ML18019A764
| ML18019A764 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 04/01/1986 |
| From: | Cutter A CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NLS-86-070, NLS-86-70, NUDOCS 8604080114 | |
| Download: ML18019A764 (20) | |
Text
REGULATORY FORMATION DISTRIBUTION S M <RIDS) 0 ~
ACCESSION NBR: S604080114 DOC. DATE: 86/04/01 NOTARIZED:
NO DOCKET ¹ FACIL: 50-400 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plantz Unit ii Carolina 05000400 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION CUTTERS A. B.
Carolina Power 5 Light Co.
REC IP. NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DENTONI H. R.
Office oF Nuclear Reactor Regulationz Director (post 851125
SUBJECT:
Forwards response to 851030 request For addi info re operability of containment purge h vent valvesi including graph of value of dynamic torque 5 butterfly valve test rep ts.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
AOSAD COPIES RECEIVED: LTR I
ENCL
~
SIZE:
TITLE:
OR Submi tta 1:
Containment Purg ing NOTES: Application For permit renewal filed.
05000400 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PNR-A PD2 PD 01 PNR-A PSB INTERNAL: ADM/LFMB NRR PNR-A ADTS NRR'REEVESi E 14 E
04 COP IES LTTR ENCL 5
5 1
1 1
0 1
1 1
1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME BUCKLEY'S B PWR-A RSB NRR BNR ADTS NRR PNR-B ADTS NRR/DSRO/EIB RQN2 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
EXTERNAL: 24X NRC PDR 02 1
1 1
LPDR NSIC 03 05 1
1 1
1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 20 ENCL 19
LVN QJXXRA'i(3",:
S'9>> "LQ~b.'"-, ",i in~.
4i <0 9 "1i~R
,~ ~-.lJ
.'1 "1
<<'.>>i>~s'i -)
Ea(~"1:
I TA., iI=1 1A H~ ~,
"~ -.";".
,'i1 <<'"'.[
.," vapo'1 rvzLo "r,')
"~ 2" AI..'I'3'~A TN.,lI31:.)3P:
'll'+39 ilG gfTQ JQ 6i'Up'"ll )of ~B'9P
'~'6'3x384
%0 Po '
lo
~>ri f68 0 l 9a'i~iog22'<
F(,uJ To"1
~> it% "'3'Ao 'i
%o Q'I I'f~~~o qg x~'~F I'~, cl
".~t"'.".G~
o f'1 < pjvp 8
$(M0 Carolina Power & Light Company APR 0 1 l986 Mr. Harold R. Denton,.Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 SERIAL: NLS-86-070 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT NO.
1 DOCKET NO.50-000 CONTAINMENTPURGE AND VENT VALVEOPERABILITYREVIEW
REFERENCE:
NRC Letter Dated October 30, 1985, G. W. Knighton to Mr. E. E. Utley, Request for Additional Information
Dear Mr. Denton:
Carolina Power k Light Company hereby provides responses to the follow up questions regarding the operability of the containment purge and vent valves (Reference 1).
The attachments to this letter contain the following:
Attachment A Carolina Power R Light Company's responses to questions in Reference 1; organized in question and answer form.
Attachment B Graph of the value of the dynamic torque and the operator closing (spring) torque at different yoke arm angles.
Attachment C BIP Butterfly Valve Test Reports; show actual valve closing time.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Pedro Salas at (919) 836-8015.
You very t ABC/PS/ccc (3062PSA)
Attachment A. B. Cutter Vice President Nuclear Engineering rtt Licensing CC:
Mr. B. C. Buckley (NRC)
Mr. Goutam Bagchi (NRC)
Mr. G. F. Maxwell (NRC-SHNPP)
Dr. J. Nelson Grace (NRC-RII),
Mr. Travis Payne (KUDZU)
Mr. Daniel F. Read (CHANGE/ELP)
Wake County Public Library BE 040Boi iy BE 0y0g PDR ADOCK 05000400 A
PDR Mr. Wells Eddleman Mr. John D. Runkle Dr. Richard D. Wilson Mr. G. O. Bright (ASLB)
Dr. J. H. Carpenter (ASLB)
Mr. J. L. Kelley (ASLB)
Mr. H. A. Cole 411 Fayettevitte Street o P. O. Box 1551 o Raleigh. N. C. 27602
'h<
J h'
ATTACHMENTA SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT PURGE AND VENT VALVEOPERABILITY(TMI II.E.0.2(6))
NRC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONALINFORMATION General Comment As indicated in the BIF Operability Report j/DT-67926 Rev. A and a BIF response letter of October 30, 1985, the dynamic torque from the effluent flow is a closing torque. It actually helps, rather than resist the operator's spring return action to close the valve.
~estion i The torque capacity of the Bettis actuator model N721C-SR60-12 is given as 2570 in-lb without reference to valve disc angle, minimum and maximum torque available, and torque available for reduced power source.
(Page Ol of BIF Dynamic Torque Calculation.)
The applicant should provide the actuator torque curves versus valve opening angle in tabular or graphic form. The applicant should compare the available torque of the operator with the maximum torque required to operate the valves during the accident scenario.
~Res nse Referring to the fact that valve dynamic torque generated by the effluent flow (Accident Scenario) is acting unidirectionally with the operator closing torque generated by the operator spring action, a relative torque willbe imposed on the actuator by the valve and not vice versa.
The maximum valve dynamic torque indicated in BIF report is 1731 in-lb while the operator minimum closing (spring) torque is 2319 in-lb. The attached graph (Attachment B) shows the value of the dynamic torque and the operator closing (spring) torque at different yoke arm angles.
The graph indicates that the operator torque capability is always higher than the valve dynamic torque thus preventing the valve from sudden closure.
In reality, the speed at which the valve willclose depends mainly on how fast the operator piston willtravel during the closing cycle which in turn depends on the solenoid valve size and its air pressure drop characteristics through its exhaust port. The valve dynamic torque may increase slightly the valve closing speed but not to an appreciable value.
Question 2 Item 3 of the Ebasco letter dated August 3, 1982 requests BIF to demonstrate operability of the purge valve at "30 and 50'pen with closure times less than 3.5 seconds."
However, the BIF report DT-67926 Revision A addresses valve operability from the fully open (90') to the fullyclosed position.
'he applicant should indicate if he intends to operate the valves from an initial position that is less than fullyopen.
The applicant should clarify that his submittal specifies and demonstrates fullclosure of the valves from the fully open position (90') in less than 3.5 seconds.
(3462PSA/ccc )
The valve operation during the purge willbe in full open position (90') throughout the purge period.
The 30'nd 50'pen requirements were for other specific reasons which are no longer applicable.
Referring to BIF Butterfly Valve Test Reports, the closing time of the valves at no flow condition is 1.5 seconds or less from its full open (90') position. Refer to item one above for the effect of the dynamic torque on the valve closing speed.
Questibn 3 The BIF analysis considered the valve to be completely closed at 0.75 seconds elapsed time and containment pressure of 30.35 psia.
However, at 5 seconds the pressure can rise to 35.06 psia.
The Shearon Harris Technical Specifications (FSAR Section 16.2, Table 3.6.1) specify a maximum isolation time of 5 seconds.
The applicant should re-evaluate the BIF analyses and technical specifications to confirm that (1) the valve closure time and containment isolation time are consistent and (2) the subsequent adjustment for containment pressure willnot adversely affect-the ability of the valve to perform its function.
~Res nse The 0.75 seconds was estimated by BIF prior to the shop testing of valves.
The 0.75 seconds elapsed time included 1.25 seconds signal process time plus 3.5 seconds estimated time for valve closure.
The 5 seconds closing time indicated in the Shearon Harris Technical Specification, Section 16.2, Table 3.6.1, was used as an input parameter for the containment effluent release in the analysis of the DBA.
Although the actual valve closing time as demonstrated by BIF shop testing (Attachment C) is 1.5 seconds maximum, and considering instrument process signal of 1.25 to 1.5 seconds, the total containment isolation should result in a 3 seconds maximum. However, to be c'onsistent with the containment pressure/time profile used in the BIF analyses, CPdcL willpropose to NRC that the SHNPP Technical Specification be revised to indicate a maximum isolation time of 0.75 seconds.
~estion e The flow dynamic torque was calculated as the valve closed uniformly from fully open to fullyclosed against the ascending containment pressure.
The 3.5 second closure period was divided into nine equal increments of 0.389 second duration and 10'isc rotation.
At each increment, the dynamic torque was calculated using the containment pressure response curve.
The maximum torque of 1731 in-lb was calculated for an 80'pening angle at 1.639 seconds elapsed time from LOCA initiation. Valve closure was initiated at 1.25 seconds to allow time to process the isolation signal.
(Page 7 and Ol of BIF Dynamic Torque Calculation.)
The applicant should provide evidence that the valve closure rate is uniform from fully open to fullyclosed.
(3462PSA/ccc)
P
~Res nse Referring to the fact that the dynamic torque is assisting and not opposing the closing of the valve, the closure rate of the valve whether it is uniform or not willnot increase the closure time above the 1.5 seconds indicated in the BIF Test Reports.
Because of this short closing time the maximum value of the flow dynamic torque imposed by the valve on the operator willbe much lower than the 1731 in-lb used by BIF for the operator sizing and the valve stress analysis.
Question 5 BIF committed to test the valves for speed of closure and reject any above 3.5 seconds.
However, BIF does not have any test data for the closure speed of the spring loaded cylinder "when it is bled into higher than atmosphere pressure."
BIF's recommendation (to Ebasco) is "to pipe the exhaust port of the solenoid valve to atmosphere to insure the 3.5 closure period." (BIF response to Ebasco comment N5, Page 03 of BIF Dynamic Torque Calculation.)
The applicant should clearly demonstrate that the valve closure time of 3.5 seconds willnot be exceeded during the accident scenario.
The applicant should provide a response to the BIF recommendation and justify operability of the valve for any new configuration, if applicable, that is not covered by the present submittal.
~Res nse The torques acting on the valve during any moment of closing cycle include:
as b.
Cs Flow dynamic torque. Acts in the direc'tion of valve closure (Td).
Torque generated by the Operator spring force. Acts in the direction of the valve closure (Ts).
Torque generated by the Air Pressure differential across the operator cylinder piston (Tap ).
The equilibrium torque equation at any moment of the closing cycle willbe Td + Ts - Thp
= 0.
Td and Ts willnot be affected whether operator cylinder is bled into atmospheric or higher than atmospheric pressure.
Tap depends on the pressure source and sink and the pressure drop through the operator solenoid valve and connected pipe and fittings.
As the ratio of Containment Pressure (P2) (pressure sink) to the operator cylinder pressure (P~) (pressure source) decreases, to about P~/Pi 0.53, the air velocity through the solenoid valve willreach local acoustic value and as a result, the air discharge from the operator cylinder through the solenoid valve willdepend only on the pressure source (Pl). When P2/P1 is above the critical ratio of 0.53, closure of the valve willdepend also on the pressure smk (P2).
The pressure (P>), which is the containment pressure during the accident scenario, willalso act upon tRe back of the operator cylinder piston through the operator breather port thus balancing off the pressure difference and assisting the spring force and flow dynamic torque to close the valve.
From the above analogy the containment back pressure (Pressure Sink) willnot affect the valve closure time. Therefore, there are no justifiable reasons for piping the operator exhaust port to the outside of containment or conducting closing speed test as suggested by BIF in their response letter.
(3462PSA/ccc )
~estion 6 The analytical procedure to perform the seismic analysis indicates that stresses willbe considered due to a combination of seismic load, dead weight, design pressure, and maximum o erator tor ue. (Item 2 of BIF Seismic Analysis.) The torque capacity of the Bettis actuator is given as 2570 in-lb compared to the maximum calculated dynamic torque of 1731 in-lb for an 80'pening angle.
(Page Ol of BIF Dynamic Torque Calculation.)
Review of the seismic analysis revealed that the stresses are based on a torque value of 1731 in-lb. (Page 0 of BIF seismic analysis).
The applicant should justify the torque value used to demonstrate valve operability.
The applicant should amend the stress analysis; if appropriate, and clearly show that the calculated stresses do not exceed the allowable stress limits.
~Res nse The dynamic torque of 1731 in-lb used in the stress analysis by BIF in their report can be justified by referring to the fact that this torque is imposed by the valve on the operator. It is a closing torque that, without the operator installed, willclose the valve in a very short time. In reality the operator is imposing a breaking torque equal but opposite in direction in order to slow the valve closing speed.
Question 7 The flow coefficient (Kv) and dynamic torque coefficient (Ct) were obtained from hydrodynamic tests using different valve disc'orien'tation and flow conditions.
The tests were performed using water and measured with hand held torque wrenches; no tests with air were performed.
(Page 3 of BIF Hydrodynamic Tests, Reference 7, and Page 2 of BIF Head Loss Tests, Reference 6.) The applicant should justify that the purge valves will experience only incompressible flow during the LOCA accident scenario.
The applicant should compare the disc shapes used in the 12 inch valve flow tests versus the specified 8 inch BIF valve.
The applicant acknowledges that the torque wrench readings from the flow tests have an error band of + 1096.
(Pages 3 and 6 of BIF Hydrodynamic Tests, Reference 7). The applicant should clearly show that the + 1096 deviation in torque does not adversely affect the ability of the BIF purge valve to perform its function.
response BIF has addressed this point as quoted in the response letter of October 30, 1985 "The flow coefficient (Kv) and the dynamic torque coefficient (Ct) are normally obtained based on water test and used on water, steam and gas applications.
Testing with air, the 1096 error would be more because close to a sonic air pipe line, velocity is required to create significant dynamic torque for torque wrench readings.
The 1096 error (if it exists) would create 1096 more stress.
However, in the stress analysis, the stress limits still would be within the acceptable local stress limits (see stress reports).
Comparing the disc shape in the 12" valve flow tests vs. the specified 8" valve disc, we found that both discs (designs) are the same configuration."
Elaborating further on the vendor reply quoted above, it is more practical to obtain the dynamic torque coefficients using water as the test medium with better accuracy than gases (including air). As reiterated'in the proceeding items, the dynamic torque has no appreciable effect on the valve closure time and therefore the test medium whether (3462PSA/ccc)
compressible or incompressible will,not change the results.
The flow coefficient extracted is the valve constant which can be used for flow estimate of any medium when it is integrated in the appropriate flow formula for the valve.
Question ii FSAR Figures 6.2.1-2 and -3 show a comparison of containment pressure transients (hot leg and cold leg breaks, respectively).
The FSAR and PSAR pressure response curves are shown on both figures.. The "old" PSAR analysis used the currently approved mass and energy release model, whereas the "new" FSAR analysis used a-model currently being reviewed by the NRC. (FSAR Section 6.2.1.3, Page 6.2.1-21, Amendment 1 1 - effective through Amendment 18, November 30, 1980).
Figure 6.2.1-2 shows that the old pressure response curve envelopes the new curve up to an approximate pressure of 50 psia (15 seconds elapsed time from LOCA initiation).
Beyond that point the new pressure curve envelopes the old curve and reaches a peak value of 51.0 psia (18.5 seconds elapsed time).
The BIF dynamic torque calculations were obtained by following the new pressure response curve up to an elapsed time of 0.75 seconds.
(Ebasco letter dated August 3, 1982 and page 7 of BIF Dynamic Torque Calculation.)
The applicant should verify that the containment pressure response data used to calculate the dynamic torque valves are based on the appropriate LOCA pressure transient and valve closure time. As appropriate the applicant should (1) amend the purge valve report to state that its results are based on new pressure response data, which still await NRC approval or (2)'update the FSAR to state that the new pressure response curves for Figures 6.2.1-2 and -3 have been approved by the NRC.
~Re Mnse As outlined above, the dynamic torque is in the direction of the valve closure.
Without this dynamic torque the valve closure was 1.5 seconds max as demonstrated by BIF test.
Containment pressure response data whether the NRC approved old data or the new one which is yet to be approved by NRC has no effect on the valve closure time.
(3462PSA/ccc)
ATTACHMENTB Graph of the Value of the Dynamic Torque and the Operator Closing (Spring) Torque at Different Yoke Arm Angles (3462PSA/ccc)
IRE55lNEI 5Nlllt tioUE
'I>>
ss C
r...
,I
(
0) 1)
i)) ~
C an cpl
~
co CSS CCI CCD CQ CCD CQ tel C>>D CS)
CQ
)
I I
I I
')
)
I I
I
)
I
)
I
)
)
I I
)
)
)
)
I I
)
)
)
)
I I
I I
)
I J>>>> )>>>> w>> )>>>> y>> J>> o)>>>>
I I
)
I I
)
)
)
I I
I I
I I
I I
)
)
)
I I
I ll I
->>I >>r>>
r I
I I
I IJ p.q I
I I
I I
I I
I I
>>I I
l-I J>>>>)
I >>
L I
I I
I
)
I I
I I
J I
I
'I I
I
)
I I
(
I I
~ I J
I I
I I
I
>> J>> o)>>>>>>>>p>> p>>l>>>>)>> J>>>>)<<>> Ie>> I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I>>>>>>
I I
I
<<L I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
IJ>><<
I I
I I
I.
I I
I I
I I-I I
IJJ>
I I
I I
n
,I I
I
?b I
I
~op>>
eo I
I I
)
I
)
I
.I I
)
)
)
)
I
)
I ~
I I
I I
I I
I al I
I I
I I
I I
I J
ol>>>>)
b I
I I>> to>>>>>>>>)
>>>>I>>
I)) n II.:
I
)
)
)
I
~ >>>>)>>>>eol >>y>>J>>g>>>>>><<)>>>>y>>J I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
l.
)
)
I I
I I
I I'
s I
I I
)e>> L>> + <<o)>>>>)>>>> P>> L>> +>>>>>> J>>>> I>> ~
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
)
)
)
I
)
)
)
I I
I I
)
I
)
I I
I I
)
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1
)
I L<<t<<)>>g P>>L>>g>>)>>P I I'I I
I I
I I
CD V
0 Vl 4 Ul0 V
g>>e
~o so J
- tO N
ID Vl N
0 CD 4
4 4
Ul CD Vl US CD Vl CD Vl 4
CD 0
'V Ol J al 0
Vl O
N N, N v
4 4
A ID Cls Us ID
~o Ul CD N
4 4
g lON 4
0 J
4 0
0 V
4 CD ICS lD V
I w%g I CLZO ln nsc w 'snrn UI os nrl sn I h lD IV Z
I %J N
re I >>oaln A
SCS I >> 0 D V glD DO N
I 0>>
>>cx cr nn II >>e I
w cs J I UIOPl I 0 IDln ID I uOVS AIPCC IVnSD I >>
Pl II II oe II WXI Ul I ICIon Vl I OX)sn 5 SD O'C I VPID I >>
Pl II Iln II ostl I V&PS Ds I 0Dsn SD I M Osn V IDCC 4 I V Pl>D I
~
Pl II IIn I
I CD OP' I ls Piss I
~
Pl
ATTACHMENTC BIF Butterfly Valve Test Reports C
(3462PSA/ccc)
'tS I t tSL:I I tKt L.) VALVtI tel Ktpt/SE'I lr I yhrotEEMC.~E~
EIEE PRESSIBRE, RATING CUST TAG NO 2 VALVETEST Valve wnh operator Leak 'test Proc
'Side I PSIC Min.
Side 2 PSIC Min.
Body hydro test Proc.
PS IC M
Flat side up Rcv.
OK/Q.C.
OK/Q.C.
Rev OK/Q.C.
Vahre plain stem Leak test Proc.
MSidc Id/+< PSIC> Min.
OK/Q.C.
Side 2L~~PISC Min.
'K/Q. C.l -t'-$X B dl'h'd r BI'.M~CZ I h R PSIC ~+
- Min,
~
K/cI C.
Valve tcrque test D/SC NY>44 M'/C
'~r cid ftf Ate A
(
S td-IEC ISZ tdft Add d.rc PA OPERATOR TEST QRO >E +- <<>+<
4 5 d9'X8 4 304~
Cyhnde.Sre Manual hleetric
'Hydro Test 90 PSIG OK/Q.C.
V I Sh r ffPrco ~trt Sp c.M.CII.Pr
~dr PS BOC Mm. Cyl: Pressure Actual/open ~PSIC MKQ.C.
Actual/close ++ PSIC~Q.C.
Dewater cylinder ~A Unless customer spec. differs ifso. eiifcr aetiial C Pg//'
S'4'c-r C C.4SE l Operator I'os.
MC VoIMSh coif P M
Torque toi Actwlfopen ft/lb Q.C.
Acc Ircl rc frflh~C.
Input shaft turns CA'o open Q dost' PERFORMANCE TEST Operator Pus.
S/N Red.
Srlf EI c.
Valve Shutoff Pressure Open n. shutoff pressure by handwhecl Q Limitswitch set Q Torque switch set Q Elect. Csl. Q Open sect close
- sec, Current draw A
lftloor stand mtdc ~ shipped
>>/u setting Q
- 2. STANDARDVALVE-Each valve shall be opened and dosed chree cimes under no flowconditions. For valves f0" and larger, thc test shall bc conducted with thc valve in the same position as it willbe instalkd in
'he field. Sce Eng. Order Data Sheets.
Passed test~
Tester
- 2. VALVESWITHSPECIAL PERFORMANCE TEST PROCEDURES Procedure No.QCXLKRRcv.~k Opcnanddosc~
times.
Passedccstg Tcstcr Final Inspection Visual O.K.
~
Q.Co Dimensional 0JC.
C Q.C.
lfrequired by customcri Pci cchi hoccri dry ME<.~iEC Molid ychc h c
Ad~colo O.lfdlEC.
Certified test rcport required AWWAProof of Design rcport Q+p P
Product Inspector s-/s-s5 Date St ~Stula to, fOPSIS QQ 2248 7 2277
~ t l i
~ ~ ~
~
J~~~~~
i ~*'ra \\ od
~ it.
C
r)
~
-ds 2 r spkds
~ c.sks S.s vns.p i.
~ coi acrv.as I
~sc -
~cree li m d.-&
. I P MODEL NO ~~+
22 VALVETEST Valve with operator Leak test Proc.
Rev.
'Side I PSIC Min.
OKrO.C.
Sid 2
PSIC Min.
OR/ILC.
Body hydro cesc Proc.
Rcv.
PSIC M'.
OK/Q.C.
Flat side up Valve plain seem CZ'*
sa Body hydro tesc Proc.Q~~
Rcv.
O pSICMQ Mi.~a "ORrO.C. 7 misc N7oeo / cZ~~>
V I '2"t'st 'OMISI Sau A e
p S.S ILCfr posse. Roa s rs.cc Cylinder Manual OPERATOR TEST Wa f95 Electric Operator Pos.
A +
Hydro Test 90 PSIC OK/Q.C.
Valve Shutoff Prcssure D~'~ 7 C Spec.Min.CII.Press r~O 80SC Min. CyL Pressure Aaual/open ~~ PSICZ.~ Q,C.
Actual/close ++
PSI C ~++
Q.C.
Dewater cylinder Q~/fA Unless customer spec. differs ifso, eiicef actual Operator Pos.
S/N V ladkaoflPcas Torque toi Actual/open ft/lb Q.Co Aa I/clos fuln~C.
Input shaft turns CW to 2
~
open Q close Q S/N Elec.
sec Opcracor Pos.
S/N Red.
Valve Shutoff Prcssure Open vs. shutoff pressure by handwhccl Q
Limicswitch sec Q Torque switch scc Q Elecc. Cal. Q Open secs close Currcnc draw A
lffloor stand mtde n ship ped w/o setting Q
,PERFORMANCE TEST L STANDARDVALVE-Each. valve shall be opened ind closed three times under no fluwconditions. For valves 54" and larger, che test shall be conducted with che valve in che same position as ic willbc installed in thc Acid. See Eng. Order Data Sheets...
~
Passed test~Tester
- 2. VALVESWITH SPECIAL PERFORMANCE TEST PROCEDURES
-Pmccd rc N.~ra Rcc.
Prm Open nd cl sr ~K times.
'assed tca Tcttcr Final Inspection
-eke acvicwco,>
pig
~
~
P i2 *iC O ~ O A ~ i P.
res-P 0<~
~.
s:~~ a.c. nao 7.n 77
~Visual 0J4 QPCn CcniYied test report required Jg Dimensional O,K.
Q.C.'WWAPro fof Daicn cpoa Q AP/~
. Ifrequired by'customers p inc IMcknca is~a ils. ~+
ILC.'oliday ckcck c
AC/d!
rola D.RJILr Pmd a inspector
~
~'. Igk7pc~/L~a i 4 pn~
. gfp cklr~p
/AS p/= cw~
~
~
~
~ '
c
~
JP~W7~
g-/s'-~S Dace
'b I F BLvlcTtKl'LYVALVE'I tb I KtPL.hl IVC7+/>~-
CUSTOMER ORDER NO.
.,,.o6 I
~
~
COOOCCCC.d.
cc VALVETEST Valve with operator Lcsh test Proc.
mSide 1 PSIC Msn.
Side 2 PSIC Min.
Body hydro test Proc.
PSIC Mir..
Flat side up Rcv.
OKIQ.C.
0 I'h/Q.C.
0KIQ.C.
Valhe plain stern
~~.=- yc,o ~C Valet tcfquc test
>Id~ ds/S ~<Ca y /h/C n C + t=~ /S S /PC'sr dtl t5opo 'cocci d rrcr OPERA'lORTFST C Is-'C-E'~
h./ c'7+7
~~
cs Zj Cs- '5/s
'ylindr.
~
Manual Eiectrsc C
py-RCs Z8-2 I
Hydro Test 90 PS IC OK/Q,C.
Valve Shutoff Pressure ~~+~+
Spcc. Min.Cyl. Pressure M~~
d0% Msn. Cyl. Pressure Actual/open PS IC~ Q.C.
'TO
~c~
~ Actus I/close~PS IC~ Q.C.
A sf so. csltcr actssal OP&/ g. st CiosE' s~r.
I Operator Pos.
S/N Valve Shutoff Pressure Torque tos Actual/open ft/Ib Q.C.
Actual/close ft/Ild~.C.
r Input shaft turns CW to open Q close Q PERFORMANCE TEST doc El c.
SCC Operator Psrs.
S/N iced.
Valve Shutoff Prcssure Open vs.shutoff pressure r
by handwheel Q
Limst swstch sct Q Torque switch sct Q Fleet. Ctl. Q c
OPen
'lees close Current draw A
Iffloor stand mtdc c shipped
<<'/o setting Q Passed test ~
Tester Final Inspection L STANDARDVALVE-Each valve shall be opened and closed three tsmes under no liowconditions. For valves 54 and Lrger, 'the test shaU be conducted with thc valve in the same position as it willbc instalkd in thc ficktSce End. Order Data Sheets.
Passed test~&~
Tester
- 2. VALVESWITH SPECIAL PERFORMANCE TEST PROCEDURES rccccd cc casa/sa Rcc.~
0red md d mL dmcc.
Visua I O.K.
Q.C.
Dimensional 0JC.~~
Q.C.
lfrequired by customers y i c chichcmc 4 'ilch~
ihC m.c hi iid y chcch c~at mlm DdrdihC.
Certifsed test report required Q A%/tVAProof of D sag port Q ~~
Product Inspector
)S 8$
Date stvsthrso Form Q,t
<<ass 7 22 71
C
~, ~a) 8'C/c +]
f M g7gg7 c I/
d a c '!
VALVETEST Valve with operator Leak test Proc.
Rev.
Sid !
PSIO Mi.
OHIO.C.
Side 2 PSIC Min.
OK/Q.C.
Body hydro tcsc Proc, Rev.
PSIG Mir..
OK/Q.C Flat side up Valve plain stem Side ~+PSIG~MIn.d
'KPQ.C.
sid SL++Piso d Ml.L o
os foe/ fo,I:
Body hydro tcit Proc.
C <
Re PSIO~+al OI'OC.~ma,,
Valve tcrque cest
~/sc ux~ae sag Qt-Z If/ /fiv. A
OC ioo rc=
ron s nfmr.
Cyhnder Manual OPERATORTEST dqi.'6<~ 5c'79 C -l/'r.-~
Elenric Hydro Test 90 PSIC OK/Q.C.
Pal Sh !offP e~~dyd Sp c.ad CL p mm ZO PS BN'in. Cyl.
Pressurt'ctual/open
~+PSIC~QC.
.Aaual/close TD PSIG~Q,C..
. Dewater cyhndcr Q///6 oVnkss customer spec. diffas ifso enter actual Oiddh/
2.
SC'Cm Cs,crag /rg gc d Operator Pos, S/Ic Valve Shutoff Prcssure Torque toi Actualpopcn ft/Ib Q.C.
Aaual/close ft/lb~.C.
Input shaft turns CW to open 0 close Q PERFORMAYCE TEST SIH SI c.
Operator Phis.
5/74 Red.
Valve Shutoff Prcssure Open vs. shutoff pressure bv hsndwhcel Q
Limitswitch sn Q Torque switch scc Q Elea. Csl. D Open sect close Current dra>>
A lffloor stand mtde o shipped wlo setting Q P ~ter Mai C~~
Final lnslseccion L STANDARDVALVE-Each valve shall be opened and closed three times under no flowcondicions. For valves $4" and lacquer, che tcsc shall be conduaed with the valve in the same position as ic willbc inscalkd in chc field, See Eng. Order Data Sheea.
Passed test~Tester
- 2. VALVESWITHSPECIAL PERFORMAISICE TEST PROCEDURES Pn ceo~ Ho faCIZKLS
.~Q Open end dose~ nmm.
Visual 0JC.
Q.C.
Dimensional OJC.~+
Q.C.
lfrequired by customers Paine chichncmis 'dn~cL IL<
H liday d ch ae mlm O.IL/ILC.
ii Cenificd cest report tequired Q'WWA Proof of Design repoa Q ~g Produa Inspector 8-rS'-BS Dace
~ IVIIWI>
ssgaaai~
I I
I J
'V p+p "1
e