ML18033B127

Comment (70) of Nonie Fickling on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities

ML18033B127
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	01/02/2018
From:	Fickling N - No Known Affiliation
To:	Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
82FR52944 00070, NRC-2017-0211
Download: ML18033B127 (1)

Text

,~_ --As of: 1/9/18 10:06 AM Received:

January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_ Post Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pf-g8el Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities I . . Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document:

NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0071 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 Submitter Information

• a R 6;;. 'll/l/ Name: Nonie Fickling 11 I ,s /,;zo17 General Comment As a long time resident of San Clemente since 1963, I have been following with great interest the history of San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant. I have attended numerous meetings held regarding the decommissioning of the plant. I am baffled why our government would settle on using sub-par storage canisters for temporary storage. The stakes are too high to settle for anything less than state of the art storage. I am gravely concerned that the thinner canisters would not hold up should we experience an earthquake higher than 7.0. I'm also concerned that should a leak occur, there are no known systems in place to capture and seal up the nuclear leak. Please look out for our safety and require the thicker canisters.

Sincerely, Nonie Fickling SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM _ 01 J E-RIDS= ADM-OJ Add= .>ere"'Y 5mi'tl! { jA s.i) https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/

getcontent?objectld=0900006482d8fe72&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018