ML18036A190

Comment (71) of Anonymous Individual on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities

ML18036A190
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	01/02/2018
From:	- No Known Affiliation
To:	Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
82FR52944 00071, NRC-2017-0211
Download: ML18036A190 (2)

Text

As of: 1/9/18 10:06 AM Received:

January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of2 PlJBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pf-qtm2 Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Docutment:

NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0072 Coilllment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 I -*------------------* ... SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= S~S111rltlt

(~tc.<o S) Submitter Information

@ f !). PR 5 ;; . .tf l./ If // /15'/JIJ/1 Name: Anonymous Anonymous r--:::-::--

____ --*----------*------

---

* ------------------------------

---

*

---

*-----

---

---

~------

---

'

General Comment I was just notified a few hours ago that the public only has until 9:00 pm tonight to post our comments to the NRC about the review plan for spent fuel dry storage systems. I live within the 50 mile plume zone of SONGS, and implore the NRC to expand the public comment window as we were not given ample public notice on this deadline.

The public looks upon the NRC to protect us from toxic fallout from nuclear waste by requiring companies to uphold the highest safety standards in creating long-term storage for the toxic waste. We expect that the NRC will protect us by requiring SONGS and other nuclear generating stations to store the waste in thick walled canisters that can be monitored ,and repaired easily to insure not only the publics safety while been stored temporarily but in doing so will make sure that the intact canisters can be moved when a long-term solution for storage becomes available.

It is public knowledge that So Cal Eddison plans to bury the toxic waste 108 feet from our coastline, only a few feet above the water table putting the public at high risk if there is a tsunami or if the water table continues to rise. We call upon the NRC to put public safety first https:/ fwwv,, .fdms.gov

/f dms/ getcontent?objectld=0900006482d908f6&format=xml&showorig=false . 01/09/2018 Page 2 of2 and require SCE to move the waste to higher ground at Camp Pendleton.

Please require SCE to move the waste where it is out of the tsunami zone, away from the freeway, and off of an earthquake fault line and deny So Cal Edison's pending license for the ISFSI at San Onofre. We, the people of Southern California, Americans and citizens of the world put our trust in you at the NRC to require the highest possible safety regulations for this extremely lethal, long lasting, radioactive material.

Thank you for putting public safety before special interests.

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/

getcontent?objectld=0900006482d908f6&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018