|
|---|
Category:Note to File incl Telcon Record
MONTHYEARML20213B2212020-11-20020 November 2020
Memo to File: Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact and NRC Financial Analysis for Constellation and Exelon'S Decommissioning Funding Plan Submitted in Accordance with 10 CFR 72.30(b) and (C) for Nine Mile Point Unit
ML18022A0692018-01-30030 January 2018
Review of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 25
ML17108A4562017-05-26026 May 2017
Clarification to License Renewal Safety Evaluation for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 (CAC Nos. MC3272 and MC3273)
ML0610900642006-04-18018 April 2006
Note to File - Docketing of Additional Information Pertaining to License Renewal Application of the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 (TAC No'S. MC3272 and MC3273)
ML0609405772006-04-0404 April 2006
Note to File - Docketing of Additional Information Pertaining to License Renewal Application of the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 (TAC Nos. MC3272 and MC3273)
ML0605906442006-02-24024 February 2006
2/24/2006 - Docketing of Documents Sent to the NRC by Linda Bond-Clark Related to Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station
ML0502404242005-01-13013 January 2005
Request for Additional Information - Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, Fire Protection Open Items
ML0502103762005-01-13013 January 2005
Request for Additional Information on Open Items for Balance of Plant Section
ML18018B1861986-04-10010 April 1986
Letter Referring to Generic Letter 83-28 Concerning Required Actions Based on Generic Implications of Salem ATWS Events and Requesting That GE Provide a Response by April 15, 1986
ML17037B9421976-12-13013 December 1976
Letter Confirming September 7, 1976 and Early October Telephone Conversations Concerning Features in the Reheater Bay Area and a December 2, 1976 Call to Inform of More Recent Observations Which May Suggest Possible Post ...
ML17037B9041976-12-13013 December 1976
Letter Confirming Telephone Conversations Relating to Certain Geologic Features and a December 2, 1976 Call to Inform of More Recent Observations Which May Suggest Possible Post-Glacial Vertical Displacement of Sediments ..
ML17037C1891975-09-30030 September 1975
Letter Regarding a Telephone Conversation on August 15, 1975 Requesting Informing Concerning Potential Operational Limitations of the Onsite Standby Emergency Diesel Engines
ML17037B5791975-09-0303 September 1975
Letter Confirming a 09/02/1975 Telephone Discussion Relative to the Meeting to Be Held 09/04/1975
ML17037C2061974-10-0404 October 1974
Letter Acknowledging Receipt of the Analysis on ATWS with Letter of September 25, 1974 and Requesting Submittal of Additional Analysis, an Explanation for the Delay, and a Schedule of the Detailed Plan within Two Weeks ..
ML17037C2511973-12-18018 December 1973
Letter Regarding Letters Dated November 28 and December 3, 1973 Reporting Failures of Eleven and Fifteen Control Rods to Insert to Position Oo Following a Reactor Scram and Confirming That a More Complete Report Will Be ...
ML17037B7681965-04-21021 April 1965
Letter Requesting More Information Concerning the Recent AEC License Awarded to Niagara Mohawk
ML17037C1561964-02-21021 February 1964
Letter Regarding a Geological Report and a Request for Examination and Submittal of an Independent Opinion
2020-11-20
[Table view]
Category:Verbal Comm
MONTHYEARML20213B2212020-11-20020 November 2020
Memo to File: Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact and NRC Financial Analysis for Constellation and Exelon'S Decommissioning Funding Plan Submitted in Accordance with 10 CFR 72.30(b) and (C) for Nine Mile Point Unit
ML18022A0692018-01-30030 January 2018
Review of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 25
ML17108A4562017-05-26026 May 2017
Clarification to License Renewal Safety Evaluation for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 (CAC Nos. MC3272 and MC3273)
ML0610900642006-04-18018 April 2006
Note to File - Docketing of Additional Information Pertaining to License Renewal Application of the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 (TAC No'S. MC3272 and MC3273)
ML0609405772006-04-0404 April 2006
Note to File - Docketing of Additional Information Pertaining to License Renewal Application of the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 (TAC Nos. MC3272 and MC3273)
ML0605906442006-02-24024 February 2006
2/24/2006 - Docketing of Documents Sent to the NRC by Linda Bond-Clark Related to Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station
ML0502404242005-01-13013 January 2005
Request for Additional Information - Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, Fire Protection Open Items
ML0502103762005-01-13013 January 2005
Request for Additional Information on Open Items for Balance of Plant Section
ML18018B1861986-04-10010 April 1986
Letter Referring to Generic Letter 83-28 Concerning Required Actions Based on Generic Implications of Salem ATWS Events and Requesting That GE Provide a Response by April 15, 1986
ML17037B9421976-12-13013 December 1976
Letter Confirming September 7, 1976 and Early October Telephone Conversations Concerning Features in the Reheater Bay Area and a December 2, 1976 Call to Inform of More Recent Observations Which May Suggest Possible Post ...
ML17037B9041976-12-13013 December 1976
Letter Confirming Telephone Conversations Relating to Certain Geologic Features and a December 2, 1976 Call to Inform of More Recent Observations Which May Suggest Possible Post-Glacial Vertical Displacement of Sediments ..
ML17037C1891975-09-30030 September 1975
Letter Regarding a Telephone Conversation on August 15, 1975 Requesting Informing Concerning Potential Operational Limitations of the Onsite Standby Emergency Diesel Engines
ML17037B5791975-09-0303 September 1975
Letter Confirming a 09/02/1975 Telephone Discussion Relative to the Meeting to Be Held 09/04/1975
ML17037C2061974-10-0404 October 1974
Letter Acknowledging Receipt of the Analysis on ATWS with Letter of September 25, 1974 and Requesting Submittal of Additional Analysis, an Explanation for the Delay, and a Schedule of the Detailed Plan within Two Weeks ..
ML17037C2511973-12-18018 December 1973
Letter Regarding Letters Dated November 28 and December 3, 1973 Reporting Failures of Eleven and Fifteen Control Rods to Insert to Position Oo Following a Reactor Scram and Confirming That a More Complete Report Will Be ...
ML17037B7681965-04-21021 April 1965
Letter Requesting More Information Concerning the Recent AEC License Awarded to Niagara Mohawk
ML17037C1561964-02-21021 February 1964
Letter Regarding a Geological Report and a Request for Examination and Submittal of an Independent Opinion
2020-11-20
[Table view] |
Text
January 30, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO: File FROM: Michael L. Marshall, Jr., Senior Project Manager /RA/
Plant Licensing Branch l Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 1 - REVIEW OF UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT, REVISION 25 (EPID L-2017-LRO-0041)
BACKGROUND After the events of September 11, 2001, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) assessed and revised its sensitive information control policies to provide greater assurance against publicly disclosing information that could reasonably be expected to be useful to potential adversaries. On November 9, 2004, the Commission issued SRM-SECY-04-0191 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML043140175), which approved (among other things) proposed guidance to prohibit proactive release to the public of sensitive unclassified information concerning nuclear power reactors. Consistent with this direction, updated final safety analysis reports (UFSARs) were presumptively withheld from public release. In June 2015, the Commission issued SRM-SECY-15-0032 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15167A090), which approved the staffs recommendation to discontinue the presumptive withholding from public release of final safety analysis report (FSAR) updates, emergency preparedness documents, and fire protection-related documents, and to withdraw the direction provided in SRM-SECY-04-0191 to the extent that SRM-SECY- 04-0191 approved presumptive withholding of these documents.
Given the issuance of SRM-SECY-15-0032, UFSAR updates are to be reviewed per the NRC Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information (SUNSI) policy and proactively released, as appropriate (as of December 15, 2015).
By letter dated October 5, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17286A080), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee) submitted Revision 25 to the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station (Nine Mile Point), Unit 1, UFSAR in accordance with the requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 50.71, Maintenance of records, making of reports, paragraph (e). The purpose of this memorandum is to document the review of the Nine Mile Point, Unit 1, UFSAR revision in accordance with the guidance provided in NRC Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2015-17, Review and Submission of Updates to Final Safety Analysis Reports, Emergency Preparedness Documents, and Fire Protection Documents (ADAMS Accession No. ML15321A400).
EVALUATION The review of the Nine Mile Point, Unit 1, UFSAR for sensitive information was conducted using guidelines in Attachment 1 to SECY-04-0191 (ADAMS Accession No. ML042310663), which was identified as an aid in RIS 2015-17. SECY-04-0191 provides a general framework and discussion of SUNSI, as well as a table detailing specific examples of sensitive information that should be withheld from public disclosure. This table is organized by categories of information (e.g., plant drawings, hydrological information, risk information, fire protection), loosely aligning with a large number of standard sections of UFSARs, and provides specific examples of information that should be withheld from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1). In addition to the table, the project manager guidance for SUNSI reviews that is available on the Division of Operating Reactor Licensing (DORL) SharePoint site was considered.
A review of the entire UFSAR was not conducted. The review excluded sections, chapters, and appendices that contain subjects identified as uncontrolled in the table in Attachment 1 to SECY-04-0191. The portions of the UFSAR that were reviewed are as follows:
- All site drawings, plant arrangement drawings, and similar figures
- Section I, Introduction and Summary
- Section II, Station Site and Environment
- Section III, Buildings and Structures
- Section VII, Engineered Safeguards
- Section IX, Electrical Systems
- Section XV, Safety Analysis CONCLUSION The following portions of the Nine Mile Point, Unit 1, UFSAR were redacted prior to public release:
- Section III, Capter G.3.2
- Figure III-2 to Figure III-11
- Figure XVI-20 Based on the review described above, a redacted version of the Nine Mile Point, Unit 1, UFSAR, Revision 25, was made publicly available (ADAMS Accession No. ML18022A443).
The redactions are consistent with the guidelines in Attachment 1 to SECY-04-0191.
Per the instructions in the project manager guidance for SUNSI reviews, appropriate copies of the Nine Mile Point, Unit 1, UFSAR have been uploaded to the DORL SharePoint site.
Docket No. 50-220
ML18022A069 OFFICE NRR/DORL/LPL1/PM NRR/DORL/LPL1/LA NRR/DORL/LPL1/BC NRR/DORL/LPL1/PM NAME MMarshall LRonewicz JDanna MMarshall DATE 01/26/2018 01/23/2018 01/29/2018 01/30/2018
