ML18023A675
| ML18023A675 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 01/02/2018 |
| From: | Mccanne S - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| 82FR52499 00030, NRC-2017-0211 | |
| Download: ML18023A675 (1) | |
Text
As of: 1/8/18 4:31 PM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION ;
Tracking No. lk2-90pd-74g7 Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document: NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0031 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 Submitter Information Name: Sandra McCanne General Comment
(@
ta Ff<. SJ..t-;qf I I I Is-/ 2017 Because of earthquake vulnerability and other risks, it is irresponsible to use temporary thin canisters for nuclear waste storage instead of thick casks used by other countries. The consequences of your decision could be deadly for thousands of people. Of course the best plan would be to remove the waste altogether. Since that is not an option at this time, please use the thicker safer units. The thin canisters are designed to last 20 years, but there is no guarantee that the nuclear waste will be removed by then.
I urge you to use the thick casks.
Thank you, Sandy McCanne SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM -03 Add= J-e..;-rne,y5m~-/-k (Jcts5:)
https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectid=0900006482d8fb2e&format=xml&showorig=false 01/08/2018