ML18018A786
| ML18018A786 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 10/05/1983 |
| From: | Mcduffie M CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| LAP-83-458, NUDOCS 8310120180 | |
| Download: ML18018A786 (16) | |
Text
DOCKET 05000uoo 05000401 NOTES:
'REGULATORY~ FORMATION DISTRIBUTION BY~M (RIBS)
~A, ACCESSION NBR)8310120180 DOC ~ DATE: 83/10/05 NOTARIZED:
NO FACIL;50-000 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Planti Unit 1E Carolina 50-401 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant~
Unit 2~ Carolina AUTH'AME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MCDUFFIE,M.A, Carolina Power 8 Light Co, RECIP ~ NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DENTONPH ~ Rs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulationr Director
SUBJECT:
Forwar ds response to request for addi info re 'dr af t SER open items re reevaluqtion of PMPiplant area water accumulation 8
adequacy of electric distribution sys voltages.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
B001S COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:.
TITLE: Lice'nsing Submittal:,PSAR/FSAR Amdts 8 Related Correspondence'ECIPIENT ID COOK/NAME NRR/DL/ADL NRR LB3 LA INTERNAL: ELD/HDS1 IE/DEPER/EPB 36 IE/DEQA/QAB 21 NRR/DE/CEB 11 NRR/DE/EQB 13 NRR/DE/MEB 18 NRR/DE/SAB 2Q NRR/DHFS/HFEBOO NRR/DHFS/PSRB NRR/DS I/AEB 26 NRR/DSI/CPB 10 NRR/DSI/ICSB 16 NRR/DS I/PSB 19 NRR/DS I/RSB 23 RGN2 EXTERNALB ACRS 41 DMB/DSS (AMDTS)
LPDR 03 NSIC 05 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
3 1
1 2
?
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
3 6
6 1
1 1
1 1
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR LB3 BC BUCKLEYgB BNL(AMDTS ONLY)
FEMA REP DIV 39 NRC PDR 02 NTIS 01 IE FILE IE/DEPER/IRB 35 NRR/DE/AEAB NRR/DE/EHEB NRR/DE/GB 28 NRR/DE/MTEB 17 NRR/DE/SGEB 25 NRR/DHFS/LQB 32
" NRR/DL/SSPB NRR/DSI/ASB NRR/DS I/CSB 09 NRR/DSI/METB 12 NRR RAB 22 ILt 04 R
/MIB COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
0 1
1 1
1 1'
1 0
1 1
2 2
.-1 1
i 1=i 1
0 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 0
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED; LTTR 53 ENCL 46
I ~ I@1 W
I i,f ft rl f (h
I ~
l Wlw 1
C f ~w'1
'Ifwf r
IP f
>I" C "'I Pl'Cp pp ra w r" f fli C
pl pp O'
lr1 liwwl P NI Cf I y'0 QCP C
Ptw
~W~~ W%~ ~~~~~'iifP
'PP
'I I,
Ieli I
fwk il 1
'q=l W
l r,
fww wh Pi WP, J www PI
- CIGAR, Carolina Power 8 Light Company OCT 05 1983 SERIAL:
LAP-83-458 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT NO.
1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS ~ 50-400 AND 50-401 RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Denton:
Carolina Power
& LLght Company hereby transmits one original and forty copies of additional information requested by the NRC as part of the safety review of the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant.
The enclosed responses relate to Draft Safety Evaluation Report Open Items.
The cover sheet of the attachment summarizes the related Open Items addressed in the attachment along with the corresponding review branch and reviewer for each response.
We will be providing responses to other requests for additional information shortly.
Yours very truly, M. A. McDuffie Senior Vice President Nuclear Generation FXT/tda (8055FXT)
Enclosure CC:
Mr. B. C. Buckley (NRC)
Mr. G. F. Maxwell (NRC-SHNPP)
Mr. J.
P. O'Reilly (NRC-RII)
Mr. Travis Payne (KUDZU)
Mr. Daniel F. Read (CHANGE/ELP)
Mr. R.
P. Gruber (NCUC)
Chapel Hill Public Library Wake County Public Library Mr. Wells Eddleman Dr. Phyllis Lotchin Mr. John D. Runkle Dr. Richard D. Wilson Mr. G. 0. Bright (ASLB)
Dr. J.
H. Carpenter (ASLB)
Mr. J. L. Kelley (ASLB) f 83i0120i80 83i005 PDR ADOCK 05000400 E
PDR ~
411 Fayetteville Street o P. 0, Box 1551 o Raleigh, N. C. 27602
14
~
4 "rtI h
8
. ~
II
~
I 4
4 4
4 LA 4
LIST OF OPEN ITEMS/SAFETY REVIEW QUESTIONS, REVIEW BRANCH AND REVIEWER Environmental and Hydrologic Engineering Branch/R.
Gonzales Open Item ll Power System Branch/0.
Chopra Open Item 307 Quality Assurance Branch/R.
Kirkwood Open Item 220 (8055FXTtda)
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Draft SER Open Item 11 Supplemental Information The staff requires that the applicant submit a grading plan.o show that there are no obstructions such as raised road beds or earth berms under security fences that could result in more than one foot of ponding on the plant island.
Note:
This response has been revised per discussions with the NRC Staff.
Response
The local Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) has been reevaluated based on the following references:
"Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates, United States East of the 105th Meridian," Hydrometeorological Report No. 51, NOAA 6 Corps of Engineers, June 1978.
"Application of Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates United States East of the 105th Meridian," Hydrometeorological Report No.
52, (U.S.) National Weather Service, August 1982.
As a result of this reevaluation, the maximum depth of accumulation of rain water on the site is 13.8 inches.
FSAR Table 2.4.2-4 will be revised to incorporate the new data.
The maximum elevation to which water will pond on the plant site during a
PMP event assuming the entire drainage system became blocked would be 261.27 ft.
However, this will not impact on the plant's ability to safely shutdown, if necessary.
All safety related structures which have entrances at elevation 261 ft.
are protected against any ponding during a Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) event by the following features:
a)
Artificialbarriers such as watertight or airtight doors.
b)
Low structural barriers (i.e., curbs).
The minimum curb elevation is 262.0 ft.
The only exceptions to the above are two entrances to the Waste Processing Building which are not protected against any ponding above El. 261.06 ft.
However, these entrances provide access to areas which house locker rooms, and shower stalls and do not house any safety related equipment.
4l
(Cont'd OI 11)
The elevation of the railroad in the plant area is 261.0 ft. (top of the rails) which is equivalent to the plant roads.
Therefore, the above analysis includes the effects of ponding caused by the railroad tracks.
Section 2.4 of the FSAR will be revised in a future amendment to reflect the above information.
The elevation of the plant security fencing is the same as plant grade.
Concrete footing for the fence ports should be at or slightly below grade.
TABLE 2.4.2-4 PLANT AREA WATER ACCUMULATION FOR DESIGN PMP COMDITIONS*
Time Incremental Incremental Plus Accumulated (HR)
Rainfall (in.)
Rainfall (in.)
Utilized Plant Draina e (in.)
Net Accumulated Water (in.) Depth 1
1.5 2
2.1 3
2.3 4
- 18. 8 5
4.0 6
- 1. 25 9
2.95 12 2.5 15 1.7 18 1.2 21 1.1 24 0.7 27 0.7 30 06 1.5 2.1 2.3
- 18. 8 17.8
- 14. 03 12.0 2.5 1.7 1.2 0.7 0.7 0.6 1.5 2.1 2.3 5.0 5.0 5.0 12.0 2.5 1.7 1.2 0.7 0.7 0.6 13.8 12.8 9.05 33 36 0.6 0.6 42.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
References:
"Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates, United States East of the 105 Meridian," Hydrometeorological Report No. 51, NOAA 6 Corps of Engineers, June 1978.
"Application of Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates United States East of the 105th Meridian," (U.S.) National Weather Service
& Corps of Engineers, August 1982.
1 sq. mi. (or point)
PMP intensity.
(8037NECccc)
J O
1 1
Shearon Harris Nu'clear Power Plant Draft SER Open Item 307 Su plemental Information Describe in detail, how the Shearon Harris design meets BTP PSB-1 "Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution System Voltages."
The response to position 4 of BTP PSB-1 was inadvertently left out of Carolina Power
& Light Company's previous response to this item dated August 12, 1983.
Additional information, in response to other questions by the Reviewer on this item, will be supplied in a future transmittal.
Response
Position 4
Actual field testing will be conducted prior to initial full power operation to verify the accuracy of the auxiliary system analysis results.
Attached is a copy of the "AC Distribution System Minimum Operating Voltage Test Summary," which will be incorporated in a future FSAR Amendment.
The guidance provided in BTP PSB-1 for correlation of the analytical results and the test results will be utilized.
(8044NECtda)
Jl t
h
'I lt 3
C
)
AC Distribution System Minimum Operating Voltage Test Summary a)
Test Objectives 1)
The results of this test will be used to validate the analytical techniques and assumptions used in the analysis for "Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution System Voltages" performed by Ebasco to demonstrate compliance with Branch Technical Position PSB-l.
1)
The general prerequisites are met.
2)
Sufficient unit auxiliary loads are operable with which to load the AC distribution system.
c)
Test Method 1)
Load the required AC distribution buses to 30% or more of each bus'ormal continuous loading and measure/record the steady state voltage and loading.
2)
With the required AC distribution buses loaded to 30% or more, install recorders on the string of buses that were analyzed by the AE to have the lowest voltage.
Separately start a large Class lE motor and a large non-Class lE motor and record the voltages and loadings of the resulting transients.
3)
Transmit the bus voltage and loading data taken in steps 1 and 2 above to the AE for evaluation and validation of the AE's analytical techniques and assumptions used in the bus loading analysis program.
d)
Acceptance Criteria 1)
None.
(8044NECtda)
1 1/,,L. ~Il., ~S.,
t 4r~
N ri 1
.'..oA'r~
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Draft SER Open Item 220(A)
Supplemental Information As a result of a telephone conversation on September 14, 1983 between the NRC (R. Kirkwood) and Carolina Power 6 Light Company (CPEL) the following is submitted to complete the CP&L response to Open Item 220:
Response
All ASME,Section III, Division 1, Class 1, 2, and 3 pressure retaining components are in compliance with all aspects of subsection NA including NA-5000, ASME boiler and pressure vessel code.
(8036NECccc)
~I g
0