ML18039A544
ML18039A544 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Browns Ferry ![]() |
Issue date: | 08/06/1996 |
From: | TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML18039A528 | List: |
References | |
REF-GTECI-A-46, REF-GTECI-SC, TASK-A-46, TASK-OR CD-Q3071-960089, CD-Q3071-960089-R, CD-Q3071-960089-R00, NUDOCS 9810020183 | |
Download: ML18039A544 (38) | |
Text
'&"( BV:Twirl CORP BFtV' 8-21-98
- 9:58AM 'ORP FhlG(J BFA'P-415 397 5209 :" 2/20 QA Record SITE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS RECORD TLE: VERIFICATIONOF ANCHORAGE FOR PANEL 3-25-31 TO RESOLVE PLANT/UNIT: BFN/3 THE OUTLIER IDENTIFIEDBYUSI A46 EVALUATION(SSEL ¹39204).
Sheet i PREPARING ORGANIZATION SITE ENGINEERING - CIVIL BRANCH/PROJECT IDENTIFIERS ClhQ3071-960089 APPLICABLEDESIGN DOCUMENT(S)
BFN-50-C-7100 KEYNOUNS (Consult RIMS DESCRIPTOR LIST) SEISMIC QUAL, EQPT, PANELS Each tirnc thcac celculariona ere iaauerL pcparcra mutt ensure that thc original (RO) lUMS accession number i~ fillcdin.
REV (for RIMS use)
RIMS accession number RL 960807 104 SAR SECTtON(S)
NIA REVISION 0 UNIDSYSTEM(S) 07t Checked:
DCN No. (or indicate Not Applicable) T39817A Prepared:
S.S. HAID
'Safety-related?
Yes 5 No D Statement ofProblem:
VERIFYANCHORAGE ADEQUACYFOR PANEL 3-25-31 TO RESOLVE THE OUTLIERIDENTIFIEDBY USI A46 AS NOTED 1N SSEL ¹ 39204.
viewed.
Approved:
J. VALENTE ORIGINAL Date:
List ell pages added by thi~ revision List ell pages deleted by this nniiaion Liai all pages changed by this retrision Calculation tcvlslon; (A)Entire Cele; (P) Selected Pagne LKGIBILI7Y EVALUATED and ACCEPTEO for issue.
'B
~ sag Signature Da t.
Abstract These calculations contain an unverified assumption(s) that must be verified lated Yes 0 No W THIS CALCULATIONDOCUMENTS THE ADEQUACYOF ANCHORAGE FOR PANEL 3-2S-31 TO RESOLVE THE OUTLIER IDENTIFIEDBY USI A46 EVALUATIONFOR SSEL ¹ 39204.
'ss8i0020i83
'1180925 PDR ADOCK 05000260 P
PDR-MICROFILMAND RETURN CALCULATIONTO:
cc: RIMS, SL 26 C-K
t
~
0
~O i
SAT BY:TVAiV CORP BFNP 8-21-98 ':59AM:
CORP EiNGG BFiiP" 415 397 5209 :" 3/20 rm:
YBRIPlCATmMOP ANCHORAGHMR PANEL 3-2S-31 TO RBSOLVB THE OUILKRIDBNTlF1EDBY USI A46 EVALUATION.
Sheet~
REVISION LOG CD-Q307 1-960089 NO.
DESCRIPTION DATEAPPROVED 0
INITIALISSUE PER DCN T39817A TOTALNUMBER OF SHEETS = 19
~O
SEXI'Y:TVAiiCORP BFitP
- 8-21-S8
'10:OOAiY 'ORP FRIGG BFiNP" 415 387 5209:-" 4l20 CALCULATIONDESIGN VERIFICATION(INDEPENDENT REVIEW) FORiVf (PER NEP-3.1)
Sheet iii Branch/Project Identifier:
Revision No.~
Method of design verification (independent review) used (check method used):
- l. Design Review
- 2. Alternate Calculation
- 3. Qualification Test 0
sign Verifier (Independent Reviewer)
Date
~,
I
~O
~O
SENT BY:TVAN CORP BFibP
- 8-21-98
'10:OOAiiI CORP EiiGG BFNP-415 097.i209 :" 5/20 Sheet of Compuoxl 5 ~ 4 Date~R~K't(
Checked ddet Dee:~~
TABLEOF CONTENTS SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
2.
COVER SHEET REVISION LOG CALCULATIONDESIGN VERIFICATION 4,
TABLEOF CONTENTS tv 5.0 BODY OF CALCULATION 5.1 I VRPOSE 5.2 ASSUMPTIONS 5.3 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS/LIMITINGCONDITIONS 2
,5.4 DATA 5,5 REFERENCES 5.6 COMPUTATIONS 5.7
SUMMARY
4 CONCLUSIONS 6,0 ATTACHMENTS A) USI A46-SEWS
I ~
~O iO
~O
S&t BY:TVAN CORP BFNP
- 8-21-98
- 10:QIAM CORP ENGG BFi'tP" 415 397 5209.:" 6I20 Shee!~ of coolpuree 5 9 lh De<el~~+ I l fe Checked ~eh Date 7- >O. VIS s 1 PURPLE'SI A46 EVALUATIONFOR SSEL 8 39204 IDENTIFIED THATTHE OVERALLANCHORAGE SCHEME OF THE PANEL'S PEDESTAL TO THE EMBED PLATE IN THE FLOOR CAN NOT BE VERIFIED. THIS CALCULATION%ILLVERIFYTHE ADEQUACYOF THE ANCHORAGE OF THE PANEL.
0
~O
~~
SEIZE BY:TVAiI CORP BFibT'-21-98
- 10:01AM CORP EGG BFi'tP" 415 397 5209
- "- 7i20 Sheee~ of Compumd +>ii r>eeclJ~3l'9ie Checked ~
Deed~7. ~-
'5.2 THERE ARE NO UNVERIFIED ASSUMPTIONS IN THIS CALCULATION, 53 THIS CALCULATIONDOES NOT GENERA'IKANYSPECIAL REQUIREMENTS OR LIMlTINGCONDITIONS WHICH UMITSYSTEM OR PLANT OPERATION FROM THATCURRENTLY DOCUMENTED IN THE DESIGN, OR PLACE SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS ON THE PHYSICAL'ONFIGURATIONTHAT ARE GENERALLYOUTSIDE THE STATED PURPOSE OP THE CALCULATION.
Sc4 M~
- 1. A7I'ACHMENT-A
4i i
0
SENT B'it:TVAN CORP BFi%'-21-98
'10:01AM CORP EIGG BFiV' 415 397 5209:" 8l20 Sheet~
ef Computed
~ ~kk Dete~~h ice checked deito Dete~ued -1(
- 1. DCN T39S17A
- 2. Drawing 0<5N370
- 3. Drawing 4SN922
- 4. GENERIC IMPLEMENTATIONPROCEDURE FOR SEISMIC VERIFICATIONOF NUCLEAR PLANT EQUIPMENT. (gZ<g >
W l2. $5o1go oo Q
- 5. MARS REPORT CEB SS-05-C Rl
- 6. DESIGN CRITERIA BFN-50-C-7100
- 7. DES1GN CRITERIA BFN-50-C-7105
iO
~O
~O
SEtNT BY:TVAit CORP BFlP
- 8-21-98 '10:02AIli:
CORP EtNGQ BFtVP-
" 415 097 5209
- -" 9/20 Sheee~.of Compueeo i S tS Deco~I~>
'it'hecked Ift~
Date 7. M ~ lg 5.6 too-ffee.eeeesef I,
g~i~>g ~~ ~
Ho ~op S~ea tfee BLS CIL-A~
t &ABO 4.
CA<
Mop QZ
/~lit-i,'tc-P QnA-
~p,~,~t~>~
s ~ws ~
EW~t p~t ~~i:
p~~ tt, g~p,( ltftoey~i 4
$ 45O ~~P ~ ~ ~t 0 l ~
@+657 I'eII ViSig'L~
1<
Wt=t.
2-- ~S-S l W~e t'6 udtf W
t r ~
L. 3~6~
I tJbT
~VtS 4'V'fI. t%fL ~ U&M VCMAL lb'64 flM If 4 PPP~
gg-5t tt t At t 5 u<<rS Skd ~E QIM1t.+W ANWo~> Se-tW~t',
t Pgpgta,g~
C A KCV'>E.t~
ap ~t~
t~<cuL~t~
ua,vr
~r-p.
I wtdvsc.
ecch Pao ~
P+1<-
p~t aefoeoefe eteetet 0 ls LsvkPstp ~T ee t ~r=
ze'>I" Ott- ~
f 4A.,
7VQZ te l 5 I+<8C.M tT754 PAr~t l-,
c~ ~
9-~-5'Y it<~>&
n-
~~
pg 4<4
~ e tt~f'F g- ~ te,~
OP- ~
~'tt'I.
g,
) tt
~5@'~T 7lg tnt t Ol=
l A~t.
f PQZ'3 WL, M~~E0 d rJ ~
5'OOr(+
~5T
&UT StgE u
~'7l ~ hY9 t>
II It Q n..
0 iO II
SENT BY:TVAN CORP BFibP
- 8-21-98 '10:03AitI:
CORP ENGG BFi%'"
41G 397 5209 :"10/20 Sheee~
of Compooof ~~~
Oem~~'b
<s'hecked
~'ate 7
~ i~dg COMPUThTIONS (CONT'D.):
F 0-
~i~ tl'L K c )r g o&
cA L,<,
C.e<$ c7ztJ~IIM7 Q wg(P~
4 CQ E Dg 4NML A5 ~T-tie t(
l A~
SlZf=',
1C.
5~ it'0 f~ ~~St-+
~ 1a
%%l4+g cap t A~/ l
~uk lH6 (At lQHQ, gg<~K55 taf-a el ppfe 'Kf-o f/5
'tk(eeoefa'ke OF ShhalV o N/S h.
6<dlp cx- <Qo LC gwRC'4 f, I
<S( c.W.
LKCa. Hole-TA L(g X>o efqa)+(S ee1f aeia)+ (Soveif)f(IQ( &e(-).
908 L5~.
f <T = (.4x g ag a i>f,a Lfe,S I y o
- USS,
~l'Y1 ziti l.
CPS<,'.
~g.C(= ~ NIt 0-P3 EP 5 t rvaehS SOS-eyPOrferF hy CO"ffl~
C'. fa.
4 f-
+4CL Ab S M<<~
NIL.plCt4 w Pl QH.T
~ I g.~. g
(=l., (,Zl' 5 t P~R~a,
$~(
SsC 4ccec..
c err-.
poy'fkmph r~<s.ff-a~
f.S =)
I ~ 01pf= p.go/.
I I
I l
I I
ot v =
f o x s <<ov Lzs o's't
~
I. o ~~mcpf >
our f/cffveufrye
'0
~O
SENT BY:TVAN CORP BFibP I
- 8-21-88 '10:03Airl:
CORP ENGG BFibP-415 397 5208
- -"11/20 Sheet~ of Compoted~&d Date~1<5 'li Checked than,Date COMPUThTIONS (CONT'D.):
rYl Ii 2'L a
iW)(Z)
(t oR)4 fo) + (S)iftt at)
=
col a2oo, eptat t l.
z (s)
(~)t,"ls"h 'k>3+(?<<j(s'ls)
= iqdt7o t~
lg 7Q ~ o IA UJ
/hg X +,22 r.
77 '7
i 0
SENT BY:TVA))t CORP BOP 8-21-98
'10:04AIV CORP E')GQ BFINP-41" 397 5209
- -"12/20 Sheet~
of Computed
~5l5 Dote I-h&-lL Checked ~~Date 7. '3~9l COMPUThTIONS (CONTP D.):
Cdrt)L LIT f 'eu)=
P)g PILL)or 'IAKLCt m te eu. LI tt5(
m 2 l 2 '
5/~
), tD9 (
) tD )
CPt)hpg
)PCS) d o)
I)th) tu)e)I)d)'LP h t" c.I'~L.K tt c z~
oA Qc5u + p.f'lcrV
Oi
SENT BY:TVAN CORP BFi'iP 8-21-98
'10:04AiV CORP EXGQ BFiF."
415 397 5209 :"13/20 Sheet~
af Competed 5 hii Dere~2$ -'7 i Checked ~&Date'Z. mete-fd 5.7 THIS CALCULATIONDOCUMENTS THE ADEQUACYOF THE ANCHORAGE OF THE PANEL TO RESOLVE THE OUTLIER IDENTIFIEDBY USI A46 EVALUATIONFOR SSEL 8 39204.
iO i
i
SENT BY:TYAiN.CORP BFiP 8-21-98
'10:QSAM 'ORP Ei%G BFiNP"
+X ATTACHMENT.
SHEET t
MR WFCIRhUOIC W VEei.Y t'
SO7l-'f(. oo 8f SY SSIE DATE~AS-44'15'97 5209 :"14/20
~
enXS f.M'SEL Line No.
39204 SCREENING EVALUATION tltORK SHEET (SEMS)
Status Y
N Ql.
Sheet 1'of P'"
Equip.
ID No.
3-PNLA-925-0031 Equip. Class 20 - Instr.
& Control Panels
& Cabinets Equipment Description LOCAL PANEL 25-31 Location: Bldg, U3 RB Floor El.
621 -=
Hanufacturer, Hodel, Etc. (optional but recommended)
I 4
Y g +~a N
U N/A(43,(~>~
OOC BS Q$i GERS GAS AGS CRS I.
Elevation where equipment receives setsmfc input 2.
Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade 3.
Equipment has fundamental frequency above about '8 Hz 4.
Capacity based on:
Existfng Documentation Bounding Spectrum 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum GERS Ground Response Spectrum 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum Conserv.
Oes. In-Str.
Resp.
Spec.
Realistic H-Ctr. In-Str. Resp.
Spec.
Does ca acity exceed demand2 (Indtcate at right (*) and in if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum fs invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)
(Identify with an asterisk
(*) those caveats are met by intent without meeting the specffic wording of the caveat rul explain the reason for this conclusion in the COHHENTS sect1on below) l.
Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class 8
N 2.
Ko computers or prograIIIIable controllers QP N
3.
No strip chart recorders 83 N
4.
Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate W N 5.
Ad5acent cabtnets or panels which are close enough to impact, or sections of multi-bay cabinets or
- panels, are bolted together if they contafn essential relays 6.
Drawers and equ1pment on slides restratned from falling out X
N 7.
All doors secured by latch'or fastener~. ~<", >~<'~ g N
8.
Attached 1ines have adequate flexibility 9.
Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details)
Y N
10.
Relays mounted on equipment evaluated >> = 9 "
'(5 N
t 11.
Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?'
N the intent of all the caveats-met for Boundtng Spectrum?
~NCJQMlIj, I.
Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., dam'ping, center of rotation)
N 2.
Type of, anchorage covered by GIP 4 '~~
< 3 I'>> ~ ~ "'qY N
3.
Sizes and locattons of anchors determined Y
N Demand based on:
C8 N
N U
(i'hich e and U
N/A U
N/A U
N/A (c-b. c')
U N/A<~, csi U
N/A (
'I U
N/A(")
U N/A N/A N/A U
N/A( >,(e U
N/A Y NN/A (2=
U N/A C" IS<" >
Qli N/A C>>>
Cl9 N/A I 9~
iO
~O
~O
SE'tT BY:TVAN CORP BFNP
- 8-21-98
- 10:06AM CORP EGG BF.'IP" 415 897 5209
- -"15/20 A
. ~~pgpgPQ; SSEI. LIna Nb.
3920L SCREENING EVALUATION MORK SHEET (SEMS)
SHEET 3
0 EDE IIITDIUAATIDNaN<~~
ET ~SI DATE 2 ~~
Sheet 2 of gy Equip.
ID No.
3-PNLA-925-0031 Equip. Class 20 - Instr.
& Control Panels
& Cabinets
,Equipment Description LOCAL PANEL 25-31 4.
Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,
veld quality and length, nuts and Qashers, expansion anchor tightness 5.
Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered:
embedment
- length, anchor spacing, free-edge
- distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking 6.
For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than I/4-inch 7.
Factors affecting essential relays considered:
gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors 8.
Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered Strength of'quipment base and load path to CG adequate 10.
Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Are anchorage requirements met?
N U
N/A 69 N
U N/A Y
N U QQj9 N
U N/A
<Y0 N U
N/A CV N U
N/A Y
N CS N/A<"~
V N aD<~1 I.
Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipmant or structures 2.
If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures 3.
Attached lines have adequate flexibility 4.
Overhead equipmant or distribution systems are not likely to collapse 5.
Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
Is equipment free of interaction effects?
C5 N
U N/A (~)A(I<1 N
U N/A N
U N/A(z)
N U
N/A (g
N U
N/ASNU YON U '~'I valuated by:
Oate:
9 EE5 g/p ~:
~O
~O
r SEiVf BY:TVAiV CORP BFi'iP 8-21-98
- 10:06AIH CORP ENGG BFiE'P-415 397 5209
- ."16r20 ETAGE W1ERNAllOMAL SHEET
+
OF boa>~roaegTiON ai v
o7t-/Can 8 ETT E
IIA DATEl >>-~4 JOB NO.~g JOB CALC. NO ~H BTIBIECT WF
. 4t.
Tn rgr ~ '.
r
~ j r
~',
Dh>
SHEET NO.
BY Dc.
DATE
".'T'HK'D~0jA DATE
>5~ SNo.:
-92.of 4yEBFANAf y)
+~ ~ ~BB
~
csATA Bi, gS~,.I y
BTnAA
~ >>,.
lpga AAA+ >\\'lr I
4f) 5B~
~
SETBETv'l~E
>Ca'C 7TA CEHD~ 'a I
V t
s)
( B~E E I P feJni'\\ id~~gii~.
oV fr EAA CfA qpFAC~W QTAA Sil'C4 B
( SBN' 4TA+w q
~
vo (,TBvfwq, M<'l4~ ~C C.LW~ EB 4 TE D'~
YA. a EA')'i*r T
cl FT
+ 4 q>>
Pa-.'I,
-~
FS
><'f/>>
g ~/
nr r..OrAV
(,r. A
~AB~Y
~
g C g.
(y T~
T'7pi+>>
iin I
nilich I'umC ~
ir
~
(A) i'B
~
Crc r.( ri ~
e'~
S*P'( ~ v
'\\
'vs Eih
~
BB V. r' vc
(~~Ms TCAry~
CB
+,
c
~
~
'<1~<
S~p E. ',S
) ESE W SEE)C~+s TAYt'C.
IEBAAi
~ ~
~, +~
EB, v
~ N $
/fan o
I I
F4 tlC ~i~
Da Tr.Xrr t lhj +O~E~~
V
~ I BSErrYIK~Trrs I
EB ~g
~Tr D~
SrTD CwiDY <<
C
$ L ~
3ya~ V/4gtCCJ~4;
$4*EnWXI /FB~ cfl~iA r)
~aj
y
~
~$
~li
~O
SERT BY:TVAiTI CORP BF:JP
- 8-21-98
- 10:07AM CORP EiXGG BFis'P" 415 397 5209
- "'17f'20 EQE ENTEAN)ETT~L ATTA YIIAENT:~
A SHEET~ C::
K4 1NTOQMATIGW Gi>LY o7I-0 C<<8 f JOBNO.~~
JOB CALC. NCE ~a)
EUBJECT S.S,e:
>'tZAH
(~-'d)
(Sf'f.'
r I
~ S
~>+a unSi EV ~<S DATE ~S-S~E EBEET NO. ~~
BY~'ai DATE CABOT'~
DATE 4~<)'5 Ef5 ~
T~+
W E'
~
S I5 amC~ ~A 11)
Qls Pcfla)A L i2 Si)Aaallu<
+0 Pc
~
L - +" "
ffgh fEB7%1 E
ATE caEE~
hqt C(NEAv oh iEEa
@Au ~
aA Ea uI'a crrl~-
sam'& L En ', ciao Pu~l
'EC 5I a aB i $
Coil) AE~B)>> "~
- lone f)rAE t '
>J s'4
- 1. (JI>( cd B.~c'-)
I's A +~-IE.
/B-cu~~gEs Q
Isa I
csi~LE M EE~<L AvE.gu~)~
ScM ~-'~i pa<<l'S p>>gG 4 1 -4
~earn@-
- uuB or M>>aAisM p>>~
7"tw EIEBIEI' IA no7 Q>>.
TlfurriTE uuEl I pyric'i if METE A
aE 5i>> ~
3%
I ~
g 4 Nels 4ia IYBL4Ia 'l
~qE u>>~
~
~
~
a
~ ~ i A
L~ig u5 ~ ~I':
au c'i gag 7 AB EEE u
~ r r
~ ~
~ ~nr I
IIEE>eL ~AL peufuu+a E.
+Ba B)a IIEy(lCAB'iu u)ISEAaaa BEaf fu~u i CuNEX)v Iratlu+ wil'<<'S
' '5" r Ar c>B t lc vwi44 c
- ,4 c
LL 4. v~A~'7i 't
~54.1
~ S ET~~ fa C
Ha ~
Lg a4 C.b/rug ~
/i@a tfaar ABAAo~u PIE ala Tr If +aaauait>>..)
L ~
l BAy 2.
TBAyg Cs~hE '<)
uj7dE)u<>N-SfW'I +r S Jgl ]>>79, 4m~
O f 'iEAu.
ISaaLr aaa E,LaWqg, P~'"" i rDu Era L
'air ES aai ~,
/ r4 aaN+
~
~ N.'.
C A.'
iO
~O
~O
SEiVf BY:TVAi'i CORP BFiNP 8-21-98: 10: 08AL'>i CORP EiNGG BFNP-415 097 5208 :"18l20 SSSL L<ee Ne.
Se>04 S>>SNY S oF
>oN >>>>oe>AAY>O>> ONLY..
oa-4>'8 (S
>>AYE2 Status Y
Sheet 1 of 1
N QV IPEEE SUPPLEMENTAL SCREENING EVALUAT10N MORKSHEET Equip.
ID No.
3-PNLA-925-0031 Equip. Class 20 - Instr.
a Control Panels a Cabinets Equipment Description LOCAL PANEL 25-31 RELAY kALKDOQN 1.
Does spot check of essential relays indicate relays present.
and proper ly mounted?
- 2. Are essential relays required to function during earthquake screened out?
If no, attach list of relays ~1th locations in cabinet and general dimensions, thicknesses and details of mounting plates that support relays for later analysis.
3.
No other relay concerns?
Requirements for relays satisfied?
.~Y N
U
'N/A Y
N N
/A Y
N N/A Y N(Q C'1 SYSTEM INTERACTION EFFECTS I. No potential sources could flood or spill onto
+Y N
U N/A cabinet?
DESCRIBE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS INDICATED BY NO OR UNSATISFACTORY (Use additional sheets if necessary)
O
~ ~Q I 4
ff i lee~
> S
'u~~e>~~
( ~
i)A~
N e
eLvc - >e~+)
QUIPMENT FREE OFJ4EED FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATIONEXCLUDINGREi.AY CHATTER' YES NO~ i a
~g t ee" ~)
IS EQUIPMENT FREE OF NEED FOR FURTHER RELAY CHATTER INVESTIGATION7 YES~
NO Evaluated by:
/
Date:
9 i~
Evaluated by:
l.
~O
~O
~,
SEi'ET BY:TYAN CORP BF(NP 8-21-98
'10:08AM CORP Et%'GG'FbiT'"
415 397 5209 :"19I20 ATTACHMENT:
SHEET~OF Ke Wmaaumox ovlv ao-
><7t-04~ ~
Ey CCff OATE ~~5<
t lof2 l.
OUTLIER IDENTIFICATION, DESCRIPTION, AND LOCATION ee
>EEL Line Ea
~sac ad esvs 3 1 L ta~
OUTLIER SEISMIC VERIFICATION SHEET (OSVS)
Equipment Location:
Bldg.
Rw~w~
Fleer Elecfatian ~a-c" Il II I 11 Equipment Description L~L L ~s-
~~
1 2.
OUTLIER ISSUE DEFINITION a.
Identify all the screening guidelines which are not met.
(Check more than one if several guidelines could not be satisfied.)
Nechanical and Capacity vs.
Demand Caveats Anchorage Seismic Interaction Other Shell Buckling*
Anchor Bolts and Embedment Anchorage Connections Flexibility of Attached Piping'ther Capacity vs.
Demand Mounting, Type, Location Other Inc usion Rules Other Seismic Performance Concerns Limited Analytical Review Other Ig dfl Igf1 f
Id
\\ Ig Iy
- large, Flat-bottom, vertical tanks.
b.
Describe all the reasons for the outlier (i.e., if all the listed outlier issues were resolved, then the signatories would consider this item of equipment to be verified for seismic adequacy):
eg eg
+L v
i
e S
SELVT BY:TYAN CORP BriVP P
l
- 8-21-98
- 10:09Aid CORP EVGG BFiVP-5 9
0:"0'0 SSEL Line Be. ~sz y Sheet 2 of ETTA OUTi.IER SEISHIC VERIFICATION SHEET (OSVS)
Equfpment ID Number
-D ->~is 3.
QQPQQQ METHOD OF OUTLIER RESOlUTION (OPTIONAL) a.
Define proposed method(s) for resolving outlier.
BY L SH'ATE~eS-SHEET~ pF~
KN fHfoaMATlOpowly
'hei I-6ao g
- or
'L i
otal 4a < ~e iVC
~ee
/Ca, ~ L4 b.
Provide information needed to implement proposed method(s) for resolving outlier (e.g.,
estimate of fundamental
.frequency).
4.
CERTIFICATION:
The information on this OSVS is, to the bast of our knowledge and belief, correct and accurate, and resolution of the outlfer issues listed on the previous page will satisfy the requirements for this item of equipment to ba verified for seismic adequacy:
Approved by: (For Equipment Classes ND - if22, all the Seismic Capabilfty Engineers on tha Seismic Review Team (SRT) should sign; there should ba at least 'two on the SRT.
One signatory should be a
licensed professional engineer.
For Relays, the l.ead Relay Reviewer should sign.)
A z,4 k KEc.l t or ype arne Jocu
- 0. pt~Q F'6 r nt or ype arne Ig~tre nature ate Date r nt or ypa arne gnature ate
iO i
II I
II 0