR/DPM Director NRR/DOM RIII RIII Hei~/jp ~er 7/23/80
? ZJ soos12 oJJ~
Q Sincerely, James G. Keppler Director PDR Local PDR NSIC TIC Ronald Callen, Michigan Public Service Commission
/
I, UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C.
20555 July-23, 1980 SSINS #6830 Accession No.:
8005050065 IE Circular No. 80-17 FUEL PIN DAMAGE DUE TO WATER JET FROM BAFFLE PLATE CORNER Description of Circumstances:
On May 8, 1980, Portland General Electric submitted a Licensee Event Report
- No. 344/80-06, concerning the April, 1980 discovery of failure of a fuel pin***
in each of two assemblies during the past operating cycle.
The LER stated that each of the fuel pins was located adjacent to a joint in the core baffle, and that the failures had resulted from tube vibration resulting from water jet impingement on the fuel pin.
This general type of damage has been experienced previously.
Three damaged fuel pins were found in 1971-72 at a non-domestic power plant.
Subsequently,-. -
one failed pin was found in 1973 and again in 1975 at non-domestic plants.
rn*
1975, one fuel pin failed at Point Beach.
These six fuel pin failures involved bypass flow through gaps in the inside corner of the baffle (the fuel 11 sees 11 a 90° angle, i.e., the edge of a box as seen from inside the box).
The baffle joints in these plants had not been peened prior to initial core loading.
Joints were peened following discovery of the failures, and no subsequent damage has been observed near the joints where the above failures were discovered.
More recently, in July 1979 fuel pin damage was detected in ten fuel assemblies at the Swedish Plant, Ringhals Unit 2.
In November, 1979 fuel pin-damage was reported at the KO-RI Unit 1 in Korea on two fuel assemblies.
Most recently in April, 1980 fuel pin failures were discovered in two assemblies at the end of Cycle 2 in Trojan.
In all three of the above recent instances, the failures were en~ountered in assemblies which had been associated with center injection points (the fuel 11 sees 11 a 270° angle, i.e., the edge of a box as seen from outside the box).
In addition in all three, the core support struc-tures utilized a baffle plate design with a reduced number of edge to edge bolts on adjoining baffles.
An ultimate fix of the baffle joint problem is to peen the entire joint with a 11flat land 11 peening technique to reduce the gap between baffle segments.
Because of scheduling concerns, this was not accomplished at Trojan during the recent outage.. Instead, PGE decided to install stainless steel pins adjacent to the two baffle joints of concern, and delay further peening efforts until the next refueling outage.
High velocity coolant cross flow (
11 jetting 11 ) through the gaps of the core baffle joints can result in damage to only a very limited number (us~ally 1 or
. 2) fuel pins, and only at certain discrete elevations on those pins.
Since
.. **---** i.... "'..., - -.
IE Circular No. 80-17 July 23, 1980 Page 2 of 2 there is no mechanism for propagation of the failures to adjacent. pins, these failures are not viewed as a significant safety concern.
However, in order to keep fuel failures and resulting primary coolant activity levels as low as possible, we recommend the followin~ actions.
Recommended Actions for PWR Construction Permit Holders and PWR Licensees:
- 1.
Determine core locations that might be subject to water jet impingement upon fuel pins that could potentially be damaged by fretting.
- 2.
(Licensees only).
Examine fuel pins that were discharged from those locations, or are now at those locations (during the next refueling outage).
- 3.
Take appropriate actions to correct/prevent occurrence of this problem.
Although this problem has appeared only in certain Westinghouse PWRs, this Circular is being distributed to all PWRs since there may be other designs where the "as installed 11 core baffle may have plant specific features which could contribute to similar failures.
~
No written response to this Circular is required.
If you desire additional information regarding this matter, contact the Director of the appropriate NRC Regional Office.
--* -- -- - -- -------~-~-*--_,..........- -*----____,.~~-~-.. -~-*--*--:::---**......-:*~-~- --.-.
.,-"'-,~-.. *---*-***-.
IE Circular No. 80-17 July 23, 1980 RECENTLY ISSUED
- IE CIRCULARS Circular No.
80-16 80-15 80-14 80-13 80-12 80-11 80-10 80-09 80-08
.80-07 Subject Operational Deficiencies In Rosemount Model 510DU Trip Units And Model 1152 Pressure Transmitters Loss of Reactor Coolant Pump Cooling and Natural Circula-tion Cooldown Radioactive Contamination of Plant Demineralized Water System and Resultant Internal Contamination of Personnel Grid Strap Damage in Westinghouse Fuel Assemblies Valve-Shaft-To-Actuator Key May Fall Out of Place When Mounted Below Horizontal Axis Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Cooler Failures Failure to Maintain Environmental Qualification of Equipment Problems With Plant Internal Communications Systems BWR Technical Specification Inconsistency - RPS Response Time Problems with HPCI Turbine Oil System Date of Issue 6/27/80 6/20/80 6/24/80 5/18/80 5/14/80 5/13/80 4/29/80 4/28/80 4/18/80 4/3/80 Enclosure Issued to All power reactor facilities with an OL or a CP A 11 power reactor facilities with an.
OL or CP All holders of Power and Research Reactor licensees (Operating and Construction Permits), and Fuel
~
~
Cycle licensees All holders of Reactor OLs and CPs All holders of Reactor OLs and CPs All holders of a power reactor OL or CP All holders of Reactor OLs and CPs All holders of a power reactor OL or CP All General Electric BWR's holding a power reactor*OL All holders of a power reactor OL or CP
-. --~ *: -
--~
.