ML18017B302

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 800929-1031
ML18017B302
Person / Time
Site: Harris  
Issue date: 11/26/1980
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML18017B300 List:
References
50-400-80-25, 50-401-80-23, 50-402-80-23, 50-403-80-23, NUDOCS 8012190368
Download: ML18017B302 (1)


Text

NOV 2 8 1980 APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Carolina Power and Light Company Shearon Harris Unit 1 and 2

License Nos.

CPPR-158 CPPR-159 Based on the NRC inspection'eptember 29 - October 31, 1980, certain of your activities were apparently not conducted in full compliance with NRC require-ments as indicated below.

These items have been categorized as described in correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.

A.

As required by Criterion VI of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, as implemented by CPSL's PSAR Section 1.8.5.6; CP8rL's Corporate QA Program Part I Section 8.3.5 and site Administrative Procedure AP-IX-02 Section 3.6.1.2 and 4.4.2, superceded drawings will be identified and controlled.

Contrary to the above, seven of ten drawings selected were found to be not the most current revisions.

The seven drawings were not identified or controlled to preclude their use during construction activities.

~

~

This is a deficiency - relative to Unit 1 and 2.

B.

As required by Criterion V of Appendix B to

10CFR50, as implemented by CPSL's PSAR Section 1.8.5.5 and CPGL's Corporate QA Program Part I Sections 6.2.l.c through 6.2.1.e, instructions willbe provided for the collection and reporting of verification data.

Cont'rary to the

above, instructions were not provided for the use of the verification checklist used to document the verification data relative to burying four pieces of emergency service water piping.

This is a deficiency - relative to Units 1 and 2.

C.

As required by Criterion I of Appendix B to

10CFR50, as implemented by CPSL's PSAR Section 1.8.3.1.3 and CPSL's Corporate QA Program Part I Section 2.4.1.a, responsibilities for QA personnel will be clearly delineated.

Contrary to the above, the responsibilities of those QA personnel assigned to monitor the in-process maintenance of warehouse released safety-related equipment was not clearly delineated.

This is a deficiency - relative to Unit 1.