ML18019A490
| ML18019A490 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 11/13/1985 |
| From: | Conlon T, Hunt M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18019A488 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-85-39, NUDOCS 8511250158 | |
| Download: ML18019A490 (10) | |
See also: IR 05000400/1985039
Text
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30323
Report No.:
50 4-00/85
3-II
Licensee:
Carolina
Power and Light Company
P.
0.
Box 1551
Raleigh,
NC
27602
Docket No.:
50-400
License No.:
CPPR-158
Facility Name:
Harris
~u
Inspection
Conducted:
October 21-25,
1985
Inspector:
M.
. Hunt
Approved by:
T.
E. Conlon,
Sec
on
hie
,
PSS
Engineering
Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
Date Signed
/-] -
A'ate
Signed
SUMMARY
Scope:
This routine,
unannounced
inspection entailed
35 inspector-hours
on site
in
the
areas
of instrumentation
procedures,
instrumentation
installation
(mechanical)
and instrumentation installation (electrical).
Results:
One violation was identified - Failure to close air lines
and sensing
lines after equipment
removal.
One
unresolved
item
was identified -
Review the
causes
of
NCR 85-1665 for
reportability.
Bsi 12
C~ OgOO{)400
5p158 85>~
ADO
,.
pDR
8
REPORT DETAILS
1.
Persons
Contacted
Licensee
Employees
~R.
L. Bryant, Instrument Engineering Supervisor
N. J. Chiangi,
Manager,
equality Assurance/equality
Control (gA/gC), Harris
Nuclear Plant
(HNP)
~R.
A. Flodman,
Resident
Engineer - Instruments
- G.
L. Forehand,
Director gA/gC,
"K. 0. Hate', Principal
gA Engineer
~C.
S. Hinnant,
Manager - Startup
"P.
W. Howard, Senior
Engineer,
Regulatory Compliance
~L. I. Loflin, Manager,
Harris Plant Engineering Support,
HPES
"R.
W. Prunty, Jr., Principal
Engineer,
HPES,
I8C
"R.
A. Somers,
Superintendent,
Construction Inspection
"E.
E. Willett, Discipline Manager - Instruments
"D.
C. Whitehead,
gA Supervisor
Other
licensee
employees
contacted
included
construction
craftsmen,
engineers,
technicians,
operators,
mechanics,
security force
members,
and
office personnel.
Other Organizations
J.
P. Kirk, Project Administrator, Daniels Construction
Company
NRC Resident
Inspectors
"G.
F. Maxwell
"S.
P. Burris
"Attended exit interview
2.
Exit Interview
The inspection
scope
and findings were summarized
on October 25,
1985, with
those
persons
indicated in paragraph
1 above.
The inspector described
the
areas
inspected
and
discussed
in detail
the
inspection
findings.
No
dissenting
comments
were received
from the licensee.
The following items were identified.
Violation 50-400/85-39-01,
Failure to close air lines
and sensing lines
after equipment
removal.
(Para.
6).
Unresolved
item 50-400/85-39-02,
Review the
cause
of
NCR 85-1665 for
repor tability.
(Para
6. )
~
~
3 ~
The licensee
did not identify as proprietary any of the materials
provided
to or reviewed
by the inspectors
during this inspection.
Licensee Action on Previous
Enforcement Matters
This subject
was not addressed
in the inspection.
Unresolved
Items
5.
Unresolved
items
are matters
about which more information is required to
determine
whether they are
acceptable
or may involve violation or devia-
tions.
One
new unresolved
item identified during this
inspection
is
discussed
in paragraph
6.
Instrument
Components
and Systems - Procedure
Review (52051)
The
inspector
reviewed
procedures
relating to the receiving,
storage,
installation,
inspection
and calibration of instruments
and
associated
equipment.
a.
Receiving
and storage
procedures
There
are
no special
receiving or storage
procedures
for instruments.
The site receipt inspection
requirements
required
by C(C-6, Receiving
Inspection,
applies
to all equipment received at the site
and
has
been
reviewed
during
numerous
inspections
in the
past.
The storage
of
equipment
is controlled
by Administrative Procedures
No. AP-X111-05,
Material Storage.
This procedure
is applicable to all materials
stored
on site that is covered
by ASME Section III.
b.
Installation
The mechanical
instrumentation
installation 'is controlled by Procedure
No.
WP-300;
Instrument
Work Package
Preparation
and Control.
This
procedure identifies other procedures
that will be required to complete
the instrument installation defined in the
Work Package.
The WP-300
procedure
covers .installation of the following:
Instrument
accessories:
filters,
instrument
valves,
regulations,
solenoid valves etc.
Air lines (branch signal):
pipe and tubing instruments
Instrument
Impulse Lines: capillary, pipe and tubing
Supports for instrument tube track and tubing
Any additional/repair of instruments
The work packages
developed
under this
procedure will contain
the
necessary
forms for documenting tubing and valve material
heat
numbers,
tubin'g bend verification, instrument
and valve installation (requiring
serial
numbers
and
other
unique identifiers)
as
well
as
material
verification including supports.
Various aspects
of mechanical
instru-
mentation installation are covered
by the following work procedures:
Procedure
No. MP-302, Installation of Supports for Safety/Seismic
Related Instrumentation
Procedure
No. MP-304,
Installation
of Safety-Related
Seismic
Process
Tubing and Instrumentation
Procedure
No. MP-305, Installation of Tube Track/Impulse Line/
Instrument Identification Marker/Tags.
Procedure
No. MP-306, Certification/qualification of Tube Bending
Persons/Tube
Bending Tools/ASME Section III (Code Class) Stainless
Steel
Tubing
The inspection of mechanical
instrumentation installation is performed
by the
guidelines
developed
in Procedure
No. TP-54,
Inspection of
Instrumentation.
The documentation
of inspections
of safety-related,
seismic
category
I (I8C
Code
Class
Nl,
N2
8 Sl) instruments,
fire
protection
instruments,
instrument tubing, capillaries,
tube support
brackets
and
clamps
and instrument
tube tracks
are
covered
by this
procedure.
This procedure lists the normal instrumentation
inspection
acceptance
criteria
such
as
sensing
line slope,
support
spacing,
material identification, .etc.
Any special criteria essential
to the
installation
and inspection
acceptance
are listed on the installation
specifications
and drawings.
The documentation
of the inspection of
the installation of local
instrument
panels
is required
by procedure
TP-28, Inspection of Equipment Installation.
The electrical
power
and
signal
cables
used for instrumentation
installations
are
inspected
and
documented
in accordance
with the
normal
electrical
cable
inspection
procedure
Inspection
of
Safety-Related
Fire
Protection/Detection
NonSafety-Related
Cable
Pulling
and
Termination.
All instrumentation
equipment
that is
classified
as electrically operated is inspected
and documented
by the
requirements
of TP-68 Inspection of Electrical
Equipment Installation.
Mithin the areas
examined,
no violations or deviations
were identified.
6.
Instrument
Components
and Systems - Mork Observation
(52053)
The inspector
selected
various safety-related
components
and mechanical/
electrical
interconnecting
equipment for inspection of activities relative
to the performance
of inprocess
and
completed
work to verify conformance
with the applicable
codes
and
standards
required
by the licensee's
commitments,
procedures
and
NRC requirements.
The following components
were
examined for compliance with the aforementioned
requirements:
PDT-lAF-2180-SB
PI-1CS-152BSW
FT-1S I-943S
FT-1SI-940S
PI-1CS-151
BSW
PI-1CS-153
BSW
LT-1FW-494 IW
LT-1FW-495 IIM
Differential
Pressure
Across
Aux
Pump Turbine Driven
Discharge
Pressure
Charging
Pump
B
Charging
Pump
8 Flow
Charging
Pump
A Flow
Discharge
Pressure
Charging
Pump
A
Discharge
Pressure
Charging
Pump
C
Level
Level
FT-1RC-414I; 415II, 416III
Loop 2 Flow
FT-1RC-424I; 425II, 426III
FT-1-RC-434I; 435II, 436III
TE-1RC-412
BIM
TE-1RC-422 BIIM
Loop 3 Flow
Reactor
Coolant
Loops Flow
Tave Temperature
Detector
Tave Temperature
Detector
Receipt inspection
records
of various
items listed were reviewed.
The
records
reviewed indicated that the equipment
was
examined for damage,
proper identification and in certain
instances
nonconforming
records
were
generated
to document
the lack of proper certification records
being available at the time of receipt inspection.
The records also
reflected
the fact that certain
components
had
been
returned
to the
supplier for modification and then returned to the site.
b.
C.
The storage
records for the
equipment listed were not reviewed since
the
equipment is
now installed.
The equipment
was protected
by fire-
proof covers that were installed over the local instrument racks.
In process
inspection of equipment
being installed
was
not examined
during this inspection.
The inspector
examined
the installation of the previous listed equip-
ment for proper location,
proper identification and protection
from
construction activities.
The
sensing
lines,
supports
and manifold
valves
were
examined
for proper installation
including slope
and
support separation.
During the inspection of panel
A-1 R-7 it was
found that additional
tubing
was
connected
to the manifold valves
for FT-1SI-940S
and
FT-1SI-943S.
This tubing
had been connected to some temporary instru-
ments
during testing.
The temporary
instruments
had been
removed
and
the
open
instrument lines
remained
connected
to the manifold valves.
Nearby at air operated
valves
3CC-Ll-SA and 3CC-L2-SB it was found that
the air lines to the solenoid air valves
had been disconnected
and the
instrument air header for these
valves
was also
open
(uncapped)
with
the
open
tube
end in the vertical position.
The inspector
was advised
that
a modification (relocation of the solenoid air valves)
had been
performed.
The
temporary tubing which connected
the instrument air
to the valve air cylinder operators
indicates that
some type of
temporary positioning of these
series
mounted valves
had been performed
by
operations/testing
personnel.
CP8 L
maintenance
Procedure
No. MMM-Oll, Section
5.3 states
that "Openings
and pipe ends shall
be
sealed at all times unless
they must be unsealed
to carry out necessary
operations."
The
two noted conditions
appear
to be
a failure to follow Maintenance
Procedure
MMM-011 and is identified
as violation 50-400/85-39-01,
Failure to Close Air Lines and Sensing
Lines After Equipment
Removal.
As-built verification
was
accomplished
by
comparing
the
actual
installation with the isometric
drawings that were part of the work
packages
-for installation of, the selected
components.
Within the work
package
is
a bill of material which identifies all the items required
for the installation.
The instrument details
CAR 2166 contains
the
Bill of Material
(B/M) for all instrument fitting needed.
From the
Drawings
CAR 2166-6-(400
Series)
the location/arrangement
drawings are
detailed.
From these
drawings the isometric drawing is developed
which
shows
supports,
identified welds by number, specifies
slope, etc.
The
installation of thefollowing "components
was verified by the isometric
(ISO) drawings listed:
POT-1AF-2180-SB
FT-1SI-943S
FT-1SI-940S
PT-1CS" 153
BWS
PT-1CS-121
LT-1FW"494 IW
LT-1FW-495 IIW
ISO No.
337
ISO No.
118
ISO No.
119
ISO No.
47
ISO No.
85
ISO No.
294
ISO No.
295
The
inspector
reviewed
installation
records
for the
following
electrical signal/power cables for the listed components:
Cable
No.
11960K- SB
11960L-SB
10454K
10452J
10454B
10454A
10310D
10310H
10993A
SR1
10993B
SR2
~Com onent
4
P DT-1AF-2180-SB
PDT-1AF-2180-SB
FT-1S I-943S
FT-1SI-943S
FT-1SI-940S
FT-1S I-940S
PT-1CS-121SW
PT"1CS"121SW
LT-1FW-494 IW
LT-1FW-495 IIW
The pull cards
and termination records
documenting the installation of
the listed cables
were
reviewed
and found adequate
with the following
exception.
The inspection
attributes
listed in the
documentation
package
had all
been accepted
except the separation verification.
The
separation
criteria for the listed
cables
were
not
met
and
No. 85-1665
had
been generated
to identify the situation.
Further investigation of these
and other cable
separation
conditions
indicated
that
a sizable
number of cables
had
been
nonconformed
(NCR-85-1665) for separation difficulties.
The licensee
has
chosen to
develop
a list of all cables
(several
hundred) that
do not meet the
separation
criteria at
some point as part of the action for NCR No.
85-1665.
The inspector
questioned
whether the licensee
had
reviewed
the
NCR for reportability under
The licensee
advised
that they feel that since
the problem is being identified at the
gC
.level the item is not reportable.
Further discussions
were held and
the
licensee
was
advised
that the condition will be identified as
unresolved
item 50-400/85-39-02,
Review the
Causes
of NCR-85-1665 for
Reportability.
This item will be examined in more detail during future
inspections..
v
~
e