ML18019A364
| ML18019A364 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 08/22/1985 |
| From: | Burris S, Fredrickson P, Maxwell G, Prevatte R, Prevattee R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18019A361 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-85-30, IEB-75-08, IEB-75-8, NUDOCS 8509050057 | |
| Download: ML18019A364 (11) | |
See also: IR 05000400/1985030
Text
~PS REGIy,
0
coO
eo
Yv
++*++
Report No.:
50-400/85-30
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30323
Licensee:
Carolina
Power
and Light Company
P. 0.
Box 1551
Raleigh,
NC
27602
Docket No.:
50-400
Facility Name:
Harris Unit
1
License No.:
CPPR-158
Inspection
Conducted:
July 20
August 20,
1985
Inspectors:
Approved by:
l
P. Frednckson,
Sect>on Chief
Division of Reactor
Projects
Date Signed
g-'z-z-'WX
Date Signed
z'- z-z-Z
Date Signed
ate Si
ned
SUMMARY
Scope:
This routine,
announced
inspection
involved 291 (resident)
inspector-
hours
on site in the
areas
of licensee
action of previous
enforcement
items;
licensee
identified
items
and
IE Bulletins;
heating,
ventilation
and air
condi tioning; electrical;
fi r e
prevention/protection;
storage;
preoperati ona1
test program implementation verification and operations training.
Results:
Of the
8 areas
inspected,
no violations'or deviations
were identified
in
7 areas;
one violation
was
found in
one
area
(violation -
"Inadequate
Inspection of
HVAC Duct", identified in the details
Section 6.g of the report).
No apparent deviations
were found.
8S09OSOOSi
SSOS56
.PDR ADQCK 050DO400
">'
'-'",,PDR
"
REPORT DETAILS
Persons
Contacted
Licensee
Employees
N. J. Chiangi,
Manager,
QA/QC Harris Plant
J.
M. Collins, Manager,
Operations
G.
L. Forehand,
Director,
QA/QC
J.
L. Harness,
Assistant Plant General
Manager,
Operations
C.
S. Hinnant,
Manager,
Start-up
LE I. Loflin, Manager,
Harris Plant Engineering
Support
D. A. McGaw, Superintendent
C.
L. McKenzie, Acting Director, Operations
QA/QC
G. A. Myer, General
Manager,
Milestone Completion
R.
M. Parsons,
Project General
Manager,
Construction
Confirmation
Completion
M. Thompson, Jr.,
Manager,
Engineering
Management
D.
L. Tibbitts, Director, Regulatory
Compliance
B.
Van Metre, Manager, Harris Plant Maintenance
M.
D. Vernon, Superintendent
E. J.
Wagner,
Manager,
Engineering
C.
C. Wagoner,
Project General
Manager,
Construction
R. A. Watson,
Vice President,
Harris Nuclear Project
J.
L. Willis, Plant General
Manager,
Operations
Other licensee
employees
contacted
included
51 construction
craftsmen,
10
technicians,
18 operators,
8 mechanics,
12 security force members,
and
11
engineering
personnel.
Exit Interview
The inspection
scope
and findings were
summarized
on August 16,
1985, with
the Plant General
Manager.
No written material
was provided to the licensee
by the resident
inspectors
during this reporting period.
The licensee
did
not identify as proprietary
any of the materials
provided to or reviewed
by
the resident
inspectors
during this inspection.
The violation identified in
this report
has
been
discussed
in detail with the licensee.
The licensee
provided
no dissenting
information at the exit meeting.
Licensee Action on Previous
Enforcement
Items
(92702)
(Closed)
Violation 400/85-04-02
"Inadequate
Electrical
Design".
The
inspector evaluated
CPKL's responses
to Region II dated April 11,
1985,
April 29,
1985,
June
10,
1985
and July 19,
1985.
CP&L has replaced
the
subject
¹10
AWG conductor
with
a ¹2
AWG conductor
per Field
Change
Request
FCR-E-4052.
A review
has
been
conducted
by
EBASCO to insure
correct cable sizing in other installations.
Administrative instructions
have
been
implemented
by
HPES design
to prevent
a recurrence
of this
problem.
This
item will be routinely evaluated
as
a part of the
ongoing inspection
program.
This item is closed.
C.
(Closed)
Violation
400/85-16-30
"Failure
to
Fol 1 ow
Procedur es
to
Control
Electrical
Field Modifications".
The
inspector
evaluated
CPCL's response
to Region II dated July 3,
1985.
CP8L has reviewed the
Electrical
Field Modifications
Log
and
taken
appropriate
remedial
action to correct the discrepancies.
The control of the log has
been
transferred
from Harris Plant Construction
section to the Harris Plant
Engineering
section
to
insure
more
rigid control.
Engineering
personnel
have
been
indoctrinated
in
this
revised
procedural
requirement for control of this log
and electrical
modifications.
A
follow-up inspection
by the
resident
inspector
indicates
that this
problem is resolved.
This item is closed.
(Closed)
Unresolved
Item 400/84-44-01
"Structural
Steel
and
Welding
Inspection
Improvement".
This item addressed
procedural
and training
changes
that were being
implemented
by the applicant to improve the
inspection
and
documentation
review
program
for structural
steel
welding.
The corrective action
steps
that were
implemented
have
been
followed
by the
resident
inspector.
Follow-up
inspections
by
the
resident
inspector
and
a review of the
gA survei llances
conducted
by
CPLL in this area indicate that these corrective actions
have resulted
in
improved
inspector
effectiveness.
This item will continue to
be
evaluated
as
a part of the
ongoing
inspection
program.
This item is
closed.
4.
Licensee Identified Items
and Bulletins
(98700)
Prior to the inspection
period,
the licensee
had identified the following
items under
a.
(Closed)
400/CDR
85-207
"Cable
Sizing Deficiency".
On February
19,
1985
the
licensee
notified
Region II of
a
item
concerning
the use of undersized
¹10
AWG conductor cables
used in a
100
amp
safety-related
circuit.
These
conductors
have
a
rating
of
approximately
15 amp.
The final report
on this item was
submitted
to
Region II in July 1985.
The reports
have
been
reviewed
and determined
to
be acceptable
by RII.
Corrective
action
included
replacement
of
undersized
cable
with ¹2
AWG conductor
per
Field
Change
Request
FCR-E-4052.
EBASCO
has, performed
a
review of previously-installed
cables to insure this does
not exist in other applications.
Procedural
changes
and
additional
training
have
been
implemented
to
prevent
recurrence.
Follow-up inspection
by the resident
inspector
indicates
that this item has
been corrected.
This item is closed.
b.
(Closed)
"PWR Pressure
Instrumentation".
As outlined in this
Bulletin, continuously
recorded. data
was required to verify adherence
to pressure
and temperature
limitations under technical
specifications.
Shearon
Harris
has
the
capability
to verify this
adherence
via
installed strip chart recorders
in the control
room.
The inspectors
consider this Bulletin closed.
El ectri ca 1
(51053B,
51063B)
The
inspector
observed
the installation activities
associated
with
class
1E cables
with the
following numbers:
11256B-SA,
109850-SA,
11831/-SA,
11970A-SA,
11869A-SA
and
11831P-SA.
These
observations
related
to cable pulling and termination
and
various
switchgear
and
cabinets.
The following were evaluated
during these
observations:
(1)
The latest termination cards
were in use;
(2)
The size
and type cable
was correct;
(3)
The
cable
identification
(cable
number
and
color
code)
was
correct;
(4)
The correct bending radius
was applied;
(5)
The cable routing was correct;
(6)
The cables
were protected
from damage;
(7)
(}ualified electrical
inspection
personnel
were
monitoring
the
installation activities;
(8)
Approved drawings
and specifications
were being used;
(9)
Approved materials
were being used;
(10) Cleanness;
(ll) Calibration of tools and instruments;
(12) Approved work and inspection
procedures
were being used;
(13) Documentation of inspections
and nonconformances.
The inspector
reviewed
CP&L nonconformance
trend reports for the month
of July 1985 for the electrical
raceway installation activities.
This
trend
indicates
that
the rejection
rate
for first inspections
and
reinspection
of previously rejected
inspections
is increasing
in the
areas
of conduit,
raceway
and electrical
boxes.
This trend indicates
that repetitive inspections
are required in the above
areas
to achieve
acceptable
results.
A review of the
CP&L trend analysis for the first
and
second
quarter
of
1985
indicates
that this
problem
has
been
increasing
each
quarter.
The
second
quarter
trend
analysis
report
shows
that this
adverse
trend
was
addressed
to
CP&L construction
management
at the
second
quarter
trend meeting
on July 19,
1985.
The
construction
manager for electrical
was required to provide
cause
and
preventive
measures
to correct this
trend
by August 23,
1985.
The
resident
inspectors
met with CP&L management
on August
13,
1985
and
discussed
this
trend
and
the
actions
being
taken
by electrical
construction
management
to correct this trend.
CP&L and construction
management
have
taken
steps
to increase
craft training,
and provide
stronger
engineering
and
construction
management
and
supervision
involvement in these
work areas
to produce.
a product that will achieve
a higher acceptability
rate
on its first inspection.
This item will
continue to
be tracked
by the resident
inspector until this trend has
shown significant improvement.
This item is identified as
an Inspector
Follow-up Item "Electrical Nonconformance
Trend Analysis" 400/85-30-02.
No violations or deviations
were noted in the areas
inspected.
6.
Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems
(HVAC)
(50100)
The
inspector
accompanied
Construction
Inspection
(CI) personnel
on
an
inspection of HVAC ductwork.
This ductwork is identified
on site
drawings
HV/1-G806-009,
HV/1-G508-S01-003,
HV/1-G508-SO 1-002
and
HV/1-G525-S01-016,
and
had
been
previously
inspected
and
accepted.
The
following
were
evaluated during this inspection:
a.
Proper location, configuration, identification,
and damage, if any;
b.
Installation
in
accordance
with
approved
drawings,
procedures
and
instructions;
c.
Attachments properly installed;
d.
Fastening
material type, identification and torquing;
e.
Interferences
identified;
f.
Inspection
personnel
qualifications;
g.
Inspection results
and nonconformances
properly documented.
This inspection
identified approximately
17 deficiencies,
such
as
loose
nuts,
missing
lockwashers,
bent
bolts
not
staked,
drawing
and
documentation
deficiencies
and
not
in
accordance
with
design
requirements.
No
single
identified
item
is
considered
of
major
significance,
but
numbers
alone
indicate
a
weakness
in installation
and
inspection
practices.
These
items
have
been discussed
with CP&L management
and
have
been
documented
in
Nonconformance
Reports
85-1791,
85-1804
and
85-1805.
The above instances
are contrary to the requirements
Criterion X, ANSI N45.2 and the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report,
section
1.8.5.'10.
This
is
a violation,
"Inadequate
Inspection
of
HVAC Duct"
400/85-30-01.
Except
as
noted,
no violations or deviations
were identified in the areas
inspected.
7.
Fire Prevention/Protection
(42051C)
a.
The inspectors
observed
the fire prevention
and protection activities
related to containing combustible materials
where the ignition of these
materials
could
damage
safety-related
structures.
The inspectors
also
observed
the ongoing site training activities for the construction fire
brigade.
b.
Some
of the
specific
areas
observed
by the
inspectors
during this
period were:
(I)
Nonflammable
protective
coverings
were
observed
over
such
equipment
as the electrical control cabinets at elevation 286'f
the
reactor
auxiliary building
and
over various
safety-related
pumps
and components
located throughout the plant.
(2)
The inspectors
observed
during the various tours of the reactor
auxiliary
building
and
the
containment
building
that
the
accumulation
of combustible
materials
in these
areas
was
being
minimized.
(3)
Flammable
materials
were
stored
to
prevent
or
reduce
the
likelihood of combustion.
(4)
Welding activities were observed
in at least
30 separate
locations
throughout
the site
and in each
instance it was
observed
that
appropriate
fire extinguishing
equipment
was available
within
close proximity of the welding activities.
It was also noted that
the
portable
fire
extinguishers
contained
sufficient
fire
extinguishing
medium,
as
evidenced
by
displaying
current
inspection stickers
and having unbroken
seals.
(5)
The inspectors
observed that at the various elevations
throughout
the reactor auxiliary building and the containment building, fire
suppression
devices
were
strategically
located
and
readily
available
for use.
c.
A review of the fire brigade drill and training records
showed that
.drills
and training
are
conducted
on
a regular
basis
for the fire
brigade
members.
No violations or deviations
were noted in the areas
inspected.
8.
Storage
(50073C)
The inspector
toured
warehouses
1,
2
and
3,
the operations
warehouse,
and
various
plant
equipment
storage
areas.
During
the tours,
the
storage
conditions of the equipment
were evaluated
to determine
whether requirements
are being met as follows:
a.
Piping and equipment,
in general,
were stored off the ground or floors
to prevent entry of dirt into them, or contamination
from environmental
conditions.
b.
The storage
areas
were identified sufficiently to provide identity and
locations
as required
by those
who
may
be
seeking
the
locations
of
parts or equipment.
- c.
Access
was adequate
for placement
or removal of parts
and equipment.
d.
Warehouse
equipment
was stored in the correct position.
e.
The
temperature
and
humidity controls
were
being
maintained
as
required.
f.
Access to plant storage
areas
was being maintained.
g.
Equipment installed heaters
were energized
as required.
h.
Protective
covers
were in place.
No violations or deviations
were identified in the areas
inspected.
Preoperational
Test Program
(71302,
42400B)
The inspectors
toured various plant areas
to verify that the following
items were evaluated
to assure
compliance with requirements:
(1)
The general
condition of the plant's
housekeeping
and the overall
condition of the equipment
were observed.
(2)
The plant
was
found to
be free of any major fire hazards.
Fire
extinguishing
equipment
was
readily
available,
and
flammable
materials
were
being
protected
from ignition sources
and
were
being
controlled
in
accordance
with
site
administrative
procedures.
(3)
The
inspectors
observed
electrical
personnel
placing
cables
in
thei r respective
cable trays
and conduits.
Sufficient care
was
being taken to prevent
damage to the cables
being
placed,
and to
cables
which had already
been installed.
(4)
The
inspectors
looked
for uncontrolled
openings
in previously
cleaned
or flushed
systems
or components.
Where
system
openings
were
identified,
cleanness
controls
were
established
during
flushing.
(5)
The inspectors
observed
one instance
where construction
personnel
were working on electrical
equipment which had already
been turned
over to the start-up
group.
The work was being accomplished
under
the
proper
administrative
controls
provided
in
the
Start-up
Manual.
b.
The
inspectors
reviewed
log
books
maintained
by the test
group
to
identify problems
or plant activities that
may
be
appropriate
for
additional follow-up.
c.
The
inspectors
evaluated
the activities being'conducted
by the
operations
QA surveillance
personnel.
QA surveillance
personnel
were
present
and
observed
the major preoperational
tests
conducted
during
this reporting period.
The results of their observations
were promptly
documented
and distributed
to
those
responsible
for the activities
which were observed.
d.
The
inspectors
observed
operations
personnel
deenergizing
electrical
components
as required
by the clearance
program
when equipment is being
placed out of commission for repairs,
tests
or rework.
e.
The
inspectors
observed
the
status
of
the
plant
being
correctly
identified in the control
room by operations
personnel.
f.
During this inspection period the inspectors
reviewed
and witnessed
the
conduct
of
the
Emergency
Diesel
Generator
Phase
Verification
and
Initial Synchronization,
1-5095-0-1.
The
inspectors
reviewed
the
procedure
to verify the following:
(1)
An approved test
procedure
was available
and in use
by the test
personnel;
(2)
Test equipment
being
used
was calibrated
and any jumpers installed
were controlled by the applicable administrative
procedures;
(3)
Changes
to
the
procedure
were
documented
in
accordance
with
administrative
procedures.
The inspectors
witnessed all portions of this test
and noted several
identified material deficiencies.
These
problems
were identified
during testing
and were consequently
corrected
by the site personnel
prior to test completion
as identified below:
(1)
Several
diesel
shutdowns
occurred
due to low jacket water
flow;
this item was resolved
by the licensee
by identifying a downstream
pneumatic
pressure
switch which
was
leaking,
causing
a
false
signal.
The licensee
replaced this switch, thereby correcting the
problem.
(2)
Diesel
shutdown
by the loss of K-1 relay.
This item occurred
due
to the fact that the
AC and
DC contacts
were improperly installed
making the
K-1 relay inoperable.
The licensee
replaced
the
K-1
relay with one from onsite
and completed this test.
(3)
The
inspectors
were
informed
by the
licensee
that
the diesel
generator
turbo exhaust
piping
had exhibited
excessive
movement
and
noise
during the initial 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> run period.
The licensee
investigated
these
abnormalities
and
found that
the
south
bank
discharge
piping
thermal
expansion
piece
(bellows)
showed excessive
deterioration.
The licensee
determined
that
the
root cause for this deficiency occurred
when the high temperature
and flow rate of the exhaust
gases
eroded
the material,
causing
bellows failure.
In addition to this justification, the licensee
and technical
representative
have performed
a thorough
inspection
of the turbocharger
internals
to insure that
no bellows material
was
entrained
back
to
the
internals
of
the
Corrective action by the licensee
has included:
(a)
Replacement
of the
damaged
(b)
Addition of
a
second
thermal
expansion joint prior to the
exhaust
pip entry to the muffler, which includes cutting the
flange off the exhaust
pipe
and welding
a
new flange
piece
onto
the
exhaust
pipe
to
allow bolting
the
new
thermal
expansion
piece into place.
g.
The
inspectors
observed
both construction
and test
personnel
during
performance
of selected
activities for the
1A-SA diesel
generator.
These
evaluations
included
high
pressure
air
compressor
runs,
air
receiver
and dryer operations,
diesel
generator
control board
and motor
control center
maintenance,
and inspection
of the generator
windings.
The
inspectors
interviewed test
personnel
and
the
diesel
generator
representative
to determine
the current
status
of the diesels.
From
these
interviews
the
inspectors
have
determined
that
there
are
not
unidentified problems with the diesels
to date.
Harris
management
continues
to actively institute
a security
program
for the diesel
generator building.
No violations or deviations
were identified in the areas
inspected.
10.
Operations Training
(36301B)
The inspectors
reviewed the operational
training for personnel
at the Harris
Site.
The
review
included
interviews
with the
operational .staff
and
management
and
an evaluation of operations
personnel
training records.
The
evaluation
was
conducted
on ten percent of the the
CP&L personnel
who have
applied for cold licensing
approval
as
reactor
operators
or
as
senior
reactor
operators.
The inspectors
evaluated
the training records for the plant general
manager
and
the
radiation
protection
supervisor.
The
records
were
found to
be
legible
and
were
documented
on
the
forms
required
by
the
applicable
operations training instruction
(TI-906).
As
a result of the record
review,
the inspectors
found one instance
where
the training history sheet for the plant general
manager,
did not reflect
his current training status.
This concern
was discussed
with responsible
CP&L supervision
and is
being further evaluated
by
CP&L operations
gA
surveillance
personnel.
This condition is identified as
an unresolved
item
"Training Records for Operations"
400/85-30-03.
No violations were identified in the areas
inspected.