ML18037A154

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted During Inspec 50-220/78-12
ML18037A154
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point 
Issue date: 11/01/1978
From: Galen Smith
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Schneider R
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
Shared Package
ML17053A227 List:
References
NUDOCS 7811150038
Download: ML18037A154 (10)


See also: IR 05000220/1978012

Text

9P,II RFGI

~o

O

o~

/7 +a**+

Docket No.-50-220

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

631 PARK AVENUE

KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406

t(OV S

nlS

Niagara

Mohawk Power Corporation

ATTN:

Mr. R.

R. Schneider

Vice President

Electric Operation

300 Erie Boulevard Hest

Syracuse,

New York

13202

Gentlemen:

Subject:

Inspection 50-220/78-12

%5KFilIM7MP!(O'Il~ MP7

This refers to your letter dated October 17, 1978, in response

to our

letter dated

September

27, 1978,

and to a telephone

contact

by Mr. Plumlee

with Mr. E.

Leach

on October 23, 1978.

~

~

~

~

, Based

on the information provided

by Mr ~Leach

we understand

that you

are using color coding to identify dosimeters

that are

i'n calibration

and your control point monitors

and technicians will routinely check

this item. If our understanding

is incorrect please

inform"us in writing

within seven

(7) days of your receipt of'his letter.

c

~

I ~

Thank you for informing us of the corrective

and preventive actions

documented

in your litter.

These actions will be examined during a

subsequent

inspection of your licensed

program.

Your cooperation with us is appreciated.

Sincerely,

~

~

~

Geo

ge

. Smith, Chief

Fu

Facilities and Materials

S fety Branch

cc:

T. E. Lempges,

General

Superintendent,

Nuclear Generation

T. J. Perkins, Station Superintendent

C. L. Stuart,

Operations

Supervisor

~

~

~

~

E.

B. Thomas, Jr., Esquire

A. Z. Roisman,

Natural

Resources

Defense

Council

gpf

ggii/~gpss

<niagara

f-ehawk Power Corporation

2

bcc:

IE Veil 6 Fi1es

(For Appropriate Distribution)

Central Files

Public Document

Room (PDR)

Local Public Uocurznt Roon

(LPDR}

Huc1ear Safety Information Center

(t)SIC)

Technica1

Information Center

{TIC)

PEG:I Reading from

State of t]ev York

0

M 7 NIAGARA

F3 U MOHAWK

NWP-1060

NIAGARAMOHAWKPOWER CORPORATION/300 ERIE BOULEVARDWEST. SYRACUSE, N.Y. 13202/TELEPHONE (315) 474-1511

0~be/L 17,

1978

A,. HLLbe/Lt N.

C/I.ocke/L, A~g CM.et'I

Fu& FanXu."y and JHate/r.ulled

Sa)etIy 8/utch

UrLcted S~u

Nucfevc Regulato/Ly CommQamn

Regin I

631

Po/Lk Avenue

burg o) PuL56kx,

PA.

19406

RE:

Socket No. 50-220

lmpe~n RepoM 78-12

8exn, N..

C/Locke/L:

Septembe/L

27,

1978:

A.

Contrary to the requirements

of Technical Specifications Section 6.3. 1, four technicians

were assigned

responsible

positions in

the Radiochemistry

and Radiation Protection organization involving

the evaluation of radiological

hazards

and the issuance

of

Radiation

Work Permits

who did not have the required

minimum of

two years of working experience

in their specialty.

These assign-

ments

became effective commencing

October,

1977, for two individuals

and commencing April 1978 for the other two individuals.

RESPONSE

TELE /Le(e/L5 Co Che ~n5pe~n

conducted

by ~.

K. P~ee

o( you/L

o(pce

on Augur 28-31,

1978 at Nie Nne hKLe Po~< NueLea/L S~on

UnLt <1.

The (oLZowkng /Le5poI+es

a/Le sub~ed

Co Che aKeged

Lt'em'$

non-compMuice

cu d~edL n Appendix A o(

Iyou/L Lese/L dated

ln 0/Lde/L Xo /LeLieve, Che ~ndLv4.duaLe o( Che /Iet pon54.sty

/Le)e/uIed

W Le ANSI N18.1-1971,

aLL Ra~on

(Uo/Lk Pe.~

d/ca(Wed

bIy xndivcduaQ

uLLth< Zua Chan Wo yea/L5 o( expe/u'.ence

have,

be.en /Lev4.cued and counte/L-

44gned

by a /Lupowible pe/L5on cence We end o( Augur,

1978.

TRQ

p/uL~ce eLM cont4.nue

)o/L aLL ~ILL'.dud& eu.'h Le5a Sion Wo yea/L5

expe/u.ence

4.n A~ ape M+.

The/Le(o/Le, )u6! compMxnce hae

been

acAi cued.

The. (ou/LL n&v&uaQ cited use/Le asa~ned

Co ~e

RNP'a

(o/L jobs

and a/Lean Ln I0fu'.ch Whey uIe/Le gus.tI4.ed W make, Che p/Lope/L dmLeLone

based

on )o/Lemen and supe/Le~on

oboe/Lotion o( comp&ence demons~ed

du/ung W~ on-Xhe-job ~rung.

hfanagemerd )Le5pon54b~y

p/u'ojL Co

August

1978

u,'a5 exe/Lobed

NI/Lough We )o/Lemen ~n cua~grung jobs N We

Cechnician5

I0fw',ch we/I.e uLLthin W~ capab LL+.

B.

l.

Contrary to Section 2.4.5 of S-RTP-50,

on August 31,

1978,

two dosimeters,

Nos.

701088

and 250968,

were held for use

by individuals and

had not been calibrated for twelve months

or more.

0

Page

2

RESPONSE

TO 8.1

Since August 91,

1978,

tee have p~)oened ~ee sep~e

aampLings

o$ peuonneL seL(-mead'os&net~.

Thee samplkngs

(10-25 each)

have

mdicated

S 955 me uLtkin We weq~ed six month caLibnati on frequency.

IC is cons&Wed Hat JuLL compMtnce has

been achieved,

since Ae

Ces~g u<ecvaL m a aecommendatMn

(ahouLd be) ~n Man a aeq~ement

(ahaLL be,), boy in pmcedme

S-RTP-50

andean

Regulatory Guide 8.4.

Ne intend Co deveLop a moae effective method o( doskn&err, coettcoL

w&ch eiXL (aciLitate Che exchange

o( caUb~ed

(oa non-caLib~ed

dosed&~ at each subsequent

caUbcation.

B.

2.

Contrary to Section III F" of the Station Radiation Protection

Procedures,

no alpha

smear counting was performed

between

January

1,

1978 and August 28,

1978.

RESPONSE

Guru',ng the p~d of apprcoxunateLg

Marcch-August,

1978, the aLpha-

countm was inop~ve due Co eLe~nic pcobLems.

In Sepkemben,,

1978,

raepairr.

upas

compL&ed>

Since Chen,

aLpha activities have

been deteunined

W be

~10 d/m/100cm

on a4atQ n contamin~n

cKec amecuu.

In We

(~e,

when the aLpha ayskemke inop~ve,

aLpha dMervninations o(

afar n contamination arne~

eLLL be, accomplished

at Xhe J.A. FMzPaVu.ck

RadiochemicaL iab

on, by coetruxctoa.

TLQ ~k has

been assigned

Co a

Cechru,cian

Joe monthLy dMertmination.

S~g We instrument inop~ve peruod,

aLpha anaLyses

o$ sampLes,

o4>m Wan a~on contamination coveys,

~cas pn$ oened

by coetnactoa,

oc using aLtMnative equipment.

FuLL compLiance has,

Wme$ oce,

been achieved.

C.

Contrary to Technical Specifications

Sections

4,6.5

and 3.6.5,

the 0.5 gram

Pu plutonium-beryllium source

was not tested

so

as

to detect the potential

presence of 0.005 microcuries of plutonium

in the test

sample at any time between

January

1 and August 30,

1978.

RESPONSE

TecluucaL Spew'.(ications

4.6.5.2

does

noC rceq~e ~ a Leakage

CesC be pm$ oened

on aomces "Chat'e aCoaed

and no4 being used".

'DurLtng We paused b~een

January

1 and August 90,

1978, We 0.5 g Pu

(pLatonuun-bwyLMun) solace um noCin use,

Xhene$ oce,

no Ces4 um

aeq~ed.

(On October

11,

1978,

howeven,, We aLpha active mu dMeenuted

and found Co be ~l x

10

5 uCL.)

NoenaLLy, a CesCLs

pngoened

even

when not aeq~ed

(due W non-use),

as M snves

as

a means

o$ keeping

We inventory

c urrcent.

In Xhe

$~e, ~wc We 4esC +ALL be. pm$ oened

an accep&bLe )ashion,

oe We fact Mat no CesC eas aeq~ed

due,

W non-use eM, be deco&ed,

aLong ~~ appmp~e inve<o~ data.

Thethe(oae,

JuLL compLiance,

has

been achieved.

Page,

9

~

~

~

D.

Contrary to Technical Specification Section

6. 13. lb, at

6 p.m.

on August 28,

1978, the gate

on the

261 ft. elevation of the

turbine building nearest

to door No. 56, controlling an area

wherein the radiation intensity was greater

than 1,000 mrem/hr,

was unlocked

and unattended.

RESPONSE

In oadn Co prevent ae-occurrence

o$ CkQ Mem, a Cechru.cion

has

been maligned Che cupons~b

City o( checking aK accusive

Ngh Radiation

@tea gal:u

(

~

1000 nor,em/M) on a ceg~ bm~ (at Leabf ~ee check

pm week). T~ a~n

hm

been When in aden

Co action ad~Ped

cuponee

Co Impmtion 77-26, which produced We improvement need

pe~on rr,epos.

Vercy ~y poult',

"R.R. Schnu.dW

Vice P~ui.dent

H.minie Pmducti.on

'%4