ML18019A385

Forwards Info Requested by NRC During 850905 Meeting Re Drug Abuse Contention.Rept Includes Matrix of Info Requested Along W/Addl Supporting Documentation

ML18019A385
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	09/19/1985
From:	Zimmerman S CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NLS-85-334, NUDOCS 8509230079
Download: ML18019A385 (107)

Text

RK I.AT INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION YSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBRe8509230079 DOC ~ DATE: 85/09/19 NOTARIZED:

NO FAQIL'5'0 400 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Planti Unit ii Carolina AO'i'H ~ NAME, AUTHOR AFFILIATION ZIMMERMANrS>>R, Carolina Power~

h Light Co>>

RECIP ~ NAME.

RECIPIKNT-AFFILIATION DENTONiH>>R>>

Office= of Nuclear Reactor Regulationi Director DOCKET 05000400 SUBJECT! Forwards info requested by NRC during 850905.meeting,re drug abuse contentions Rept includes matrix of info requested along w/addi supporting documentation, DISTRIBUTION CODE!

BOOLD COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE!

TITLE: I..icensing Submittali PSAR/FSAR Amdts 8, Related Correspondence NOTES:

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAMEI NRR/DL/ADL NRR LB3 LA INTERNAL>>i ACRS 41 ELD/HDS1 IE/DKPER/EPB 36'RR ROEgM ~ L NRR/DE/CEB il NRR/DE/EQB 13>>

NRR/OE/MEB 18 NRR/OE/SAB 24 NRR/DHFS/MFEB40.

NRR/DHFS/PSRB NRR/OSI/AEB 26 NRR/DSI/CPB 10, NRR/OS I "/ICSB 16" NRR/DS I/PSB 19 NRR/OS I/RSB 23~

RGN2 EXTERNAL; ?AX DMB/DSS (AMDTS)

NRC PDR 02" PNl< GRUEL"z R COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

0 1

0 6

6 1

'0 1

1 1

1.-

1 2

2 1

.1 1

1 1

1 1

1.

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

3-3 1

1 1

1 1

1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR LB3 BC BUCKLKYiB 01 AOM/I.FMB IE FII.E IE/OQAVT/QAB21 NRR/DE/AEAB NRR/DE/EHEB NRR/DE/GB 28 NRR/OE/MTEB 17 NRR/DE/SGKB 25 NRR/DHFS/LQB 32 NRR'/DL/SSPB NRR/DSI/ASB NRR/DS I/CSB 09 NRR/DSI/METB 12 B

22 REG F

04 8/ImAMI/MIB BNL(AMDTS ONLY)

LPDR 03 NSIC 05 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

0 1

l 1

0 1

1 1

1 0.

1 1

2 2

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 0

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 0,,

1 1

1 1

1 1

TOTAL NUI>>IBER OF COPIES REQUIRKD: LTTR 5?.

ENCL 44

hl "rr l( r CI

~

~

W a (, lit>>

lt r

(II W

lr W(>>

,I f I If>

Iv r

< gr>>i ~ I,W>>

~

I W ~ 't I ~

W e f(

I W

II I

r,'(

I e'>>.X Cr(tk I,)'WW v VIP r I 1;

n tl WW

~

CMO Carolina Power & Light Company SEP 1 9 >985 SERIAL: NLS-85-330 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT NO.

1 - DOCKET NO.50-000 DRUG ABUSE CONTENTION

Dear Mr. Denton:

Carolina Power R Light Company hereby submits the information requested by the NRC staff during the September 5, 1985 meeting to discuss the drug abuse contention.

The attached report includes the matrix of information as requested, along with additional supporting documentation.

The Section I introduction summarizes the report and provides an outline of where specific information is located.

If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact us.

Yours very truly, SRZ/3DK/ccc (193'13DK)

Attachment S. R. 'erman Manager Nuclear Licensing Section CC:

Mr. B. C. Buckley (NRC)

Mr. G. F. Maxwell (NRC-SHNPP)

Dr. 3. Nelson Grace (NRC-RII)

Mr. G. Knighton (NRC)

Mr. T. Novak (NRC)

Mr. H. A. Cole Mr. Travis Payne (KUDZU)

Wake County Public Library Mr. Daniel F. Read (CHANGE/ELP)

Mr. Wells Eddleman Mr. John D. Runkle Dr. Richard D. Wilson Mr. G. O. Bright (ASLB)

Dr. 3. H. Carpenter (ASLB)

Mr. 3. L. Kelley (ASLB) 8509230079 85091 9 PDR ADOCX 05000e00 A

PDR: g J

411 Fayettevilte Street

~ P. O. Box 1551 o Raleigh, N. C. 27602

INFO&fATION RELATING TO THE CONTENTION CONCERNING ALLEGED DRUG USE ON THE SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PROJECT

e.

l I'p t+ ~ ltd I QQ gt)'(>'

1 ll)<J'

%l

~

I Pp]"

g At/ "/'f

<<g I()

t4 gl N) ~ Fgt/ fffP)'g

) IP, ~(

p

',l)t)

I

)"l<

~ 8< <l+"

I P 'f T'), f

'<[ "lQ"$

'<fl 'fT'f "

J

INFORMATION RELATING TO THE CONTENTION CONCERNING ALLEGED DRUG USE ON THE SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PROJECT Table of ContentsSection I Section II Section III Introduction Analysis by Individual Case Descriptions of Safety-Related Plant Component Inspection Programs

~Pa e

12 A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

F.

G.

Pipe Hanger Instrumentation Erection Mechanical/Pipe Welding HVAC Installation Civil Electrical Safety-Related and Seismic Category II Equipment 13 14 15 16 17 22 28 Section IV Section V

Section VI Section VII Appendix A Quality Activities of the Nondestructive Examination Program Quality Activities of Start-Up Group Reinspection Activities and Results Summary Job Descriptions 29 30 32 36 A-1

II tt I

g'll p g g

F)

N v s*

• r I,

'F I

N I'>,,

~

m

~

A

<)l.o q ~

r 8,

a f

r>g~r.

~ '~

s

'cy" l)

~

p

~

C-

"gH'(

1lq y P

- ~"

=g ) ~

~pe" f c.ay~

IY Pt g"

'I i ~ '

.p,

~

C>

~ -

~

P t'la t~.~

~(~ A

Section I INTRODUCTION This report summarizes information requested by the NRC staff relating to the contention concerning alleged drug use at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Prospect (SHNPP).

The contention alleges that drug use is widespread among construction workers at the SHNPP with the potential implication that drug use has compromised the quality of construction at the SHNPP and the ability of the plant to be operated in a safe manner.

The information provided in this report demonstrates that the quality of construction has not been compromised.

Of the more than 26,000 individuals who have been employed at the SHNPP site since

1978, as of September 15 only 201 individuals have been identified as having, or as suspected of, some level of involvement with controlled substances either on site or off site.

Of these 201 individuals, none are currently employed at the SHNPP.

This report provides gob employment information, for each individual terminated for drug-related

reasons, information on safety-related work or inspections performed by these individuals, and a general discussion of those quality assurance programs and/or reinspections which ensure that all safety-related work meets stringent quality guidelines.

Where a quality control (QC) or construction inspection (CI) inspector or engineering support person has been implicated as a possible drug user, the report provides the findings from reinspections of work performed by such individuals.

The report is organized into seven sections, the first of which is the introduction.

Section II provides data in chart form by individual and indicates whether the individual performed safety-related work.

Section II also includes a discussion of the review process for safety-related work and the basis for confirmation of the quality of each individual's work.

Section III provides a general discussion of the inspection and quality assurance programs which cover each safety-related construction activity.

Section IV discusses the quality assurance activities of the nondestructive examination (NDE) program.

Section V provides information on the activities of the plant start-up group to ensure that completed systems and equipment function properly as installed.

Section VI provides the results of reinspections.

Section VII is a summary.

h

)

r 3

3 I

F 3

~,

ll)t p

'fr ~

~ h

~

'I I

", l')

rhP

, p

~

~ rpr 3 I P'Ie el I

Q rh

~

~

~ I

~

""r pe I'l

'h r)r 'j) el'

~

r I

3 l" he) e h'

~h)h':

3

'h e

I Fl v)

F II

~ p r h

~ IF) Prre h! rll

~

g I helel

'h fhthl

tf I'

)

3

~"

rh 3 )3

/

I) 3 c

lr) 3)

I 3 ~

h

~

a

~ r

~

\\'h' Ii

~

g) ~

3 le fr

)

II e he'h 3

e)p)

F:')

r 3

re 3

1 I'

e f le 3

3 e

~

e,r' PI ~

~ <<e

~,

~ I I 3 I

K

'gf

~

3

)ef 3

~ ~ h, 3

rrh" 3

~

~

h I.f P

~ ~,

F 3 ~

I, )

h,

~

I h

~

I

~

h, ~ )

~ Fh

I

~

Section II ANALYSIS BY INDIVIDUALCASE This section provides information in "matrix" form, as requested by the NRC staff, on individuals terminated or removed from the SHNPP site since 1978 for drug-related reasons.

Chart II-1 provides summary information by individual employee.

An explanation of each column in Chart II-1 follows:

Column A - Individual Reference Number Each individual is identified by a unique reference number to protect his or her identity.

Column B Basis of Dru Involvement The information available regarding the basis for identifying an individual with drug involvement has been summarized into six categories:

"Suspicion" indicates less than actual proof of drug involvement (search or testing not performed).

"Possession" includes individuals who were found to be in possession of a controlled substance on site.

"Positive test" indicates the presence of drugs through urinalysis drug screening.

"Arrest - off site" indicates individuals who were arrested away from the site as a result of police activity.

"Arrest on site" includes those individuals who were identified in the undercover drug operation.

"Refused test/search" indicates individuals who refused to submit to a urinalysis test or a search of their person, property, or vehicle.

Column C Em lo ent Duration (Months)

The length of employment in number of months is provided for each individual.

Column D - Job Classification Job classifications for each individual are listed.

Appendix A to this report includes a detailed job description for craft workers, including carpenters, electricians, utilitymen, pipefitters, field engineers, ironworkers,

K I

'P KPKP P 'I

~

t

~

I

~ P p

~

I p

~ p PF

~

~

v P P p

p f

~ I F 'I

painters, instrument workers, truck drivers, rebar workers, and sheet metal workers.

Also included are job descriptions for Daniel overhead personnel, individuals identified as "other",

and inspectors.

Column E Safet Work Performed This column contains four entries:

yes, possibly, unlikely, and no.

These terms describe the results of evaluations to determine if the subject employees were involved in safety-related work.

A "yes" or "no" entry means that available records and/or discussions with the individual's supervisor(s) confirm with a high degree of certainty whether the individual was involved in any safety-related work at the SHNPP.

"Possibly" means that the individual's training and job classification would allow the individual to perform safety-related work but records do not disclose that such work actually was performed.

"Unlikely" means that available information suggests that the individual did not perform any safety-related work but that the possibility at some time during employment cannot be eliminated.

Column F Qualit Confirmation Basis Safety-related craft work is subjected to multiple checks and cross-checks, first by supervision, and independently by the Quality Assurance (QA) organization.

The work of involved individuals was evaluated to verify that the work was subject to quality confirmation.

Records identified specific inspection activities for inspectors and work performed by engineering support personnel.

The quality confirmation basis entry in Column F is used to reference information in Sections III or VI.

Section III provides descriptions of safety-related plant component inspection programs.

Section VI describes the results of reinspections or other evaluations of involved individuals.

Column G Comments This column provides additional descriptive information to enhance job classification entries listed in Column D.

For example, review of Chart II-1 provides the following information about individual number "17" (Column A):

the individual had a positive drug screen test (Column B); was employed for sixteen months (Column C) before termination or removal from the site; was classified as an instrument worker (Column D) described more fully in Appendix A; is indicated as "possibly" having performed safety-related work (Column E) described more fully in Appendix A; is referenced as being covered by III B-Instrumentation Inspection Programs (Column F); and was a welder (Column G).

fy>>) f I

IrfI>I ti>> ~

1 tl g

>>') )) f "I

,)~t','1 1

<<f th gr)>>

I t

~

>> ~

I" I

4.>>

f>>~

l r) f t-gf Ih lf[rf) f '

f titf 1

I.ivl"-

>>I hh fth"fj; t V.I,I,"II

~ )

~

rt>>4>>tf I I', ff Mh

.I f) ~

~ I

. f )tg t>>1- -

~

>>I ('r)

~ M>>

I rl I>>f fr)4 ~

q f

gfh

~

~ t M,I >> ~

~

I

~Il 1 >>,f'4>>

~

4>> ~ ~ -

>> '- 'll" rh)

V

~ I r

1 g 1>>

g>>

1

)

')g~, <,>>u)t ht"")

" r>>))>>I

>>I I ~

fth1

~ 'f 1'" ~

I ~

~

yt >> )

).

~

'I, g.

I

~ I I f)rg.

)y)q t)wI I,,

- ~

~

".V->>>>1,

) fq u>>hf+.,gf

~

~

~ <<t>>,. f Vi

>>I

>>.>>I

~

J II

~ 1 g) 1*

t ),

~ g

>> I.

I I

f I" ft 1

1

>>4>>f )

~

'tt t 'r f>>>>u f ~ )

ttt I i It>>4

+ t.

1) 1

'I 4

M

<<= K>>vr

~, ) "

1 ru>>f l l ru

)

~ t

~

11>>4 1 I

I.*

r* ~ 1>>

I I

1

>>IP

>>gi, I tf ~

t 1 1"

~

gg)'l

>>'4 tt,) t'r Iht I

f) 4 '

1'>>'

~,

~>>I 4>> yt

~

~

I >>)

~ ~

~ I-I II'Vtt'I

~ ut I

~

>>)

~ 441 r) 1 lu th urg

~

I ),~

(),

)

4

,Ig g r',fft) 1>>

r>>h(t w )p

~

1 ),I gg

~ g;Vr'

'I "itt',

~

)

I ~ )>>4 rr>>

I 14

~

II

>> fh fft)).i

,I '1>>t>>I 1 I 4

~ ~,

~

g) I I

" ) I

>> )

4 I, I ~

V t) f) )>> ~ )

Itj 4)tui 1'f tv gv ft)'

Vf

~ I>> I ~ I th<<-

1

~

r

)

~

1 14 ff)

>>I<)r )>>

fg f r)tg r

erg<<

)>>f t>> h "4'1)

~

I

>> ~ >> I) lu 4>> I>>>>>>'

\\

1 4

1'"

~ I I >>I ~ 1

= ~ >>)IH t I I r>>, ~,g 1>>f>>)

I

'I 1~

1 1 ti' I ~

~

1 I

>>iru t

~

>>'I rtfg) )+ l 1

>>I

The information in Chart II-1 is of a summary nature based on the best available records or information.'owever, determining with certainty all work or even all systems or components on which work was performed by an individual craft worker is not possible.

Time cards are not sufficiently detailed, nor verified for accuracy of work descriptions, to serve that purpose.

QA records are, in almost all cases, keyed to systems, components or structures and not to individual craft workers.

A reasonable insight into a worker's activities can be obtained from his gob classification and interviews with his supervision.

However, the information available is not always sufficient to eliminate the possibility that he performed safety-related work which may not be identified.

Therefore, in evaluating whether safety-related work was performed by a craft worker, CPSL generally assumed that the craft worker may have performed any work for which he was qualified within his gob classification.

In evaluating craft workers, helpers were determined to be working under the direction of qualified journeymen who were held accountable for quality standards.

In fact, the majority of craft work is performed in teams where one worker's performance is subject to the scrutiny of fellow ~orkers.

The work of the journeyman craft worker is reviewed by his foreman before being turned over to the QA organization for independent review.

Much of the work is subject to in-process inspections as well.

Certain foremen and general foremen were also identified as implicated with drug involvement.

While these supervisory personnel do not actually perform quality work, where they were identified, it was assumed that their supervisory role possibly could have implications for the quality of the work performed.

In all cases, safety-related work was found to be subject to walkdowns, inspections,

and, on a sample basis, third-party audits.

For safety-related tests within each gob classification, the work is subject to quality review as described more fully in Section III.

Where individuals.implicated were inspectors or engineering support personnel, the task of identifying his work was possible and was accomplished.

Available records allowed identification of, tasks so that reinspection plans could be structured.

Reinspections performed pursuant to site procedure CQA-7 are described in Section VI and results are provided.

In certain cases, evaluations demonstrated that reinspections were not warranted.

These evaluations are also described in Section VI.

Charts II-2 and II-3 summarize and categorize certain information contained in Chart II-1.

Chart II-2 provides a

breakdown by gob classification for the 201 employees terminated.

Chart II-3 provides the reasons for termination by job classification.

1 ~

rh)frh I sh

" jl I ~f "~

f pl I

~

'sf) I P $

)

'I I h=

1 I) ~

"f 1'\\ ~

Ih sh

<<I~

~ I', )

~

"l ~ l

~ sfr I

~ )

1 'I s

1 h

hwh Ig

) l

~

~

I

'I

~

sh l

)

I

~ I 1

) l

~

I 1

1)f )

1""~)

~

~

1

~ ~ I chp) l'I)l, r

h

~

l l.j )'

~ ~ Ph fr

~

~ rh II I') ")

I l l'>> ~ I I

I' ) f

~ l

~ t g

I,~I

~

~

'll )

I),

wpr gVsh+

as l

ffTj I

sl I) ~ P

)sw

'I 1) a-1

)

1 f<

---

> l '

I I

~ p rh

~ ~

wssl ff I "h)

Ip T

s) s)hf'f IJ sl, Tips f*

sl

~

)f I

1 I ~

jl

)sf' l

I"1

fI)

~

I

'I 'l II

"-~

sh gsl ',,

w r)f

=

1,

))

'1)

~

~

~

,plf r ws

~,. I)

)< 'r' hit'l ~)'fk

,, l 1

hlr I

~prlh

~ I ()1

~

1

"~I

~

I ~

I ilw I

I, l '1, I

l

• ) rr

'lfp I 'lj 1

l

~ hl

~ I 1

sr l II p s)

'I ~ I

'1 I~

l):Ih'I I

1 brr sr,p I

pp) h

~

I ")I 'I I

I

. I)sh

~ ~

1

~ l 1

I I

I ~

~

1 1

~

~ l

INDIV.

REF. MO.

B BASIS DRUB INVOLVEMENT C

EMPLOYMENT DURATION MONTHS)

CHART Il-l D

JOB CLASSIFICATION SAFETY WORK PERFORKED F

DUALITY CONF IRKATIOM BASIS COiVY)B4TS I

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

18li 12 13 14 15 16 17 l8 19 28 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 38 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 48 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 58 51 52 POSScsSZOM POSITIVE TEST SUSPICION SUSPICION REFUSED TEST/SEARCH SUSPICION POSSESSIQII SUSPICION REFUSED TEST/SEARCH POSSESSION REFUSED TEST/SEARCH SUSPICION SUSPICIQN POSSESSION SUSPICION SUSPICION POSITIVE TEST POSSESSION SUSPICION POSSESSION RAKED TEST/SEARCH SUSPICION ARREST/OM SITE PGSITIVE TEST SUSPICIOM REFUScD TEST/SEARCH SUSPICION

SUSPICION SUSPICION SUSPICION SUSPICION SUSPICION REFUSED TEST/SEARCH ARREST/OFF SITE SUSPICION SUSPICION PGSSESSIQM SUSPICION POSSESSIQM POSSESSION SUSPICION RcCUSED TEST/SEARCH SUSPICION SUSPICION SUSPICION POSITIVE TEST SUSPICION POSSESS IOM POSSESSIOM PGSScmiON POSITIVE TEST SUSPICION 17 5

17 9

9 2

8 34 3

14 9

1 38 24 16 7

6 le 14 6

1 39 3

16 52 54 38 l3 28 6

32 19 27 22 5

6 15 23 5il 5ll 85 32 1

17 37 5

UTILITY INSPECTOR OTHER ELECTRICIAN DAMIEI OVERHEAD ELECTRICIAN PIPE FITTER ELECTRIC IAV TRUCK DRIVER IMSPcCTOR INSPECTOR PIPE FITTER DANIEL OVERHEAD UTILITY DANIEL OVERHEAD PIPE FITTER INSTRUIIENT ELECTRICIAN DANIEL OVFRHEAD UTILITY INSPECTOR ELECTRICIAN ELECTRICIAN INSPECTOR CPSL NOM"INSPECTOR CARPENTER OTHER PIPE FITTER CPKL NOM"INSPECTOR ELECTRICIAN PAINTER IRON WORKER INSTRUMENT DANIEL OVERHEAD IRON WORKER CPCL NIN-INSPECTOR PAINTER ELECTRICIAN ELECTRICIAN ELECTRICIAN INSPECTOR TRUCK DRIVER ELECTRICIAN ELECTR I CIA)V ELECTRICIAN INSPECTOR CARPENTER ELECTRICIAN OTHER UTILITY CPEL NOM-INSPECTOR PIPE FITTER NO YES YES NO h0 POSSIBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBLY NO POSSIBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBLY h0 NO MO POSSIBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBI.Y UNLIKELY NO YES NO YES NO h0 UNLIKELY YES POSSIBLY NO POSSIBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBI.Y POSSIBLY NO POSSIBLY NO NO POSSI BI.Y NO NG POSSIBLY NO POSSIBLY NO POSSIBLY POSSIBLY YES POSSIBLY NO UNLIKELY h'0 POSSIBLY N/A VI A VI D N/A N/A III F-ELECTRICAL III A,B,C III F-ELECTRICAL N/A VI B VI B 111 A,B,C N/A N/A N/A III A, B,C III B-INSTRUMENTATION Ill F-ELECTRICAL III E-CIVIL N/A VI A N/A III F-ELECTRICAL N/A N/A III E<IVIL VI D III A)B)C N/A III F-ELECTRICAL III E-CIVIL III E-CIVIL III B-INSTRUiIENTATION N/A III E-CIVIL N/A N/A III ELECTRICAL N/A N/A VI B N/A III F"ELECTRICAL N/A III F-ELECTRICAL VI B 111 E-CIVIL III F"ELECTRICAL N/A 111 E<IVIL N/A III A,B,C HELPER FOREKAN WELDER CLERK TRAINEE 6ENERAL FQREYAN FOREMAN FOREYAM HELPER HELPER HELPER HELPER 6ENcRAL FOREMAN 19-Sep-85 I

e

INDIV.

REF.NO.

B C

BASIS EMPLOYMENT DRU6 DURATION INVOLVEMENT (IIOMTHS)

CHART Il-i D

JOB CLASSIFI CATION E

F QUALITY SAFETY WORK CONFIRVRTIOM PERFORKED BASIS COVPENTS 53 54 S5 56 57 58 59 68 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 78 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 88 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 98 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 188 181 182 183 184 POSSESSIOM POSITIVE TEST SUSPICION POSITIVE TEST SUSPICION ARREST/OFF SITE SUSPICION SUSPICION POSSESSION REFUSED TEST/SEARCH POSITIVE TEST POSSESSION SUSPICION SUSPICION SUSPICION SUSPICION SUSPICION ARREST/ON SITE PQSKSSIN POSSESSION POSITIVE TEST SUSPICION SUSPICION REFUSED TEST/SEARCH REFUSED TEST/SEARCH

• ARREST/OFF SITE POSITIVE TEST SUSPICIN POPcBSI QM REFUSED TEST/SEARCH PGSS"S SION SUSPICION ARREST/ON SITE POSITIVE TEST SUSPICION POSSESSION SUSPICION SUSPICION POBSES SION POSSESSION SUSPICION RrrUSED TEST/SEARCH POSSESSIN BUSPICIN ARREST/OFF SITE SUSPICION REFUSED TEST/SEARCH SUSPICION SUSPICION POSSESSION R~ED TEST/SEARCH POSITIVE TEST li 8

15 38 22 5

14 9

15 65 14 12 18 8

15 54 8

19 6

32 27 12 6

21 21 26 27 36 14 32 13 5

14 61 73 5

6 9

4 8

18 18 6

43 9

16 4

16 27 28 6

ELECTRICIAN CP&L NON-INSPECTOR PIPE FITTER CP&L NON-INSPECTOR OTHER UTILITY ELECTRICILsj ELECTRICIAN FIELD ENGINEER CP&L NOM-INSPECTOR INSPECTOR UTILITY ELECTRI CILIA OTHER DANIEL OVERHEAD ELECTRICIRN PIPE FITTER ELECTRIC ILM ELECTRICIAN IRON WORKER CP&L NOM-INSPECTOR PAINTER INSTRUMENT TRUCK DRIVER CP&L AM-INSPECTOR PIPE FITTER INSPECTOR ELECTRICIAN ELECTRICIAM INSPECTOR ELECTRICIAN OTHER ELECTRICIAN CP&L NOM-INSPiCTOR REBRR UTILITY ELECTRICIAN OTHiR IRN WORKER CRRPENTER OTHER INSPECTOR PIPE FITTER OTH"R DANIEL OVERHEAD INSPiCTOR INSPiCTOR UTILITY ELECTRICIAN SHEET IIETRL INSTRUMENT IhSPECTOR HO NQ NO NO YES UNLIKELY POSSIBLY NO POSSIBLY NO YES UNLIKELY h0 YES h0 POSSIBLY POSSIBLY YES POSSIBLY POSSIBLY NO POSSIBLY HO NO NO NO YES POSSIBLY POSSIBLY YES POSSIBLY YES UNLIKELY NO POSSIBLY UNLIKELY POSSIBLY NO POSSIBLY NO YEB POSSIBLY POSSIBLY YES HO YES YES UNLIKELY POSSIBLY PQSSIBI.Y POSSIBLY YES N/A N/A N/A N/A VI D III E<IVIL III F-ELECTRICAL N/A III E-CIVIL N/A VI A III EKIVIL N/A VI D N/A III F-ELECTRICAL III AsBsC III F-ELECTRICAL III F-ELECTRICAL III E-CIVIL M/A 111 E<IVIL N/A N/A N/A N/A VI C III FMECTRICAL III F-ELECTRICAL VI C III F-ELECTRICAL Vi D III F-ELECTRICAL N/A 111 E-CIVIL III E<IVIL 111 F-ELECTRICAL N/A III E-CIVIL M/R VI D VI B III A,BsC VI D N/A VI C Vl A III E<IVIL III F-ELECTRICAL Ill D+VAC III B-INSTRUVEMTATIOM VI R HELPER HELPER FOREIILM HELPER INSTRUViENTN5 H":LPER WELDER HELPER HELPiR FORENLM

, FORENM WELDFR HELPER FORPAM FORE ViLsI WEI.DiR 19-Sep-85 2

A INDIV.

REF.HO.

B C

BASIS EYiPLOY)I NT DRUB DURATION IHVOLVE)IENT (MONTHS)

CHART 11-1 D

JOB CLASSIFICATION SAFETY MORK PiRFOR)IED F

QUALITY CONF IRYiATION BASIS CON)IBIS 185 186 187 188 189 118 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 128 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 138 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 148 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 158 151 152 153 154 155 156 SUSPICION SUSPICION SUSPICION SUSPICION ARREST/ON SITE REFUSED TEST/SEARCH SUSPICION REFUSED TEST/SEARCH POSSESS IOM SUSPICION SUSPICIGiM PGSSESSIOM ARREST/ON SITE ARREST/ON SITE SUSPICION SUSPICION POSSES SION POSSESSION RcCSED TES7/SEARCH P0SSESSION SUSPICIOM ARREST/OM SITE SUSPICION POSSESSION REFUSED TEST/SEARCH SUSPIC IGN SUSPICION SUSPICION PDSSESSIGN POSSESSIGiI ARRiST/ON SITE POSSESSION SUSPICIOM SUSPICION POSSEBSIOM POSSESSION POSSESSION POSSESSION POSSESSION REFUSED TEST/SEARCH REFUSED TEST/SEARCH REFUSiD TEST/SEARCH POSITIVE TEST REFUSED TEST/ScEARCH REFUSED TEST/SEARCH REFUSED TEST/SEARCH REFERS) TES7/SEARCH REFUSED TEST/SEARCH REFUSED 7EST/SEARCH REFUSED TEST/SEARCH POSSESSIOM REFUSED TEST/SEARCH 21 79 37 5

6 28 2

7 7

22 1

5 8

17 24 31 13 38 6

5 29 93 3

59 53 75 29 37 19 5

7 27 57 4S 6

12 5

57 59 14 9

12 16 32 18 3

3 34 27 16 OTHER INSPECTOR INS7RUXENT ELECTRICIAN ELECTRICIAN INSTRUiMENT PIPE FITTER UTILITY DANIEL OVERHEAD ELECTRICIAN IMSTRU)IENT UTILITY PIPE F17TER ELECTRICIAN OTHER DANIEL OVERHEAD CARPENTER SHEET KETAL PIPE FITTER ELECTRICIAN ELECTRICIAN ELECT RIG I AH IRON MORKER DANIEL OVERHEAD DANIEL OVERHEAD PAINTER ELECTRICIAN ELcCT RIG I AM PAINTER IRON MORKER ELECTRICIAN PIPE FITTER UTILITY PIPE FITTER PIPE FITTER PIPE FITTER ELECTRICIAiM ELECTRICIAN ELECTRIC 1AM ELEC7RICIQI ELECTRICIAN ELECTRICIAN FIELD ENGINEER ELECTRICIAN SHiET METAL ELECTRICIAN INSTRU)IENT INSTRIDIENT IMBTRUXENT ELECTRICIAN INSPECTOR ELECTRICIAN YES POSSiBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBI.Y NO KO POSSIBLY UNLIKELY NO POSSIBLY HO UNLIKELY UNLIKELY UNLIKELY YES HO lNLIKELY NO UMI IKELY HO HO UNLIKELY POSSIBLY MO h0 UNLIKELY POSSIBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBLY YES YES POSSIBLY UNLIKELY POSSIBLY POSSiBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBLY HO POSSIBLY POSSIBLY NO POSSIBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBLY YES POSSIBLY VI D VI C III B-IMSTRU)IEMTATION III F-ELECTRICAL N/A N/A III As Bs C III E-CIVIL N/A III F~CTRICAL N/A III E<IVIL III A,BsC III F-ELECTRICAL Vj D N/A III E-CIVIL N/A III A,B,C N/A N/A III F-ELECTRICAL 111 E-CIVIL N/A N/A III E-CIVIL III F-ELECTRICAL III F-ELECTRICAL III E-CIVIL III E"CIVIL III F-ELECTRICAL III AsBsC III E-CIVIL III AsBsC III A,B,C Ill AsBsC III F-ELECTRICAL III F"ELECTRICAL III F-ELECTRICAL III F-ELECTRICAL III F-ELECTRICAL N/A III E-CIVIL 111 F-ELECTRICAL H/A III F-ELECTRICAL III B-INSTRUMiiNTATION III B INSTRUYiENTATIOM III B-INSTRUHEMTATIOM III F-ELECTRICAL Vi B III F-ELECTRICAL BiNERAL FORFYiAN HELPER HELPER HELPER MELDER HELPER HELPER HELPFR FOREYR4 FOREYAN MELDER FOREYd5 FOREMAN HECPER INSTRUMENTXAM HELPER MiELDiR 19-Sep-85 3

A INDIV.

REF. NO.

B C

BASIS EMPLOYMENT DRUB DURATION INVOLVEMENT (MONTHS)

CHART 11-1 D

JOB CLASSIFICATION SAFETY MORK PFRFORKED F

DUALITY CONFIRKATION BASIS 157 158 159 168 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 178 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 188 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 198 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 288 281 REFUSED TEST/SEARCH POSITIVE TEST REFUSED TEST/SEARCH REFUSED TEST/SEARCH REFUSED TEST/SEARCH REFUSED TEST/SEARCH SUSPICION POSSESSION SUSPICION ARREST/OFF SITE SUSPICION SUSPICION SUSPICION POSSESSION SUBPI CION SUSPICION POSSESSIOM POSITIVc TEST SUSPICION REFUSED TEST/SEARCH SUSPICIOM POSSESSION REFUSED TEST/SEARCH SUSPICION SUSPICION POSSESSION POSSESS ION SUSPICION REFUSED TEST/SEARCH POSSESSION POSSE SSIOM REFUSED TEST/SEARCH POSSESS ION POSSESSION POSSESSION POSITIVE TEST POSITIVE TEST REFUSED TEST/SEARCH REFUSED TEST/SEARCH POSSESSION POSITIVE TEST POSITIVE TEST REFUSED TEST/SEARCH REFUSED TEST/SEARCH POSSESSION 21 21 23 44 6

12 5

17 29 6

8 9

14 18 31 27 1

32 14 34 3

18 16 9

33 28 28 7

5 24 3

38 1

1 29 18 24 6

4 1

7 18 18 18 28 DANIEL OVERHEAD.

DANIEL OVERHEAD INSPECTOR INSPECTOR PIPE FITTER SHEET METAL OTHER PIPE FITTER OTHcR DANIEL OVERHEAD INSPECTOR DANIEL OVERHEAD PIPE FITTER ELECTRICIAN PIPE FITTER CPIL NOM-INSPECTOR IRON MORKER INSPECTOR OTHER CARPENTER INSPECTOR DANIEL OVERHEAD ELECTRICIAN ELECTRICIAN ELECTRICIAN IRON MORKER UTILITY OTHER IRON MORKER ELECTRICIAN UTILITY PIPE FITTER ELECTRICiAN IRON MORKER SHEET METAL IRON MORKER INSPECTOR INSPECTOR UTILITY ELECTRICIAN ELECTRICIAN DANIEL OVERHEAD DANIEL OVERLUslD DANIEL OVERHEAD UTILITY NO NO NO POSSIBLY POSSIBLY PDSSIBLY NO POSSIBLY h0 NO YES NO POSSIBLY NO POSSIBLY NO hO YES YES UNLIKELY YES NO POSSIBLY h'0 POSSIBLY YES UNLIKELY MO POSSIBLY POSSIBLY UNLIKELY POSSIBLY hO POSSIBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBLY POSSIBLY UNLIKELY NO POSSIBLY NO NO NO UC,IKELY N/A N/A N/A VI C 111 A)B)C III D"HVAC N/A III A,B,C N/A N/A VI C N/A III A)B)C N/A III A)B)C N/A N/A Vl C VI D III E-CIVIL VI C N/A III F-ELECTRICAL N/A III F-ELECTRICAL III E-CIVIL 111 E-CIVIL N/A III E-CIVIL III F-ELECTRICAL 111 E-CIVIL Ill A,B,C N/A Ill E"CIVIL III D-HVAC III E<IVIL VI B Vl B III E-CIVIL N/A III F-ELECTRICAL N/A N/A N/A III E-CIVIL DOCENT REVIEMER MELDING INSTRUCTOR HELPER 6ENLRAL FOREKAM HELPER HELPER FOREMAN MELDER MELDER HELPER MELDER HMR RcCORDS CLERK RECORDS CLERK RECORDS CLERK

E

Chart II-2 Breakdovn by Job Classifications CP6L Employees not Working as Inspectors Daniel Overhead and Clerical Daniel Craft Carpenter 5

Electrician 55 Utility 15 Pipe Fitter 21 Field Engineer 2

Iron Worker ll Painter 5

Instrument 10 Truck Driver 3

Rebar 1

Sheet Metal 5

Subtotal 133 19 133 Inspectors 5

8 10 Subtotal 23 CPGL

~Technical Service Division Daniel 23 Other Contract Employees 15 Total 201

• Technical Service Division is a division of Daniel International.

P PT lP ~

Chart II-3 Job Classification by Reason for Termination 1

2 3

4 5

6 Total CP&L Non-Inspectors 5

Other Contract Employees 0

Daniel Overhead 2

Craft Carpenter 0

Electrician, 1

Utility 0

Pipe Fitter 0

Field Engineer 1

Iron Worker, 1

Painter 0

Instrument 1

Truck Driver 0

Rebar 0

Sheet Metal 0

Inspectors CP&L 4

Technical Service Division 2

Daniel 2

2 0

4 0

0 11 0

2 13 0

0 15 5

3 6

3 0

19 1

'0 3

0 4

1 0

0 0

5 3

0, 0

8 3

0 0

10 2

2 1

0 0

5 8

16 23 0

7 55 2

10 2

1 0

15 2

7 10 1

I 21 0

1 0

0 0

2 1

6 3

0 0

11 0

2 3

0 0

5 6

0 3

0 0

10 3

0 0

0 0

3 0

0 1

0 0

1 2

3 0

0 0

5 Total 19 41 53*

75 5

8 201 Reason for Termination 1 Positive Test Results 2 Refused Test/Search 3 Possession 4 - Suspicion 5 Arrest for Off-Site Activity 6 Arrest for On-Site Activity

• Thirteen individuals of this number were established as using drugs on site.

A A ~ A A

I' IA II I

A

~

Section III DESCRIPTIONS OF SAFETY-RELATED PLANT COMPONENT INSPECTION PROGRAMS This section provides a description of the inspection programs which cover safety-related plant components.

The inspection programs discussed include pipe hanger; instrumentation erection; mechanical and pipe welding; HVAC installation; civil; electrical; and safety-related and seismic Category I equipment installation.

Each of these inspection programs is subject to audits and related inspection efforts to ensure compliance with specifications and procedures.

Certified inspection personnel are frequently updated on changes to applicable procedures through training classes and programs.

Certified inspectors are subject to monthly audits by supervisors to ensure that overall performance is satisfactory.

Various organizations, both internal and external, audit or evaluate both the construction and inspection process.

Periodic reviews are performed by NRC Resident Inspectors and Region II Inspectors.

In addition, there are evaluations,

audits, and surveillances by such groups as CP&L Corporate QA and on-site QA, INPO, and NRC-CAT.

The Authorized Nuclear Inspector (ANI) performs periodic audits to ensure applicable pipe erection work is being performed and inspected in accordance with the ASME Code.

These audits provide an overview of work in progress and a review of documentation for compliance with design and procedural requirements.

A (

'-y

~ I 1

( )( ~ fr)

< rf

'I f

",tf S<

~,

I ry tff f>fl"

)

)

f f "tt) 1 1

>r}f<<l<<t >

~

I l

(>r rh ~

>(<

)r)

< f p l>rh ~

1 r

~ s<<r 1 t

> ~<<s(f>

hr l'

>}

I'

~ ~ IIr<<

• 'rf rsi f)gw l

<< '>'fg'p" r' af ~

rr 1 }

~ <<f<

1st H<" I r) 1< ~

r} 1st I

<<t

"> lsh f Ii t'If h

~ >

f,rtsh l'

r) 'hr h

1 'I')ff' r

<fr

~ h.

~tf ~lh

~

'f(}'<<<<

")

• ~I')

".<<y r>

1 ""

r fstr

't,g

(>;

}'

"->~

.-r,

~

~ I" 1

(}(tn f ~ << sr>-.Itl

ll,illy r>)

<< l

~ >t" 1 f r, )t<<s<<s

~ )

~rs )).1 fr f

~

<< "r

~ 'r>rr / 1'1st 1

~'

~', ffish<> )

sf

<lr

<<)

1'

~

r

~

f> f ~

r f

ll

'I 1

~ )

f

)

)> }f 1

1<< -,,<<)g f

~))g~

~<<r

~ >

r<<(fan sl

')r) '" )

~

g

) ~

I shsthfs)

I

~ "<>)t 1

',r h

q ) r t ")ht'r}l t I fl t

I

'I 1

II

(

shh

') 'fr hh r<<)

)f)+I)

~

)

)

"y I

I r

fh(tf 1 'I 1" I" ~,'I F

r tt

~ '

r>>

<r) 'i f k)

~ I

~ 'ft

~

r,

) lrlt~,tl ~,

t ~

~ pq')

A PIPE HANGER INSPECTION PROGRAM The quality program for pipe hanger erection and inspection is a multi-faceted program which involves engineering, craft, quality inspection, and document review personnel.

Pipe hanger engineering personnel have the responsibility for reviewing design drawings and developing a pipe hanger package in accordance with site work procedures for each pipe hanger to be erected.

A hanger engineer is assigned to the daily a'ctivities required to build the hanger, to obtain acceptable inspections, and 'to resolve any problems following fit-up and before final welding.

A welding engineer assigns welding procedures and hold points in a weld data report in accordance with site work procedures.

QC then performs a welding review of the weld data report for accuracy.

When a complete pipe hanger package has been developed and released to craft personnel for erection, the craft superintendent and foreman lay out the work and provide specific direction to the support craft for material and erection requirements.

These requirements are specified in site work procedures.

When a hanger is erected, the foreman and crew review the hanger to ensure that it is built to design specifications.

At this time, the welding engineer will perform a preliminary weld inspection in accordance with site work and welding procedures.

After this review, the package is returned to the engineer for concurrence.

When the pipe hanger is determined to be ready for inspection, a site-certified inspector assembles the required information and performs an in-depth inspection which covers approximately fiftyattributes.

Welding attributes such as type, size, profile and porosity are inspected by certified QC welding inspectors.

Attributes such as dimensions, geometry, location, bolted connections and material identification are inspected by CI inspectors certified for such inspections.

When any rejections found by QC/CI inspection have been corrected and accepted, the QC welding final inspection is performed in accordance with corporate and site procedures.

If the attributes meet the design document requirements and the acceptance criteria, the package is signed off as complete and returned to the hanger engineer for review.

The engineer reviews the package to ensure that the design intent has been met and that the necessary documentation is,included in the package.

An engineering review group completes the review of the package and assures that required items have been inspected and properly documented.

Finally, the document review group reviews the package for completeness and accuracy and transmits the package to the QA vault for retention.

Any discrepancies are addressed and dispositioned in accordance with site work procedures.

Large frames and whip restraints are handled in a similar manner.

I w

~ I

~

h

'ht 1 I

1 ~'1 t"dh

,w, I

P h

f

~

I I

w t

1 1

I tl',

r

~ "'I ~

~

1 w

~

~

~

1,

~

I 1

I'thm

=I ~

tw I

I htf

~

>>I>> hthwh f I

~

rf h tf,

~

I l ~

th, t f

1 I

d ~ "l (I

~

1

'rhd

~l I) ~ tll w,

I 1- ~'

1

~

I r) r-II Ittfth

, ~

~

th rr tw 1

I

~

~

1 l,)

w t

~r.)

g fth 1

I r w

I t, I

, )' t

,ww'

') t l I 1

~ 1 thrwdh

'I It

)

~

f w

~

w I

h wt w ~d t 1

'h t I 1

~

1 ~

Rt'wrrt)w.

~lt

~

~

w -tw th

~ ~

w

• w 1 )h-I

~ rl) ~

I ~

tw I

~ =

w

~

w

'I 1

' II

~ 1 w

rt t

}1 )r) t I r

~

'I I'l"" 1 )

wh 1

ll ltht Pffft dh ~

h

~

1 II w

w

'I twit

~ wh"'I 1

~ <<I'- =tt' tlh w,-

)

1 h

hh w

I t.

r>

1 efwtwgt r I

~

I t

~ ~

~

1

~)I r'"

ll t

w 11 r

w f ~

I

' I ~

1 I 1

I t

~ r I

~I

~f W

I

~ ~ I hr

)t ~

~ I I

tt 1

~

• I

)*

~ ~

t-with, trw s I

~

~ P d)

B INSTRUMENTATION ERECTION INSPECTION PROGRAM Construction instrumentation engineers develop work packages in accordance with site work procedures and ensure that the work package contains the design criteria necessary for the installation of tubing, hangers, instruments, and components needed to meet ASME code requirements.

Engineering personnel route the work package to welding engineering, the QC document review group and the Authorized Nuclear Inspector (ANI) for initial review and then ensure that required signatures are on appropriate documents in the work package.

Construction personnel requisition the necessary materials for the installation and issue the material to the craft organization for installation.

Craft personnel locate the area where the material is to be installed, prepare the material for welding, fit the material together, weld the material, and request QC inspection when required inspection hold points are reached.

Craft personnel proceed with installation when inspection hold points are signed off by QC.

The QC inspection group performs the required inspections in accordance with site technical procedures and identifies problems and potential problems to appropriate individuals for resolution.

Inspections include pre-fit, fit up, pre-heat, material verification, welded and mechanical joints, location, configuration, identification, physical

damage, nondestructive examinations (when required),

and review of documentation to ensure acceptance signatures from welding engineering, QC and the ANI.

The function of the document review group is to perform the required initial and final review of the work package.

The initial review determines that proper pieces are being joined; mandatory hold points have been checked; random hold points are assigned; technical data are reviewed with appropriate isometrics or other design documents; and the documents are signed,

dated, and routed to the ANI for review, if applicable.

The final review includes verifying items previously covered on the initial review and ensuring that hold points have been accepted by QC and/or ANI, that filler metal and spool piece heat numbers are acceptable, and that NDE verification and NDE reports are attached, if applicable.

Reviews are performed in accordance with site and company<<approved procedures.

Documentation is forwarded to the QA vault for retention.

Tp t rh 4 t I'

~ >>> "ii>1 fr i

I, t I

• I

(

I'P

'\\ I ~

T T

TP

~f 9

'I I}

I ~'ff9>> 1 )

if f'

il)

" 9 J

1

~ 'f

~, ff II

~ 1 f)'f')

~f t

} <<T,) l tt,}

~ 1 1

I

'P 1

}

g

"*}~ tf>>1 f'PT

)" 'l f>>ftI'f, I

~'

4 "I(

P>> t ~

if )

If f ~,9 1 } Tl, I

4

~'}. f) 4 9 ~,I 9' 1

<<, fr'1 1"'I>>l o',)

~

h 41 ~

1 4

~

} I

>>I ~

4

}<

fit ) ~ff) 1 9 1 ~ 1 Pf,,'I r, -i,, 9 I 4'f 4th fl ) I 1>> ~ I) I I g}I I<<T f'.) ' ~ ,Pl" t" I'h 9 ff>>i } I "ff hhh I'l 'I ff)~>} f, f >> 'P>} t}( 'b f, ~ h 1 l I I '" ~ > f,~ t I ~ lh' I I >4 'TI"~ ~ ~ >f ) '\\ ~' ~, =I ~, ") t )if f I ~ I f f>>>f 'I ~ t ~' f h P >> f, ) ~ I T ~ t tf'} ~ P IP ~ >, 9 >-, ~ P)TPI ~~,,t}~ - f 9 ~ > 1>> f-~ f>tt },f=f,,f (4} y 1 ht ~ 4, I tl) Stf 1 1 <<f>)P I f>> <<4>>lf f ~ 4 1 I =4 4 r>>>t I f T I 1 ~ >IP 4

4) )'ff

)II 9' ) I'I Ilf'P I ~ t> ",it) ~1 } t}f}.h }'>> 'Of)r'". 'f)~> , ~ ~ } ) I fTT I* t ~ ~ Pt } ~ <<1 l'i)if ') ') I f f ~ I I P, T ~ >> 1 I ~ ~ I, ) I ~ f I ~ ) 1 > ~ 9 I ll ) II 1 tf I>} PI 1, 1 f ~ --} ~'=J h I } f ~ f' ', -;}P)>> C MECHANICAL AND PIPE WELDING INSPECTION PROGRAM Mechanical engineering personnel are responsible for preparing the piping installation work package and incorporating the design requirements for material. The package is forwarded to welding engineering to assign site welding procedures and appropriate hold points. The package is then forwarded for the QC initial review group to verify that applicable design requirements have been incorporated and to assign any additional hold points necessary for inspection verification. As specified by procedure, certain items are sent to the Authorized Nuclear Inspector (ANI) for review of completeness and accuracy and for assignment of hold points for verification. At this time, the package is forwarded to craft personnel as outlined in the work package. Craft supervisory and field personnel review the work to ensure that no interference problems exist. Craft personnel prepare items for installation by cleaning, marking, scribing, bevelling, etc., as required and notify the QC inspector for verification prior to fit-up. Following pre-fit verification and acceptance, craft personnel perform fit-up and notify QC for inspection as required by design and applicable codes for the particular item. The QC inspector verifies material type and inspection points, such as verification that an item is adequately supported or that mating surfaces are free of damage. Visual inspections of interim and completed welds are performed to ensure that welds comply with applicable codes. If required by ASME code or site procedure, preheat and post-weld heat treatment is performed and documented by QC inspection personnel. If required by code, the inspector requests that applicable nondestructive examinations be performed. In addition, QC inspectors observe and document the torquing of bolts in a mechanical connection. When the items have been accepted by QC, the QC final review group reviews the package to ensure that required inspections have been performed, reports are accurate and the package contains required documentation. After QC review, the ANI reviews the package, if it is an ASME Code Class 1, 2, or 3 item, and signifies approval by sign-off. Documentation is forwarded to the QA vault for retention. A walkdown inspection by craft supervisory and field personnel is performed after work completion to check the system and components for damage that may have inadvertently occurred since final QC acceptance. Discrepancies are repaired in accordance with site procedures and documented by QC inspection personnel. A system hydrostatic test is performed to ensure that there are no weld or connection leaks. QC personnel are present during

testing, and, if required by procedure, ANI personnel are also present.

m ) ~ h ~" Ihf ~ ) ) f 1<<h ~)f) ~>> ) Sh r cnr v f r') ~f c ~ ~ lr>> it( ~ h 'r ~t'r ~ I t 'c t )he ~ ~ ) Ch t f)lc

• f h

h f 5 ~

• h Ih

~

• ll C )

~ ) ~ ) r I h t' ~ C h ~ 'I tf C II t c tf) ) I', h h h m c II t) )V I" I C h ~

lhr, t

h r C 5 f) I) ~.

• c 1 C", h'r I',)

1 t - <<Ilt), Ir 'I 'c h "~ htf ll l f ff* th t)h ~ ) f I ~ "f ~'h t I C I ) v "q c ) I ( Ir I ( ~ ~ ) C ~ ~ - ~fa>> r)' 'r)'ff I ) I C),f c ~ t) ~f ) I I ~ hh t ~ >>I h ) r) ~ ) r, ~ I'h 5 \\ch 5

)r I ~

Cg "~ f) C'I f 1 h ~ ) 1 r, hr l) r.f f ~ r I'p D HVAC INSTALLATION INSPECTION PROGI4Qi Engineering personnel review design documents, such as design drawings, specifications, fabrication and erection drawings, and design changes prior to compiling the work package which the craft personnel use to install components. Engineering also initiates special reports which are required for seismic welding. The mandatory hold points (e.g., fit-up inspection for full penetration welds and final inspection for seismic welds) are specified by engineering. The work package documentation is submitted to the quality control reviewer who checks for technical data and verifies that mandatory hold points have been entered. At this time, any additional hold points, if necessary, are added in accordance with site procedures. The craft foreman receives the installation package and assigns the work to the appropriate craft. The craft fabricates and/or installs the components in accordance with the drawings and instructions in the package. If problems with the fabrication and/or installation occur, engineering is consulted and a resolution of the problem is developed. When inspection hold points occur, the craft may not proceed until a satisfactory inspection has been made by QC and the appropriate inspection report filed. Inspection hold points include material identification, physical integrity, alignment, correct bolting material, configuration, weld joint fit-up, and final weld. The attributes inspected cover the mechanical and welding work performed by the craft in accordance with approved site procedures. Engineering personnel research the design documents for welding and bolting of the components to ensure that items have been installed and that appropriate inspections have been completed. The package is sent to the QC review group to review for correct connection details and for complete welding and mechanical documentation. When the reviewer has determined inspection hold points have been satisfactorily performed and accepted, the package is returned for engineering review to verify completeness prior to transmittal to QA vault. ~ ~ h t heFFW t I ~ lth' 1 I' ~ P t) t -PZ) FF th )h>>h ~ 1)',1 I 1 I ) Il 1 N l R I ~ g ~ ~ r ll heZ'e't +=t I h ~ ', '(I fe I 1 ) P 1-1 ' Fl f)) t) h t ~ r> ~ 1 N sh, ~ lt 1 4 )tg e)I - tv e ) ~ F ~ 1 1 Pt) ~ P, I 1% ",1 I Ft>>' ) ~ ~r p ~ I ze et, ) ~ ~ '1 yf)) hrh r-I IF,, ~. t ) e ~ ) 1; ~ ~ P h 1 e 1 1 1ghI I ) I'hl'I fl Z 1'h') 1 e)

• l ~

I ~ )r Ff,) h I 1 P) ~14= ~ +hi ~ ~ 1 'I ~ > 1, lht)lf ')} ")Fy~ S n f PI') v 1 ~ ~ tlt <<r.', I ~ 4 Tl flee I ~ I I) ZF )t<<F' t ~ ) 1 ~ ! )} I I' <<) 1 P [,) e 1 '1 I t ~ ) I' 's h )Tf llf Z 1 Ff ) h ) ~, PP Ih ~ r,r, )- I "~111 '1 <<"1 '1))

• I f 1

~ (-' e ~ e} ~ 1 'I ) t 3 'r t)I<< I)( e(ZFP 1 k )'s) f )I ~ I P', 1')4) ) ~ Ff" he ~ 1 rt p ~ I } 11') lh,)'. 1 ~ I )e)s h' 1 1) F)") tt ) l7 1 I 'I, )}PZ )h I I')te re ~ P) I' 1 'II)4 ~ ) ee ttt)W F ~I} Z P I ) he Ptshl} ~ I ~ 1 +Q 1 fit t 1 ~ 1 ~ P tf'} E CIVIL INSPECTION PROGRAMS For the civil discipline, the Harris Plant Engineering Section (HPES) has responsibility for providing design specifications and establishing quality attributes. These items are coordinated through the architect-engineer and are the basis for site work procedures developed by. construction engineering personnel. Construction engineering interfaces with HPES to resolve field problems associated with construction. Design engineering personnel review procedures for compliance with applicable Corporate QA program requirements prior to issuance of these procedures for work activities. Quality control organizations perform quality attribute inspections in accordance with site quality control procedures and CI technical procedures which are based on design requirements, industry standards, and regulatory guidelines. The inspection process includes visual inspection as well as written reports. These inspection reports are reviewed by QA and CI supervision for completeness and accuracy to ensure compliance with design specifications and site technical procedures. Specific inspection programs for the civil discipline are discussed below. E-1 Excavation and Backfill Placement Inspection Program Craft supervision are required by work procedure to coordinate excavation and backfill of seismic Category I areas with construction inspection personnel. CI inspection personnel visually inspect the area and prepare a report which gives approval for work to continue in the work area. Typical inspection points include excavation, subgrade condition (if approved for backfill), moisture content of fillmaterial, placement lift thickness, density and moisture content as placed, and compaction method. These inspection points are monitored during the backfill placement for compliance with design guidelines and technical procedures. If a field inspection test indicates an out-of-specification condition, .backfill is suspended in this area until the area is reworked and the nonconforming condition is evaluated by construction and/or design engineering. Daily field inspection reports are prepared for the work areas, and these reports are reviewed by construction inspection supervisory personnel for completeness and accuracy. These reports are transmitted to the QA vault for permanent records following final sign-off by CI supervision. '1 V ~ ~, tt ~ I" ~ I 'Ma' ~ re e e I'l ~ t f e rf he ~ I'*,ee 1 l', ~ P I' ~ ll I\\ ' I' 1 I V, ~,rhr ~ ') h t , ~ e ~ ~ 1 V ~ 1 ~1) I'I =>> 1 h el Vthte ~ I* 'e ~ h V')e t h ~ re 'M I' 1 " 'It -)e)r )t, ~r( ~ ('h "rt P r 'h re I II ..g,)) ~ ) "V It ~ ew M ~ .l I" 1 (,'hr e (eh(" ~ 1 r pre(1 Mlf 1 If) ) ~ ) 1 )) ~ ~ 1 hre lit M ~- ~ " ) mi ~ h pl' I - ~ ~ V ~ t )r'e'l 1 ~ ll 'Ilh I ~ '"1 f'I h I' J ~ 1 I),h 1 )re h, e t e" eI' It e, 1+M. t ~ t., Vr, V. I r'" 't h

• 1 ~

e r, h foal l h t ~ rh " 1 re I I'I( rhte I ( te I t ~ I r ~ 1 <e)M 1 tt) t e) r ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I rll -h 1 ~ ~ 1 "" ~ 1 I M 't Il'eel( fre e) t t 1 1 tr; fPI-M re ~ ~ I t, f V, 1 ~ ~ ~ h I l', e r)",. l '1 ~ Mf)t E-2 Structural Steel Installation Inspection Program Inspection requirements for structural steel installation are defined in technical procedures. These procedures are reviewed by QA engineers for compliance to codes and design specifications prior to issuance. Craft ironworkers erect and bolt-up structural steel and install miscellaneous structural steel according to design specifications and site work procedures which are based on design specifications. CI performs work inspections according to site technical procedures, design specifications, and drawings. The inspections include review of structural supports erection (fit-up), alignment, mating surface condition, torquing of bolt and materials, and miscellaneous structural steel installations. In addition, CI verifies that bolting and structural steel materials are suitable according to design specifications and drawings. QC inspects structural steel welded joints. Inspections include fit-up and preheat (where required by specifications) and visual examination of completed welds. The document review group compiles structural steel packages for each seismic Class I and seismically designed component. CI reviews these packages and inserts appropriate CI field inspection reports into the packages for bolted connections and structural steel items prior to final sign-off. In addition, QC reviews the packages for welded items and inserts appropriate field inspection reports which have been reviewed and signed. The packages are sent to the QA vault for retention. E-3 Reinforcing Steel and Embedded Items Installation Inspection Program Rebar craft perform the installation of reinforcing steel in accordance with the design specification for this material. Rebar work activities are delineated in site work procedures. CI performs inspections of work done in accordance with appropriate technical procedures. CI inspectors and field engineers independently verify rebar quantity, type, size, length, projection, lap splices, location and cover. Each bar is also checked for placement within specified tolerance, cleanliness, freedom from corrosion,

cracks, dents, cut or burned areas, arc strikes and gouges.

Inspections of embedded plates, penetrations and anchor bolts are performed by CI inspectors in accordance with site technical procedures for these items. CI checks these items for location, size, type and material.. CI prepares reports to document that field verification items are installed in accordance with applicable site technical procedures and design drawings. These reports are transmitted to the QA vault for retention. i 4 ~ w I'I, IP I' pns, r 44 P p f ~'ps j I', 4, ~ Y 4 I' ~ 4= tt' 4 ~ P ~ I } ~ ~ h>IS h ~ >h I 'I-P 4 k 4 '4 'n'f I', h ~ fn d ~ PP d dh d} Sh P I g>n<<r 'I IW 4 4 <<4 d Pt' 4I I ~ I gn I't~ h p P ~ P >h > PP h,s h ~ h' h ~ L ~ h ~ h ~ PP sg 4 I ~ 4 PP gg ~ *-prh fs << ~. ' Q II h I 4 II P >>I, I I 4 I I' ~ i I ~ \\ h, 4 nipfh g h h v d 4> hfrh.. ph n" Pd k 4 ~ ~ f}P,,4, I ~ 4

hdh, 4

r 4 Ed 4 ~ f f V<<II ~ ~'h ~, } ~ 'I <<h nh It 4 P ~ hd h ~, 4, n n'1 "'h h ~ h>} P ~ 'h I r h ~ -4 p

• I>,rh P

~hr P a h nh 4'4 It ~ Ihl P '-It 'l k) I'\\ If ~ IP hs I 'hf n E-4 Concrete Masonry Wall Construction Inspection Program Bricklayer craft perform the installation of concrete masonry walls in accordance with design specifications and work activities as outlined in site work procedures. Using design specifications, site technical procedures are developed by CI and work procedures are developed by construction engineering. CI performs inspections in accordance with site technical procedures. CI is responsible for inspecting each Type II'seismic hollow core block wall; Type II non-seismic block wall; safety-related, solid, shielding block wall; and Type IV seismic, solid, shielding block wall. Each wall under construction is inspected periodically during daily construction. Inspection checkpoints include contact surfaces, proper materials, wall reinforcement, proper cure, plumbness, and alignment. There are approximately twenty-seven quality attributes which are inspected. Inspection reports are retained in the QA vault. E-5 Cadweld Installation Inspection Program Ironworker craft personnel are trained in accordance with site procedures and are responsible for installing cadwelds for mechanical splicing of concrete reinforcing steel. Cadweld splicers are periodically reviewed by QC to verify their qualifications. During the cadweld installation process, QC is responsible for monitoring splicer qualification status, monitoring prefabrication, visually inspecting splices, status marking, identifying splices and location, tensile testing, and performing technical reviews of cadweld documentation. For every splice, there are six primary cadweld splice checkpoints, including splicer identification, splice centering, and acceptable limits of voids. In addition, a sample from each splicer's work is cut out and tensile tested to destruction. During the cadweld document review process, the cadweld inspector performs the initial review and submits documentation to QA for final'eview and submittal to the QA vault. E-6 Penetration Seals Installation Inspection Program Penetration installation craft personnel perform installation of penetration sealing materials in accordance with design specifications furnished by HPES and site work procedures prepared by construction personnel. CI performs inspections of in-process work and testing of seal materials, such as cleanliness and density, to ensure that the quality of construction meets or exceeds drawings, specifications, and procedures by visual observation and hands-on testing of seal material according to site technical procedures. There are three primary inspection hold points: cleanliness, seal material installation, and final configuration of penetration filling. Inspection reports are prepared by CI and enclosed in the work package. The work package is reviewed by first-line CI supervision, construction personnel, second line CI supervision, and the document review group for completeness and r 1 r) 1 ~ Pw ) il c I, 'IFI r I ~ I IPJ ~ a P f\\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Pi r ~ t<')P, I ~ a" ~I) = ~ hr, 1 ~) I' P )" 1 1P",,'C 1 ~ ~ 1 t ~ P 'I 1 ~ F)It 1 ) ~ I ~ P Ch ~)

• -)P I

I ~ l t), l >a' ~ ) ) 1 1 )>> I ) ~ 'P P ~ 1 c ~ h ra ~ ) >> r), Ir l ~ 1 wc ~;fr I ~ I' a 'I ""W r ~ P l" P I ~ P ')I ff"1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I' P I' ill 1 ) F ~ ll ~ "~ ~I) a,f" a ~ nc ~ ~ 1 c) F rh C, 'I 'I ~ WC) ~ + Crt ~ ' P I I 1 rl I' P r)')', p r)hh ~ ~ 1 I ~ hfcch ry ") ), h 1 rhr ii ~ hrl r) rh ) accuracy. Following these

reviews, the completed work packages are transmitted to the vault for permanent records.

E-7 Protective Coatings Application Inspection Program Service Level I Protective coating craft personnel complete surface preparation prior to coating application. After surface preparation is 'cceptable and the prime coating application is completed, the application cure time is checked before subsequent coating is applied. The coating craft is responsible for all coating preparation and application according to site specifications. CI is responsible for surface preparation inspection and acceptance prior to coating application. The coating material mixing is also inspected and recorded by CI on inspection forms. Prior to subsequent coating application or final acceptance, CI performs a dry film thickness check to ensure coatings were applied at the proper spread rate for steel surfaces. In-process wet film readings are taken on concrete coatings during application. CI checks for visual defects prior to releasing the surface for subsequent application or for final acceptance and records information on an inspection -report. Visual defects could include such items as missed areas, run/sags (heavy build-up), improper

adhesion, or embedded particles which may have fallen into previously applied coatings.

CI verifies that the painter has met certification requirements prior to allowing application of approved coating material. Any violation of requirements during the in-process coating activity is documented on the appropriate report by CI and is evaluated by the engineering group for resolution. The document review group reviews protective coating application and inspection documentation for conformance with appropriate site specifications and forwards the documentation to., the gA vault for permanent plant records. E-8 Safety-Related Expansion Anchor Installation Inspection Program Craft personnel, trained to site procedures, are responsible for installing wedge anchors for the securing of safety-related equipment and fixtures to hardened concrete. CI is responsible for providing visual inspection of drilled-in expansion anchor installations to ensure that procedural requirements are met and that the quality attributes required by design documents are attained. Anchor placement documentation is initiated by the engineering personnel and is forwarded to the construction engineering craft, field engineers, and CI for appropriate ) 4 C 1 tl 1>> i, t

4) )Q lh i I I, rhrlflr 4

e trl ) f ~ i ~ ) ~ rl <<)r rt p)'1 rl r-fl' ) (f((A t" I rf I )I ~ r f i I ~ I"4 4 )ecr)~e))11=1 ~1 q 1 4 r I ffrl II'1 ~ ) h 'jf 'I I 1 \\ C) 'cf CCI 1 r r) i ~ ( ~

• )

ff ) Cf f (lf(f ) )5 llffff~ e I 4 ~tl',4 t ((f ~ .Drl 1 I rh f() r)e f) r ') eh re )' )')')',. 'I li' ~ ' l [1 c ~ hi ref)I ) I ~ ) rr,)'4 ~, 4, I()) g 1 1 I)*')- ( I 1 1 )f ~ 4 - 114 s Ig

• .D

~ ~ ~ C )rcrhfhl't rt r) rt I " ) 4 I)Clef ~ I 1 lsl ~ )err ~, ) ~ I ) 'C) I* Cr li e 4 lc) i)f ~'tr c rr)- t cg)) I fC) 1'I'I I r I 1 Il 14) )'i,r 1 .-t ~ ) f I Cc)'>> r) 1 I) ~ 1 1 tr)r) 4 r) g -r)r 4) 1 Igr)" 1 ) tier > , l CI>> 1-. ~ l.

• ),)>>.

.r) II'r ll I )c) fhg) ~ ) f .lI'r ~ ) ff, t ~ I ) II ) '4 4) I q ~ sir) q ~, ' cl hf 4 ~rrf f) 1 ) '4 I ~ ) el') tl I, ~ -,4) 4 ~ )1 1 Cl) ~ ~ ) ) ',<<rr 'I .'lfI') ) 4 'I err rltfh 1 "rt V r, 'I as) f) 1 I I I I'7 lf 'I~, 4 ~ efhrtr )ic I 4 ~ f4 'I herr)e) PI ~ 1 ) lr )r i ~ + C)~ 1 1 Il,f ~ = i rr I fl 1 ~ 1 hfdf 4 ) ~ 'lc c)=e C ~ = 1 r'4 il fh I ~ I ~ ~ I 1 It Ii )4) t I 1' I il) II r D rf ) 'Ifr)he(h J )" f 1 'I , ~.C 1) ~ r~ f4r 4"'4) 4 1 ~\\r) I il li sf ) li s ~ ~ ) ) r ~, CI preliminary sign-offs and notification of scheduled placement. Following construction inspection sign-off, craft. personnel are approved to lay out and drill the expansion anchor holes. If there is a discrepancy with hole locations, holes are relocated by the craft and the discrepancy is resolved by design engineering personnel. Following completion of drilled holes, a preplacement inspection (e.g., cleanliness,

diameter, hole location) is performed by CI, and craft personnel are released for anchor acquisition.

At this point, CI inspects such items as expansion anchor quality, anchor length, certification of the anchor installer, anchor installation tools, and concrete placement date. During and following the installation process, CI verifies attributes such as anchor torquing, orientation, and plate contact with concrete surface. CI notes completion and approval of the anchor placement by applying an inspection indicator paint on the nut-washer interface. In addition, the indicator paint serves as a 'checkpoint to detect any tampering following installation. Upon completion of an anchor placement installation, the traveler and inspection reports are completed by CI. The inspection package is forwarded to the first-line supervisor for review and sign-off and then to the QA vault for retention. E-9 Concrete and Grout Placement Testing Program Concrete craft personnel perform the placement of concrete as identified in site specifications according to site work procedures. QC and CI inspectors approve the concrete placement by inspection report sign-offs. The QC batch plant inspector monitors the batching of concrete by verifying that the correct mix design is used and that batch quantities are within tolerances by initialing concrete batch tickets. CI performs craft work inspections in accordance with site technical procedures and signs off the inspection checkpoints on appropriate inspection report forms. CI performs preplacement inspection to ensure the placement area is free of such items as debris, install, embedded

items, and reinforcing steel.

When the batch of concrete is received, CI checks the proper mix design, the truck drum counter and the number of revolutions since the concrete was batched. CI records this data on inspection documents and observes the concrete for approximate correct slump. At this time, quality control concrete test personnel take required initial samples of concrete at the point of placement in accordance with site quality control procedures. Test batches of concrete are determined from intervals based on quantity of concrete placed (e.g., the first batch and each fifty-yard interval thereafter). Results of the above tests are provided to the CI inspector. The required tests include concrete temperature, slump, unit weight, air content and casting of test specimens for compression testing. Test results are recorded on the concrete batch ticket and on appropriate quality control inspection forms. These Eorms are signed off by the inspection tester and supervisor following completion of concrete tests and are transmitted to the QA vault for retention. CK ~ ~ ~ r '1 r I ~ e ) ~ ~ VII ) I 1C)f'h K 1 err f ~ ~ ) ~ et ~ r) ~ ~ re I -Kf r ~ ,V "ewer J ~ c r I ftPIP ~ 1, ~ F m,h K ~ W I I r I r li ~ P)t I ~ I E 1 K IfI f ~= r r ~ ) ~ rh f th , fge) h e r I T 1 II ~ I ~ e \\I ffr ~ CW S) ~ ) il ) I'r tw r p ~ ) e t, c)f E ~ I) f>> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ lf W " C) P) ) W W) Wr h ~ It t W 'IIK rr-fi I' ~ Clt ) h ~ ) r e> h r ~ ~ 'I ret, e C*r'lW ) ) O'I ha V

• r I

• )V

') ) -~ P r I F - ELECTRICAL INSPECTION PROGRAMS Inspection programs for safety-related electrical components at the SHNPP are discussed by component in the following paragraphs. F-1 Electrical Cable Pulls Inspection Program Upon completion of designated

raceways, construction personnel issue cable pull cards to the field to begin the cable-pulling process.

Construction personnel are responsible for providing the information needed to pull the cable, such as applicable design drawings and procedural instruction sheets. Craft personnel receive the, installation cards, pre-cut and pre-reel the cable, and transport the cable to the designated area. Cable reels are then set-up by the craft to facilitate the pull, the cable serve is made, and CI is notified to perform the necessary inspections. After inspection, craft personnel pull the cable through the designated routes with a CI inspector present. Upon completion of the cable pull, the cables are tied down to the cable trays in the applicable

places, and the cables are sealed on both ends and supported.

CI is present during the entire process of pulling the cable and verifies that quality attributes (such as pull tension, bend radius, burrs and sharp

edges, correct routing and separation) identified in site inspection procedures are acceptable.

When the pull is complete, any unsatisfactory conditions are resolved, and nonconforming conditions are properly documented, the inspection reports are signed by the CI inspector. The inspection reports are forwarded to the first-line supervisor for review and approval in accordance with approved procedures. Cable pull cards are signed by the inspector after the inspection reports are signed. After work has been completed on systems (cables, terminations, equipment), systems are walked down by construction turnover personnel to ensure that work is complete and acceptable. Systems which have discrepancies are noted on an exception list or a punchlist, and discrepancies are corrected prior to turnover to the plant Start-Up group. F-2 Electrical Safety-Related Cable Termination, Safety Cable Penetration Termination, Conax Seal Installation Inspection, and Fire Protection/Detection Cable Termination Inspection Electrical engineers have the responsibility for preparing, reviewing, documenting, and issuing installation forms for accomplishing scheduled work activities. When installation forms are prepared, they are checked against design documents prior to issuance to craft personnel. Scheduled work assignments are controlled by in-process inspections performed by CI inspectors, I ~ h If >>h 1 tl nt h e t-1) 'er ) ~ I ~' ( <<e ~ he <>pe) 'y qw ~ V ) y II e 1' ~ ~ ((>>>>) l; le I ,- ~.t 1, h.l ~ ' ~ ill. I, If ) e eh I ) V t e f "'tg ~ I ee. '1 I ~ e>> ). ~r, ~ r ~ .Ve)F ) ) <<y e ye' 1 y t ' I I lhl f -<<h 'r <<t I' e ~ r) f ) I lr I ei r<<ff ttf ye) e ( v,)' I er) II e' fh ~ ). h n ~l ey ) ~. h <<f e ~ vl "r<<I c )I e-h ef I <<e<< .VI Il j I>> e= V) r trh f) f If ~ I h ',I 'Iie, 'rh e ) It e ~ ~ ~ r>>')I <<e h e ) <<e ) ~ r en" ) I e I

ree, e

th e* ~ ~ << e>> ~ << 'I ~r I eh ~ et I>> 'h t e ~ at established hold points. As work activities are completed, the CI inspector completes inspection documentation, documents nonconformances, and verifies that concerns are resolved, that work is complete, and that relevant data are correctly recorded prior to signing the installation forms. Inspection hold points include cable number, cable end to be terminated, equipment identification, megger test results, continuity test results, use of correct tools, and cable separation. These items are signed off by the inspector on appropriate forms and submitted in the inspection report for supervisor review. The inspection report is given to the CI supervisor for review. The supervisor reviews documentation for completeness, legibility,

accuracy, and compliance with the requirements of the nonconformance control procedure.

Following supervisory review and sign-off, the inspection documentation is forwarded to the QA vault for permanent plant records. F-3 Electrical Equipment Installation Inspection Engineering personnel have the responsibility for initiation of the electrical equipment installation traveler in accordance with specifications, procedures, vendor instructions and drawings. Engineering provides step-by-step instructions foi completion of work including appropriate installation hold points. Engineering issues the traveler to the craft responsible for the installation. The craft is responsible for performing the installation of the equipment in,accordance with specifications, instructions and drawings provided by engineering on the traveler. At noted hold points or upon completion of the installation activity, craft personnel are responsible for notifying CI to perform an inspection. CI reviews the installation traveler and initiates an inspection report corresponding to the traveler hold points. CI inspects the equipment installation in accordance with specifications, vendor instructions and drawings as referenced on the traveler. The results of the inspection are recorded on an inspection report. Inspection hold points include equipment identification, location, equipment

damage, material traceability, separation, cleanliness, and clearances.

The inspection report is reviewed and transmitted to the document review group. The document review group is responsible for combining documents (e.g., work traveler, inspection report and any other permanent plant records) associated with the equipment installation and for conducting a review of the documents for legibility, content and errors. Following review, the package is transmitted to the QA vault for permanent plant records. ~ I.I I),. ~ e e>> 'I r ~ ~ g P>>rr) ~ w I) I ~'t h a v t,f II t e ,>f)he r h ~ r)f <<the! Ill ~ ~ ~ ~ r) ee e 't ~ 1 ~) tl'h"I W it e ~ e e I I ~ ~-1) e ~I It ) I t)>>e ) tf h ht,e>>I >> ) P ~ ) ~ ~ "h-e j h h>>err ~'I, ~ >> ~ e e r J>), e ) ~ e't f. ~ 1 tehrtb I ~ ~

• t

~ P Pr er h II,I'" I e ) f'I.> ~ = 'I Pth ) fff r>>" ')+ I f>>)) i ef ' 'f P ~ I ~ If I r fif ) f F)tf r I t f'. r ) ~ h'ref l) "I t 1 ~, ~i)/eh e) ) 1 e " <<r>> ')hrn )> >>I fh I) ~ e V ~ f$"ff,f I ~I, h ) 1 ~ '( r-rh ll

• i

) t) I e ') r p er vp)pe ) e ff O'I I I ~t I e 'r!f e I' h if t 1 t ~ 't ~ I r> ~ I e l>>I I I ~ r I r~ ) phgt "'rth.r frh, f ~I I lf e ~p) r'r I ') )it) <<rf)'rh > =e) )PP) P) x I .n)v ) ) ~ >>e ~ rr Ph I ~ e er> I ) ~ ~ )Pr f )I e I I P P I e )r II ) ~ -h-f r P re l <<>> I -h)",r; ~ ')> ~ '.'I> f ) I I rhf ~ ) lib" "') F-4 Assembly, Disassembly, and Modification of Repair of Safety-Related Equipment Engineering has the responsibility for preparing a work package according to design documents. Craft personnel are responsible for performing the work in accordance with site work procedures by utilizing the information and instructions provided by engineering and the referenced documents listed in the work package. Craft personnel are also responsible for notifying CI prior to the start of the work package. CI is responsible for reviewing the work package and for preparing an inspection report in accordance with specified inspection hold points. CI is also responsible for inspecting to ensure that work is performed according to site procedures, specifications, and design documents referenced in the package. Inspection hold points include electrical cable traceability,, meggering, continuity, material identification, location, and cleanliness. Following completion of the inspection report, it is forwarded to the CI supervisor for verification of completeness and - accuracy. The CI inspector transmits the inspection report to engineering for inclusion in the work package. The work package is transmitted to the document review group. The document review group is responsible for reviewing the work package for legibility, content and errors. Upon completion of review by the document review group, the work package is transmitted to the QA vault for permanent plant records. F-5 Electrical Raceway,and Support Installation and Inspection Program The term "raceway" includes electrical conduit, cable trays, and boxes. Engineering responsibilities for raceway installation include providing design criteria for installation and inspection, controlling and maintaining the installation documentation

system, resolving nonconformances, and resolving design and field-related problems.

Construction personnel are responsible for installing the raceway in accordance with the approved design documents. Construction craft personnel perform the installations, notify engineering when there is an installation problem, and notify the inspector when the raceway is ready for inspection. CI inspects the installation to the design requirements. CI is responsible for documenting the results of the inspection and identifying any nonconformance with the work. Inspection hold points include type, size, location, attachment,

spacing, separation, and interferences.

P ~ 1 ~ I I I I I llI1 I h P I ~ P <<'vn ~ ( I <<(II I h I'I 'h ) l h ~ ~ <<cv I I llc" h <<'r CP ~ ~ P ~ 1 "~ ,v I<< P:I I P I P l1 P P ~ c I *- ~ I>> c v<< 41 h I I h h ~ f I I I h 'h v P c V Il "I ~ PW <<PIP '1 P, I I)* 1=~ I ~ ~ ~ IP <Ip v ll r I!I ~ Iv << I P v<<<<1 ~ r I I ( <<c' ~, <<1 pq $ <<1' li C Pr, IP hl ~ I I ~ c<< ~ I -<< ~ h ~ II, ~ ~ F V1c ll I I l F P Pv ~ F P ~ I ) ~ I Fhcrt I I I ~ I<<I, I I <<1 <<c ~ P 'll <<C P <<l'I, I I '*' '<<1 'I <<f 'I F'I I FF ~ I r1 F FP P ~ I ~ C, h h ~'<<1 <<11 rp<<c,* P ~ 1 I ~" ~ ~ P<< ~ ~ I , P. ll <

>I 1>>F P <<1 Ih ~ I F I I PF<<<<7<<) The document review group is responsible for ensuring that the documentation contains legible, complete, and accurate information. Upon completion of this review, the documentation is forwarded to the QA vault for permanent plant records. F-6 Electrical Support Melding and Inspection Program Engineering responsibilities for electrical support welding include providing design cri.teria for welding and welding procedures, resolving nonconformances, and providing assistance with welding design and field problems. Construction personnel are responsible for welding the supports in accordance with the current approved design criteria and procedures. Craft personnel notify engineering when welding problems are encountered and notify the inspection unit when a weld is ready for inspection. QC inspects the welding to the latest design and procedure requirements and monitors in-process welding activities. The inspector is responsible for documenting the results of the inspection and identifying any nonconformance with the work on appropriate inspection and nonconformance forms. Inspection hold points include pre-heat temperature, fit-up, material identification, geometry and completed welds. Completed inspection reports are forwarded to supervisory personnel for review and sign-off prior to transmittal to the document review group. The document review group is responsible for ensuring that the documentation contains legible and accurate information. In addition, review personnel ensure completeness of the documentation package. Following this review, inspection reports are "transmitted to the QA vault for permanent plant records. F-7 Documentation and Control of Electrical Instruments Engineering has responsibility for'reparing the installation form for electrical instruments and for providing a complete work package which includes applicable design documents and special installation instructions. The assembled work package is transmitted to the field to be worked by the electrical craft. The electrical instrument installation work is done in accordance with site work packages by following installation sheets and design documents step-by-step through completion. Completed work packages are returned to engineering, and CI is notified that the installation is ready for final inspection. Inspection points and attributes are assigned to the instrument installation inspection report based on data taken from the installation sheet. Inspection hold points include material identification, location, 7 l) ~ lg>> I'1 t 7 7 ', 7 ) I*fr>> 7! nff>>)) ))'qf) f ~ f ea'h fe ~ 'f ~" f f ~ 7 1 ~ ~ a 7 1 1 e ), a ff l,fe "PP 'fa) ~ I t ~ I PP ~ Pdf. ~ ft) ~ df (I f'ff)f ~ Uf ~ ->> -.)ff= f F f<<7(f ~ ~ 1-fa>> t t t >>I ~ ) 't ) ff \\ h 'f rhth fe ~ ~ ~ 1 ) I ~ 1, 1 'f Ver) I ) t <<Q",3 f I .) f) t "e - f, 1 f r)'* It tea>> ~ P)f>>f) I 1 f <<ttf<<e f <<1' f f I ~ (1 'I fff .7 f

Plf,

~ "f)'t iff ft, 1 f', )fep) ) e ~ ) P.P). ~ I.P ~ Pt >>) I ) f'I ) 7 ~ P ".t ~ a fff'Fl h "g 'fe I a h h ~ F, t ~ \\ 1 '7 1' h P f e a fg 9 t ~ j I' I I r>>7 a P f' y>>r f a a p ~.a F 1>> 'I \\ I 1 7 I aft) II ' <<I, IP at ~ e f ~ f I" I' '1 ffV 7 'P'<< 1 I tate))- I e 'I I I ~ ) P ~ 1 ~' ~ pl ~ 7 I f IP-I F ~ "P ff1 F t<< )'>> ) Pt I'<< 7, ~'l hIt e 7 h 7 cleanliness, and separation. CI performs the installation inspection and completes an inspection report. Following completion of the inspection report, the inspection supervisor reviews the report for completeness and accuracy and signs-off the report. Completed and signed-off inspection reports are transmitted to engineering. Engineering combines the work package and the inspection report and transmits them to the document review group. The work package documents are reviewed by the document review group for completeness, correctness and signatures to ensure that required inspections have been performed. F-8 Electrical Embedded Items Installation Inspection Construction engineering has the responsibility for researching the design drawings to determine which embedded items must be installed and for preparing a concrete placement card which records the placement area and the items to be inspected prior to concrete placement. Craft personnel are responsible for researching the design drawings and installing the embedded items in accordance with the design drawings and site work procedures. When the installation process is complete, CI performs inspections in accordance with si.te technical procedures and design drawings. Inspection checkpoints include size and type of conduit, method of support, conduit ends

capped, and location of horizontal and vertical sections.

Inspection checkpoints are documented on inspection reports which are signed by the CI inspector and the supervisor who perform a review for completeness and accuracy. In addition, the document review group has responsibility for reviewing the inspection documents for accuracy and completeness prior to submittal to the QA vault for permanent records. F-9 Electrical Separation Inspection Program The Electrical Separation Inspection Program was initiated as a result of a change in design criteria by engineering which required a re-verification of separation distances on electrical installations. The inspection responsibilities for this program consist of a final inspection of required separation distances between electrical equipment, raceway (cable tray, conduit and boxes) and exposed cable which have been previously inspected. The results of the inspection are documented on the applicable inspection reports. Inspection checkpoints include separation distance between Class 1E and non-Class 1E equipment, Class 1E

raceway, Class 1E and non-Class 1E exposed

cables, and Class 1E cable and Class lE raceway.

The completed inspection reports are reviewed by CI supervisors to verify completeness, legibility and accuracy and are signed-off to indicate acceptance prior to transmittal to the QA vault. r<< , ~ r 1 r ~ II I 1 <<)1 ~'T ~ ) )") ~ I II >> ~ 1 ~ 1 r) 1 t ( er ~ ~ <<<<ff"rfff(1<< ~ ~)<< ) 1 t() 'I 1'<<1' ')( WI*) ') ~ ')I I r' ~ I f ~ ~ <<r ~ I, r ) ) ~ ) ~ 4 (1) ~. I f

f. )

(E<<t)= If); ~, )~ /4$ .) ~ -<<)', r ~ t' If) ( ) tr ~ ' It ~ I ~ I I', 4 ~ P<<I,,S<< "<< ~ e ~r',. ~ << I'/r I ~1' <<<<4 ~ ~ 4 '1 'nl<< )I ~I ~-, 4)ft I>> ~ f' ~ ~ I',I <<t'III))r<< I I e ~. ) ~ ()) j << ) t I ) I << ~, 'e I 1/ t ff ~<<*( "<<r) ) T 'f<< 'I r<<'t) I"I ~rt'fete "~ ) <<I) <<<<v 'g))) I 'f'ft 11 4 ~I)11 I t 1 lt ~ <<r er,)') ) ~ <<t ~ I(I) I ~ e) e ', (-rl<< lf ) t ~ ) II ~ I ~ I ~ r<< ) ) 't r<< ()rr "tr 1 ~ ~ ~ I rt 4 () t( f I ltt I ~) tr),r rt ~ tr<<>> r <<" ) r) 4 ~ ~4, ) "4 't<<") ~ 'I I "-=~1/ ,) rt tl << ~ r,t t I ) ~ ~ ~)r ~, ')r" /4 E f I ~ I ~ 4 ~ r <<1 <<rr ~\\ <<t<< ~ t rr tt( <<e p, e e" ' Construction and inspection procedures have been revised to incorporate the new design criteria for ongoing construction and inspection activities. Installation and inspection of ongoing activities require consideration and.evaluation of previously installed items which were inspected for separation under this program. This overlap in inspection activities increases the confidence level that the separation inspections performed under this program are acceptable. II, th 1, 1 R R I I'I 1 fif" R' I I R 'I I 1 I r 'I ~'fi 'I I ~ It tl ~ ~ I G SAFETY-RELATED AND SEISMIC CATEGORY I EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION INSPECTION PROGRAM Engineering and construction personnel have the responsibility for establishing procedures, as required by regulatory guidelines, to provide instructions and documentation for the storage, transport, and installation of equipment. These groups research manufacturer storage requirements and ensure that these requirements are met from the time the equipment arrives on si.te until the equipment is turned over to start-up personnel. In addition, they ensure that vendor requirements are followed while transporting equipment to permanent plant locations. Design documentation associated with particular equipment is compiled, and written instructions for installation are provided to craft personnel based on research of requirements. Engineering and construction personnel resolve problems encountered during storage, transport, or installation which are detected by craft or inspection personnel. Craft personnel have the responsibility for providing maintenance of equipment during storage as prescribed by engineering, installing equipment based on design information provided by engineering, and sequencing work activities in order to allow inspections on quality attributes. Quality assurance and quality control personnel are responsible for ensuring that equipment installed by craft is in accordance with design drawings, site procedures, and instructions provided by engineering. These groups ensure that quality meets or exceeds design and regulatory requirements, identify and report problems encountered during installation, and document inspections as required by site procedures. Typical inspection checkpoints are setting area, foundation, alignment, mating surface cleanliness, material verification, and clearances. Upon completion of installation activities, the documentation is submitted to first-line QC supervision for review and sign-off for completeness and accuracy. The document review group researches, retrieves, and accumulates applicable equipment design documents, installation documentation, and inspection documentation. The packages are reviewed to verify completeness, correctn'ess, and traceability of completed work. Documentation is transmitted to the QA vault for storage. <<28- f ~ h I ~ ')M ~\\ "IP ~ l I f I ~ I f)<<M 1 f ~ ~ h ~ ~ P ~ fth) P t ~ ~ h M <<) f )lt' h "f>>~ t 'I l ff,, 'I = " 'lt>> I' IP ~ l g f I ~ h'tt M f ) f ~ III 'M 'l, ~ 'I It M ~ ~ Pt ff "f=' I ~ tth, II ~' I ~ M I ~ fM) ~I ~ 'Ih ~ 'PP) I I ll I ~ P f It h Section IV QVALITY ACTIVITIES OF THE NONDESTRUCTIVE E3QSfINATION PROGRAM (NDE) Nondestructive examination (NDE) of construction activities is an integral part of CP&L's quality control activities through performance of systematic and orderly inspections in accordance with site-specific programs and regulatory requirements. The examinations are primarily designed to detect and identify inherent process flaws as well as those which may result from improper construction activities. NDE is performed and documented in accordance with written procedures by certified NDE personnel as identified on process control documents. In order to ensure that nondestructive examinations are performed properly, there are a number of activities undertaken to ensure inspector proficiency and to provide consistent results during testing. NDE inspectors perform examinations in accordance with comprehensive written procedures which detail each step to be taken during the examination and provide clear written acceptance criteria to be used in evaluating examination results. NDE is comprised of two basic types of examinations: surface and volumetric. Surface inspection methods are magnetic particle and liquid penetrant testing and are used to detect surface imperfections. Volumetric inspection methods are radiographic, ultrasonic, and leak testing and are used to detect physical evidence of internal weld and material characteristics. NDE inspectors are subject to stringent certification requirements-prior to being allowed to perform independent NDE inspections. Prior to certification, NDE inspectors are required to meet specific training requirements involving both classroom training and on-the-job training. They must pass comprehensive certification examinations which are mandated by the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code and the American Society of Nondestructive Testing. There are specified minimums for the number of training hours for classroom work dealing with theory and application and for on-the-gob training and experience. In addition, NDE personnel certified under CPSL's NDE procedures are recertified every three years through written examination. The work of an individual NDE inspector is reviewed by other NDE personnel, as well as by Authorized Nuclear Inspectors, corporate auditors, NRC personnel and other site QA and QC organizations. Completed examination results are maintained as part of the QA records. NDE results identifying unacceptable conditions are processed in compliance with site programs and procedures to effect necessary repairs. Reinspections of repaired areas are also conducted in accordance with procedural requirements. ~

• P r)'

~ ' lt <<1 17 ) ~

• tt HI 7 e}t H)e h f e

h L <<)ff << 'I I I)f' he I 'tpfr I h 1<<h"" I hh) f h "'"~5 '" I )f t ~ ll 7 ~ .P '71 ) t' ,hff'1f 7 OIC) )1, ) II h h/ t'7<< h It 55 I, ~>>I ~ 7 ll I'H 5 1 1 \\ ) IT I'<<ff ~ 1 h lh ~ Tf <<i4'7 <<) h I >>}LI 7 ~ 1 ~ ~ 71 1) 7 ~ 'h It 1 7 I'e tf I <<>> << I <<>> f I I' ~ 1 h I I h f tg <<h ft) ) '\\' 7 ii ~ ~ fh "h e>> ~Ir~ ~ 15 h L 7 ~ ) " C) hll ~ r, T h f } f ) ~ h ~/ ) 1<< ~ ) r 'h 'I ) 1'>> H ~ I h 1 ~ f 7 r<<7. ~ 1 ) H ) ~ I h "7 1 ) 'fr ~ I' ~ h h 1 h h "~ Section V QUALITY ACTIVITIES OF START-UP GROUP The SHNPP start-up testing program, as a key element in overall site quality assurance activities, provides assurances and verifications that construction work has been accomplished in a quality manner and that plant equipment and systems perform safely and as designed. This program is conducted by members of the operating plant staff in three sequential sub-programs: the component testing and initial testing program, the preoperational test program, and the start-up power test program. The component testing and initial operation program is conducted during the construction.phase when equipment and systems are completed to the point that testing can begin. Systems are tested functionally by 'imulation. Systems and equipment are cleaned by flushing before hydrostatic pressure tests are performed. The preoperational test program begins when equipment or systems are completed according to construction specifications. This program verifies that specific systems and equipment perform as designed and installed. Preoperational tests are detailed and step-by-step tests of major equipment components and system functions. The start-up power test program begins with initial reactor core loading. It verifies the ability of systems to perform as designed and to operate within the specified parameters. The control of activities which affect quality during start-up testing is provided by the Start-Up QA Program. This program operates under approved procedures. Start-Up procedures which involve safety-related systems are reviewed independently by QA personnel. When a system or a piece of equipment is completed, it is released for testing by construction to the start-up group. Any work done after this release is controlled by appropriate construction procedures and with the use of the Construction Work Request and Authorization (CWRA) or by appropriate maintenance procedures and with the use of Maintenance Work Request and Authorization (WR&A). In order to maintain necessary controls, work on systems after release is processed through a central coordination authority, the system start-up engineer. Any request by the start-up engineer to maintenance personnel for repair work is done through a WR&A. The start-up QA group reviews WR&A's, makes additions or deletions to instructions and assigns QC hold points as necessary. If additional construction work must be performed on a

system, such work is controlled by a CWRA.

When this occurs, the approved construction procedures are utilized to perform the work, and the requirements for CI or QC inspection are invoked as if it were new work. r)r jl c, htv 'I ll k ~I) I / e 4 ) ws ~r I ef)vttf,'e rh n hr, rrh "'S'g. v> 1st ~ c I rf-1 "J'<< 1 I ~ e ttff) rC> t ~, ~ 1 .f, ~)1,,4 I f I) tc) tw ~ ) 1 C e ~ 1 r> ~ ~ I, W)ft~ << 'Pkr I' I 4 e)fk>><<vs ~ t<< ~, re)fk I'I 'et ~ I 1 ~r' ) ~ I I ) ~ I I ~t.)-*f~ f ~ I ~ 1 1 '))I I e )'"? jk rh ~ 4 1 I fh -I w 1 I.V ~ I I I ' - ~ I )i 4) 1 vr- ~ 4 ~ ) ~1 hk w,)=)r hv)~' )rh $ 'I e Il Wk QI e ~ f c ~ I ~ Ir) k )"I =) 1 \\ I ~ I ee er e I ~ r> v

1) st I<<

f >") "'- ) S 'I rhsr 4,'k 1' ~I' 'I tt pr) -' r e.. ~ r "~ ~ <<)rk ' '- ~ ~ " I ~ fk '~ "r> ~ ff' 'e )hgtfsr ~ tr I kc ~ ~ e) ~ -, r I'I) 1 h I ~ <<I h )VIIII ~ 8 e)f II e ~ 1, <<f ~S e> w>l <<) tk. '1 vk ~ ~ ~,,cl ~ el> t ~ ' I > the ~ ~ V<< ~ vsw) k <<) ~ t')re IC)f'~ee ) ) ~ i r kf > "1' 1 1 k I t .)g=k ~ ) Ch '] rh, I f c)% ) 1 1 r f fff)r> tr e ~ ~ 1 ~ " c>re re I e ~ I ~ sl, ~, ~ I 1 ~ IJ h .I ~ ) I' 1 >I ~ ',, Ih1), hf r 4=1 1<< 4 ~ ' I ~ I.f k '"I 'll t) I ~ ) ~ f ~ re)i'f*) ) I ~ II -.~ =' I r ) I' 4 ~ 14 >I s V<<fk f ~ >'1 1) ~ r ~ I The following is a step-by-step description of the activities which occur during the start up of a component or system: 1. Start-Up en'gineers assure completion of the equipment or system through a walkdown and verification of any remaining work that is listed as an exception. 2. Start-Up engineers write necessary procedures which

include, as applicable:

a ~ b. c ~ d. Equipment checkout instructions. Procedures for flushing or cleaning. Procedures for hydrostatic testing. Preoperational test procedure. 3. QA personnel review these procedures prior to performance to assure appropriate requirements are included. 4. Start-Up engineers perform tests and checks including: a ~ b. c ~ d. e. Motor tests. Verification of pump output (pressure/flow). Continuity of wiring checks. Instrumentation calibration and tests. Verification of control circuits. 5. QC inspections are performed during each of these tests. 6. QA surveillance, such as monitoring, observation, and reviews of completed documents, is performed for key tests and checks. 7. Preoperational tests are reviewed by a team which consists of the Manager Start Up, Manager Operations, Manager-Engineering, and Director QA/QC prior to performance and after completion. The final review verifies that test objectives and requirements were met and that the system or equipment performs as designed. V' ~ s h M Section VI REINSPECTION ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS This section addresses reinspection activities and results for NDE inspectors, CI inspectors, QA/QC inspectors, and engineering support personnel. Even though the work of these individuals has been subject to rechecks and audits by others, there has been a project determination to resample their work to provide an additional layer of confidence that there were no quality-related problems. Sampling methodology and acceptance criteria, which are based upon Mil Standard 105-D, are contained in site procedure CQA-7 entitled "Evaluation of Program Effectiveness" and served as a basis for the reinspection process. The results of our reinspections demonstrate that the overall acceptance rate for the work of the inspectors in question is comparable to that for inspectors whose work has been reinspected for other reasons. A. NDE Inspectors Mithin the group, three NDE (nondestructive examination) inspectors have been terminated because of positive drug screen test results and two have been terminated for refusing to take the test. Four of the inspectors performed Liquid Penetrant Testing (PT) and Magnetic Particle Testing (HT) examinations. Reinspection of the PT and MT examinations have been completed in accordance with site procedure CQA-7. The following reinspection data pertain to these four inspectors. Individual Reference Number NDE Method Number of Items Originally Examined Number of Items Reins ected Number of Deficiencies 21 99 104 63 MT PT MT PT MT PT(S/R)< PT(W/W)* MT PT 65 218 47 496 5 68 232 81 714 13 38 8 66 2 16 48 13 80

• Solvent Removable (S/R) and Mater Washable (W/U) are two techniques for liquid penetrant examinations.

The four noted deficiencies were corrected by minor buffing and were reexamined. All four deficiencies were found to be acceptable without repairs. The results of these reinspections confirm proficiency and reliability of the inspectors'ork, and no further reinspection or analysis was deemed necessary. The remaining inspector, as well as three of the four mentioned

above, performed Radiographic Testing (RT); this work was not reinspected for the following reasons:

1. Certified as Level II Limited (Shooter Only) in RT, these individuals participated as members of two-man teams in making radiographic set-ups and film exposures; they did not perform interpretation of RT film for final acceptance or rejection of items radiographed. 2. RT film is subject to two separate reviews/ interpretations by other Level II personnel qualified for film interpretation. B. CI Inspectors Within the CI organization, six electrical inspectors were terminated for one of the following drug-related reasons: positive test, refused test, possession of drugs or suspicion. One civil inspector was terminated for refusing the drug screening test. A reinspection was performed on all seven of the subject CI inspectors in accordance with site procedure CQA-7. The following reinspection data cover the six electrical inspectors and the one civil inspector who performed the referenced quality inspections. Ind. Ref. No. Type of Ins ection Number of Originally Inspected Items (Attributes) Number of Reinspected Items (Attributes)<< Number of Deficient Attributes* 41 94 10 193 194 46 Cable Terminations Cable Pulls Cable Terminations Cable Pulls Cable Pulls Cable Terminations Cable Pulls Cable Terminations Cable Pulls Cable Terminations Cable Pulls Drilled-In Expansion Anchors 64 (710) 45 (490) 49 (530) 71 (710) 13 (130) 4 (44) 85 (850) 15 (165) 44 (530) 29 (380) 148 (1690) 20 (260) 13 (146) 8 (88) 8 (87) 13 (130) 3 (30) 2 (30) 13 (140) 3 (70) 8 (98) 8 (107) 20 (229) 5 (65) << Attributes are quality-related characteristics which are checked for each item. 1 rt Ita ta" I' ~ ~ ~ t Il~ tth $ 1 f ~ 'I II) )QI ~ ~ T ~ 1 ~ ht ht ~ 'I 'I' t lh Ih tf l g f I) ~ 1 T h I I ~ 4 III " '*Ttx'h ~, q Fh,h I 1 0, P ~ ~ h 1 l ~ ~.I f oaf I Ih I I la ~ Ih I t I I Ifl ~ Q FpI T f ther ~ ~ ~ g ~ / f hill, f yh Ih f f $ fII, I ", ~I Oa ~ 'I ga, ~II l ~ ll,l[ T P f ~ I 0 f P I I}~ ~,f t h.h,h ~ I The results of the reinspections were reviewed and evaluated by CI supervisory personnel. Deficiencies were identified on nonconformance reports for disposition. The most serious of the deficiencies was a conductor connected to the wrong terminal.

However, the pre-operational testing program is designed specifically to detect this type of deficiency.

The eight deficiencies had no safety significance. The work of each of the seven inspectors in question clearly exceeds the minimum acceptance standard of 95% established by site procedure CQA-7. The overall acceptance rate of the seven inspectors is 99.3%. This confirms the proficiency and reliability of the inspectors'ork and no further reinspections are deemed necessary. C. QA/QC Inspectors Within the QA/QC inspection organization, ten certified inspectors and one inspector-in-training have been terminated because of positive drug screen test or refusal to take the drug screen test. Reinspections have been performed in accordance with site procedure CQA-7 on four of the inspectors who performed safety-related functions. The results of the reinspections are as follows. Ind. Ref No. Type of Ins ection Number of Number of Originally Reinspected Inspected Items Items (Attributes)

• (Attributes)*

Number of Deficient Attributes* 79 177 82 98 Pipeweld Pipe Hanger Weld Pipe Hanger Weld Hechanical 120 (1800) 30 (2282) 49 (2960) 739 (2934) 20 (300) 30 (2282) 49 (2960) 80 (599) 0 17 22 0 The decisions to reinspect 100% of the pipe hangers accepted by Reference Numbers 82 and 177 were based on finding weld deficiencies in two or more of the initial reinspection samples. A total of 39 minor weld deficiencies were identified and reported on nonconformance reports for disposition. None of the deficient attributes were determined to be safety significant; however, they have been or will be reworked to maintain design conservatisms. Reinspection results show that the work of the four inspectors in question exceeds the minimum acceptance standard of 95% established by site procedure CQA-7. The overall acceptance rate of the four inspectors is 99.3%. This confirms the inspectors'roficiency and reliability and no further reinspection is deemed necessary.

• Attributes are quality-related characteristics which are checked for each item.

I~ ) wt~t'>> P ~ ~ I 1 II') I', k ') f)(f - ~ ~ - 4>> t~' I,. P

• ft

)t>> I f) r ~ ~ 1' ,f rt<<w =,P" ~ F,) I k) 1 ~. ~, I 1 1 7 ~ ., P ~ - f ~, ~) ~, ~ $7>><<) ~,) >>$ r ) <<4I I II f', ') f 7 ~ ~ ~ 1 y, ~, >><$4 I I~ 7 )$ k ~ I y ' f. t)t')Wr)1,)I>,'tlt<<<<)) 1 I, ~ 't I) ffh w P I 7 <1 ~ Wf<<',, ~, ~,, 4>> 1 ~ 4)$flr 4 <<ht<<) P' ) ~ P ~ /,'3 I <<<t) , t ~ r". 7>><<f)W <<4' ')', 4 ~)'kf' ~t $ 7 ~,I. "1 ~, ~pl-) 1 r,ha ~<<~t 4 f "1 <<l>> f t<< I ~ $ 7 1 ) <h>>r )I I<1< ~ ~ 'hfk I f>><< 4 'I) I t< r 1 tt 1 1 ) )$ to/f') 1 I \\>>, ft) ) f ~ 1'r ll 'h'7 'fhh>>h'<k ) )"r <<>>1<<f >>f " )'t) hrf 1 'I ~ )I<< ~ 3 7 f<3 "j>>~ -P<g ) ) ., ~ <) <<3'1 'k> '"" ) ) ~ ')f) f-1 ~ 1 ~hfyt)) ', ),.l; r) )).P q<, P ) fh t) 'rf W< $) 7=*') I 'llfgt i ~ tkk 1 <FI '\\ < ~ f)$ $ f rr>>, f9 qf<<rrr f r / ) w 3 pl<< I th ~ ~ ) 'I I II t <<<1, ~ 1 h ~r." h ~ wff ;1 r t " ' r -f $ t I>> rh< ~ 7<7 <) ~ k, ~ h, >r) ~ P ~ ) 1-ff ),. ~ $ I 1 I ).-)4 'f >>7 r ~ 1 ~ yr<<W P 1 t) ~ P hit)

• P h ~

rh 1 ll'>> <<1 tff) + ~ ~t< 7 1 ~ ~ >>+ <)ttq 7 p ~ <) <<<1 ~ k 7q f">>I 'I'It< t) f) ~ 1 ~ ~ <<$. f "I~ )II, ~ >>$ $) ') ') ', I" I 'Ft) P ~-., ' >>ft'>>1) r,F$ 1 'f 74' ~ 1>>1 ~ ~ <<< ~, ~f ) )r) ~ Three inspectors are currently under reinspection evaluation in accordance with site procedure CQA-7 requirements following their termination. Since the inspector-in-training was never certified, no reinspection was required because safety-related inspections were not performed by the individual. Two inspectors were certified for field concrete testing, cadweld and rebar tensile testing, grout testing and sieve analysis. There were no safety concerns with their concrete, grout, or sieve analysis testing assignments because final acceptance of these tests is based on subsequent concrete compressive strength tests. Due to the high success ratio of cadweld tensile tests (eight failures in 2764 tests), it was concluded that any misinterpretation of test results by the inspector would have no safety significance. Supervisory audits of each inspector's work were completed periodically during their employment with no problems or concerns identified. Another inspector was assigned to perform final system walkdowns with representatives from the system turnover group, construction engineering, and start-up personnel. This assignment did not require the individual to review documentation or inspect systems to determine quality or acceptability. In addition, the inspector was not solely responsible for any aspect of his assignment, and the turnover documentation packages were reviewed by a supervisor. For these

reasons, no reinspection or re-verification of this inspector's work was required.

D. Engineering Support Personnel Engineering support personnel perform original calculations and revise calculations in accepting ongoing and final as-built field conditions. Other engineering support personnel verify these evaluations and review and check calculations and revisions. Ten engineering support individuals who perform design-related work hav'e been implicated in drug involvement. Of these, five individuals were evaluated in accordance with site procedure CQA-7, and their work was found to be acceptable with no discrepancies. The other five were evaluated as performing acceptable work because their work was evaluated by independent reviewers who provided quality verification. None of the independent reviewers were under suspicion, were arrested, or were terminated for drug activity. Therefore, the work which these engineering support personnel performed is considered reliable and does not require re-evaluation. <<1 E 4 '= t ~ I I li I

• i<>t)EI 4

1 I .('I '4 ') <<I() 4'4 4 4 'nt( II )' ) ~ ~ "."r r I ) ) ~ 4 ~ ~ \\. r( 4 4 'I <<>>r ' )44 4 4 'I" 1 ~ ~ F I)g ) t I r >>J( ~ () t ) 4 "<<) 4>>')<<) ~ 4 'I l' tl ~I'(1 1 ) f) 4 ~ E>><<rl 4 4 4 ( nt<<'(' ~) ((1 'l 44,. ~ tg ) I 1 ) V 4 ~ JJ'.. ~ 'l ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 l' 1 I') ') r>> J h 4 ~ 4 <<('I t(l~ ~ (Il '( I 4 ~ "t I ~ II \\ I ~ II <<<<( 4 t<< (J) l <<F 'h 4 lh 'r ~ ('" ~ I ( )(- 4 ~ 1 Nl(tl<<r, 'h ~ 4 4 ~ N'I "~ 4 (t<<I ""' J4 ( '1 '<<} )(t F tf,m r r hf I ~ I t ~ I) I*

1) <<<'

~

4) f)t(

1 1 1 ) ~ ~ >>( ~ ~ })

• ~

(' E,l II 1, 't-1) 4 (4 ( 4) ~ 'I lh v * '4 h 't) <<4 ~ ~-4 ' J ~ >>P ~ ~ E F 4 t 4 ( I 4 ( ~,)'r) 1 ((<<4). I

• E(r),

lr I J 1 ~ '((1 4th l<<4 (.- 1 '1 4th b ~ ) ~ ~ ",1 ~ 4 ) F E I'* ~ >>. ( r( II I I nfl,>> +, () ~ I 4, 1 ~ E( (4 ( 4 (Fn 4 ("1 ~ ' ((Fh,- <<) r I>> Shrtrh 4 ~, 1" ~' ~ 1 4)l I

rfr,

• l<,n4 I" t' 4

F Il F' I 4<<f 1')4 1 ) I '"I l r n F ~ t<< ll F-'I'(Eh I mt* nrmrt ()' )

4. ~ ),I h

( I')~ 1>> 1 r<<) 1>> r )<<4 I ' ) <<)>>lt '1 1 ~ ) ) )(' lt 1'>>( = <<.JI r>t ~ ~ '1 (I. )'1 ( 4'. ( ( r 1 4 t ), f 1 ~I; 'I ) 44( tl trht( t t V 1 <<) '1 '1 ~ ~I" 1- )rr, ) ~(4 4 g hf 4( 'Nll () 1 4 rr(hr,, ~ t' )- 4")1 Section VII

SUMMARY

There is not a widespread use of drugs by employees at the SHNPP.

Of the more than 26,000 individuals employed at the SHNPP since

1978, 201 individuals have been identified as having, or as suspected of, some level of involvement with controlled substances.

Over half of the 201 incidents involved circumstantial information or refusals for whatever reason to subject to a search or urinalysis test.

Only thirteen individuals have been established as using drugs on site.

None of the 201 individuals are presently employed at the site.

Many of these 201 employees did not perform safety-related work.

Some were utility workers, truck drivers, clerks or painters.

Most were craft employees; only 17 were foremen or construction supervisors.

Only 23 QC or CI inspectors have suspected implication in drug activity.

There has been no confirmed incident of a significant quality deficiency attributed to craft personnel, quality inspectors, NDE personnel, or engineering support personnel identified or suspected of drug involvement.

CPGL reviewed the job classifications of implicated employees and conferred with supervisors as appropriate to ascertain, to the extent possible, on which systems and compo-nents the employees worked.

CPGL has determined that craft work on safety-related systems was subject to multiple checks and cross-checks by peers and supervisors while being performed and by QC and CI inspectors after completion.

Safety-related systems are further verified for proper construction by walkdowns prior to turnover and start-up testing.

The ability of the inspection programs to assure quality construction has been confirmed by on-site QA audits, Corporate QA audits, NRC I6E inspections, INPO audits and NRC-CAT inspections.

Even postulated drug use by all 201 implicated em-ployees would not challenge the quality assurance program.

A statistically representative sample of work performed by those QC and CI inspectors implicated in possible drug involvement has been reinspected.

The basis of the sample size is Mil Standard 105-D, as adopted in CP&L's site procedure CQA-7.

The results of these reinspections, which are set forth in detail in this report, confirm the quality of the inspections performed by the 23 impli-cated inspectors in that no significant deficiencies were found.

Furthermore, the sample reinspection program which was initiated by the on-site QA unit-not specifically motivated by the drug problems has identified only 237 discrepancies out of 40,421 attributes reinspected.'one have been determined to have safety significance after evaluation.

All of this information provides reasonable assurance that the QA program is working to detect discrepancies in construction activities whether related to drug use or otherwise and to ensure the quality of construction at the SHNPP.

~'

~

1

~

I I 'I<<

~

h 1

I I

<<1 <<'

I '<<11<<m I<<

f<<$

I'

<<)

"I

~,1 ~,

~ \\

~

~

r

~

f y>>l)t I

~

I I

~ >>

1

"<<=

"1' I

lt I

~

h

~

I

~

I my)

<<t I'

t, r

I

~

~

1)

~ f

>> ~ * <<r

'1 t

t AI h',

I ~

1

~

>>,1 t

1 It h

t I

fft<<

h'

'f-I ~

~ t. >>p

~

~

I I) Ihl

<<1 I'

~

I

~ f' 1

I

~

1

I,>>

~

<<1 I

f

~

~

th'

<< ~

h I ~

r 1

'1 1

I r)t' y'I<<

t=m

'"~ ym)

" f

'I ly' II

,I h

~

I Ihrm>>

C 1

I~,

1

~ t t

r

~

m Iftht

~

I I

I yl h f

I I

h<< ~

~,1'lyt tll 1

h h

I

~

'h)*<<<<i 1<< tfl') -I 4

=mt II I

~

I 11

~

h gh Il

~

<<'I hh

Appendix A JOB DESCRIPTIONS Job Descri tion Utility Craft Rebar Craft Ironvorker Craft

Carpenter Craft Painter Craft Pipe Fitter Craft Instrument Craft Sheet Metal Craft Electrician Craft Truck Driver Craft Field Engineer Craft Daniel Overhead Other Inspectors

~Pa e

A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7 A-8 A-9 A-10 A>>11 A-12 A-13 A-14 A-15

w 41 h

V I'

,ea

UtilityCraft Non Safet -Related Activities Perform general cleanup (tools, equipment, materials and work area)

Perform reading and driving of grade stakes Perform leveling earth to grade specification using a pick and shovel Mix and rough-smooth concrete using proper hand tools Assist with preparation of concrete or metal surfaces (scaling)

Assist in the positioning, joining, aligning, and sealing of pipe sections Assist in the erection of scaffolding, shoring, and braces Hop, brush, or spread paints or compounds over surfaces for protection Spray materials such as water,

sand, steam, vinyl, paint, or stucco with a hose to clean,

coat, cure or seat surfaces Apply caulking compounds by hand or with caulking gun to seal surfaces Assist and/or perform grinding, sanding, or polishing surfaces such as concrete, marble, terrazzo, or wood flooring using abrasive hand tools Perform sawing of rough lumber Perform dismantling of forms from set concrete Assist in the mounting of pipe hangers Assist in the demolition of temporary buildings or structures Assist with the handling of building materials and tools Assist equipment operators in the alignment,

movement, and adjustment of machinery to grade specifications Assist in the installation of waterworks, locks, and dams Stretch tight line Flag traffic Assist in maintaining project roads, parking areas, and walkways

, Rope off unauthorized areas used by utility craft Perform dewatering operations Perform fire watch duties Distribute potable drinking water as required Assist in securing project for inclement weather Perform basic rigging Potentiall Safet -Related Activities Install wedge anchor bolts A-2

II I

II t ~

I' t

I I

t

'I I

~

I t*

~I I

F g I I t Il II I

~

I

Rebar Craft Non Safet -Related Activities Perform general cleanup Perform tying operations Perform unloading and storing of rebar Perform craft-related math Perform rigging or rebar Perform hand carrying of rebar Use craft tools Use burning torch Potentiall Safet -Related Activities Perform preassembly of rebar (mats, columns, walls, beams) steel Perform placing of rebar Perform identification of rebar Perform lap splicing Use bending machine and shear Perform cadwelding Install wedge anchors

~

II I'

'I g*

1 It

'\\

t I

,1 II

'I I

~ '

4 ~

I r

It

Ironworker Craft Non Safet -Related Activities Perform general cleanup in work area and miscellaneous duties Use and care for craft-related hand tools Assist with crane movement and set-up (learn hand signals)

Assist with portable power tools Use shop power tools and portable power tools Perform cutting torch operations Assist in scaffold and/or float erection Change crane boom or cable Perform installation of grating or decking Perform rigging Perform scaffolding inspection and/or erection Perform permanent handrail fabrication and installation Potentiall Safet -Related Activities Perform Perform Perform Perform Perform Perform Perform bolt-up operations layout and fabrication Nelson stud welding erection and connection of structural steel erection of miscellaneous steel plumbing operations welding A-4

h I'l fq r

~

g 5

$ ~ If I

I

Carpenter Craft Non Safet -Related Activities Clean, inspect, repair (if necessary) and stack forms Identify common form components Perform form removal Perform form installation Maintain clean work area Identify carpentry tools Use (non-power) hand tools, measuring tools, portable power tools Perform basic layou't operations Interpret basic job prints and sketches Fabricate forms (not in place)

Fabricate forms (in place)

Install shoring and bracing

Select, measure and cut material Assist in fundamental rigging Use shop power tools and explosive power tools Erect and disassemble commercial scaffolding Fabricate and install job built scaffolding Perform detailed layout Perform framing and proper installation of framed openings Installation railings and/or steps Use man-lifts (contingent on project certification)

Welding - Temporary Potentiall Safet -Related Activities Installation of anchor bolts Install wedge anchors Install permanent doors A-5

~

~

~ ~

I

(

t h

pP

Painter Craft Non Safet -Related Activities Perform general cleanup and miscellaneous duties Assist with or maintain cleanliness and operating condition of equipment and tools Operate sandblasting equipment Mask-off protected surface areas Use and care for surface preparation tools and equipment, i.e.,

side grinder, wire brush, and sandblasting equipment Maintain equipment (including disassembly and reassembly)

Store, handle, and use chemicals Perform basic rigging Potentiall Safet -Related Activities Use paint equipment and/or spray pot in the application of coatings Apply primers Apply finish coatings Prepare surfaces; i.e

, sandblast, patch, grind, wire brush, chemically treat, etc.

Mix, store and transport primer and/or finish coatings t

l.h

>>I

~

t ~)

Ih ~

h

)

f

~ I rfr<<

r ~

r h

'f I h fr ), fl

>> A fr"gf'r r f>> r>>

l ',

l r f)h e)

~ >>

~ >>

II) - ~ ll

~

1

~ f ff

~

) hh f<<>>V f

'h

~I<<

rfl>>'$

)

f'f) f

~'f) lh'

~ X r

)f~ I'l hf ~

~

)

Y ~ )<<>>>>h

<<'I

~'h

~.,

r)j h

I') tf>> f),

~ 'h r

r fhr) h <<)) ) f) f h>>r )

f

$ r r

'r',

~

")% ) r h

tl' J fr) h

~

1'f V

r"

~(

'>>r>> ~" f" r I>> ) )

'I

~

~ )

~ p r

Pipe Pitter Craft Non Safet -Related Activities Perform general cleanup and miscellaneous work Use and care for hand tools and measuring devices Thread pipe Install terra cotta,

ceramic, rubber reinforced or epoxy joined pipe and fittings Install pipe with screwed fittings Perform rigging and transportation of pipe, valves, fittings, etc.

Potentiall Safet -Related Activities Cut pipe Cut and install gaskets Install pipe with flanged fittings Install pipe hangers Clean, bevel, prepare, and install pipe with weld joints Bend pipe Install valves, traps or strainers Lay out pipe (to include use of templates)

Perform welding Install wedge anchors A-7

1 1'"

~

I I

II lh r

I II II r

hh h."

Instrument Craft Non Safet -Related Activities Perform cleanup during and after completion of job Perform cutting, threading and installation of screw pipe Layout, fabricate and install hard-drawn copper tubing and fittings Use care for hand tools and power tools Potentiall Safet -Related Activities Perform cutting, cleaning and preparing materials Perform drilling, tapping holes and setting anchors Fabricate pipe hangers and other supports Perform hydrostatic and pneumatic testing Install multi-tubing and junction boxes Layout, fabricate and install tube tray and supports Perform layout and mounting of panel instruments and devices Perform layout, installation, and bending of tubing Layout, fabricate, and install instrumentation systems Perform pipe assembly for socket weld pipe, tubing and fittings Perform pipe assembly for butt-weld pipe and fittings Installation of hand valves Perform welding Install wedge anchors A-8

1

~t he

~

~

j1

~ ~

II h

rt l

Sheet Hetal Craft Non Safet -Related Activities Perform Use and Use and Use and Perform Perform general cleanup and miscellaneous duties care for hand tools and measuring devices care for power hand tools care for shop equipment basic soldering operations rigging and installation operations

, Potentiall Safet -Related Activities Perform cutting, cleaning, and preparing materials Assist and/or perform in fabrication of brackets,

braces, and other supports Assist or perform fabrication of patterns (to include punching, drilling and riveting operations)

Assist or perform edging, notching and seam folding operations Perform forming, crimping, beading and grooving operation Perform miscellaneous fabrication and installation operations (to include pocket locks, drives, and companion angles)

Assist and/or perform fabrication of duct Perform welding Install wedge anchors A-9

H H

~

l

~

It

~

'I,

Electrician Craft Non Safet -Related Activities Bend conduit Install lighting systems Install heating equipment, grounding equipment, and branch circuits Megger wires; identify and tag wires Install temporary services and outside branch circuits Potentiall Safet -Related Activities Run conduit, including flexible conduit and other fittings Install hangers, brackets and braces Install batteries Install cable tray Pull wire Terminate wires and/or cables Perform tying cable in wireways and/or cables Install fuse devices Install DC and AC motors and/or generators Perform sizing and wire routing Install cranes,

hoists, elevators and associated equipment Install remote control components (signaling devices)

Install switches Install switchboards and panelboards Install high voltage systems (600 volts or more)

Install low voltage systems (600 volts or less)

Install electronic control systems Perform welding Install wedge anchors A-10

'I

'e "F

f e

I'=

I' T-ll

<<4

Truck Driver Craft Non Safet -Related Activities Carry out duties as assigned by supervisor Operate assigned vehicle safely Perform daily service and maintenance checks

4 0

II p

~

g)

.<qa ll'f q<~, ygj~i i)e, l"l>~p j i~ ~

<), '

<<"eiy',

p,

'P<)'

j',1 fr>('gJ i

t

} )el'g

.gpss).g i

~q y -f )~g fgcg>>i l~ f '

"<<~ ~i"f

)

e x

• i'>

..")

rove

~

I

~,

f

Field Engineer Craft Non Safet -Related Activities Care for and use survey instruments Potentiall Safet -Related Activities Establish reference monuments, lines and grades Perform measurements and checks on work in progress Perform measurements and as-builts on completed work A-12

I

~ j

~If

• f L p"

1 II III

~

)

41

Daniel Overhead Included within this classification are:

-hourly overhead (clerk)

-non-exempt personnel (aide)

-engineers

-specialist

-technician

-secretary This classification will encompass a variety of work functions which may involve as few as one or as many as all of the following activities:

Non Safet -Related Activities Type File Answer telephone Prepare change request Develop basic programs Prepare material requisitions Evaluate technical aspects Supervise personnel Develop construction problem resolutions Perform studies of construction practice and procedure Potentiall Safet -Related Activities Prepare/review work packages Prepare/review documentation Prepare/review non-conformance reports Write procedures Determine/interpret quality standards A-13

J II 1

t ~

II Tlt'~

~

'u I

f P-r

~

q

~

t' 4

N

Other Included within this classification are Janitors,

drafters, engineering support personnel and document reviewers.

Janitor Non Safet -Related Activities

Sweep, dust, collect trash in office and common areas Wax and polish floors Clean restrooms Drafter Non Safet -Related Activities Reads engineering sketches Utilizes drafting techniques Prepares engineering drawings Engineering Support Personnel Potentiall Safet -Related Activities Interpret problems encountered by construction personnel Create or process field change reports to reflect field problems Develop viable solutions to resolve field problems Perform calculations necessary to support solutions Verify calculations developed by other engineering support personnel Develop design changes supported by calculations Document design changes in accordance with procedures Interface with field craft personnel to ensure design change is workable and is carried out Document Reviewer Non Safet -Related Activities Follows site work procedures Checks documents for completeness,

accuracy, and traceability A-14

(

H E

r P

II FI P,

FE

'*lg

'"F P

Inspectors Construction Inspection and Quality Control inspectors are hired based on previous experience and training pertinent to the intended assignments.

Inspector candidates are indoctrinated to project procedures, policies and specifications and are assigned to on-the-job-training with certified inspectors for prescribed periods of time to gain proficiency and demonstrate ability prior to being considered for certification.

When required on-the-job training requirements are met, inspector candidates must pass written and oral examinations in the certification process.

CI and QC inspectors work to approved procedures and inspect for quality attributes developed by design engineering.

In addition to physical attributes, inspectors check for other items important to quality such as:

use of latest revisions of drawings, procedures and specifications; qualifications of cadweld splicers, protective coating applicators and welders; weld material control; cleanliness of controlled work areas and material traceability.

Inspectors are assigned to perform prescribed monitoring and inspections in the following general areas of activity:

Civil and Structural Concrete production and placement Concrete embedments Reinforcing steel placement and splicing Structural steel placement, bolting and welding Soils placement and compaction Electrical Equipment setting and installation Cable pulling and termination Cable tray, conduit and raceway installation Penetration installation, sealing and maintenance Material Control Procurement and receiving Lifting and handling Mechanical Equipment setting and installation Piping and HVAC duct bolting and welding Seismic support installation Pressure testing systems and components Nondestructive examination (NDE)

A-15

F It It 1

~

C T

~ $

I't

\\

TT

~

~

~

T