ML18037A628

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 931016-1119.Violation Noted:Design Changes Were Not Controlled in That on 931105, Ten Pages of Identification Number Changes for Fuses & Other Components Not Coordinated Through Operations
ML18037A628
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 12/17/1993
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML18037A627 List:
References
50-259-93-39, 50-260-93-39, 50-296-93-39, NUDOCS 9401040111
Download: ML18037A628 (3)


Text

e ENCLOSURE 1

OTIC 0

0 A ON Tennessee Valley Authority Browns Ferry 1, 2, and 3

Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260, and 50-296 License Nos.

DPR-33, DPR-52, and DPR-68 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on October 16 - November 19, 1993, violations of NRC requirements were identified.

In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"

10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violations are listed below:

10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion III, Design Control, requires that measures shall be e'stablished for the identification and control of design interfaces and for coordination among participating design organizations.

These measures shall include the establishment of procedures among participating design organizations for the review, approval,

release, distribution, and revision of documents involving design interfaces.

Contrary to the above, these requirements were not met for the following two examples:

1)

Design Changes were not controlled in that, on November 5,

1993, ten pages of identification number changes for fuses, handswitches, and other components which were changed by Design Change Notice S19592 were not coordinated thorough the Operations Department to change plant label'ing and procedures.

2)

Design Change Notice (DCN) S25756A to modify the unit separation boundary for system testing was issued without the appropriate control and coordination in that required plant configuration changes were not completed.

This was discovered on October 15,

1993, when an NRC inspector identified configuration changes, addressed in the DCN, not in their correct position.

The licensee then audited the configuration of the components required by the DCN and identified approximately two pages of needed changes.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I) applicable to all three units.

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, the Tennessee Valley Authority is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the,U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:

Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II,'

copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation.

This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a

Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:

(1) the reason for the violation, or if contested,

.the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results

achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not 9401040111 931217 PDR ADOCK 05000259 8

PDR

Tennessee Valley Authority Browns Ferry 1, 2, and 3

2 Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260, and 50-296 License Nos.

DPR-33, DPR-52, and DPR-68 received in the time specified in this Notice, an order or demand for informa-tion may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or

revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should'not be taken.

Where good cause is shown, consider ation will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 17th day of December, 1993