ML18029A815
| ML18029A815 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry  |
| Issue date: | 08/23/1985 |
| From: | Miller W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Parris H TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8508300337 | |
| Download: ML18029A815 (6) | |
Text
AUG 2 3 1985 Docket Hos. 50-259, 50-260 and 50-296 Tennessee Valley Authority ATTIC: ttr. H. G. Parris Manager of Power 500A Chestnut Street Chattanooga, Tennessee 37401 Gentlemen:
We recently completed a review of certain applications for license amendments and other approvals which TVA filed with the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (ONRR) for review in connection with the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit Hos. 1, 2 and 3.
These applications were filed between September 1982 and December 1983.
Consequently, fee determinations ave pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 170.22 of Inarch 23, 1978 regulations.
The purpose of this review was to determine what fees, if any, are due the USNRC or whether any refunds are due to be made to TYA under the provisions of 10 CFR 170.
The enclosed list reflects each request, any fees paid and the ONRR staff's final fee determination and action on each.
As a result of the final review of these applications, we find that a total of $27,200 is due the NRC.
This is basically due to the fact that fees were not remitted with Items 2 through ll (Supplements 1 through 10 to Technical Specification (TS) Change Ho. 176) of the enclosed list because TVA considered these to be supplemental to the September 14, 1982 application (TS 176) since several of the proposed changes involved the same specification as TS 176 and the changes weve al'l considered to be administrative in nature.
Applications for amendments can be supplemented or superseded without additional fees being paid as long as the basic application is still pending review and as long as the supplemental data or the superseding application does not add new items to what was previously requested.
The ONRR staff have informed us that new items were included in each of the supplements.
Consequently, fees are being assessed separately for each of these supplements, except fov Item Ho. 4 on the enclosed list.
It has been-determined that Item No. 4 should be exempted from the fee oracle+
SURMAMC~
DATC~
5083
~g 0SO00a59 850e23 PDg ADQC PDR NRC FORM 318 t10.80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
f I
II
~ Jeyp 1
Tennessee Valley Authority PSB 33 I8g requirements of 10 CFR 170 since this application was requested for the convenience of the Commission to simplify and clarify the TS.
On this
- basis, we have concluded that an exemption, pursuant to 10 CFR 170.11(b),
from the fee requirements of the Ilarch 23, 1978 regulations is authorized by law and is hereby granted for the February 1, 1983 application.
In summary, TVA is requested to remit the sum of $27,200 to this office.
Sincerely,
,~4 e 4aeoi trorr~Vi gr.
Enclosure:
List of Applications and Fees cc w/encl:
Nr. Percy
- Hammonds, TVA IIilliam0. Miller. Chief License Fee Management Branch Office of Administration DISTRIBUTION w/encl.:
PDR LPDR Reg Files tUfg, ORB-3.
RCl ark, ORB-3
-SNorris, ORB-3 RMDiggs LFMB Reactor File LFMB Pending Check File LFMB R/F OFFICE P SURNAME LFMQ~M LTrempPPr:jp oaTE)>
8/L~/85 LF I:ADM
~
~
~
~ +
~
~
gs 8/W/85 LFMB:
DM CJH ovgay 8/P /85 LF t
8/
er..
85 NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
'b l
C
~J r
t
List of A lications and Fees Ten'nessee Val 1 ey Authority Browns Ferry Unit Nos.
1, 2 and 3
Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260 and 50-296 A lication Date Fees Paid Fees A
licable ONRR's Fee Determination and Action 9/14/82 (TS 176)
Adm. changes 25000 ll/5/82 (TS 176, Suppl.
none
- 1) supp.
12/17/82, eliminates PORC review of gA, revise PSP audit
- cycle, and correct errors 4,800 2,000 More than administrative or pro norma in nature and involves two duplicate units.
, Approved by Amendment Nos
. 102, 96-and 69 on 7/2/84 for Units 1, 2 and 3.
Administrative in nature and involves two duplicate units.
Approved by Amendment Nos.
- 103, 97 and 71 on 7/16/84 for Units 1,
2 and 3.
12/17/82 (TS 176, Suppl.
2)
Adm. changes none 2,000 Administrative in nature and involves two duplicate units.
Approved by Amendment Nos.
- 100, 94 and 67 on 6/ll/84 for Units 1,
2 and 3.
2/1/83 (TS 176, Suppl.
none
- 3) Audit of Safeguards Contingency Plan 4/7/83 (TS 176, Suppl.
none
- 4) correct omission of inst.
channel for Tur-bine Control Valve Fast Closure or Turbine Trip 4/28/83 (TS 176, Suppl.
none
- 5) change logic for the group 7 isolation valves to reflect actual logic 6/3/83 (TS 176, Suppl.
none
- 6) Depth of water over spent fuel assembly 6/20/83 (TS 176, Suppl.
none
- 7) Actuations of main-stream safety/relief valves 6/24/83 (TS 176, Suppl.
none
- 8) Correct valve posi tions none 25000 2,000 2,000 2 5000 4,800 Exempt from fees.
Issued to simplify and clarify TS for the convenience of the Commission.
Approved by Amendment Nos.
95/89/62 on 4/23/84.for Units 1, 2 and 3.
Administrative in nature and invo 1 ves two duplicate units.
Approved by Amendment Nos. 97, 91 and 64 on 4/25/84 for Units 1, 2and3.
Administrative in nature and involves two duplicate units.
Approved by Amendment Nos. 96, 90 and 63 on 4/24/84 for Units 1,
2 and 3.
Administrative in nature and involves two duplicate units.
Review commenced prior to the time it was withdrawn.
Administrative in nature and involves two duplicate units.
Approved by Amend-ment Nos. 99, 93 5 66 on 5/30/84 for Units 1, 2 and 3.
Single safety issue and two duplicate units.
Approved by Amendment Nos.
- 106, 100 and 73 on 8/2/84 for Units 1, 2 and 3.
A lication Date Fees Fees P id
~All b
Nlll!'
i i
d A 10.
7/18/83 (TS 176, Suppl.
- 9) Plant staffing and use of SRO trained in fuel handling none 2,000 Administrative in nature and involves two duplicate units.
Approved by Amendment Nos.
- 105, 99 and 72 on 7/30/84 for Units 1, 2 and 3.
11.
8/24/83 (TS 176, Suppl.
- 10) Delete surveillance require-ments for dampers none 19600 Administrative in nature and involves a
duplicate unit.
Approved by Amendment Nos.
104 and 98 on 7/27/84 for Units 1
and 2.
12.
12/15/83 Relief from none performing hydrostatic test 4,000 Involved consideration of a single safety issue for Unit 1.
Review almost completed prior to the time it was determined the request was no longer needed'OTAL FEES APPLICABLE
$29,200 TOTAL FEES PAID 2,000 TOTAL FEES DUE NRC 2 27 200