ML18018A815

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rept of Fragility Test on SMB-1-25/H4BC W/Std Cast Adapter for Limitorque Corp
ML18018A815
Person / Time
Site: Harris  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/17/1975
From:
AERO NAV LABORATORIES, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML18018A805 List:
References
5-6167-5, NUDOCS 8310130280
Download: ML18018A815 (66)
v • d • e


Text

LABORATORlES, lNC.

14-29 112TH STREET COlLEGE POIHT, H.Y. 11355a (212) 939-4422 t UNCLASSIFIZD )

RFPORT OF FRAGILITY T=ST ON SMB-1-2 5/H4 BC WITH STANDARD CAS'PJ)APTZR FOR LIMI OR/UK 'CORPCRA.ION KING OF PRUSSIA, P:NNSYLVA'.IIA'ESTED SY

.QKCKED SY APPROVED SV ETL REPORT AERO NAV SALES ORDER CUSTOMER P.O.

5-616 /-5 3-6167 383864-3 DATE 17 Decernhe 1975 NONc 83101~0~

50ppppp I

p 830919 PDR ADGC~

pDP, E

I al'K 1

OF 15

'~aCES UNCLASSIFI:D ~

PURPOSE OF TEST:

~Pre 'w

( UNCLASSIFIED )

ADMINIS'~i%TIVE DATA DATE 17 December 1975 To determine the effects of seism'c v bra.ion on the physical and opera ional character'st cs of the subnitted specimen.

MANUFACTURER:

LIMITORQUE CORPORATION 181 S. Gulph Road King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 MANUFhCTURER TYPE AND SERIAL NUMBER:

Limitorque SMB-1-25/H4BC Position A

Train - 4 Gear L't Switch See pa agraph 2.0 for na e plate data DRAWINGS SPECIFICATIONS'ested in accordance vath IEEE-344 and deta" ed OR EXHIBIT:

instructions of clien-.

~

~

QUAN.ITY OF ITEMS

~

One (1) only TESTED:"

EQU IPMEHT:

REPORT:

Unclassified Unclassified DATE TEST COMPLETED:

18 November 1975 TEST CONDUC'isa BY:

AERO NAV LABORATORIES, INC.

14-29 112th STREET COLLEGE POINT, NEW YORK 11356 DISPOSITION OF SPECIMEN:

Re urned to client ABSTRACT:

Zt is the function of the Aero Nav Laborator'es, Inc.

as an impartial test'ng agency in per orning this test, to subject he specimen to se'snic vibration of magnitude and direc=ion as spec'ed in the detailed speci ications.

PAGE 2

OF 15 PAGES UNCLASSIFIED

)

5-6" 67-5

1 t

Pro, 7/

'NCLASSrFXED

)

. FACTUAL DATA 1

0 DESCRIPTION OF TEST APPARATUS:

Vibration Machine 6 Control System, Type RVH-72-5000, Serial No. 51402, manufactured by L.A.B. Corpora-.'on.

Calibration Due:

5 March 1976 1,2 1

3

~ 4 1.5 1.6 Accelerometers, Model 2213E, Seria'os.

CP36, CP37,
CP48, LA57 and
CP43, manu actured by Endevco Corporation.

Calibration Due:

18 January 1976.

~

Amplifier, Model 2616, Serial No. CA', manu actured by Endevco Corporation.

Calibration Due:

18 January 1976.

Power Supply, Model 2622, Ser:al No.

CA24, manufactured by Endevco Corporation.

Calibrat'on Due:

18 January 1976.

Band Pass Filter, Model No.

330M, Se ial No. 2116, manufactured by Krohn-Hite Corporation.

Cal'bration Due:

26 Februa=y 1976.

True R.M.S.

VTVM, Model 320A, Se ial No. 8622, manufactu ed by Ba lantine Labs.

Cal:bration Due:

..29 Februa' 1976.

2 ~ 0 NP2.

PLA~~

DATA:

SMB-1 S/N 216677

, Orde No.

383964E Motor >> Reliance 25 ft pounds XD 8 447015-AZ H4BC S/N 216691 0 de No. 383964E, Position A PAGE 3

CF 15 PAGES UNCLASSlF:ED g 16

0 E

UNCLASSIFIZD FACTUAL DA A 3 '

HETHOD OF'EST:

The submitted specimen mounted on a baseplate supplied by Limitorque Corporation was affixed to the table of the seismic simulator in such a manner that the ax's of the H4BC stem nut was vertical.

Five (5) acceleromete s

we e

used to monitor resonant conditions of the actuator.

During the test t'e actuator was electrica'y connected to a control console supplied by Limitorque.

,C 3'.1 Resonan Freouencv Search:

The specimen was subjected to a resonant requency search from 5 to 33 Hz.

The appl'ed exc:tation 'eve',

were in accordance with Table.I.

The frequencv range was increased in discrete steps of 1 Hz and v.'brat'on

'as mainta'ned at each frequency.or a per.'od of no-less than six (6) hours.

The. above tes was pe "ormed in each of the three (3) mutually pe pendicular ax's.

Table I Amplitudes of Vibra 'on Frequency (Hz) 1 Acceleration (G

eak) 5 to 33 0.1, to 0.75 3.2 Seismic Dwell Tes ~:

Upon completion of the resonant requency search 'n a'1

axes, the specimen was subjected to a se'smic dwe test at each of the resonant frequencies noted during the resonant frequency search.

If no resonant f equencies were noted the seism=c dwell tes-was pe ormed at 33 Hz.

The acceleration levels used f'r The dwell tests s.a-.ed at 3 g's and was inc eased in 1 "g" increments un

=-'ither the 'specimen failed or the max~urn level of the vibration machine was reached.

This tes was per crmed in each of the three (3) mutually perpenc cula= axes.

.During and after each dwell in each ax-'s the spec'zen was operated.

PAGE 4

OF 15 PAGES

~

'f UNCLASSIFIZD 5-6167-5

UNCLASSIFIED FACTUAL DATA g)d, T/

4.0 RESULTS OF TEST (cont nued):

The following observations were noted and recorded during the above detailed test procedure:

0;1 Vertical Axis (Alon the HMBC S.em):

Accelerometer Locat:ons and Orienta.'on:

Input On baseplate - vertical Outputs A - Table Inpu (H2)

B - Table Input (Hl)

C - Unit Response (Hl)

D - Uni>> Response (V)

Y Z - Un't Response (H2)

PAGE

'5 OF 15 PAGES l UNCLASSIFIED 5-5167-5 ETL

~

h

~ 'tfCLASsl I-D gru. J/

FACTUAL DATA 4.0 RZ'SULTS OF TEST (cont'nued):

4.1.1 Resonant Frecuenc Search:

Freq.

(Hz) input (G's)

Outputs (6's)

C D

~ 4 5

b 7

8 9

10ll 12 3.3 14 15 16 17 3.8 19

'l Q 21 22 23 24 25 25 27 29 29 30 31 32 33

0. 105 O. 125 0 ~ 3.85

.0'40

0. 320 0 ~ 380 0'45 0.550 o.ego 0'20 1.000 1 050
0. 200 0 ~ 230

~

0.250 0.270 0.305 "0'40 0'70 0 410 0 '40 0.480 0 ~ S30 0 ~ 570 0 ~ 600 0.640 0 ~ 680.

0'30 0 ~ 790 0 ~ BSO 0 ~ 016

0. 016 0; 014 0 ~ 016 0'24 0 ~ 020 0 ~ 023.
0. 027
0. 029

'0. 036 0.052

~ 054 0 ~ 033

0. 035 0 044
0. 047 0 031
0. 037 0.047 0.053 0.054 0.052 0 ~ 05'7 0 ~ 063
0. 054 0 053
0. 047 0 ~ 054 0 ~ OSD 0'47 0.0135 0 ~ 013.
0. 014 0'155
0. 017" D. 022S
0. 037.

0 051.

0. 056
0. 064
0. 07D
0. 076
0. 023
0. 024
0. 039
0. 030 0.032 035 0.037 0 041
0. 046 0.0495 0.0545 OS O59 0 ~ 064
0. 067
0. 072 0 078 0 085 0 ~ 093 0.013 0 '13
0. 03.5 0 ~ 03.25
0. 0145 0.014"
0. 0165
0. 017
0. 023
0. 022
o. 022 O. 032 0 '25 0 ~ 030 "O.027 0.026 O.D26 0.025 0'26 0.027
0. 027
0. 031S 0.034 0'42 D.Q48

'.059 0 ~ 092 0'68 0.068 O. 084

0. 115 0 ~ 150 0'20
0. 270 0.370
0. 430 O.485 0.590 0'2D 0.860 0 ~ 920 I~ 110 0.2l 0
0. 240 O. 270
0. 300 D. 330
0. 360 0.385 0.420 0.470
0. 510
0. 560 5.600
0. 555
0. 700 o.7eo 0.810 O.BBO 1 ~ DOC D.pll 0 ~ OOB
0. 0086 0 103 D.oil 0.012 0.012 0.0117 0.012 0.017
0. 019
0. C18 0.017 O.OlB
0. 019
0. 014 O. 018 0.0 7

~ O. 03.6 O. Dl 47 Qe 0145 O. Cle O. 519 0,. 02l D. 027 0 ~ 0345

0. 062
0. 042
0. 043.
0. 05".

PAGE 6

CF lS PAGES

( VNCLASSZF==-D 5-6 6"-5

FACTUAL DATA N. 0 RKSUL'ZS OF TZST '('c'ont'inued) 0.2 Horizontal Ax"s Ah )'l'on the Hoto

'Accel'eromet'er Locations and Orienta..on:

Inbut Outputs A

On baseplate (Hl)

- Table Inpu (H2) 3 - Table Iibu (Vl)

C - Unit Response (Hl)

D - Uni Resbonse (H2)

Z - Un't Response (V)

Pp,GE '

OFl'AGES UXCLASSIm

UNCLASSXFX:.D FACTUAL DATA

/pe, rJ 4.0 RESULTS OF TEST (cont;inued) 4.2.1 Resonan~

F eauencv Sea. ch:

Frea.

(sz)

Xnput (G's)

Ou~ut:s (6's)

B C

D 4

5 6

7 9

3.0 11 12 13 14 1 5 16 3.7 18 19 20 21 22 2 3 24 25 26 27 28, 29'0'.

31 32 33

0. 087
0. 130
0. 170
0. 225 0.280 0.345 0.420 0.520 0.620 0.760 0.8SO 0.980 0.190 0.220 0.230 0.250 0.270 0.295 0'25 0.360 0.400 0.425 0.470 0.510 0.550 0.590 0.535 0.680 0.720 0.821 0.038 0.045 0.047 0.049 0.051 0.051 0.047 O.

044'.

044 0.050 0.053 0.066 0.070 0.061 0.059 0.060 o.oe3 0.065 0.045

0. 052 O. OS2 O. 050
0. 040
0. 039
0. 041
0. 046 0 ~ 047 0.047 0.044 0.045 0.0049 0.008 0.010 0.0135 0.014 0.016 0.021 0.025
0. 029
0. 036
0. 042 0.053 0.0185 0.0195 0.022 0.025 0.028 0.031 0.033 0.036 0.0395 0;042
o. 04e 0.050 0.054 O.OS8 0.063 0.067 0.072 0.082
0. 067 a.o99 0.1SO 0.220 0.280 0.360 0.430 0.540 0 ~ 660 0.770 0.890 1.100 0;190 O. 220
0. 240
0. 270 0.'310 0.340 0.370 0.405 0.440 0.47S
0. S20
0. S40 0.620 0.640 0,730 0.780 0.820 0.940 0.018

.0121 O. 019 0.023 0.026 0.030 0.028 0.025 0.027 0.049 o.aee 0.087

0. 018
0. 03.7 0.0175 O.O195 0.024 0.02S 0.029 0.032 0.036 0.039 O. 042
0. 04S 0;050
0. 063.

O.D73 0.077 0.086 0.10S 0.027 0.031

0. 033.

0.027 0.030 0.033 0.040, 0.047 0.052 0.061 O.D66 0.087 O. 028 O. 033.

0.0355 0.036 0.038 0.042 0.046 0.047 0.056 0.051 0 ~ os I".,

0. 06":

0.06 0.077 0.105 a.o83 0.083 o.o9e PAGE 8

OF 1 5 PAGES UNCLASSXFI:-3 5-6167-5

'ICLASSIFIEV

. FAC UAL DATA re, l/

l'.0 RESULTS OF TEST (continued):

4.3 Horizontal Axis (H ) Alon the H4BC Input Sha Accele ometer Locations and Or:enta.ion:

Input On baseplate - in dwection of vibration Outputs A - Table Input (Hl)

Table input (V)

Uni-Response(H2)

D - Uni

Response

(Hl)

E - Unit Response (V) h PAGE 9

OF l~ PAGES

( UNCLASSIFIED S<<o C7-"

ETL

'NCLASSXF ZD

)

FACTUAL DATA 2/d,Ã/

4.0 RZSULTS OF'*TZST (continued):

4.3 1 Resonant Freouencv Sea ch:

Freq.

(vz)

Input (C's)

Outputs (G')

C D

5 6

7 8

9 10ll 12 13 15 16

~ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 0 ~ 089 0 ~ 115 0.165 0'10 0 ~ 280 0 ~ 360 0.435 0 ~ 530

'0. 670

0. 770 0 ~ 890 l.100 0 ~ 190
0. 205 0 ~ 230 0 ~ 24S 0 ~ 280 0 ~ 310 0 340 0'70 0'95 0 440 0.461 0 510 0.5SS 0'00 0'30 0'00 0 ~ 750 0 ~ 790 0.013
0. 016
0. 0175
0. 018 0

022 D.028 0.036 0.042 O.OSD 0.057 0 ~ 063

0. 082
0. 021
0. 021 0 ~ 023
0. 024 0 ~ 025
0. 027 O. 031
0. 034 0 ~ 035 0 ~ 0385 0 041 0.052 0.047
0. 051
0. 056
o. oeo
0. 065 0 ~ 068 0, 0185 0 ~ 0185 0, 022 0, 024
0. 027 0 ~ 032 0 ~ 036
0. 041
0. 052 0 ~ 056
o. oee D. 084
0. 022
0. 024
0. 026
0. 028
0. 030
0. 034
0. 037 0 ~ 041 0 ~ 043 0 047 0 049
0. 0445 D. 057 0 061 0 ~ 066
0. 071 D ~ 075 0 ~ 079 0 ~ 076
0. 115 0 ~ 175 0.225 0 280 0 ~ 340 0 ~ 400 0.470
0. 640 0.710 O. 840 1.100 0 ~ 175 0.195
0. 225 0 240
0. 275 0 ~ 310 0 ~ 335 0 ~ 37D 0.400
0. 940
0. ~70 0 ~ 520 0 ~ 552 0 ~ 590 0 ~ 630 0 ~ 700
0. 750 0 ~ 790
0. 024
0. 027 O. 033
0. 033
0. 022
0. 056 O. 067
o. Der
0. 057 0

Do2

0. 070 O. 080
0. 027
0. 036 D. 029 0.02S 0.020 0 ~ 0165 0.0165 0.0195 0 ~ 0'8 O. 0'7 0.0185 0.018
0. 0205
0. 024 0 ~ 038 0.027 0.029 0.043 0.027 0,0245
0. 023 0'24 0 ~ 031
0. 034
0. 037 0.038 0.046 0.049 0 ~ 049
e. o55
0. 025
0. 027
0. 024
0. 026
o. o2e
0. 03"
0. 031 0 ~ 937
0. 0325
0. 033
0. 034
0. 0345
0. 037 D. 040
0. DSI
0. 042
0. 036 0.'03 9 PAGE 10 CF 15 PAGES UWC~aSSIFI=-".

6 57 ETL

UNCLASSZF1:-D FACTUAL DATA F 0 RESULTS OF-T:-ST (cont"nued):

Se smic Dwell Tes 4.4.1 Ve tical Axis (Alon the H~BC Stem):

The Seismic Dwell Tests we e performed at.33 H"

for a duration of thirty (30) seconds at each level.

The following obse vations were noted and recorded during 'the Dwell Tests:

Response

Acceleration Frequency (H"-)

33 3Q 33 33 33 Xnput (t')

3 ~ 4 4 ~ 7 5 ~ 9 7 ~ 3 8 '

Motor (V) 3.5 g's 4.9 6 '

8 ~ 0 9 ~ 4 Motor

'(H )

0.150 g's 0 230 0.330 0.480 O. 570 3.8 g's 5.2 6.6 8.2 9.6 0 ~ 29 0.38 0.43 0.55 0.62 gts 0.27 g's 0 ~ 3(

0.46 O.59 0.75 The

e. was no evidence of operational malfunction or meehan'cal damage to the specimen as a resu't o= th-s test PAGE 11 OF 15 PAGES t UVCLASSZFZ:-D 5-6167-5

1

'nCLASSIFIED FACTJAL DATA I

34ee~

tr'o, </

4.0 RESULTS OF TEST (continued):

4 '

Seismic Dwell Tests (continued):

4.4.2 Horizontal Axis (Hi) Alon the Motor:

The Seismic Dwell Tests were performed a

33 Hz for a duration of thirty {30) seconds at each leve' The following observations were noted and recorded during the Dwell Tests.

Response

Accelerat'on Frequency (Hz)

Input (G's)

Motor (Hi)

Motor (U)

U 33 33 33 33 33 0,010 g s 0 ~ 170 0'20 0.330 0.310 3 ~ 0 3.5 4.1 4 '

5.5 6+1 6'

'7.5 8.0 8.9 g

S 0.34 g's 0.70

0. 82
0. 92 1.10 0.08 g~s 0

29

0. 31 0.45 0.43 There was no evidence of. opera. iona'al unc-.'"n o

meehan'cal damage to thespecimen as a result of th's test PAGE 12 CF 15 PAGES UNCLASSIFIED E7L

i I

'NCLASSIFIZD FACTUAL DATA

.rru. </

4.0 RZSULTS OF TES (continued):

Seismic Dwell Tests (continued):

4 ~ 4.3 Horizon al Axis (H2) Alon

<<he H4Bc Input Sha t):

The Seismic Dwell Tests we e performed at 33 Hz or a duration of thirty (30) seconds at each level.

The following observations were noted and during the Dwell Tests:

Response

Accele ation recorded Frequency (Hz)

Input (G's)

Motor Motor (H )

(V)

H~

Hi V

33 33 33 33 33 2 '3.8 F 9 6 ~ 2 7.9 F 1 g s 4 ~ 3 5.6 7 '9.0 0.045 g's

0. 065 0 ~ 078 0 ~ 229 0.150 2.8 g's F 1 5 ~ 2 6 '

8 '

0. 048
0. 06S
0. 120
0. 230 0'90 g's 0.036 g<c 0 '6S 0'30

- 0'90

'0 420 There was no evidence of operat'ona" mal unction or mechanical.

damage to the spec=en as a resul= of this test.

PAGE "'3 OF 15 PAGES

( UNCLASSIFI:-D A 'A S~glg I <<0

UNCLASSZFZED

)

FACTUAL DA A 5'

VZSUAL POST TEST EXANZNATZON:

Visual. Post Test Examination revealed no evidence of any external physical damage as a result of the st ess of this test.

6 ~ O'ECO~NDATZONS:

None, data merely submitted.

7 '

CONCLUS:ONS:

Final evaluation of the subm'ted specimen for confo=rance to the requirements of the deta ed spec'cat'ons will be accomplished by Limitoroue Corporation upon review or esults reported herein and'urther examination as required.

PAGE lg CF l5 PAGES UNCLASSZ~ZED 5-5157-5

SMB-1-2S/H4BC MOTOR ACTUATOR Ik 4+j ~lgj

~

~ ~

~

SEISMIC TEST SETUP

REPORT B-0006

SUBJECT:

Seismic Testing of SMB-1-25/H4BC with Standard Cast Zron Adapter REFEREN&:

Limitorque Purchase Orde Aero Nav Test Report:

5-6167-5 Unit Zdenf'ation:

SMB-1-24/H4BC Position "A" 4-Train<<4 Gea Limit Swit@

SMB-1 Serial Number 216677 Motor Z.D. Neer 447015-AZ H4BC Serial Number 216691 Objec ive:

To perform a fragility test per ZEEE-344 on the SMB-1-25/H4BC with standard cast iron adapter.

)

Procedure:

The SMB-1 was mounted to the H4BC using a

standard cast iron adapter.

The combination was then scanned in each of the three major axis and the fragility test performed in one axis.

A new cast adapte was installed after the firs-fragility 'test and the fragility test repeated in another.axis.

After the 2nd fragility test the cast adaptor was replaced with aa new cast iron adapte and the 3rd fragility test was per ozmed in the 3rd axis.

The new adapters were used for each axis even though there was no evidence of damage to any of the'dapters du ing the seismic fragility testing.

All rotors were monitored by means of indicator

\\

lights'.

Additional contacts on the spare rotors. were wired in series with a sensitive chatter circuit to detec contact chatter.

The unit was run from an "open" position (control'ed by the limit switch) to'a closed torque out position (controlled by the torque switch) back to the "open" position duirng and after ea& of the dwells and at the.

end of the seismic qualification.

The torque swit& was set at the minimum setting and the H4BC was torqued out against the internal s ops.

Res ults:

Conclus ion:

The unit functioned properly performing all control functions and all indicating functions.

There was no indication of contact chatter or physical damage.

The unit, performed all functions and torqued out at the minimum torque switch setting with no malfunctions or physical damage during all the dwells and at the end of the seismic qualification test.

The unit is considered qualified per the ZZEE Standard 344 specification for seismic levels up to 8 g's.

Shea'ron Harris Nuclear Power Plant Draft SER Open Item No.

354 NRC Ouestion 210.52 (Valve) Requirements of, Specification 16.1g The Specification CAR-SH-M-44, Rev.

13, dated 1/28/83 states that Category 2

and 3 valves shall be capable of sustaining several types of thermal transients.

Describe the data furnished by the Seller to assure that Category 2 or 3 butterfly valves meet 16.1g of the Specification.

RESPONSE

Item 1

& 2 of paragraph 16.1g is a general design requirement for design specification prepared by Ebasco for valves.

The requirements are not considered applicable to butterfly valves and, therefore, paragraph 16.1g (Item 1

& 2) will be deleted from specification (CAR-SH-M-44, Rev. 14).

However, discussion with Jamesbury (valve supplier) indicated that Category 2

and 3 butterfly valves can easily withstand heating and cooling of 100'F/hr between 40'F and the valve design temperature.

The maximum design temperature of supplied valves are 140'F and 220'F.

(7876FXTccc)

e

2l0.52.

Ebasco Specification Butterfly Valves Project Identification No. CAR-SH-M-44 16.1 SPECIAL UIREMENTS (Cont'd) d - Valve trim shall not contain copper or copper alloy components, aluminum or aluminum alloy componerits.

e - Teflon oi other nonmetallic sealing whose properties are affected by radiation shall not be used in the constiuction of any valves installed in radioactive ser'vice.

f - Valves shall not contain pockets or other cavities where radioactive materials can accumulate g -

1 valves in Piping System Categories 1,

2 and 3 shall be desi ed. Q Q-pe SME B 6 P V Code Section IIIfor cyclic duty as follows.

Cate o

'2 and Valves in piping Cate ry 2 and 3 shall be apable of being heated and cooled at a rate ot 0

F per hour etween 40 F and the design temperature of the valve a efined the Valve T.ist.

Xn addition valves shall be capable of su i

g cyclic thermal transients as follows:

1 - Valves shall be capa of sustain without adverse effects,'

'step change in temperature of t working fluid from 40 F to 400 F

or 200 cycles during the esign life of the valves t

2 - Valves all be capable of sustaiping without adv e,effectsg a s p change in the temperature of the working flui rom o F to 40o F for 10 cycles during the design iife of valves o

~ >>c

~

The design life of all valves and accessories specified herein '"

shall be'0 years

- 1'8-

~

~

~

i i

Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Draft SFR Open Item No.

354 NRC Ouestion 210.53 Valve Report (JHA-77-99 dated 8/2/78)

Pages 2 and 3

Pages 2 and 3 are missing; please supply these pages.

RESPONSE

Page 2 and 3 are in fact the pages 1 and 2 of two pages of tabulation 828403, Rev. 2.

(7876FXTccc)

Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant J

Draft SER Open Item No.

354 NRC Ouestion 210.54 Valve Re ort, Correspondence with Specification The Report JHA-77-99 dated 8/2/78 does not use the same identifications used in the Specification CAR-SH-M-44, Rev.

13, dated 1/28/83.

Furnish a cross-index between the Specification Category 2 or 3 valves and the Report.

(It seems like there is at least one Category 3 valve in the Specification that is not covered by the Report.)

RESPONSE

The cross-index between the Specification Category 2 or 3 valves and the Report is provided in the attached tables.

(7876FXTccc)

CROSS-INDEX PONY 435082 'UESTION: 210.54 Page 1 of 5 SPEC

~

DATA SE 1/48 2/48 3/48 4/48 5/48 6/48 6/48 3537X VALVE SIZE 30" 30tt 30" 14" 14" 8tt 8"

VALVE OPERATOR Hotor Gear Hotor Gear Gear Notor Motor SPEC IDENTIFICATION (VALVE TAG NO ~ )

3S W-BlSA-1,2 3SW-B2SB-1,2 3SW-B7SA-1,2 3SM-B9SB-1,2 3$W-B105SA-1,2 3SW-B106SB-1,2 3SW"B5SA-1,2 3SW-B6SB-1,2 3SW-B13SB-1,2 3SM-B14SSB-1,2 3SW-B25SA-1,2 3SM"B26SB-1,2 3SW B21SA 1 s2 3SM-B22S8-1 D2 3SM-B23SB-1,2 3SM-B24SB-1,2 3SW-B103SA-1,2 3SW-B104SB-1,2 3S W-B45SA-1,2 3SM-B46SA-1,2 3SM-B47SA-1,2 3SM-B48SB-1,2 3SW-B49SA-1,2 3SM-B50SB-1,2 3SM-B51SB-1,2 3SM-B52SB-1,2 PRMECT IDENTIFICATION 30"-SMBOO/7-1/2-H2BC 30"-YGC-35 30"-SMB00/7-1/2 H2BC 14"-VGC-8 14""VGC-8 8" SMBOO/5HlBC 8" SMMO/5HIBC REPORT PAGE NO ~

64 40 40 25 25 46

PONY 435082 'UESTION:

210.54'ROSS-INDEX Page 2 of 5 SPEC DATA SH 7/48 8/48 23/48 25/48 26/48 27/48 VALVE SIZE 24" 30" 12" 6"

4tt 8 tt VALVE OPERATOR Gear Motor Gear Motor Hand1e Gear SP EC IDENTIFICATION (VALVE TAG NO ~ )

3SW-BUSA-1,2 3SW-B18SA-1I2 3SW-B19SA-1,2 3SW-B20SB-1,2 3SW-B15SA-1,2 3SW-B16SB-1,2 3SW-B82SA-1,2 3SW-B83SA-1,2 3SW-B84SB-1,2 3SW-B85SB-1,2 3SW-B74SA-1,2 3SW-B75SA-1,2 3SW-B76SB-1,2 3SW-B77SB-1,2 3SW-B86S 8-l,2 3SW-B87SA-1,2 3SW-B66SA-1,2 3SW-B67SA-1,2 3SW-B68SB-1,2 3SW-B69S B-1,2 3SW-B107SA-1>2 3SW-B108SA-1,2 3SW-B109SB-1,2 3SW-B110SB-1,2 PRMECT IDENTIFICATION 24" VGC-20 30" SMB00/7-1/2H2BC 12" VGC-8 6" SMB000/2-HOBC 4" Handle 8" VGC-3 REPORT.

PAGE NO 36 64 18 42 14 16 3537X

PONY 435082 ~

QUESTION:

210 54 CROSS-INDEX Page 3 of 5 I

SPEC DATA Sll 28/48 33/48 36/48 37/48 44/48 3537X VALVE SIZE 36" 8tt 10" 4 II VALVE OPERATOR Motor Motor Gear Gear Gear SPEC IDENTIFICATION (VALVE TAG NO ~ )

3SW-B70SA-1,2 3SW-B71SA-1,2 3SW-872S8-1,2 3SW-B73S8-1,2 3SW-BGSA-1,2 3SW-B301SA-1,2 3SW-B302SA-1,2 3SW-8304SD-1,2 3SW-B305S8-1,2 3CH-B5SA-1,2 3CH-86S8-1,2 3CX-B5SA-1,2 3CH-86SA-1,2 3CX>>87SA-1,2 3CX-DGS8-1,2 3CH-87SA-112 3CH-BGSA-1 2 3CH-B9SA-1,2 3CH-B10SA-1,2 3CH-B11SA-1,2 3CH-812SA-1,2 3CH-813SA-1,2 3CH-B14S8-1,2 3CH-815S8-1,2 3CH-816S8-1,2 3CH-817SB-192 3CH-818S8-1,2 3CH-819SD"1,2 3CH-820S8-1,2 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION 8" SMB00/5-HlBC

  • Not included (Note: 1) 8" VGC-3 "Not included (Note: 1)

Not included REPORT PAGE NO+

46

-16

PONY 435082 'UESTION: 210 54 CROSS-INDEX

'age4of 5

SPEC DATA SH 42/I8 2/7 3/7 VALVE SIZE 4'6" 12 tt VALVE OPFRATOR Gear Gear Gear SPEC IDENTIFICATION (VALVE TAG NO ~ )

3CX-B9SA-1,2 3CX-B10SA-1,2 3CX-B11SA-1,2 3CX-B12SA-1i2 3CX-D13SA-1,2 3CX-B14SA-1,2 3CX-B15SA-1,2 3CX-B16SB-1,2 3CX-B17SB-1,2 3CX-B18SD-1 2 3CX-B19SD-1,2 3CX-B20SD-1,2 3CX-B21S 8-1 i2

~ 3CX-D22SB-1,2 3SF-B6SB-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B20SA-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B18SD-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B1SA-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B2SB-1&4, 2&3 3SF-D5SA-U4, 2&3 3SF-B3SA-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B4SB-1&4, 2&3 3SF>>B7SA-1&4, 2&3 3SF>>B8SB-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B11SN-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B16SN-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B17SA-1,2 3SF-D17SB-3,4 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION

+Not included (Note: 1)

VGC-8 VGC-8 REPORT PAGE N00 18

  • Note (1):

These va1ves (indicate *) vere added to the subject contract (PONY 435082) after Report JNA-77-99 was submitted Report wi11 be revised to include all added valves

0

PONY 435082 'UESTION: 210.54 CROSS-INDEX Pyge 5 of 5 SPEC DATA SH VALVE VALVE SIZE OPERATOR SPEC IDENTIFICATION (VALVE TAG NO ~ )

3SF-B21SB-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B22SA-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B24SB-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B25SB-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B26SA-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B28SA-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B29SA-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B30SB>>1&4, 2&3 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION REPORT PAGE NO ~

4/7 7/7 4 tt 12" Handle Gear 3SF-B31SN-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B32SA-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B33SB-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B34SA-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B35SB-I&4, 2&3 3SF-B9SA-1&4, 2&3 3SF-BLOSB-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B15SB-1&4, 2&3 3SF-B19SA-1&4s 2&3 Handle VGC-8 14 18 3537X

Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Draft SER Open Item No.

354 NRC Question 210.55 Valve Report Dimensional Input The procedure in Report JHA-77-99 dated 8/2/78 is incomprehensible without drawings of the valves.

Furnish drawings for the valve identification on Butterfly Valve Data Sheet 5 of 48, P. 0.

No. NY-435082.

The drawings should be in sufficient detail so that we can check the dimensions used in the calculations in the Report for this specific valve.

RESPONSE

Please find attached copies of valve drawings on Valve Data Sheet 5 of 48.

These are the drawings furnished by Jamesbury to Fbasco.

Jamesbury do not release detail (shop) drawings of their product other than to an independent engineering consultant for analysis work.

However, if a specific dimension or group can be identified for a given part we can more easily comply with your request.

(7876FXTccc)

Ia I0.55 Ooa'FR(a OIF. I ICMr TAC Hoor.

ov II ID(11 ar tortr r

rt rr (

]

~MAO Q

I ~AT dg Q ILACR 8

MAX I Mi ITy Mill AI 8

ic ~15541 141 IMMcsocIAR al %II(FA~I5 4 5(1 0II11 II@.C frIcIce Ill.i IRIMC5OII~ ~

~lr.inIMIIl.

~

I~ s~oao(I.E4!g I/O D4 icv. F ar r I

+0 I r <<b Ia,(oaf 41DCD SrMR ~ 4

~to

~ \\a rra 1~0 A1 DOCD oavt 0 W 0 ICatraaW, Crn,C

~.ORIRW rll Dear' OCV h 0 RRR(D 11O4 RRICIC0 I DC@ ~ M

'E F

Q)ICT KQQ

~jraiMFC

( atr\\I\\ (oroacrl1

~r 111 tv lav r arorrI

~

D oacrrrntaoaa I 41 ~ toaaaIII, o/

~ tr

~0 IaFT AI PfP

! o' I

yc) or l2y MIII Ii.dlcf Cccc RRI F0R

~OIRR Itlv ICOv~cai '

~~

OIF OTE41aaa,g,2 f COTFIC in.toec'C~TA III~Ce bLOC fflO(ICCOdv A~I' 7+

IQ Ac.

15g

~MAO 0.

IZS Pgr~

Q.'~~dr

~

IefIX-A~II Ticow ~~isagor ccAE KK CS ISg QIA.<'.

I-CluBt29 TAPIR TIES.

Icn QQ,(,c~ir~HI RC>>

Qa APPFOXIMATE WE 0 IHOfls CV'ICF Irnr

~8:

L TMS OUTLIVE RRCCICONS IS PICTORICLLY 6

STMDOLIC Or TNE PCOOCSCT TO eE SMPPLIED. DEMS SVCN AS, QVT NOT LOATEO Toa CAIOWHEEL SPCCCES OR LOACACFE C~ICCFIATCNS MAT OR MAY Hof DEFLECT II@ KTMIL APPEARANCE Dr TIE V4LVE.THE OOIENSXOCIL OAIA PRESENTED IEREON WLL HOf OWAFE.

QF2 1$ W OIOS 5A I 2 SA t 5514 d(04 Od IIT('SA (CAO TR OC FICT4Cg(O JDAIOg 514aoaoac

~

NUCLEAR ATME SECT.III CDICH~4

~CIXICN2>>

cucs~

ALLOATA IO IAE STAMPED OII IlkNEIICIT O NtIS'T GE 0 54 MIN.NEICICT.

I ygltrIT NO.VO bC

/

~

oraC(1 SIC TA~ IIAlCMIQ

~ 4 OIICf 0I Ia 4 COSIOOI"EILKQ~IIVlCEhWI f pgfl C OOCI 4 CROCFEkELIFINT CCT.

LDA(SCO II(IIO 4 C S Qt

~ ICII4 Lnf. Rt 8 I'O HolUWXMOS NSHOgI2.$8<Op,

.Hr 5 C2yy,lfrZy".

Ttrra, QTT ~ ~ F Sd DO HOI SCAIE OAAIIIHG I(15 ooa(IFRO Rro 111 rvotwccoa conIDI(co IcM41

~RI >>I Facrc ~It IP Irc J+DIIOvtt CORF Mao MI

'101 lo M vsco IMIFI45 wcaaooallo ot 54o cocr DIII~NEERSonf W YP~IMDLafLCL3 F~a) I(+~ac.

R ALI Aloft C

1\\

Ro(1 I ~

Ioa(4 tC

~I II cc I11 bfffddblltg car j

Aaa r a II 0 wl cv~

~ ~

~.

ar I:FI %(+A II lcf'

0

TF t N

~ I 12 0

6 fat

v. ~ FF RAW RAST. I<<FR S g F 4v I ~

t lva

~.-'k D

  • PR R

6'atin PARI a

FIR T A UUSI Cf PAXEvafo

~ tA AU(LEAR 0 A PRLACAAU.

Ip I ~ )

44 I

COOT PAAI RARE UAlfRIAL aSUE Sa-ttC <<Ca

~,

~'lp

, S A

, Fr.

Zt t

INSERT AfAf 6

SAIAFI CfARI4G SPAC E R SHATI 5EAl

(

SSNOR IAIRG IG C PWNIESUOR PLAT f

~ I PRESSURE PLUG lt ARSE RI PUI I

ASIA A 36 CARCOAI sf(El Flllfo TEFLOU tl6 lf

~

51 Sf L ANSI SOG SERIES I

Alsf'I AI I SGO SERIES I

O'STU A.tlC~ GRAN <<C ~

ASIA( SA ICN I

~

I stsll AISI 300$ EFUfs I~

IUO IS U RUI IC OCR<<ASAIER Il AU(PLATE

'1.51'L.AISI SOOSERIES Sl S l AISI 1(

SERIES

~

CGA 51 ELN~R IRCPLATEO Sist l.ASst 5005f RITS

~

~

~

8 41 6

2 5

A+~~

A 21

'LSI'l AISI SGCI SERIES tl tC NO CAP SCRE W ItI:f Sll NISI SGOSERIE 5 ROA(ATOR PLAIE

.t IL alsl SMISERIE5

>> UUIHUU

'.AR CIA<<

IEf TEN AOII 11 ALGA tl AAIVE SCREW tl AlfR I TAG ROACAIUR s(ANTI<<

IARFIG Saa(ERLRIII I

AI

~ 5 AARAG OPOLEA 80 I

~a RE IIf

~ 5 RSIALLATIOII IAG fao a 51 I'I I

IINtattfaltf R IANAISTARTRAPE R 22 WAFER LIIKRT ALII g

P I

F QDUKUQ6515 K TI&f TP86 W

t IIItt Ol

'G(

Qw~lLTara FT C Wasf A Alla 1

I I

It IAFFR PRI OC CUSTOUIRS I 0 I

OAT~TL AISI~

R aLTIUIRVU SEF TffOW STLTA SCA ~ GRAOE CXItlet:

ASIU A~64 ~ GRAOC~II1(t!

Sf.sf l.atll 5'AG SERRS VIEW A-A TS i6 TO I4 t

IISTOMER CEIASCO SEPT..CS AGEIIT CAROLttta TAONSCR LIGAOTCQ PO J FIO N

IEM HOISI VNIAANO(AI IAO IIO(AI

~ +~A NUCLEAR Asgf SECT.IU

,Tfllff~~

gs ItA'A~>>

JtkR~

NN 4ON Ql~ NAAAC AA ll

. ~ A

<<affi Ayva I C Vasvf 4CO/i -i I

~ AIV

~NNNFFANF~

D 4

4 4

~

'Qaat" kP'~'lHATIE kllfl4544L!TTI4LIAlam'

Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Draft SER Open Item No.

354 NRC Ouestion 210.56 Valve Static Equivalent Loads The Report JHA-77-99 dated 8/2/78 (Page

4) cites static equivalent loads and gives the source as "Ref. 1."

Reference 1 (p.

98 of the Report) is:

"Ebasco Spec.,

Addendum F, Rev. 5, 5-19-77."

We do not find the cited loads therein.

Is the Report incorrect?

The Specification CAR-SH-M-44 (Rev.

13)

(6.) gives static equivalent seismic loads, without definition as to whether Seismic is SSE or (1/2)

SSE.

Where did the writer of the Report obtain the static eauivalent loads cited on p.

4 of the Report?

RESPONSE

The Reference 1 listed in page 98 of the Seismic Report should be the Ebasco Specification CAR-SH-M-44; Addendum F is part of the specification.

CAR-SH-M-44 Paragraph 6 specifies the static seismic loads which the valves must be designed to withstand.

The specified seismic loads are considered to be DBE (Design Basis Earthquake).

Therefore, Seller's interpretation of static seismic loads cited on page 4 of the Report is correct.

(7876FXTccc)

Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Draft SER Open Item No.

354 NRC Question 210.57 Valve Shaft, Allowable Stresses (p.

10 of Report JHA-77-99 dated 8/2/78)

(a)

Where did the 95000 (psi?) yield strength for "Type 316 ST. STL." come from?

(b)

Material to A-564 Type 630 is furnished with minimum specified yield strengths ranging from 75 ksi to 170 ksi, depending upon the hardening and/or aging treatment.

Where does the Specification CAR-SH-M-44, Rev.

13 address this treatment so that the Report can use a yield strength of 125 ksi?

(c)

Page 93 of the Report shows calculated shaft membrane plus bending stresses of up to 74000 psi. If failure of the shaft can lead to failure of the pressure boundary and if the calculated stresses are mainly due to

pressure, the calculated stresses are deemed to be excessive.

What are the calculated shaft stresses for the valve identified in Butterfly Valve Data Sheet 5 of 48, P.

O.

No. NY-435082 due to the Design Pressure of 225 psig?

What are the allowable stresses for design conditions and where are they identified in the Specification?

RESPONSE

(a)

The 316SS referenced is per OO-S-763 condition B which has a yield of 95000 psi.

The shaft material was later changed to ASTM A-564 type 630 H1025.

(See approved outline/assembly drawing).

The yield is higher for A-564 than OO-S-763.

(b)

The Specification does not specify detail requirements of all materials used to fabricate the valves.

The Seller had selected A-564 Type 630 H1025 as the shaft material as indicated in the valve assembly drawings (sample attached).

Therefore, the use of 125 ksi yield strength is appropriate, per ASME material specification (A-564 type 630 H1025-Yield stress 145,000 psi).

(c)

The 14" valve with SMB-000/2HIBC Actuator was deleted from the contract and is not applicable.

However, the stress shown is for a design pressure of 225 psig and qualifies shaft for the item on data sheet 5 of 48 with gear actuator.

The valve shaft is not a pressure retaining part by ASME Section III Code and the actual allowable stress is per the AISC manual of steel construction or 0.9 x Sy of 145000 130500 psi, hence a

76X safety factor on allowable.

(7876FXTccc)

Ll SO>(22 II'I

.4 I

f, I

~

~

~

~ ~-

~

~ <<~tt~~~ sir v rsspr 2

2 l

A SCC SIIT I Ol' 0

/

CARI~

O'IT SIAICAIRL I

I

~

~

s

'I' I

1 I

J

~ I 29 4

It P

4 4(

6 2

S 3

I3 0

21 42 IG Ie IS

~ I

~t ec sse5(RI WAF(R SssAf I 5( AI SMAFI S(AasssG SPA( E R SHAfl 5f Al coMOR(5ssoM AsseG (OsesR(SSSOH PlAIC PRt SSVIS(

PlVG HS(AI frM

~ltOG(

Pssl seM IIVI GCARASs4R M(R*I(

IO PSCR(W SSDSCAIOR PlAI(

syt SCRfw SsDs( ~ IOR I(ssesl( R ARsseG SPA((R SV51ALLATIOse rls5 CU510hlA 1AG I

ASIM A tII ORAOG yeG(S I

AS(II A 16 CARS(fe Siftl I

AS(M A OSI Cf I

AS M A 56A,GRADf 650 H IOI I

FILL OIFO I

sassMsss ssesAFs esssa I

5151L AISI SCOSERICS OCSAFR SAT IR el 51' IOO S(RIES I

ASIM A.tl6 GRADE WCR I

AS(M~IO(r

'GA IS

~

I 51 51 l AISI SOO 5(RICS ASrN A 55A CRAPE C'lO selO15 t

CARS(fe Sl((L CAR R ISMC (SAR

~

CAISSGM '51((l CAASSS sSSG llAl

~

CAASOSI SlffLCFROR IFSC I

ALUIIIMVIr l6

51. SIL.AISI SGG 5(RIES I

I Slg AISI XIOSERIES t 'il SI l Al$ 1 SDO SEAS( 5 I

CARSON 5'I I

ISFLOII I

I\\FLOM I

5 seIAIsseR RlrsrfAssf Pef(R I

'lr. s

~ Assi soo I Spsls I, ~

~,I 2 la. 57 PUSCPMgII t(SASCO SERvCtS~AG(ut e sSS MAs s

PO J AO

%w esses esressA

~

~

R Ss

~

~..

IS 16 (D

(4 9

IEI( kQ 1(E Usr(res '.C.I(IN Np(g TAG NO(5)

M psst y~yg PGI<<I'~LL C

. D R 284OS-I7 r

A

Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Draft SER Open Item No. 354 I

NRC Ouestion 210.58 Valve Hydrostatic Tests The Specification CAR-SH-lf-44, Rev.

13 (8.2) gives hydrostatic test requirements for nuclear safety class valves.

(a)

DoesSection III require a hydrostatic (body) test of 1.5 times the design. pressure?

If not, what is your interpretation of the Code hydrostatic test requirements for butterfly valves?

(b)

Specification 8.2a:

Is the pressure rating of lOOF the same as the Design Pressure?

If not, what is the pressure rating of lOOF?

Provide a

sample record of the performance of the seat tightness test.

RESPONSE

(a)

Yes, hydrostatic (body) test is required.

Each valve shall be given a shell test at a gage pressure no less than 1.5 times the 100F rating, rounded off to the next higher 25 psi (1'ar) increment.

(b)

Not necessarily.

The design pressure and temperature must fall within the allowable pressure/temperature rating Tables of ANSI B16.5 or B16.34, whichever is applicable, if one adopts the use of the ANSI Class rating.

Hence, since 225 psig at 40'F falls within the 150// ANSI Class
standard, the hydro test should be (per ANSI 16.34 for SA 216 WCB) 285 psi 8 100'F x 1.5 427.5 psig and then upgrading to the nearest increment of 25 gives a test pressure of 450 psig.

Note:

Sample record of seat tightness is attached.

(7876FXTccc)

0 II,P, t

e, ~

4~

erj v m'y~

~

vafffy Assurartce Deparlment

Q Check assembly drtavrfng revision letter vtffh Engfneerfng Servfces (Sfueprint Room) fnsp. Record revfsfon'etfer of pressure retaining parts~ and ver ffy vrfth Engineerfng Setvfces.

fnsp, 6.

Record pressure retaining part fnformaffon. ff fncompfete calf Q.A.E, Part No, 29 "2 Rtmtv. C Hoof Cocle/Sirfaf < Heat No. 09 - lJ 34 7. Check ports 8 materfafs against order fhSp e Assembler I 5 X s t~~ S.C! r 8. Assemble complete per'SN~QRev. + tb 8/P sbttnwSD SBASCO ttetsttsll ptt ~ rS QV l l'l ~ 0 ~ m swami tlASCd VOA 8$ 'L Assembler NY 435082 1/preps' CIuglity Assurance, Department Jamesbury Corp. a ~g, 5 NUCLH V/orcester MA Quaffty Assurance Form N,Q,A ~ Form No, 202 D te; 4/24/79 Rev. H Sht,2 of 4 Tfttes Nuctear/Pro sects Products Quolfty Checkffst " Yafve Ssrfaf No. 9. Hydr ostctt c/tseeeesoslcyest per JSN7~ Rev,~ Bod Chick that tester ls on Qual( ffed Valve 7esters Lfst. Q,A. Rep. (2) Check that nuclear pressure gages are usecf ancf are in caltbratfon. Gage No. PGN>> Test Pressure l~<~sfg Tfme

mfn, Leok te Tester~

stnessed by: Q, ep. A ~ e ~ r.. Cushxler ~y gr All valves over 4" its. Hydrostotlc Test/ttecoseetic Test'tser JSN I> Sev. loafer /he'll /~Check that tester fs on QuolfAecf Valve Testers Lfst Q,A,Rep. (2) Check thof'uclear pressure gages ore used 'and are in CallbrOtfOn. Gage NO, lsGN-(K I'&la v Tfme Snfnv/~e ~ Leak te Tester Vifltnessocl byeQ eA o po All valves over 4" ANl Customer - rS'- yS'9p ~ I I R C) CL ') ll. r4serrsble Topworks 3'&0 Tester C.A. p. Custofne r ~ SVS fVyCO IT ctfono Assabf or 12. HydrostcHc/ysosssosrttc Test tsar JSN~A5 Rev. Seat 1 Check thot tester fs on Quofffled Volvo Testers Lfs. Q.A. Re p. (2) Check that the pressure gage used fs fn col fbroHon. Gags No. GPtsJi L Tflbe rhno ~c. 8" jt'-8 SS ys'.. ~ ~ ~ I~ ISASCO VodtItt'V43K>B~ e Seee ~ ev ~ ~ ~ ~ $ <~93QC1 S c;t'Y:."t5ag a~et Qi"c Hy8r~st:otic Xt:~tie~~ . $ Q)J?l}tc= Al otiQu . SQPE.: . '. 4~vfc; ~'p~exo Vak'weft o .X;0 n..;.":.;T..s.m'."- CC:.Oa>O-. io +eo tie 0 ya o% lac asswibly'A%11.bc: @(van a scat,

sea1, ra8 c>'fc r t5.C tl'Ca 0 743 VO XC-OCtQCt17SQ dC'0~1>>'0 (C ~ tj ~ ) i151VD1C ~
lcLvtor, c".c.ctr5.c c-. t.
arm~";t

"- a, to".Lo") Fa b .:itn t?:" -if.".Xva s!:a13. ltc $.:i~t."X1t.6 t.-..".-c 5v."t c) fc:=,=. ds.lVC0 Q l.~05 t~ CD8 C.l 900 g &~iQ' CQ <C a>~ SPt. j:Lro. t ~5? ..: 5sspc=t:t?.:~ vU'"v {t't;c) Sc-.."c:- -;-. @coact::.ct." X~ e.L~:C.( tCt 9 O'XT'g 3Z fl.C32 'L't' eu8~" gL C>> ~ KBASco SF~AyM'c': Paplo.pe cgrg 0 le ~~;pi c e; 6~ . NNQ r- ~ eo, ~ ..:-:='... =;.::::.,:>,~.,rj, -;:. ~;.. G z~o. "\\ r ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ o ~ ttro<e~4~4 -0 ltghak ~ Cable JSN T35 app>8 Mi - ~ ':::: ': '. '" '.:"': Bpg'~t:og X/24/78 ÃHi~Ti~e.iKgHOTXPl ~ v ~ 0 ~ r:EV. eAVC ~ ~ This Oscu;.e't;: ~v:~~ Q tigIygggag~ ~ ttttgCe Isa4a.tt.~ aD yegg, fÃlTF.: ~we of tit~ ~ Wt CSSIOttvo CtlrVet&0 e0 Se W'~ ~ tl "O"0-. tetf oct h ee w~ ~ W. ~c"~ tortrttly 00 +~ 00' ~ g.% ~L.~ ankara r~'+'.l% ail laCOji~ LJ. ' oa'tiSo: e~; t DALAI:.~4~~ ~t j5 E,I p,(jan-,j ~ ) oooo'wP ) Q+QC) tp %l leo Qgg j:p e,t st w 'o20T eerie C + j g govern ie3 0 0 0 o g Qe'$>>J0 j c lpga ~'f o ie Q vase ool 3 fre+i ~ 0 ~

eel,

~ oo ~ o go ~ log] e ti}oe 4 '0J! )00 +g Q'il'S f g Q QQ Q foO C2

hag'.s:.:t rc Sit. cÃsix c-1'".'~~=8-'->'. '

C7 'Q ~ 1 g t g. c ~ ~ c'rg 0 t e I I'I !.OtX i0'OA (vtQ ',O'0 'Oa ISO mlsO MNM Al& OCl HA iO Irma. e 0 ~ 0 e f', ~ ~ ~ ~ y If S~Q0 ooi ~ oo o ~ \\ eoC10~4 Qeo AC 4~ 0<+ 0 oq ~ 'Ye-L.V

g. t.rf. >>C::. S'-:.~isa-"'

i:- tO l e'4 ie "~G j I, e>>- o ~ ~e~gof 0.g g C-g~ i ).Coign t'ai 00gq< 4~( r 't C l ~o~~e o.: ~e.it To.ot ~ ~ jaCf g g( ) gpeto'fig Ce titt ~ tC Iti Q l' ~ ) Q'Q+ 3 4 topi Xalg ~ t tl ~ g )lrl pg>$ y tr.< ~) CigJ,Q Q.C $ C~ pit'tt L't &18r.CCtCfe ry S0 I' eif" vcr'c; ~><a lie'>'>"t'jt-~~t..tc: 3...y t:t-ptctc1, F1>.V 0 0 i 0 gory ei ert -..::~ S.tl ~$ Lt. t.~ g,ppL~c"*t )c: c'":--.:-Q- $-6-' Xtc. Lz7-"" i~zfgc~.<<.hatt ~ litt.'L'j.'i~ f.- 4:0 bC.e'>s) '- - 'C' i>r,t3 lw RXCi.t'" 'st ~<'1 4 +Ps t~ tb1c.c ( g) t:<>'>>: to i'<st Ll,. gt.- t;;~i-'~ g j>'cp',fc J 000 oelieoeeaa ~oe000 ~ae vaoveee0 Pc>':6 ~. ~t'>> '4 I.C lt>h. ft 1't> All laity Qti~>Yt 0Sot4 .f.(>0"."it.".g"-> E > L~-"~W tt:F. Tl.'" f iiQPEtP'r hatt,aAf t;<J'fi'Y pose,, g,itP '<'" t!;iY "~as 0 ~ <<i pig'~Z:y .4 hg 0 f, Q I~ ~,, ~ ~ ' 'r'.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0. <,.;" ~ o g '1 F I I C~ ~<< P<<r<<0 Plea)) j i<<too<<'l <<1<<o ~ k( h.l ~ l<< $<<hf ) ~ ~ ~ <<\\ A<<'l<<> 4!)L <<lea7 , ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- Slg

Sa'ct hand D3rc Hydro"'t'ctLH. TcstXaj JSN-T35 Rev.

D.'-xz~.ute c,u tio>):Elafcr Ssharc Valves 0 8 ~ ~ ".- ',R.0 CYCLE TMT (co:>ttnua8$...':-... -'=-"-..:- -.-;~'"='" ".'-: ~-.-'-~ '"=' I ~ ~ . seated. and to'emo"trate that tha v"lv'c @trodi can ba .'"-'.:~~" acco.-pli bc8 vithovt.ga11ia or bhc'5 " ~ For ptnrr-opcrptcd v-1vys.'ki ch ectti-.~s cn8 o4bcr'-'.-.'-,=.~;,. uccesso=ics sheik ba verified to be ia acorn'~ace+i b 'op -rat5n~ aequi c'esi n requirm nts ~ 3.0 NJ)T Al J 3QHC N'.BBO a'TXC PAT PjiQCE iQPZ . 3.1 Pit.h vc1vc.. f-. i3.osad position, fi13. iwceyt s$ c'c oS: 1:hs .valve <+8: voter, es itin.. thc reaov=l c". ar~ contr"-p-;.-c ei-, anQ "- u-he '~a occced-n c vita ""L~c X.'Rema= to the aseeri)Xy c:rw~~~ to esteblis" the cc=-a t NST. xetia" and shaft eater-al. SBc t,~s a ~ e~f a. I'-"'1 80Fil 409 Sc.ries P I'o45 )8."G~, Hcd C.I ~ >Obey C:eric s D &+I~ t ee<<<< g)+<<t <<l ~ $<<o +<<<<+i) ol): grani~ ~ ~ . J '.4 ~<<8+g 31u p;-i " 3 0 p~i 310 r<<s $4fI t.n:

g. ~~t I e +%

~ 8"cH. 1I 4 pii <<w~c ~. ii..J fj j<<<<<<gw ) ~<<J )4am ~ 310 pvi~ <<10'.: I3 Op 310 p"i~ f)<<~ 3:.d p.-~i / ~ 3 '0'. ~e y ga g<<>> W<<l ~ Q s<< <2'"..~p ct X'== s.".t Xe&."Zo-t) i'"CC ~>4..~C."/". '"-.~.'~ '.:.-S.".. '.= {Se= t V~~t~ Te<O. ) <<ge (i<<<<<<<<>>e ~ <<'%14m+ <<<<<<<<C l<<q, <<Ot ae r e<<>> ~ 40 <<~ ~ A Slw<<>><<4 so<< l<<QJ<<ls ~l ~ ~ <<<<mao bo<<<<<<<<<<) <<<<T ~ ~ ~ <<<<W o<<~<<<<Ls ~ ~ << ~ >><<o<<<<<<<<fg<< ~QQ ~ 4<<<<$<<$ <<<<$<<Af il\\ 4++<<<< ~ ~ 'l <<<< ~ t<<fy<<L<<1oAL<<<<V<<<<<<<<<<4 ~ <<P4 <<<<4<<<< ~ <<<<0 ~<<5 <<>> <<4 ~ ~ o 1<<>> lo 5 c " 'L'lgiz tl << t l valve ~.e ~ + '. ate:c'c c'4 t'ressvrc eh"jl I)c: eau"c fur r ~ac:o>>. 3.~.2 1,'~ a'X).ic e:".' ~c.".".."..-,r.'a t:.. $:.~ c::c:.=.. c:. t=.".. para ).t).B bc.iz'v . 5.".):<t'r'Q".. av. tl; v~3v:: is '-:)can.=r.d tc th ec.".- gy~~g.v:z: t.i)~L, ~ ~ Pal~fQ ~hvvv ei vk ~.h'>> h 1,-. I $i,~ w PZa, z'P'. ~, ~ I 1 1 ~ ~ 1 c.Qjpropthtic Testi&p", 48~ ~~~ Rev'nst.e c'uratXan) 'Vafer-Sphere Valvce -.-" 'I, ~, '.'..'3.3::kcccoti.ace/Tlclectfon C XtcriiV Seat Vest eontinuel ~-::.".~~"'-"-:. '.'Va1ve'SX"..e:

Allot"hie Xc.a~aFe rate 3M

>fi~ peart Prg~pQ e ~ --.-.:..'..-=.,R--;.:-.-.-. =-.; '.=.-"4 ".:.", -;;. '....": 60 ml/min" ~ ': - "-'":" '""".-.-;. ';. 60 alImin.;.. -'i""8" '. .. ',V5 alIain.:-" h

.3.4 5 pre surL~e @+8.c'nn melvc: ef aeter,

-end dry with 8~ end clc-.an ca~zessec'ir or any vitro"cubi ga ~ '3.5. Acce>>t'~rc" jR~ii.et~a,. Crater~~ (Bise'B:ci'-c ".'tr.t~c Tc st> '3o5o 1 Faciriove the VR~vc he tKc test vv'ixcDre 4 n8 enwQB?L the dec.' ~ v hemic "$xns of =-e..ov~iioz dna/or cracker~ sha3.'L he cause So xc.'~c.c.":oa l~~.if @VENT e hue eh a 1 Clean tap ~"ter at e temperature mat to czcecB 120cI'iath 10'f. L:- volu.-.e od 832527 rust ~ni.ibitcr g;"~itc & Sa~lc~y Co., Sorcc:~ter shks~ ') caile11 bc LQeC ~ W ~ ~ 4 ~ hv r~% ~\\+A h ~ h l vl 'IAW ~ I. 1'age 3 cf 3 ~ ~ ') ~ Nvhv;~ ~ )TIvg I I, l ~ l )} 1,vvhh hvv N ' h \\', Ivv~11 'I I ~ ~ ' vv ~ I ', 0 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Draft SER Open Item No. 354 NRC Question 210.60 Pi ing Specification (CAR-SH-M-30, Rev. 16), Corrosion and Erosion Allowances Where are corrosion/erosion allowances specified? If not specified, how are the requirements of NB/NC/ND-3640 evaluated?

RESPONSE

The corrosion or erosion allowances for calculating the piping minimum wall thickness are currently not specified in the Ebasco Specification CAR-SH-M-30, General Power Piping.

However, an additional thickness to provide for corrosion or erosion was considered and is included in the wall thicknesses/schedules specified in the Ebasco Line List.

As stated in ASME-III, subsections NB/NC/ND-3640, the corrosion and erosion vary widely from installation to installation.

While there are no code recommendations for a "specific corrosion/erosion thickness,"

allowances of 0.080" to 0.150" for carbon steel and 0.0025" for stainless steel materials is considered throughout the industry as an "adequate tolerance."

The pipe wall thicknesses/schedules specified on Shearon Harris Project are based on the equations specified in ASME-III, NB/NC/ND-3641.1.

After considering the mill tolerances (12 I/2% for seamless pipes and 0.010" for the plate pipes),

and additional thickness of 0.080" to 0.150" for CS pipes and 0.0025" for SS pipes is considered for corrosion/erosion.

It is noted that the corrosion/erosion allowance used on the Shearon Harris Project is not unique for each piping system, material grade, pipe size or water chemistry.

Rather, a generic allowance (in the range of 0.080" to 0.150" for CS and 0.0025" for SS) is added to the calculated minimum wall.

This is generally accomplished by selection of a commercially available wall thickness/schedule which exceeds the minimum calculated wall thickness by 0.080" to 0.150". (for CS pipes) or 0.0025" (for SS pipes).

We shall revise the M-30 specification to indicate that the wall thickness/schedule specified in the Ebasco Line List includes the tolerance for corrosion/erosion.

During the August 16, 1983, meeting with NRC in Bethesda, MD, a question has been raised regarding the "adequacy" of minimum pipe wall for the 48" Service Water lines (7SW48-312 and 7SW48-313).

Our further evaluation revealed the following:

Min. wall calculation per Code equation assumes the weld )oint efficiency

~

~

equal to 1.

This is justified by use of a plate pipe with 100%

radiography (ASTM A-155 KC 65, Class 1).

(7876FXTccc)

NRC Question 210.60 (cont'd)

Considering 0.140" corrosion/erosion allowance (the established range is 0.080" to 0.150")

and 0.010" mill tolerance, the min. required wall is 0.371".

The selected wall is 0.375".

We are enclosing a copy of our calculations pertaining to these Service Water Lines.

In general, the piping systems constructed from a carbon steel plate material, assume a weld )oint efficiency equal to 1.

This is based on the fact that the specified material specifications do require 100% radiograph examination.

Refer to the individual pipe codes in Appendix A of Specification CAR-SH-M-30.

As stated

above, the Ebasco specified pipe wall thicknesses do meet the Code requirements.

(7876PXTccc)

~v

~

~

~

(g,/0 EWSCO SERVICES JNCORPORA'TED CALCULATIOil COVER SlKET CLIENT PROJECT

..A FO<<=;. h L:~:-T COUP~

&Cv.~COO fH-NUTS Q Q 5 4 4 OFS NO. CAR-6418.~33 SEPT NO.

>36=M'UBJECT

~

~

ER Vi'CC gad.<-~C f'r~'~ g4'

~F'iCn'E. -.

~

ChLCULhTZON NO. 'VI vp+LrnCu NQlBER OF SHEETS PROBLRf jil<<ipy viDrvci icy oF 7Ja'x zd Ti/ic<

-+<c.~--.c~

. Fo~

d~~~.~

n/~~+<@'~R f>>r~ r~r <.

~Fey g go+

~eFg/jf 0

CtD iP Pfd'C'+Viod'

~

~<p'57~he,

~

~

FgpecJ-SH Vp.>Z Sy<~g>.~

jjl!<lb DAT JH DATF O

P4 O

NO!iJ CALCIIMYION NY CMCC RED Nv RL'V)L>ED OR APPROVED I'RELIMAARY FINAL

$ 01'Er" EDES CALC NO.

~ ~

~ ~

~,

y I

v 4 lg,, I

' 'vvl ~4vrvl44,<<! vrlllrrvpt4I r4 v R

)

~

'BASCO SERYlCES IHCORPORATED IT CVC d'ATK~b J~?~

p/i, C a

,,,+a UIll(96 CI IKHT EIIEET OP r ea r o ~ o r.r p OKI'T.

OFE EO P

~

~ miKCT gIIIIyKCT arg

~p//

Cr iyaa MCEIr7 ~ WaIVS / <Wd

+VAN 2 iCtE,Pv 8

.CW7E<rA Js wade 7$icr PrF"5 /5 seed err-"rd'o Fbr ALL &<uE DrA~d'.~~.

/ iripic (zo 0 D.Ii.Iirccez) lpi 7QE sert'/ce Wslhc~.ya7'/

. -.p:/.

Cfdr-uC4 fzo4 i=zA~r4d'S 7 QZr"r'$7' P. $+ccir4gdc

+or y~

rice (0'8 "o.ao) 7o relairy 7@ye paD cpurc'j-Dr/'

DÃpz gpAr4$44 +prep 7'aPd'Pr~~

spec)/rcw7r~d

/5 A.7a.>

Al8'5'C 6<

caaca Z riEEO ggaeeroloe 7aye Iloihigiyue>ia,'rl

~dZo don'f d<FIC r+Cy rs ZOO Z.

gd+C/.d-~'Cd.

Pipwg /WC Z/~7 (S'Xa +- nX JZC '-g~'7g'I gCVtS C-WdC ~2 SW -p pyr,'CL 7jjicrrrES

~~/ <<fc.

r,r CODeo Ia

<<tspiDwrD-ply oi r55VE:

4a /15/pZ

/+ST ZZf.] Woe +'oa W~X,y pier ~ "

Ddj'C cr r>-IrE/Tr Ac'M+orI jerryJ (nJQO)

Q'oR

~A&ij'PS. P..'<'~'~

I J

4) KEuc 7o F lg yDe 'precdg

<zwpp Q ~- (jul(

437a. n 8klgg: SdE<F g gg;wCgca.

S~uw~zy or Pd'S AS

rtr err rj'vt-r~-

~ --- ~.

SYSTEM 6'<Vir d' 5 C LINE DESIGNATION NO.

P DESIGN PRESSURE, PSIG T

DESIGN TEMPERATURE, F PIPE SPECIFICATION 8 GRADE E

AI.LOWABLESTRESS, PSI rxrF /

ZF /

/5S'4'o 2&CO 6C'c c'Iran 5 c Pcs r D 9 OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE, IN.

C 9 ALLOWANCE FOR MINIMUMSTRUCTURAL STABILITY y

COEFFICIENT m <<MINIMUMPIPE WALLTHICKNESS, IN. (See NOTE 2)

NOMINALWALLTHICKNESS> IN (See NOTE 3)

AzF /

((WZaS) rr S a.O.

C. ZZ/

A

o. ZZ/

rf o.

u'SC...)

FIRST STANDARD SCHEDULE THICKNESS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN SCHEDULE (CORRESPONDING TO ts )

~rt&Bt~SELECT ED o.s 5

o. 87$

ID INSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE, IN. fSee NOTE 1)

C ALLOWANCE FOR MINIMUMSTRUCTURAL STABILITY y

COEFFICIENT m <<MINIMUMPIPE WALLTHICKNESS> IN ~

(See NOTE 2) tn

~ NOMINALWALLTHICKNESS, IN.

(See NOTE 3) s

~ FIRST STANDARD SCHEDULE THICKNESS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN SCHEDULE (CORRESPONDING TO s)

Use either of the following equations to determine m:

BASED ON OUTSIDE DIAMETER BASED ON INSIDE DIAMETER (see NOTE I)

PxD C~A Px ID+ 2SE

+ 2 PC + B 2 (SE+ Py) 2 (SE + Py-P)

C w Allowonce lor minimum structural stobility gCrgr Orred

/CrO)nrwAr m 0.065" for 1>r2 to 3 1/2 inch nominal pipe siss SD. r'4o (A'd'F. 4) m 0.000 for 4 Inch nominol pipe siss arid lorger SEo Maximum ollowabl ~ stress in material due to intemol pressure ond joint eHiciency, ot the design temperature, psi.

B m.038" for pipe ordered to specified machined I.D. with topered backing ring ond extruded pipe specified by I.D. with tapered backing ring.

m.000" for the obove pipe with flot bocking ring or other types of pipe with any Design Guide M-4 backing ring.

y o A coefficient having valves as fallows:

(See NOTE4)

TEMP. F Ferritic Steels Austenitic Steels 900 AND BELOW 0.4 0.4 950 08 0.4 1000 0.7 0.4 1050 0.7 0.4 1100 1150 Ah>D >0095 D.7 0,7 0.5 0.7 NOTE 1 - Use moximum possible inside dlhxnerer with oll its toleronces on woll thickness and outside dh'omerers, except for pipe ordered to specified mochlned I.D. and extruded pipe speci%ed by I.D. where note 8, paragraph 4 of Design Guide MNE45 gowhns.

NOTE 2 The pipe woll thickness rehlvired for o given pressure-temperature cond>rien increases os pipe sise increases.

NOTE 3 For seamless pipe vse ~8)S i(or ony cise ol plare pipe, odd 0.0)0 inches to the calculated m to obtain rn ~

<<.8)S

'OTE 4 <<The value of y moy be ihrrerpofored between 50 F volues shown abovm For 59onfenous materials rxld cost iron vse y ~ 0.4.

GENERAL NOTESr See Design Guide MNE-6$ Pipe Line Sizing for specific In%%drmarlon.

CLIENT P

ST ATIOII OJECT bY CHECKED ArPrt=t' h>>CC>I DATE s

I STANDARDIZED WORK SHEET PIP E WALLTHICKHESS AHD SCHEDULE DETERMIHATIOH EBASCO SKRVICKS INCORPORATED MECHANICAL-HUCLEAR EHGIHEERIHG APPROVED 626 16/7 72 ls lh~ c 50v 5 s 0 x 5 DATE WORK SHEET MN E.WS.16

interoffice Correspondence TO F. Heyden DATE August 18, 1983 OFFICE LOCATION 87/2WTC I

OFFICE LOCATION 88/2WTC SUBJECT SHEARON HARRIS SERVICE WATER PIPING - CORROSION ALLOWANCE I have reviewed the information you provided concerning water chemistry> and coatings to be provided for the sub)ect piping.

Corrosion allowance depends on a number of factors including water chemistry, temperature, velocity, etc.

In this case, calculation of corrosion allowance is complicated by the initial presence of a protective coating.

I presume the coating will not be maintained, otherwise there would not be a need for any corrosion allowance.

J. Pirtel, Ebasco coatings expert, informed me that the specified coatings, Plasite 1000 primer and Plasite 7122 topcoat, could be expected to deteriorate 25X in five years.

There are a number of indices one may use to calculate, from water chemistry parameters, approximate corrosivity of a specific water.

Based on the Langelier Index, the Shearon Harris service water is relatively corrosive.

Corrosion rate for most soft (that is.to say corrosive) fresh waters falls in the range 0.002-0.006 in/yr.

An average corrosion rate of 0.004 in/yr could reasonably be assumed for the Shearon Harris ~ater.

Based on a 40 year service life and deterioration of the initial coating as discussed

above, about 0.140 inch-average wall thickness loss could be expected over the life of the piping.

CHcC:51 cc; J. Pirtel

Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Draft SER Open item No.

354 NRC Ouestion 210.61 Pi ing' ecification (CAR-SH-M-30, Rev. 16), Out-of-Roundness In 12.01a and 12.02a, there is a requirement:

"The degree of out-of-roundness shall be such that there will he no decrease in flexibilityor increase in stress over the allowable stress for the design conditions."

(a)

How is assurance obtained that this requirement is met?

(b)

Is an increase in flexibilitypermitted?

(c)

What is the "allowable stress for the design conditions" ?

RESPONSE

(a)

The tolerances specified for bends in Paragraphs 12.01a and 12.02a in Part Two of Specification CAR-SH-M-30 are incorporated in Southwest's bending procedures and the bends furnished by Southwest are checked for compliance with the applicable procedure.

The bending procedures which have been approved for use on the Shearon Harris Project are:

PROCEDURE NO+

REVISION SUPPLEMENT 4-106 4-107 4-108 4-109 0

0 0

0 A copy of the above listed procedures is enclosed for your convenient reference.

(b)

An increase in flexibilityis not permitted.

(c)

"The allowable stresses for the design conditions" are the stresses from ASME III, Appendix I for a specific pipe material grade and corresponding temperature specified in the Ebasco Line List.

Paragraphs 12.01a and 12.02a will be revised as follows:

"cross section without buckling or undue stretching of pipe wall.

Out-of-roundness at pipe bends shall not exceed 6 percent."

In addition, Westinghouse will be advised about the 6% out-of-roundness allowed in Southwest Fabricating pipe bends.

(7876FXTccc)

pr~, <(

Qg 1

hf 4 ~ 4 t

I g I

$ f

\\'I

~ 1)

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18018A815&oldid=5041491"