ML18019A607
| ML18019A607 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris |
| Issue date: | 02/12/1986 |
| From: | Blake J, Kleinsorge W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18019A605 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-86-05, 50-400-86-5, NUDOCS 8603050159 | |
| Download: ML18019A607 (14) | |
See also: IR 05000400/1986005
Text
~lE Rtay
(4
P0
Cy
p
cA
gC
pW
+**++
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30323
Inspection
C ndu
Inspector:
p
or
ary 21-24,
198
Approved by:
J.
.
a e, Section
C ref
gi
ering Branch
iv sion of Reactor Safety
Report No.:
50-400/86-05
Licensee:
Carolina
Power and Light Company
P. 0.
Box 1551
Raleigh,
NC
27602
Docket No.:
50-400,
I
Facility Name:
Harris
1
License No.:
CPPR-158
.L@
b
Date Signed
z.
el.'te
Soigne
SUMMARY
Scope:
This routine,
unannounced
inspection entailed
30 inspector-hours
on site
in
the
areas
of licensee
action
on
previous
enforcement
matters
(92702),
housekeeping
(54834B) material identification and control
(42902B)
and material
control
(42940B) safety-related
structures,
safety-related
piping observation of
work and
work activities
(49053B),
spent fuel storage
racks
(50095),
inspector
followup items
(927018)
and licensee identified items
Results:
One violation was identified - "Failure to Follow As-Built Documen-
tation Procedure" - paragraph
7.
No deviations
were identified.
Sb02~8
<
I
ZqOSOSOa59
OSOOOOOO;
pod
gDOCK O
PDR ~
8
4
~ I
'
I
ff 4 'ii
'
4 4
V
If',
I
IVVVV
V
4
4
li
4
'4
~ I
REPORT DETAILS
Persons
Contacted
Licensee
Employees
- R. A. Watson,
Vice President
Harris
- N. J. Chiangi,
Manager
QA/QC Harris
- G. L. Forehand,
Director QA/QC
- D. McGaw, Superintendent
QA/QC
- H. W. Bowles, Director
- C. L. McKenzie, Acting Director QA/QC Operations
Other
licensee
employees
contacted
included
construction
craftsmen,
engineers,
technicians,
and office personnel.
Other Organization
- W. Chao,
EBASCO - Civil
NRC Resident
Inspectors
G.
F. Maxwell
S.
P. Burris
- Attended exit interview
Exit Interview
The inspection
scope
and findings were summarized
on January
24,
1986, with
those
persons
indicated
in paragraph
above.
The inspector
described
the
areas
inspected
and
discussed
in detail
the
inspection
findings listed
below.
No dissenting
comments
were received
from the licensee.
(Open) Violation 400/86-05-01:
"Failure to Follow As Built Documentation
Procedure"
- paragraph
7.
(Open)
Inspector
Followup
Item 400/86-05-01:
"Spent
Fuel
Storage
Rack
Assembly Support" - paragraph
8.
The licensee
did not identify as proprietary
any of the materials
provided
to or reviewed
by the inspector during this inspection.
Licensee Action on Previous
Enforcement Matters
(92702)
(Closed) Violation 400/85-38-01:
"Failure to Establish
Adequate
Measures
to
Control the Storage of Permanent
Plant Equipment"
h
I
~l" ~ r ~ ~ *,
] ~
1
W'I
r
1
P
II
h
F
W
W
L
CP5L letter of response
dated
December
18,
1985,
has
been
reviewed
and
determined
to be acceptable
by Region II.
The inspector
held discussions
with the responsible
engineer
and
examined
the corrective actions
as stated
in the letter of response.
The inspector
concluded that
CPSL had determined
the full extent of the subject
noncompliance,
performed the necessary
survey
and follow-up actions
to correct
the present
conditions
and
developed
the
necessary
correction
actions
to preclude
recurrence
of similar circum-
stances.
The corrective actions identified in the letter of response
have
been
implemented.
4.
Unresolved
Items
Unresolved
items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Independent
Inspection Effort
Housekeeping
(54834B),
Material Identification
and
Control
(42902B)
and
Material Control
(42940B)
The inspector
conducted
a general
inspection of the power block construction
area to observe activities such
as housekeeping,
material identification and
control; material control,
and storage.
Within the areas
examined,
no violations or deviations
were identified.
6.
Safety-Related
Structures
a.
Observation of Work and Work Activities (48064B)
The inspector
examined
completed
work
and associated
records for the
structures/supports
indicated
below to determine
whether
applicable
requirements,
as well
as
work and inspection
procedures,
are being (or
have
been)
met in the following areas:
testing
and
NDE.
Structures/Su
orts
A-SI-51-R-20
Pipe Whip Rupture Restraint
A-SI-50-R-24
Pipe Whip Rupture Restraint
C-1-310
Feedwater Restraint
Frame
C-1-309
Restraint
Frame
Seal
Water Heat Exchanger
b.
Review of guality Records
(48066B)
The inspector
reviewed pertinent work and quality records for the below
listed structures
and supports
to determine
whether these
records
meet
established
procedures
and
whether
these
records
reflect
work
accomplishment
consistent
with
NRC requirements
and
SAR commitments in
the following areas:
materials;
installation/erection;
and inspection
(gC) records.
- 'I
IV'
I'u'1
8<
Ifu I
I<< lh
Cgg
I
J'4
,4
(4. 'I
4,
'I
I
4
I
4ll
4
~
',I f
I,l'4
~ 'y jj'jj ll
'I
s
Il
)P, T
gC
<< t
lh
<<
<<I
Alh<<
~ <<
~ \\
<<4'I
4
4
<<k
C I'I
I
(
4
<<C
/
-,
~
11
Ill ', t.'
I
Ic4',
4 'l
I<<
~
~
4
H
<<,*
"'jk<<<<.4
<<
'
jj
I
jj ~
'I
I
j.:
V
C;C -,,
Iujt
<<II
Ij
Ij
S
4
, I
4 4,
4
~
C
t<<'
Il
ulul
,I Vh
Hijus
Nk'
4I'H
4
I
4
'I
I
j,u
4
j
~
C'I
Ijh 4
t
I'h
I
4
II, *I
I
I I 'I
44
N,i
4
[4
'[
S
" 'jj< .I,
h
4
4
Structures/Su
orts
A-SI-51-R-20
A-SI-51-R-24
C-1-310
C-1-309
Pipe Whip Rupture Restraint
Pipe Whip rupture Restraint
Restraint
Frame
Restraint
Frame
Within the areas
examined,
no violations or deviations
were identified.
Safety-Related
Piping - Observation of Work and Work Activities (49063B)
The
inspector
selected
five as-built/final
design
safety-related
piping
drawings indicated
below and
compared
them with the actual installation.
ISO No.
1-BR-337-R2
1-CC-207-R5
1-CC-215-R3
1-SW-208-R5
1-CC-134-R3
~Sstem
Boron Recycle
Component
Cooling Water
Component
Cooling Water
Component
Cooling Water
Cl ass
With regard
to the inspection
above,
the inspector
noted that
on drawing
1-SW-208-R5 the distance
between
the centerline of line 3SW6-80SB-1
and the
socket face of field welds
and
were recorded
as
9 15/16-inches.
In both cases
this is one inch more than the actual
as
built dimensions.
The above is contrary to CPIIL Procedure
WP-141, Revision
4
"As Constructed
Pipe",
Appendix
A paragraph
which requires
as-built
measurements
to be accurate
to 1/16-inch for stress
analyzed lines.
Failure
to accomplish activities affecting quality in accordance
with procedures
is
a violation of Title 10,
Code of Federal
Regulations
Part 50, Appendix
B
Criterion V.
This violation will be identified as 400/86-05-01 "Failure to
Follow As-Built Documentation
Procedure".
Within the
areas
examined,
no violations or deviations
were identified
except
as noted above.
Spent
Fuel Storage
Racks
(50095)
The inspector
observed
ongoing
work activities to determine
whether
the
licensee
work control
system
is functioning properly
and
whether
the
installation
of spent
fuel
storage
racks
is
in compliance
with
NRC
requirements,
licensee
commitments
and applicable
codes
as described
below.
The
inspector
observed
handling,
cleaning,
installation
and
leveling
activities during the installation of the spent fuel racks into the spent
fuel
pool
to verify the
following:
availability
and utilization of
specially trained personnel
and equipment;
approved
drawings, specifications
rf, h
441H
~ Ih
0"
~ f>>
h
.Hh
- a':y
I .'
V
II
I
,
h "(f
4
>>r(d
i
J
~
V
Vh
II 4
Vf f
f
"'vv
r
rh
HI
b
La
h
C
(.
V
~
h
4
I
, I IJH
f
X
,
~ hhlf
nfl f'C@ )
~
i,
I Al>>w
4
Iv
w
I
HI
I
V
Hh
II
ll h.
fh'
I
H>>.
C'H
&4
,. I
4'I C)
Ll f
h
'fh .
4
VV
~
C
J
H
~ V Jl
lww
4
~
~ I
4
J
""IH
f
I'h
V'
t
V
- I '4
h
h)3(
'HCll1H
'"
H f"H;V, ~
'4
HI
Jl'4
Id
I
II
Ih hll
~
-H4( >>4>>
J
4 1>>
Hl
HVH
h
)"HIJ, 'li
""h
'O'H f
ll
li,
HH4'l
v
'll
1
>>
H
w
.>>
CHIIV
f'
h>>H',
'hllh 'h'll h>>
HH,
'fll
IJ
"
III '
h
~
~ >> '
Hhw>> cl >>I
v
V
..H,
1 1'f,v
and procedures
are available for use (latest revision) at installation site;
proper location
and orientation
checked
against
drawings; seismic restraints
in place
and
gapped;
no apparent
damage
to racks or spent fuel pool during
installation; required installation welds
and performance of specified
NDE;
required bolting, shimming,
and torquing of fasteners
are being performed in
accordance
with approved
procedures;
gA inspection
coverage is adequate;
and
corrosion test
specimens
are installed properly (if required
by specifi-
cations).
With regard
to the
above inspection,
the licensee
informed the inspector
that the design of and the installation pattern of the spent fuel storage
rack assemblies
had
changed
with respect
to the spent fuel pool bottom and
the spent fuel storage
rack assembly
embedded
support plates.
This change
resulted
in
some of the
spent
fuel
storage
rack
assembly
support feet
resting
on liner plate
and
not
on the
intended
embedded
support plates
resulting in deflection of the liner plate.
The condition is described
in
Field
Change
Request
No. AS-10360.
Pending
NRC review of the
above Field
Change
Request,
this issue will be identified
as
inspector
followup item
No. 50-400/86-05-0:
"Spent
Fuel Storage
Rack Assembly Support".
Within the areas
examined,
no violations or deviations
were identified.
9.
Inspector
Followup Items
(92701B)
(Closed)
Item 400/84-30-01:
"VT-2, 3, and
4 Examiners"
At the
time of the inspection
discussed
in
NRC Report 400/84-30-01,
the
licensee's
program did not address
qualification of visual
examiners
VT-2,
3,
and
4.
The licensee
has
subsequently
issued
CPSL Procedure
IST-108,
Rev.
1, dated
January
3,
1986,
"Nuclear Inservice
Inspection
Procedure
for
the Certification of Visual
Examination
Personnel
(NES)" to address
the
above qualification.
This inspector
reviewed
the
procedure
and
has
no
further questions.
This matter is considered
closed.
10.
Licensee Identified Items
a ~
(Open)
Item
400-CDR-80-41:
"Potential
Failure
of
the
Reactor
Protection
System Following Secondary
High Energy Line Rupture"
On July 7, 1980,
the licensee notified
NRC Region II of a 50.55(e)
item
concerning
a potential
failure of the
reactor
protection
system
following a secondary
high energy line rupture.
The final report was
submitted
on
February
28,
1985.
The report
has
been
reviewed
and
determined
to
be
acceptable
by
NRC
Region II.
The inspector
held
discussions
with responsible
licensee
and/or
contractor
represen-
tatives,
reviewed supporting
documentation,
and observed
representative
samples
of work to verify that the corrective actions identified in the
report
have not been
completed.
This matter
remains
open
pending the
NRC verification of the
adequacy
of the insulation that the licensee
plans to employ and the completion of the installation.
1
I
V Ii
H I
k
J
H
f
V
u
VHJ 't
L'%
I 'H
ff"'t,
4
f<<l J
I f"
f't'
4 '"',P
d
lt
"'(C'
g X'fthm
4
It,
'I'fl
P
I 'l
h<<C
h
t
yll
fi
<<H
II
f
ft
lth
It 4
lt
HC t<<
tll
I.i
4
J*
.H
4f
C
I<<y
I
h
I,
I
'tl
I,
'll
I
=
P
J
Hiil
Ii'
I'
Nil 'I
"A
'
I
l
~
I
f
lk
~ hy'f
'tbf
4 IICyI
<<4
4
k
4
dl'S
I
4
4
I ~
H
~ f
I k
(lilt
I'
y
C..
'I
tl
h
l.k,:
I)
k "f"
p,
~
I f
II
E,f k,~tf
~ H
I <<'
'I
C'
C t"
~ Cl
f<< ~
V
ly')C,
VW
~ VV
I I
<< I I 4 ty Ilf
h
IiI'I
I'
',it
Jft
I
h"
.
Itll) I .,
i
I'j" 1
II
~
f
htt
IH
I
f'
4
)('
QJ
I'f k'l
~'t
il
11
vll J
g
~
J
I
SI(ff
tt
(Closed)
Item
400-CDR-82-92:
"Bolted Structural
Connections
with
Excessive
Gaps"
On July 2, 1982, the licensee notified
NRC Region II of a 50.55(e)
item
concerning
excessive
gaps
in bolted structural
connections.
The final
report was submitted
on Nay 10,
1985.
The report
has
been
reviewed
and
determined
to
be acceptable
by
NRC Region II.
The inspector
held
discussions
with responsible
licensee
and/or contractor
representa-
tives,
reviewed
supporting
documentation,
and observed
representative
samples
of work to verify that the corrective actions identified in the
report have
been completed.
This matter is closed.
(Closed)
Item
400-CDR-81-102:
"Grease
In Friction
Type Structural
Connections"
On
September
15,
1982,
the
licensee
notified
NRC
Region II of
a
50.55(e)
item
concerning
grease
in friction
type
structural
connections.
The final report
was submitted
on
May 10,
1985.
The
report
has
been
reviewed
and
determined
to
be
acceptable
by
NRC
Region II.
The inspector
held discussions
with responsible
licensee
and/or contractor
representatives,
reviewed supporting
documentation,
and
observed
representative
samples
of work to verify that
the
corrective actions identified in the report have
been
completed.
(Closed)
Item 400-CDR-82-111:
"Seismic gualification Test Failure of the
Starting Air Check
Valves for the
Emergency
Diesel
Engine
Generator
Set"
On December
23,
1982, the licensee notified
NRC Region II of a 50.55(e)
item concerning
seismic qualification test failure of the starting air
check valves for the
emergency
diesel
engine generator
set.
The final
report
was
submitted
on August 16,
1984 dated
August 17,
1984.
The
report
has
been
reviewed
and
determined
to
be
acceptable
by
NRC
Region II.
The inspector
held discussions
with responsible
licensee
and/or contractor representatives,
reviewed
supporting
documentation,
and
observed
representative
samples
of work to verify that
the
corrective action identified in the report has
been completed.
(Closed)
Item 400-CDR-82-112:
"Deficiencies In Bolted Connections"
On
December
29,
1982,
the
licensee
notified
NRC
Region II of
a
50.55(e)
item
concerning
deficiencies
in
bolted
structural
connections.
The final report
was submitted
on Harch 29,
1985.
The
report
has
been
reviewed
and
determined
to
be
acceptable
by
NRC
Region II.
The inspector
held discussions
with responsible
licensee
and/or contractor
representatives,
reviewed
supporting
documentation,
and
observed
representative
samples
of work to verify that
the
corrective actions identified in the report have
been completed.
<<
I"': ;
CE"
- SQ-98-',"-I'
<<(
( '<<<<3 9\\("2299(X
~
'gu
u<<
~
w
~
~
Mlu<<M
<<)
- ('(: l, l
)<<f
<<0'('<<(
~,
.5
M*l
Ib
r
!
ri<<1
) fU~:)I)
,I'IT
1 (""rp=.S'::5lIll v..'
, )I', f.<<f)..!,<<"
J
~
,
I<< "I
? 'u
'I
-) f(I.) I(;;
f
<<
Mli
<<1
'"'i <<I'f9:)(103
'*h
'CM<<>>
)9
I f
I f.). 3.')
j;<<i<<" 'iI'.'." r)
M I)
M
u
M "~JU<<"f )(
c<<I(1(M
2~(.<<3
9O
"'
<<19 fU. DU'f~+2
3
r r
u
u
<<
<<f<<'
<<
(Ii
<<
II
(M
<< ~ <<M
)I: ',,tll!3 992O99rl
)i rll1 f<<9"'P Pf'l"
'I,( I)
" 0
f
,'cy<<
b Jff rl". I9$9b
".II
) ~M".
'
> 2(,oi'i)o2rb LI I'uv.":
,I" ( \\'<<)(
<<<<"")
. (ll'9'<<
'('i<<)I
t0
?!)
'
'I"M<<!
9V r "9 'I
<<
'
MM)<<l(<<
(
M(
Ml<<g
("3)2c.o
~ I ID
r.-
" ?)I'ao09(
oo r09)I
~~%bi)
)("'I9?(I0
bo 6
J
<')
Wuf:-6.l
.?.1'()."
I')'(9<
(( I (;r,.
<<
~<<5
~
<<<<
Il
zI<<'I,"><<I,
IO~
<<<<
M)Or t"I>>
9 ((
<<
<<
~
g<<
1
)I(4
'T.
o=
<<
'()(
<<
I
ms>>
."'!," '.rlrT()o ~,~2o90ri
(II~'
)
I
M
I ) I
~ f,;<<<I!!)"'IM
I <<1
((lr<<I( i(','M
M~<<<<
'f
~"
( s) 2"('3I?"."08rb
(. I':.<<i'I(::)
+((I;<<(f
f
)
'M
P
M
i<<M
~
<< lll
M
"f86 ":<<939<<.
uu
<<
)V)6V
1 '((l(IJ"I
'()
~
M
."',
lip(3 ('l',<<j (
><<') )<<!( "
<< I
'<<<<
II
"2oor=au,o:3
b
r0o9'-0 'r~;.r)
'I(
i.". U:;(I>>."
<<'y
<<
A
';I
g
II ". < P."<< '<<
)
'
M
u
1'I '(
<<
I
<<
<<
<<<<
- l)O 99209" [
(
3 )rwr(
)
s
I ~ 'M"
I'. J
r'("(II)2 26b
3 I c "9'1
I f
b -o ra")909b
- O(22in2tb
I:ll
~ "f.:".
w
'
( '".
<< I<<I<<<<)ul",79<<V 3'I ( Iy '
<<<<
<<0
M!!) (Ir'I(:
9'(." j(i~
<<0q9'T 9f'9 ()r
.(9~ rfd'O
!. ".f<<):
."I'
I'>>
(:.0
r
<<p 43
2!jf",
3'~0;( 9'f
rl)9'(
u
<<I
<<0)I),l M
.>I (I(')ob
9"'"- I I(!'
f.
(Closed)
Item 400-CDR-83-115:
"Base Material
Defect in Spool
Piece
Supplied
by Southwest
Fabrication
and Welding Company"
On January
26,
1983,
the licensee notified
NRC Region II of a 50.55(e)
item concerning
base
material
defects
in
a spool
piece
supplied
by
Southwest
Fabrication
and Welding
Company
(Southwest
Fab.),
The final
report
was
submitted
on July 29,
1983.
The report
has
been
reviewed
and determined
to
be acceptable
by
NRC Region II.
The inspector held
discussions
with responsible
licensee
and/or contractor
representa-
tives,
reviewed
supporting
documentation,
and
observed
representative
samples of work to verify that the corrective actions identified in the
report have
been completed.
g.
(Closed)
Item CDR-83-123:
"Pressure
Boundary Material Supplied
By Tube
Line Corporation
Not Meeting Specification
Requirements"
On March 30,
1983,
the licensee
notified
NRC Region II of a 50.55(e)
item concerning
pressure
boundary
material
supplied
by
Tube
Line
Corporation
not meeting specification
requirements.
The final report
was
submitted
on April 28,
1983.
The report
has
been
reviewed
and
determined
to
be acceptable
by
NRC Region II.
The inspector
held
discussions
with responsible
licensee
and/or contractor
representa-
tives,
reviewed
supporting
documentation,
and observed
representative
samples of work to verify that the corrective actions identified in the
report have
been completed.
Wn
~
~
P
Vu
9$'
~
Vn
I
4
I
~ I, ur
1l
IWI ",9
v
w J'Jc.
'lw
I
~
tu
It r,
'
I,
lt,,
I
)II
4-
C.,I
Wt t" >>'
'll
. c.
4
I
I
<<4'm
9
'"ll f hr>> )
4
C~/4
II
4
t'
"C
'v
Wu
4 l ) (1 Q L'.h
Wl
r
t
'I Jp
trhnl
I
'4
<<II
'l'-.
9>'ll
'
~ "1"
9
I
I
ltWuv II
'
ul
hl
I
II WV
wun